Difference between revisions of "ORG LC comments"

From Government Linked Data (GLD) Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Align treatment of registered addresses with RegOrg Proposed)
m (Align treatment of registered addresses with RegOrg)
Line 37: Line 37:
 
This edit has been made to the current editor's draft and the issue can be marked as closed.
 
This edit has been made to the current editor's draft and the issue can be marked as closed.
  
=== Align treatment of registered addresses with RegOrg ===
+
=== Align treatment of registered addresses with RegOrg [Proposed] ===
  
 
Comment from Richard Cyganiak recorded as [http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/45 Issue-45]
 
Comment from Richard Cyganiak recorded as [http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/45 Issue-45]

Revision as of 16:40, 15 February 2013

Last Call Comments Disposition: ORG

Comments and draft responses for ORG Last Call ending 2012-11-25

prov:wasDerivedFrom

From PROV feedback [1]

Suggestion that prov:wasDerivedFrom should be explicitly or implicitly asserted to link a the org:resultedFrom organization to the org:originalOrganization

Check PROV semantic constraints

From PROV feedback [2]

There are additional semantic constraints on use of PROV that should be checked before proceeding with its use in ORG.

Consider use of "invalidation"

From PROV feedback [3]

Suggestion to use PROV invalidation vocabulary to state when a changed organization ceases to exist.

Request for more complete illustrative diagram

The non-normative pictorial representation of the vocabulary is not complete, and clearly stated as such in the LC document.

Comment from João Paulo requesting that the relation between org:Organization and foaf:Agent and between org:Post and org:Organization should be made explicit. [4]

Relationship to foaf:Organization [Done]

Off list comment from Dan Brickley.

The ORG vocabulary itself states that org:Organization is owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization but this isn't reflected in the HTML description.

Recorded as Issue-42

This edit has been made to the current editor's draft and the issue can be marked as closed.

Align treatment of registered addresses with RegOrg [Proposed]

Comment from Richard Cyganiak recorded as Issue-45

Proposed that the range constraint on org:siteAddress be removed and vCard simply referenced as an example.

This change has been made to the current editor's draft.

Domain/range of org:reportsTo [Done - pending confirmation]

Comment from João Paulo.

State the domain and range of org:reportsTo as being foaf:Agent as opposed to unionOf(foaf:Agent, org:Post) and add clarifying text pointing out that someone can reportTo an org:Post. This is not a change in semantics, just a clarification.

Recorded as Issue-48

Edit has been made, João Paulo to confirm acceptance or otherwise.

org:reportsTo is not acyclic [Done]

Comment from João Paulo.

There is currently a comment in informative text mentioning reportsTo as acyclic that should be removed or clarified. This would be a minor change, not affecting semantics.

Recorded as Issue-49

The offending informative comment has been removed and this issue can now be closed.

Should org:Organization be sub-class of foaf:Agent

Comment from João Paulo.

Recorded as Issue-50

(consider birthday property as a test case)

Should org:Post be a sub class of org:Organzation

Comment from João Paulo.

Recorded as Issue-51