Difference between revisions of "Data Catalog Vocabulary/AccessURLRedesign"

From Government Linked Data (GLD) Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(mention ACTION-71)
(add link to Phil's summary)
Line 1: Line 1:
Here we are working on a proposal to modify the way <code>dcat:accessURL</code> works, and what to do about the subclasses of <code>dcat:Distribution</code> (<code>dcat:Download</code>, <code>dcat:Feed</code>, etc.). This is intended to resolve [https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/8 ISSUE-8] and [https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/9 ISSUE-9].
+
Here we are working on a proposal to modify the way <code>dcat:accessURL</code> works, and what to do about the subclasses of <code>dcat:Distribution</code> (<code>dcat:Download</code>, <code>dcat:Feed</code>, etc.). This is intended to resolve [https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/8 ISSUE-8] and [https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/9 ISSUE-9], and specifically the issues [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Aug/0004.html summarized nicely by Phil here].
  
 
@@ Details to come from Fadi and Richard; they have a proposal on paper!
 
@@ Details to come from Fadi and Richard; they have a proposal on paper!

Revision as of 20:28, 31 January 2013

Here we are working on a proposal to modify the way dcat:accessURL works, and what to do about the subclasses of dcat:Distribution (dcat:Download, dcat:Feed, etc.). This is intended to resolve ISSUE-8 and ISSUE-9, and specifically the issues summarized nicely by Phil here.

@@ Details to come from Fadi and Richard; they have a proposal on paper!

To Do

  • Once the proposal is completely written up and feedback is being solicited, we should ping Ed Summers, as he originally raised these issues. (There was an action on George to ping Ed, which I believe was never done.)