ISSUE-205: optional activity in generation record

optional-activity-in-generation-record

optional activity in generation record

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Luc Moreau

Opened on:

2011-12-21

Description:

We may want to assert the time at which an entity is created. The placeholder for such time information is a generation record. But a generation mandates the presence of an activity identifier. But it may not be known.

It would be nice if the activity identifier was made optional in the generation record.

Does this have implications for the ontology?

Cheers,
Luc

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-15)
2. [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-20)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-20)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-20)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-19)
6. Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-18)
7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-01-17)
8. Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-17)
9. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-01-12)
10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-12)
11. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-01-12)
12. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-01-12)
13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-01-12)
14. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-01-11)
15. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-11)
16. Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-11)
17. PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-12-21)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log