IRC log of prov on 2011-12-22
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:51:53 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #prov
- 15:51:53 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/12/22-prov-irc
- 15:51:55 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:51:55 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #prov
- 15:51:57 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 15:51:57 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 15:51:58 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Provenance Working Group Teleconference
- 15:51:58 [trackbot]
- Date: 22 December 2011
- 15:52:03 [pgroth]
- Zakim, this will be PROV
- 15:52:03 [Zakim]
- ok, pgroth; I see SW_(PROV)11:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
- 15:52:19 [pgroth]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2011.12.22
- 15:52:31 [pgroth]
- Chair: Paul Groth
- 15:52:45 [pgroth]
- Scribe: Paolo Missier
- 15:52:52 [pgroth]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 15:53:06 [Paolo]
- Paolo has joined #prov
- 15:55:21 [Lena]
- Lena has joined #prov
- 15:56:36 [Zakim]
- SW_(PROV)11:00AM has now started
- 15:56:43 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:56:56 [pgroth]
- Zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- 15:56:56 [Zakim]
- +pgroth; got it
- 15:57:19 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 15:57:37 [Paolo]
- zakim, ??p1 is me
- 15:57:37 [Zakim]
- +Paolo; got it
- 15:57:43 [pgroth]
- thanks paolo
- 15:57:46 [pgroth]
- everything is setup
- 15:58:35 [davidschaengold]
- davidschaengold has joined #prov
- 15:59:06 [Curt]
- Curt has joined #prov
- 15:59:16 [Zakim]
- +Curt_Tilmes
- 15:59:42 [Zakim]
- +pchampin
- 15:59:48 [Zakim]
- + +1.646.389.aaaa
- 16:00:22 [davidschaengold]
- Zakim, +1.646.389.aaaa is davidschaengold
- 16:00:22 [Zakim]
- +davidschaengold; got it
- 16:00:31 [tlebo]
- tlebo has joined #prov
- 16:00:51 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 16:01:03 [Zakim]
- + +1.315.330.aabb
- 16:01:20 [dgarijo]
- dgarijo has joined #prov
- 16:01:21 [tlebo]
- zakim, aabb is tlebo
- 16:01:22 [Zakim]
- +tlebo; got it
- 16:02:09 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:02:18 [pgroth]
- Topic: Admin
- 16:02:25 [Zakim]
- -pchampin
- 16:02:27 [StephenCresswell]
- StephenCresswell has joined #prov
- 16:02:29 [dgarijo]
- zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- 16:02:29 [Zakim]
- +dgarijo; got it
- 16:02:48 [pgroth]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-12-08
- 16:02:59 [pgroth]
- PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the Dec. 08 telecon
- 16:03:02 [jcheney]
- jcheney has joined #prov
- 16:03:13 [dgarijo]
- +1
- 16:03:15 [Curt]
- 0 (not present)
- 16:03:16 [Paolo]
- +1
- 16:03:18 [tlebo]
- +1
- 16:03:23 [davidschaengold]
- 0 (not present)
- 16:03:26 [jcheney]
- +1 minutes
- 16:03:46 [pgroth]
- Accepted minutes Dec 8 telecon
- 16:03:51 [pgroth]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-12-15
- 16:04:00 [pgroth]
- PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the Dec. 15 telecon
- 16:04:01 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:04:01 [dgarijo]
- +1
- 16:04:02 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller.a]
- 16:04:04 [Curt]
- 0 (not present)
- 16:04:06 [StephenCresswell]
- +1
- 16:04:07 [Paolo]
- +1
- 16:04:15 [tlebo]
- +1
- 16:04:16 [Christine]
- Christine has joined #prov
- 16:04:20 [jcheney]
- +1 minutes
- 16:04:21 [Luc]
- Luc has joined #prov
- 16:04:25 [davidschaengold]
- 0 (not present)
- 16:04:31 [pgroth]
- Accepted minutes of the Dec 15 telecon
- 16:04:56 [Paolo]
- Paul: next telecon Jan 5th
- 16:05:02 [pgroth]
- Topic: Plan for Second Working Drafts
- 16:05:26 [pgroth]
- prov-aq
- 16:05:33 [pgroth]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Dec/0232.html
- 16:06:05 [Zakim]
- + +44.238.059.aacc
- 16:08:31 [pgroth]
- +q
- 16:08:36 [pgroth]
- ack pgroth
- 16:08:38 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:08:50 [Paolo]
- target for resolving issues on prov-aq: one week prior to F2F2
- 16:09:12 [tlebo]
- q+
- 16:09:17 [Zakim]
- +pchampin
- 16:09:21 [pgroth]
- ack tlebo
- 16:09:52 [Paolo]
- Tlebo: issue of advertising where to find provenance
- 16:10:12 [Paolo]
- Pgroth: to be addressed after 2nd WD
- 16:10:43 [Paolo]
- Tlebo: why so elaborate? one paragraph should suffice
- 16:11:01 [satya]
- satya has joined #prov
- 16:11:22 [Paolo]
- Pgroth: GK thought it may be too much for this version of the draft.
- 16:11:27 [pgroth]
- +q
- 16:11:29 [pgroth]
- ack pgroth
- 16:11:37 [Paolo]
- Tlebo: GK and I have scheduled a discussion for Jan.
- 16:12:07 [Paolo]
- Pgroth: anyone from PROV- primer? (no)
- 16:12:16 [Luc]
- http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#changes-since-second-public-working-draft
- 16:12:30 [Paolo]
- Pgroth: PROV-DM plans for 3rd WD, asking Luc
- 16:12:45 [Paolo]
- Luc: issues just posted have already been worked on
- 16:13:01 [Paolo]
- Luc: new section created where all constraints are collected
- 16:13:18 [Paolo]
- Luc: this gives constraints more space in the doc
- 16:13:38 [Paolo]
- Luc: relations such as "wasComplementOf" reworked, Paolo sent a draft proposal
- 16:13:47 [Paolo]
- Luc: also reworked recipe -> plan
- 16:14:03 [Paolo]
- Luc: also tried to clarify "identifiers"
- 16:14:15 [Paolo]
- Luc: collections still being worked on (Paolo)
- 16:14:40 [Paolo]
- Luc: most issues raised in the tracked have been addressed. some will not happen (new example, request from Yolanda)
- 16:14:51 [Paolo]
- Luc: debate b/w ids and accounts still needed.
- 16:15:03 [Paolo]
- Luc: end of January target for next release (3rd WD)
- 16:15:09 [pgroth]
- +q
- 16:15:13 [pgroth]
- ack pgroth
- 16:15:14 [Paolo]
- Luc: vote proposed around Jan 20th
- 16:15:15 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:15:34 [Paolo]
- <correct> end of January target for next release VOTE
- 16:16:15 [Paolo]
- Luc: need feedback. Will invite WG to review the whole doc by Jan 15th
- 16:16:22 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:16:30 [Paolo]
- Luc: issue authors please comment o the state of your issues
- 16:16:54 [dgarijo]
- I'm here, but I've been out this week.
- 16:16:54 [Paolo]
- pgroth: plans for PROV-O?
- 16:17:26 [Paolo]
- Satya: discussed org for next version, but no call this week
- 16:17:51 [Paolo]
- Satya: discussed updating constraints part, following updates in PROV-DM.
- 16:17:57 [Luc]
- q+
- 16:18:07 [Paolo]
- Satya: no constraints were included in the first release, that will happen in the next
- 16:18:24 [Paolo]
- Satya: realigning recipe -> plan
- 16:18:37 [Paolo]
- Satya: new complementOf proposal to be discussed in the next telco
- 16:18:52 [pgroth]
- ack luc
- 16:18:52 [Paolo]
- Satya: ditto for the data containers proposal (aka collections)
- 16:19:02 [Paolo]
- Luc: timetable?
- 16:20:11 [Paolo]
- Satya: reorg: Jan 10th target date. New features as discussed: around Jan 15-20
- 16:21:12 [Paolo]
- Satya: release of next version: around last week of Jan
- 16:21:49 [Paolo]
- Luc: concerned about focus on the constraints -- they may still evolve in PROV_DM depending on discussion outcomes
- 16:22:24 [Paolo]
- Luc: lightweight vocabulary for all the PROV-DM is desirable, constraints to be added later after their defs settles
- 16:23:09 [Paolo]
- Luc: F2F 2 will talk about interoperability, so encoding of the vocabulary is essential if we are to be able to do that
- 16:23:43 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:24:00 [Paolo]
- Satya: substantially agrees that all DM terms are reflected in -O
- 16:24:30 [Paolo]
- Pgroth: please send out an update to the list after the next confcall with the new schedule
- 16:24:31 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:24:46 [Paolo]
- Satya: will do -- also, all invited to the -O call
- 16:24:51 [pgroth]
- q
- 16:24:53 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:25:08 [pgroth]
- Topic: Prov-sem
- 16:25:16 [pgroth]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/FormalSemanticsStrawman
- 16:25:53 [Paolo]
- jcheney: rearranged the structure and terminology following -DM
- 16:26:26 [Paolo]
- jcheney: instance of the DM viewed as a formula
- 16:26:55 [Paolo]
- jcheney: "objects" with a lifetime, attributes. "objects" captures what is common to entities, activities, agents
- 16:27:17 [Paolo]
- jcheney: events are instantaneous but they can have attributes as well, so they are objects as well
- 16:28:19 [Paolo]
- jcheney: (presentation on semantics)
- 16:28:44 [Paolo]
- jcheney: not clear whether time interpretation is needed. GK suggested to avoid time, which may be possible and simpler
- 16:29:34 [Paolo]
- jcheney:: some things may hold "at any time" (see complementOf)
- 16:30:00 [Paolo]
- others depend on time if the mapping ids- >object is independent of time, then fewer things will depend on time in the model
- 16:30:02 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:30:13 [Luc]
- q+
- 16:30:28 [pgroth]
- ack Luc
- 16:30:38 [Paolo]
- del/others depend on time
- 16:31:19 [Paolo]
- Luc: this helps understanding the DM. what's the best way to discuss about specific points?
- 16:32:23 [Paolo]
- jcheney: email the list. use actual issues for specific things
- 16:32:35 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:32:37 [satya]
- q+
- 16:32:42 [Paolo]
- jcheney: e.g. the recent complementOf discussion was appropriately on the list
- 16:32:43 [pgroth]
- ack satya
- 16:33:47 [Paolo]
- satya: time invariant/time dependent interpretations -- -DM is based mostly on events. are events going to replace time in -SEM?
- 16:34:09 [pgroth]
- Zakim, who's noisy?
- 16:34:24 [Zakim]
- pgroth, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P5 (4%), +44.238.059.aacc (60%)
- 16:34:43 [pgroth]
- P5 can you mute?
- 16:34:46 [zednik]
- zednik has joined #prov
- 16:34:50 [Paolo]
- jcheney: time instants are arbitrary partial order. total order not needed. this maybe close to the notion of events in -DM
- 16:35:49 [Zakim]
- + +1.518.633.aadd
- 16:35:57 [Paolo]
- jcheney: ex: use, generation, activity start and end are events in -DM -- so events are associated with the specific relations and properties used in -DM
- 16:37:11 [satya]
- @James- yes, that is something I would like to be considered and discussed
- 16:37:15 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:37:21 [Paolo]
- jcheney: there is an assumption that events are instantaneous, however they may span a temporal interval. This would make them similar to activities, possibly those that cannot be decomposed. but this is premature
- 16:38:21 [Paolo]
- jcheney: need feedback before moving on to additional sections
- 16:39:14 [Paolo]
- jcheney: complementarity is what it was prior to the latest discussion. It may not necessarily match the draft.
- 16:39:39 [Paolo]
- jcheney: also added sections on the viewOf/foobar relations and tried to give them a formal meaning
- 16:40:21 [Paolo]
- jcheney: viewOf anti-symmetric, lifetime containment, and relationship amongst the sets of attributes of the two entities
- 16:40:53 [pgroth]
- type it
- 16:40:59 [Paolo]
- jcheney: foobar (now changed to alternateOf)
- 16:41:16 [Paolo]
- jcheney: also being updated
- 16:43:30 [Paolo]
- jcheney: mismatch between a property like "two entity IDs describe the same entity" vs "two entity IDs are associated with two entity records about the same real world thing, but which give different characterizationss"
- 16:43:56 [Paolo]
- jcheney: need further discussion over email
- 16:44:02 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:44:21 [Zakim]
- -pchampin
- 16:44:43 [Luc]
- q+
- 16:44:49 [pgroth]
- q-
- 16:44:54 [pgroth]
- ack Luc
- 16:45:03 [Paolo]
- jcheney: new recent changes in -DM regarding IDs of entity vs entity records should now be taken into account
- 16:46:04 [Paolo]
- Luc: in -DM we have 3 levels: things in the world, entities, and entity records. Their distinction is important. In the -SEM doc the same distinction ought to be made.
- 16:46:45 [Zakim]
- +pchampin
- 16:46:55 [Paolo]
- jcheney: yes that pushes -SEM in the direction of having 3 levels rather than 2 (as it is now in -SEM)
- 16:47:32 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:48:29 [Paolo]
- pgroth: discuss identifiers or accounts?
- 16:48:40 [pgroth]
- Topic: PROV-DM Identifiers
- 16:48:40 [Zakim]
- -pchampin
- 16:49:20 [Paolo]
- Luc: in -DM entities have identifiers, entity records include the ID of the entity, but we do not identify the entity record /itself/ using that same identifiers
- 16:49:55 [Zakim]
- +pchampin
- 16:50:26 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:50:49 [pgroth]
- q+
- 16:52:28 [Paolo]
- pgroth: id of an entity record -> account + entity Id. what's the implication from an access point of view? there is no URL direclty for the entity record
- 16:52:59 [Paolo]
- Luc: there should be no impact on the PAQ
- 16:53:43 [Paolo]
- entity records must be searched possibly across multiple accounts. this has always been the understanding of how access works
- 16:54:11 [Paolo]
- pgroth: now we only indirectly reference an entity record
- 16:54:14 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:54:18 [pgroth]
- ack pgroth
- 16:54:41 [tlebo]
- pgroth, an "entity record" is a chunk of an RDF abstract graph. An entity is mentioned and described in that graph.
- 16:54:45 [Paolo]
- Luc: there was never a direct way to refer to entity records. it was always in the context of a given account
- 16:54:48 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:55:17 [tlebo]
- +1 to avoid naming entity records.
- 16:55:28 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:55:32 [Paolo]
- Luc: we have never been keen on minting new IDs for every entity record created. Req. was to minimize burden on asserters
- 16:56:03 [pgroth]
- q?
- 16:56:10 [tlebo]
- q+
- 16:56:18 [pgroth]
- ack tlebo
- 16:56:18 [Paolo]
- Luc: what do the SW people / PROV-O team think of accounts and how they can be mapped to SW constructs (eg named graphs)?
- 16:56:49 [Zakim]
- -pchampin
- 16:57:53 [Paolo]
- tlebo: accounts are being mapped to NGs, it seems to map to "abstract graph" -- indep. of encoding, location,etc.
- 16:57:55 [Christine]
- apologies .. I need to leave .. thank you Paul and Luc
- 16:58:03 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller]
- 16:58:39 [Paolo]
- NGs are generally meant as graph containers. there is still some confusion on which interpretation of the NG should be used in this context
- 16:58:43 [satya]
- @Luc, sorry I have lost audio, will try to respond by mail to the updated account description in DM (an any points that Tim discusses regarding mapping to named graphs)
- 16:59:50 [Luc]
- q+
- 16:59:55 [pgroth]
- ack Luc
- 17:00:06 [Paolo]
- will work off the concrete example in the id-accounts section in -DM
- 17:00:21 [Paolo]
- Luc: can we focus on all the example of accounts found in the -DM doc?
- 17:00:39 [Paolo]
- to see what maps naturally and what doesn't
- 17:01:23 [Paolo]
- Luc: account IDs are meant to be global, precisely to align with NG id convention
- 17:02:12 [Zakim]
- + +1.443.708.aaee
- 17:02:21 [Paolo]
- Tlebo: SW does not provide global URIs for NG. some reconciliation will be needed
- 17:02:51 [Paolo]
- Luc: there is no obligation to encode account IDs are URIs
- 17:03:46 [pgroth]
- q?
- 17:04:04 [Zakim]
- -tlebo
- 17:04:05 [Zakim]
- -dgarijo
- 17:04:06 [Zakim]
- -davidschaengold
- 17:04:07 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller.a]
- 17:04:10 [Zakim]
- -pgroth
- 17:04:11 [Zakim]
- - +44.238.059.aacc
- 17:04:12 [Zakim]
- - +1.443.708.aaee
- 17:04:12 [Zakim]
- - +1.518.633.aadd
- 17:04:14 [Zakim]
- -Paolo
- 17:04:20 [Zakim]
- -Curt_Tilmes
- 17:04:22 [pgroth]
- rrsagent, set log public
- 17:04:29 [pgroth]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 17:04:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/12/22-prov-minutes.html pgroth
- 17:04:35 [pgroth]
- trackbot, end telecon
- 17:04:35 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 17:04:35 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been pgroth, Paolo, Curt_Tilmes, pchampin, davidschaengold, +1.315.330.aabb, tlebo, dgarijo, [IPcaller], +44.238.059.aacc, +1.518.633.aadd,
- 17:04:36 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 17:04:36 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/12/22-prov-minutes.html trackbot
- 17:04:37 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 17:04:37 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items
- 17:04:38 [Zakim]
- ... +1.443.708.aaee