ISSUE-48: Revision should be a class and not a property

Provenance Concept: Revision

Revision should be a class and not a property

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Satya Sahoo

Opened on:

2011-07-27

Description:

Revision is a new BOB and not a property as defined currently in conceptual model:

isRevisionOf(b2,b1,ag)

The above description is already covered by isDerivedFrom property.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-12-02)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-30)
3. [PROV-O] issues in document (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2011-10-13)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-08-22)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2011-07-28)
6. Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-07-27)
7. PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-27)

Related notes:

Display change log