ISSUE-221: What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf?
constraint-was-associated-with
What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm-constraints
- Raised by:
- Luc Moreau
- Opened on:
- 2012-01-17
- Description:
- For completeness, we should define ordering constraint for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf.
For wasAssociatedWith(a,ag), it feels that ag must have some overlap with a.
For actedOnBehalfOf(ag1,ag2,a), it seem that ag2 should have existed before the overlap between ag1 and a. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-07-18)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-05-21)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-19)
- PROV-ISSUE-221 (constraint-was-associated-with): What are the constraints for wasAssociatedWith and actedOnBehalfOf? [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-17)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
