ISSUE-616: Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer
quoted-in-primer
Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Primer
- Raised by:
- Simon Miles
- Opened on:
- 2013-01-23
- Description:
- Public comment from Chuck Morris:
"I just looked over the provenance primer. One thing I noticed is that the wasQuotedFrom relationship is very confusing semantically. Take the example in the primer where Betty posts a blog entry with a quote from the newspaper article. The provenance is expressed as (ex:blogEntry prov:wasQuotedFrom ex:article .) But that seems to imply that the blog entry was quoted by the newspaper article instead of the other way around. I suggest that a better name for the relationship would be prov:hadQuotationFrom."
Original mail:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2013Jan/0006.html - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Primer issue closed (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-03-20)
- RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-03-02)
- Re: FW: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2013-03-01)
- FW: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-03-01)
- RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from chuck.morris@ngc.com on 2013-02-28)
- RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
- Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2013-02-10)
- Re: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from pgroth@gmail.com on 2013-02-10)
- Fwd: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2013-02-08)
- RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from chuck.morris@ngc.com on 2013-02-07)
- RE: The wasQuotedFrom relationship (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-01-24)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2013-01-24)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2013-01-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2013-01-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2013-01-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2013-01-23)
- RE: PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-01-23)
- PROV-ISSUE-616 (quoted-in-primer): Confusing use of wasQuotedFrom in primer [Primer] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-23)
Related notes:
Documentation on response:
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ResponsesToPublicCommentsCR#ISSUE-616
Display change log