Difference between revisions of "DCAT LC comments"

From Government Linked Data (GLD) Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add table with all DCAT LC feedback. Status / response/ ack columns still empty.)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Last Call Comments Disposition: DCAT ==
 
 
 
Comments and draft responses for the [http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ DCAT] Last Call ending 2013-04-08.
 
Comments and draft responses for the [http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/ DCAT] Last Call ending 2013-04-08.
  
=== Title of comment one (status of completion) ===
+
{| class="datatable sortable" style="width: 100%"
 
+
|+Disposition of comments
From: (with link to email)
+
|-
 
+
! Comment !! Summary !! Status !! GLD response !! Acknowledgement
Summary of comment
+
|-
 
+
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Mar/0001.html Aaron Couch] ||
Summary of reply and link to email
+
* List all properties in ToC
 
+
* 2 editorial comments
Evidence of receipt or resolution
+
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0001.html Jeni Tennison] ||
 +
Use dct:rights instead of dct:license
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0002.html Jeni Tennison] ||
 +
Consider adding dct:provenance or prov:has_provenance
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0004.html Paul Groth] ||
 +
* Consider adding dct:provenance or prov:has_provenance
 +
* Consider referencing PROV
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0006.html Stuart Harrison] ||
 +
Can DCAT describe APIs?
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0010.html Vasily Bunakov] ||
 +
Add a dcat:interface property that points to a statement or manifest about technical means of accessing the dataset
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0013.html Marios Meimaris] ||
 +
Add a property that links a distribution to an external concept that describes its access rules and methods
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0007.html Alasdair Gray] ||
 +
* Move textual definitions into the tables for each property
 +
* 1 editorial comment
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0008.html Phil Archer] ||
 +
Don't say that 2005-01-01 should be used for "unknown date in 2005"
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0014.html Stasinos Konstantopolous] ||
 +
Don't say that 2005-01-01 should be used for "unknown date in 2005"
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0009.html Alasdair Gray] ||
 +
* Rename dcat:dataset and dcat:distribution to dcat:hasDataset and dcat:hasDistribution
 +
* (Note resulting long discussion thread)
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0025.html Bill Roberts] ||
 +
* Add something for Granularity
 +
* Clarify how to use accrualPeriodicity
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0036.html Andrea Perego] ||
 +
Add properties for dataset versioning, along the lines of ADMS
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0039.html Christopher Gutteridge] ||
 +
Add Contact and Corrections properties
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0060.html Andrea Perego] ||
 +
What exactly is the scope of DCAT? Datasets or any kind of resource? Consider extending the scope.
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2013Apr/0068.html Ed Simons] ||
 +
Seven comments, three suggestions
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Apr/0007.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
The mental model of catalogs + datasets, and whether they can be used independently, is not really clear
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0178.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
Is it implied that a dcat:Dataset must have at least one distribution on the Web
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0179.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
What is the "single source" that the dcat:Dataset definition talks about?
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0182.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
Spec presents Concept and ConceptScheme in a single box despite being separate classes
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0180.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
Not clear what distinguishes a dataset from rdfs:Resource
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0183.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
Range of dct:language should be dct:LinguisticSystem
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|-
 +
|| [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0181.html Makx Dekkers] ||
 +
DCAT should not place restrictions on use of SKOS
 +
||
 +
||
 +
||
 +
|}

Revision as of 09:17, 11 April 2013

Comments and draft responses for the DCAT Last Call ending 2013-04-08.

Disposition of comments
Comment Summary Status GLD response Acknowledgement
Aaron Couch
  • List all properties in ToC
  • 2 editorial comments
Jeni Tennison

Use dct:rights instead of dct:license

Jeni Tennison

Consider adding dct:provenance or prov:has_provenance

Paul Groth
  • Consider adding dct:provenance or prov:has_provenance
  • Consider referencing PROV
Stuart Harrison

Can DCAT describe APIs?

Vasily Bunakov

Add a dcat:interface property that points to a statement or manifest about technical means of accessing the dataset

Marios Meimaris

Add a property that links a distribution to an external concept that describes its access rules and methods

Alasdair Gray
  • Move textual definitions into the tables for each property
  • 1 editorial comment
Phil Archer

Don't say that 2005-01-01 should be used for "unknown date in 2005"

Stasinos Konstantopolous

Don't say that 2005-01-01 should be used for "unknown date in 2005"

Alasdair Gray
  • Rename dcat:dataset and dcat:distribution to dcat:hasDataset and dcat:hasDistribution
  • (Note resulting long discussion thread)
Bill Roberts
  • Add something for Granularity
  • Clarify how to use accrualPeriodicity
Andrea Perego

Add properties for dataset versioning, along the lines of ADMS

Christopher Gutteridge

Add Contact and Corrections properties

Andrea Perego

What exactly is the scope of DCAT? Datasets or any kind of resource? Consider extending the scope.

Ed Simons

Seven comments, three suggestions

Makx Dekkers

The mental model of catalogs + datasets, and whether they can be used independently, is not really clear

Makx Dekkers

Is it implied that a dcat:Dataset must have at least one distribution on the Web

Makx Dekkers

What is the "single source" that the dcat:Dataset definition talks about?

Makx Dekkers

Spec presents Concept and ConceptScheme in a single box despite being separate classes

Makx Dekkers

Not clear what distinguishes a dataset from rdfs:Resource

Makx Dekkers

Range of dct:language should be dct:LinguisticSystem

Makx Dekkers

DCAT should not place restrictions on use of SKOS