ORG LC comments
From Government Linked Data (GLD) Working Group Wiki
(Created page with "== Last Call Comments Disposition: ORG == Comments and draft responses for ORG Last Call ending 2012-11-25 === prov:wasDerivedFrom === From PROV feedback [http://lists.w3.org/…") |
(→Last Call Comments Disposition: ORG) |
||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
Recorded as [http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/49 Issue-49] | Recorded as [http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/49 Issue-49] | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Should org:Organization be sub-class of foaf:Agent === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comment from João Paulo. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Recorded as [http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/50 Issue-50] | ||
| + | |||
| + | (consider birthday property as a test case) | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Should org:Post be a sub class of org:Organzation === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comment from João Paulo. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Recorded as [http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/51 Issue-51] | ||
Revision as of 15:30, 6 December 2012
Last Call Comments Disposition: ORG
Comments and draft responses for ORG Last Call ending 2012-11-25
prov:wasDerivedFrom
From PROV feedback [1]
Suggestion that prov:wasDerivedFrom should be explicitly or implicitly asserted to link a the org:resultedFrom organization to the org:originalOrganization
Check PROV semantic constraints
From PROV feedback [2]
There are additional semantic constraints on use of PROV that should be checked before proceeding with its use in ORG.
Consider use of "invalidation"
From PROV feedback [3]
Suggestion to use PROV invalidation vocabulary to state when a changed organization ceases to exist.
Request for more complete illustrative diagram
The non-normative pictorial representation of the vocabulary is not complete, and clearly stated as such in the LC document.
Comment from João Paulo requesting that the relation between org:Organization and foaf:Agent and between org:Post and org:Organization should be made explicit. [4]
Relationship to foaf:Organization
Off list comment from Dan Brickley.
The ORG vocabulary itself states that org:Organization is owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization but this isn't reflected in the HTML description.
Recorded as Issue-42
Align treatment of registered addresses with RegOrg
Comment from Richard Cyganiak recorded as Issue-45
Domain/range of org:reportsTo
Comment from João Paulo.
State the domain and range of org:reportsTo as being foaf:Agent as opposed to unionOf(foaf:Agent, org:Post) and add clarifying text pointing out that someone can reportTo an org:Post. This is not a change in semantics, just a clarification.
Recorded as Issue-48
org:reportsTo is not acyclic
Comment from João Paulo.
There is currently a comment in informative text mentioning reportsTo as acyclic that should be removed or clarified. This would be a minor change, not affecting semantics.
Recorded as Issue-49
Should org:Organization be sub-class of foaf:Agent
Comment from João Paulo.
Recorded as Issue-50
(consider birthday property as a test case)
Should org:Post be a sub class of org:Organzation
Comment from João Paulo.
Recorded as Issue-51
