ISSUE-153: Complementarity description differs from model definition

complementarity

Complementarity description differs from model definition

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Primer

Raised by:

Graham Klyne

Opened on:

2011-11-18

Description:

Primer section: 2.7 Complementarity

While I personally think the notion of complementarity described here is the
more useful one, I don't think it agrees with the current PROV-DM
(http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/ProvenanceModel.html#record-complement-of).

(What you describe here might be termed "characterizationOf" (of "viewOf"),
which notion I see as being foundational to the way entities are related to
things.)

To clarify: in my reading, primer defines complementarity as an asymmetric relationship, where one characterization is subsumed by the other. But the model definition is symmetric, simply saying that the characterizations overlap in some sense.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-01-05)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-12-05)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
6. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-12-01)
7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-23)
8. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-11-23)
9. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-11-23)
10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-23)
11. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-23)
12. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-23)
13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-22)
14. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
15. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-22)
16. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-22)
17. Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2011-11-21)
18. PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-18)

Related notes:

Display change log