ISSUE-288: ProvRDF issues for Usage

TLebo

ProvRDF issues for Usage

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Satya Sahoo

Opened on:

2012-03-05

Description:

If activity id is optional for generation record, why is it not so for usage record? These two points need to be reconciled either way. (Satya)

Similar to generation, time can be "folded" into the "attribute" list. (Satya)

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#Usage

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-09-04)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-05-30)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-30)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-24)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-23)
6. Re: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/9 Issues (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-15)
7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-06)
8. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-03-06)
9. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-06)
10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-05)
11. PROV-ISSUE-288 (TLebo): ProvRDF issues for Usage [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-03-05)

Related notes:

Display change log