20:59:17 RRSAgent has joined #audio 20:59:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/12/05-audio-irc 20:59:19 RRSAgent, make logs world 20:59:21 Zakim, this will be 28346 20:59:21 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 20:59:22 Meeting: Audio Working Group Teleconference 20:59:22 Date: 05 December 2011 20:59:28 Scribe: Olivier 20:59:33 ScribeNick: olivier 21:00:15 Chair: Allstair_MacDonald 21:00:54 agenda+ Olivier's intro, potential co-chair 21:01:01 agenda+ intro to NAMM, F2F proposal 21:01:09 agenda+ decision on publishing "model" 21:01:17 agenda+ decision on the names of the two drafts 21:01:26 agenda+ use cases and requirements document 21:01:31 agenda+ coordination with WebRTC 21:01:36 agenda? 21:01:49 rrsagent, pointer? 21:01:49 See http://www.w3.org/2011/12/05-audio-irc#T21-01-49 21:02:41 the conference code isn't work for me 21:02:48 Zakim, who's here? 21:02:48 sorry, shepazu, I don't know what conference this is 21:02:49 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, FILT3R, MikeSmith, Ronny, kinetik, foolip, trackbot, F1LT3R, olivier, shepazu, paul_irish 21:02:50 nor me 21:03:01 Zakim, room for 7? 21:03:03 ok, shepazu; conference Team_(audio)21:03Z scheduled with code 26631 (CONF1) for 60 minutes until 2203Z 21:03:18 shepazu has changed the topic to: code 26631 (CONF1) 21:03:33 Team_(audio)21:03Z has now started 21:03:40 +[IPcaller] 21:03:55 +[IPcaller.a] 21:03:57 +Doug_Schepers 21:04:17 +??P5 21:04:29 zakim, ??p5 21:04:29 I don't understand '??p5', olivier 21:04:32 zakim, ??p5 is me 21:04:32 +olivier; got it 21:05:25 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 21:05:25 +kinetik; got it 21:05:34 roc has joined #audio 21:05:52 "the conference is restricted at this time" 21:05:57 roc: use 26631 21:06:32 +[IPcaller] 21:06:33 Joe has joined #audio 21:06:48 hey, this is a Compunetix conferencing system 21:06:50 I am not able to join the conference -- getting "restricted at this time" 21:06:57 Joe: use 26631 21:07:00 thx 21:07:08 my wife worked at that company 21:07:14 surprised to hear it's still alive 21:07:32 + +1.978.314.aaaa 21:07:34 agenda? 21:07:48 zakim, take up agendum 1 21:07:48 agendum 1. "Olivier's intro, potential co-chair" taken up [from olivier] 21:09:02 Olivier: [intro, hello world] 21:09:43 Doug: proposal for Olivier to join as co-chair 21:10:08 q+ 21:10:14 ack me 21:12:01 Olivier: explains how understanding of process could be useful, to help first-time chair Al 21:13:03 Doug: having two co-chairs also helps 21:13:33 Doug: not yet official, need to be vetted by W3C management 21:13:41 ... if any objection, talk to me 21:14:20 Joe: support 21:14:39 [quick round of intros] 21:14:52 Joe: CEO of noteflight, music notation software company 21:15:03 ... lot of firsthand experience going into use cases 21:15:45 Doug: mostly experience with flash, also with Java? 21:16:03 Joe: our product mostly use flash, also have experience with Java and audio on many platforms 21:16:48 Doug: formality at W3C management on Wednesday 21:17:06 zakim, cluse agendum 21:17:06 I don't understand 'cluse agendum', olivier 21:17:10 zakim, close agendum 21:17:10 I don't understand 'close agendum', olivier 21:17:18 zakim, next 21:17:18 I don't understand 'next', olivier 21:17:22 zakim, next agendum 21:17:22 agendum 2. "intro to NAMM, F2F proposal" taken up [from olivier] 21:17:30 Doug: thoughts on f2f in LA 21:17:36 Al: 19-22 ? 21:18:11 Olivier: would we try and have it before, after, during? 21:18:15 Doug: better for me before 21:18:21 Joe: same for me, better before 21:18:46 ROC: have already signed up for another event around same dates 21:19:05 ... might be possible to fly straight there 21:19:11 q+ 21:20:18 ROC: f2f discussions are good to know people, not sure how this can be effective 21:20:40 Doug: group has lacked cohesion so far, a f2f might help 21:20:45 ack me 21:21:03 Al: any other time of the year you're already in the area, ROC? 21:21:25 ROC: might be in North America in July 21:21:44 ... Matthew can represent Moz 21:22:05 ... but might be hard representing the work I've been doing 21:22:47 Agenda+ ideas for moving forward 21:23:23 Doug: think the f2f would be a good idea, would also be good to go to NAMM 21:24:14 ... people who can't make it could call in? 21:24:43 Joe: would work for me, would be good to meet others since I'm going to NAMM anyway 21:24:50 Doug: we probably should do it 21:25:46 RESOLUTION: assuming we can find logistics, the group would like to have f2f meeting around NAMM in January 21:27:07 Doug: ideal if someone from WebRTC from Mozilla can join too 21:27:13 q? 21:27:21 zakim, take up next agendum 21:27:21 agendum 3. "decision on publishing "model"" taken up [from olivier] 21:27:58 Joe: amendment - would be hard to do it before, after works 21:28:02 olivier: ditto 21:28:05 Al: ditto 21:28:15 Doug: not me, but noone cares about me anyway 21:28:22 (scribe may be taking liberties here) 21:28:39 zakim, take up agendum 3 21:28:39 agendum 3. "decision on publishing "model"" taken up [from olivier] 21:28:47 Doug: two possibilities for the publication 21:29:01 ... we should try and publish ASAP 21:29:29 Olivier: we had resolution to publish at TPAC, just a matter of how, and ASAP... 21:29:38 Doug: two ways we could publish 21:29:49 ... one has the two proposals as part of the same spec (chapters) 21:30:01 ... or an umbrella document, and two separate docs for each proposal 21:30:16 ... first approach has one name for the doc "web audio API" 21:30:36 ... the other approach would have "web audio api" be a landing page 21:30:57 ... and the two proposals "media processing api" and "web audio graph api' 21:31:12 Al: would require renaming Chris Rogers' doc? 21:31:20 Doug: yes 21:31:40 ROC: don't object keeping its current name 21:31:56 Al: could make it confusing, if Chris is amenable, we should rename it 21:32:38 Olivier: would be nice to keep "web audio API" for umbrella spec 21:32:48 Doug: would like there to be one spec come out of this 21:33:09 ... can't speak for merits of each proposal, but would be good to integrate the two proposals into one 21:33:17 ... if we can 21:33:43 ... and have a "web audio API" spec and a "something"spec 21:35:32 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/31-audio-minutes.html 21:36:02 Doug: which approach would the group prefer? 21:36:09 q? 21:37:33 Olivier: concern was to publish two specs, one gets abandoned 21:37:46 ... Doug, maybe you can explain how this would be handled? 21:38:00 Doug: the spec that does not get pushed forward gets published as a note 21:38:19 ... the other goes forward in REC track 21:38:33 zakim, take up agendum 7 21:38:33 agendum 7. "ideas for moving forward" taken up [from olivier] 21:38:50 ROC: suggest we get feedback from other vendors 21:39:00 ... Microsoft and Opera 21:39:10 ... we want the spec to be implemented 21:39:28 ... if browser vendors have preferences, they should be heard ASAP 21:39:32 q+ 21:40:04 ack me 21:40:15 Doug: am trying to get that from them 21:40:54 Olivier: seems to be a good reason to publish FPWD 21:41:03 ... publish and gather feedback 21:45:06 RESOLUTION: publish one umbrella document, two proposal as FPWD 21:45:14 s/proposal/proposals/ 21:46:13 RESOLVED: subject to confirmation by Chris R, the three documents will be "Web Audio API", "Media Streaming API" and "Web Audio Graph API" 21:46:23 agenda? 21:46:35 zakim, drop agendum 4 21:46:35 agendum 4, decision on the names of the two drafts, dropped 21:46:40 zakim, next agendum 21:46:40 agendum 3. "decision on publishing "model"" taken up [from olivier] 21:46:42 zakim, next agendum 21:46:42 agendum 3 was just opened, olivier 21:46:49 zakim, open agendum 5 21:46:49 agendum 5. "use cases and requirements document" taken up [from olivier] 21:46:59 Al: use cases copy-pasted from the incubator group 21:47:13 ... wanted to go over those and make it relevant 21:47:24 ... don't think streaming is mentioned there 21:48:04 Olivier: what happened to the list we drafted at TPAC? seems to have been overwritten? 21:48:42 http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Basic-Examples 21:48:54 Al: the page we started on at TPAC is now here 21:49:00 ... -> http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Basic-Examples 21:49:13 ... goal was to give simple examples with pseudo-code 21:49:39 ... two completely different pages 21:49:43 http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use-Cases 21:49:52 ... the use cases are here: http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use-Cases 21:50:00 ... and were copied from incubator group 21:50:13 ... nothing touched here for over a year 21:50:40 q+ 21:50:42 ... would like the group to look through those and add anything missing 21:50:44 ack sh 21:51:00 Doug: few different ways we can make progress here 21:51:49 ... could spend time on telcond about this, might be more productive if individuals take cases and develop them further 21:52:04 Al: do we have an anatomy of a use case we could use ? 21:52:19 ACTION: Doug to provide "anatomy of a use case" template 21:52:19 Created ACTION-4 - Provide "anatomy of a use case" template [on Doug Schepers - due 2011-12-12]. 21:53:17 s/bt/by/ 21:54:19 Olivier: suggest people send intention to work on section, coordinate with others wanting to work on same 21:54:42 Doug: agreed 21:54:53 zakim, take up agendum 6 21:54:54 agendum 6. "coordination with WebRTC" taken up [from olivier] 21:55:01 Doug: we have coordinated with them already 21:55:16 ... let's make sure we take their use cases and req into account 21:55:50 Olivier: happy to look into it 21:56:03 ACTION: Olivier to integrate WebRTC use cases into our doc 21:56:03 Created ACTION-5 - Integrate WebRTC use cases into our doc [on Olivier Thereaux - due 2011-12-12]. 21:56:34 ACTION: Al to find minutes of joint meeting with WebRTC (if any available) 21:56:34 Sorry, couldn't find user - Al 21:56:57 rrsagent, drop action 3 21:58:31 Topic: any other business? 21:59:41 ADJOURNED 21:59:42 -[IPcaller.a] 21:59:43 -kinetik 21:59:45 -Doug_Schepers 21:59:47 -olivier 21:59:49 - +1.978.314.aaaa 21:59:50 -[IPcaller] 21:59:52 Team_(audio)21:03Z has ended 21:59:53 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:59:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/12/05-audio-minutes.html olivier 21:59:54 Attendees were Doug_Schepers, olivier, kinetik, [IPcaller], +1.978.314.aaaa 21:59:58 zakim, bye 21:59:58 Zakim has left #audio 22:00:54 :) 22:01:14 shepazu: olivier: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/01-webrtc-minutes.html 22:01:21 aha, thanks 22:01:33 rrsagent, bye 22:01:33 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/12/05-audio-actions.rdf : 22:01:33 ACTION: Doug to provide "anatomy of a use case" template [1] 22:01:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/12/05-audio-irc#T21-52-19 22:01:33 ACTION: Olivier to integrate WebRTC use cases into our doc [2] 22:01:33 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/12/05-audio-irc#T21-56-03 22:01:37 Those minutes are from the second day of TPAC