ISSUE-144: how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type?
Tlebo
how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- prov-dm
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2011-11-06
- Description:
- The reserved attribute "type" is used a few places, but with no mention to its relation to rdf:type. This becomes particularly concerning when "subtyping" is mentioned. Should we avoid reinventing the wheel? Can we say somewhere that "type" SHOULD BE considered as rdf:type, and RDFS should be used to handle subtyping semantics and inference?
6. PROV-DM Extensibility Points
"Subtyping is allowed by means of the reserved attribute type." - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's 'type' and 'subtype' [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-06)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's 'type' and 'subtype' [Ontology] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-03-06)
- PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's 'type' and 'subtype' [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-21)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is 'reserved attribute 'type'' related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-10)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is 'reserved attribute 'type'' related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-08)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is 'reserved attribute 'type'' related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-07)
- PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is 'reserved attribute 'type'' related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-06)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
