ISSUE-412: should pairKey reference a resource instead of literal?
pairkey-a-resource
should pairKey reference a resource instead of literal?
- State:
- POSTPONED
- Product:
- Ontology
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-06-19
- Description:
- raised at IPAW tutorial. "You'll lose the semantics".
-Tim - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-412 (pairkey-a-resource): should pairKey reference a resource instead of literal? [Ontology] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-06-19)
- PROV-ISSUE-412 (pairkey-a-resource): should pairKey reference a resource instead of literal? [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-19)
Related notes:
Strong preference to keep it as a literal. Dictionaries moved to a Note, anyway.
Timothy Lebo, 1 Jul 2012, 13:59:25Display change log
