ISSUE-216: qualified wasAttributedTo?
TLebo
qualified wasAttributedTo?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Ontology
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-01-15
- Description:
- Accounts will likely be associated to their asserters with the prov:wasAttributedTo binary relation.
Would the DM be able to have qualified wasAttributedTo relations?
I think that it would be a natural question for a consumer, upon hearing that "account x was from agent y", to want to ask about how, when, or in what situation agent y stated those things (e.g., under oath in a courtroom, on twitter 2am on a Friday night, etc).
Hopefully, the Qualified wasAttributedTo would follow the pattern of the varying "precisions" (i.e., granularity) for wasDerivedFrom, which may relate an activity that draws the Account to the asserter.
Thanks,
Tim - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-17)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-01-17)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-17)
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-16)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-16)
- Re: Towards PROV-O Accounts (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-01-15)
- PROV-ISSUE-216 (TLebo): qualified wasAttributedTo? [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-15)
Related notes:
wasAttributedTo can be qualified, so closing.
Timothy Lebo, 24 Feb 2012, 01:55:13Display change log