ISSUE-153: Complementarity description differs from model definition
complementarity
Complementarity description differs from model definition
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Primer
- Raised by:
- Graham Klyne
- Opened on:
- 2011-11-18
- Description:
- Primer section: 2.7 Complementarity
While I personally think the notion of complementarity described here is the
more useful one, I don't think it agrees with the current PROV-DM
(http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/ProvenanceModel.html#record-complement-of).
(What you describe here might be termed "characterizationOf" (of "viewOf"),
which notion I see as being foundational to the way entities are related to
things.)
To clarify: in my reading, primer defines complementarity as an asymmetric relationship, where one characterization is subsumed by the other. But the model definition is symmetric, simply saying that the characterizations overlap in some sense. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-01-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-12-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-12-01)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-23)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-22)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-22)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-22)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-11-21)
- PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-18)
Related notes:
Closed by GK in response to <http://www.w3.org/mid/CAKc1nHf+pah1VMaV6aJpR9DShZrrU0AeSN+w4NQ_A04LCYj-JA@mail.gmail.com>
Graham Klyne, 5 Jan 2012, 17:58:50Display change log