ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner
involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Ontology
- Raised by:
- Khalid Belhajjame
- Opened on:
- 2012-02-26
- Description:
- I find the term involved not intuitive. I thought of "related", but it is not great either.
Additionally, I would suggest giving more structure to the sub-properties of involved, to reflect for example the kinds of domain and range involved, e.g., entity_entity_related, agent_agent_related, entity_activity_related, and activity_activity_related. Again we need some intuitive names for the new properties that we introduce.
Khalid - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
- Re: [provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-14)
- Re: [provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-03-14)
- [provo] Re: PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-02-26)
- PROV-ISSUE-269: involved property need to be renamed and its sup-properties need to be structured in a better manner (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-26)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log