ISSUE-224: Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs?

unified-prov-namespace

Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Luc Moreau

Opened on:

2012-01-19

Description:

To promote interoperability, can we provide a single namespace for PROV specifications?

Issue assigned to PROV-DM, but applicable to all data model mappings.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-224 (unified-prov-namespace): Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
2. Re: Namespace for prov specs (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-22)
3. Re: Namespace for prov specs (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-22)
4. Re: Namespace for prov specs (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-03-22)
5. Re: Namespace for prov specs (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-03-21)
6. Namespace for prov specs (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-03-19)
7. [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-29)
8. [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-29)
9. Re: PROV-ISSUE-256 (TLebo): change namespace of prov-o (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-24)
10. PROV-ISSUE-224 (unified-prov-namespace): Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs? [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-19)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log