ISSUE-107: (Bugzilla 17415) JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers

JSWorkers

(Bugzilla 17415) JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Web Audio API
Raised by:
Marcus Geelnard
Opened on:
2012-06-04
Description:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#JavaScriptAudioNode

It has been discussed before (see [1] and [2], for instance), but I could not find an issue for it, so here goes:

The JavaScriptAudioNode should do its processing in a separate context (e.g. a worker) rather than in the main thread/context. It could potentially mean very low overhead for JavaScript-based audio processing, and seems to be a fundamental requirement for making the JavaScriptAudioNode really useful.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0225.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0245.html


Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [web-audio-api] (JSWorkers): ScriptProcessorNode processing in workers (#113) (from notifications@github.com on 2013-09-11)
  2. Re: Audio-ISSUE-107 (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers [Web Audio API] (from olivier.thereaux@bbc.co.uk on 2012-06-06)
  3. Re: Next teleconference : 6th June (from Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk on 2012-06-04)
  4. Re: Next teleconference : 6th June (from mage@opera.com on 2012-06-04)
  5. Audio-ISSUE-107 (JSWorkers): JavaScriptAudioNode processing in workers [Web Audio API] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-04)

Related notes:

[MikeSmith]: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17415

5 Jun 2012, 12:58:46

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthew Paradis <matthew.paradis@bbc.co.uk>, Raymond Toy <rtoy@google.com>, Chairs, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 107.html,v 1.1 2019/11/12 13:32:10 carcone Exp $