ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention
explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- PROV-O HTML
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-04-09
- Description:
- http://www.w3.org/mid/EMEW3|2c084c78f3361c61dff318d0c8aad9d6o339EE08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F7C02D3.7090705@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Hi prov-o team,
Just one more thoughts that came up when reading the primer.
Looking at the following snippet:
ex:correct prov:qualifiedAssociation [
a Association ;
prov:agent ex:edith ;
prov:hadPlan ex:corrections
] .
it is strange to see prov:hasPlan, why not simply prov:plan (and similarly
for other hadXXX properties).
Cheers,
Luc - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-05-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-04-29)
- PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-09)
Related notes:
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/348 on product Ontology is similar to this issue.
Timothy Lebo, 22 Apr 2012, 18:42:26Closing issue regarding explanation of PROV-O naming conventions.
PROV-O has decided to add explanation of naming conventions to online documentation and look into updating ontology annotations to also explain naming convention.
Display change log
