Difference between revisions of "ORG PR transition"

From Government Linked Data (GLD) Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Document Abstract)
(Status of the document)
Line 33: Line 33:
<i> Copy from the document itself.</i>
<i> Copy from the document itself.</i>
<i> What is wanted here? Surely not a cut/paste of the current SOTD section, better to look at the actual published version. </i>
== Changes to the document ==
== Changes to the document ==

Revision as of 13:19, 21 November 2013

Transition to Proposed Recommendation

This page is for editors to organize the documentation and evidence necessary to transition a document to Proposed Recommendation. The page's content will be used for the transition request and to inform the transition meeting for that document.

This is a working page for the Government Linked Data working group. It may be subject to change/revision at any time.

Structure taken from W3C Technical Report Development Process.

ORG Timetable

ORG CR transition request - for reference


The Organization Ontology

Current URI


Document Abstract

This document describes a core ontology for organizational structures, aimed at supporting linked data publishing of organizational information across a number of domains. It is designed to allow domain-specific extensions to add classification of organizations and roles, as well as extensions to support neighbouring information such as organizational activities.

The namespace for all terms in this ontology is: http://www.w3.org/ns/org#

The vocabulary defined in this document is also available in these non-normative formats: RDF/XML and Turtle.

Status of the document

Copy from the document itself.

What is wanted here? Surely not a cut/paste of the current SOTD section, better to look at the actual published version.

Changes to the document

Provide public documentation of all changes (both substantive and minor) to the technical report since transition to CR. This may include links to the document's comment page(s), plus any relevant discussion, emails or documentation.

Substantive changes

A substantive change (whether deletion, inclusion, or other modification) is one where someone could reasonably expect that making the change would invalidate an individual's review or implementation experience.

Minor changes

Other changes (e.g., clarifications, bug fixes, editorial repairs, and minor error corrections) are minor changes.

Evidence of wide review


  • a brief summary of the implementation methodology and CR exit criteria
  • a link to the document's Implementation Reports
  • a summary of conformance or success in meeting the exit criteria.

Evidence that the document satisfies group's requirements

Link to the relevant section in the Working Group's charter. Report which, if any, of the Working Group's requirements for this document have changed since the previous step, and include a link to the email/meeting notes when that decision was made.

Evidence that issues have been formally addressed


  • the tool we used to track issues, and a link to them
  • a link to the public comments page, if relevant
  • a brief summary/explanation of any issues still outstanding, or a sentence explaining that all are satisfactorily resolved.

Formal objections

If we have received any.

Dependencies on other groups

Report any changes in dependencies with other groups — if we have any.

Record the group's decision to request advancement

This will be a link to the minutes of the working group meeting when we resolve to transition this document to PR.

Expected date of publication

This is probably the first Tuesday or Thursday after the working group resolves to transition to CR. Check with the chairs or staff contact for the group.