15:59:37 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 15:59:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-irc 15:59:39 MichaelC has changed the topic to: HTML-A11Y Task Force 15:59:39 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:59:39 Zakim has joined #html-a11y 15:59:41 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:59:41 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 15:59:42 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:59:42 Date: 10 November 2011 15:59:43 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Nov/0050.html 15:59:54 janina has joined #html-a11y 16:00:25 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM has now started 16:00:32 paulc has joined #html-a11y 16:00:33 +??P65 16:00:43 +Michael_Cooper 16:00:51 zakim, ??P65 is Janina_Sajka 16:00:51 +Janina_Sajka; got it 16:01:04 +[Microsoft] 16:01:11 richardschwerdtfe has joined #html-a11y 16:01:16 zakim, [Microsoft] has paulc 16:01:16 +paulc; got it 16:01:17 Zakim, call Mike 16:01:17 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 16:01:19 +Mike 16:06:59 +??P88 16:07:31 +Cynthia_Shelly 16:08:49 lwatson has joined #html-a11y 16:09:01 +John_Foliot 16:09:21 zakim, ??P88 is Léonie_Watson 16:09:23 +Léonie_Watson; got it 16:10:07 Stevef has joined #html-a11y 16:11:01 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:11:10 scribe: MikeSmith 16:11:26 Topic: Bug triage subteam 16:12:00 zakim, mute rich 16:12:00 Rich_Schwerdtfeger should now be muted 16:12:11 zakim, unmute rich 16:12:11 Rich_Schwerdtfeger should no longer be muted 16:12:19 +??P16 16:12:54 lwatson: on call on Tuesday, discussed changing priority of a particular bug, and looked a some bugs that were lacking keywords, as well as looking at "needs info" bugs to make sure they have an assigned person 16:13:04 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:13:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 16:13:06 zakim, P16 is me 16:13:06 sorry, Stevef, I do not recognize a party named 'P16' 16:13:20 zakim, ??P16 is Steve_Faulkner 16:13:20 +Steve_Faulkner; got it 16:13:43 janina: I suspect our priority over the next month will be following up on various bugs and that more of us need to be helping do hat 16:13:48 s/hat/that 16:14:35 richardschwerdtfe: about canvas, Frank asked to write a modified version of the hit-testing proposal 16:14:46 ... I asked him to base it on the current draft 16:15:00 ... and I asked if we really need to change focus ring 16:15:12 ... my take on it is, could we live with what's already in there 16:15:25 ... and I think we could 16:15:41 JF has joined #html-a11y 16:16:06 ... so I think Frank is writing it up and we want to run it by Jonas Sicking and Ted O'Connor 16:16:35 ... some other things that came up is that we've been talking about the component model that will help on this down the road 16:16:47 ... but in the mean time, we need to deal specifically with canvas for now 16:16:52 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:16:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 16:17:46 janina: the text-alternatives subteam did not meet this week 16:17:59 ... and there are a couple of items that are waiting on me to complete 16:18:13 ... I expect that we will meet next Tuesday 16:19:05 cynthia: about the a11y API mappings subteam, Stevef, are we going to meet next Tuesday? 16:19:25 Stevef: yeah, can, but have to leave at half-past 16:21:37 John: about the Media subteam, we need to get the subteam re-convened; we should probably do that next week 16:22:17 ... we have the poster-alt issue that has a Formal Objection from me logged against it 16:22:50 ... I talked with Frank about the ARIA-based solution for the poster-alt issue 16:23:04 ... and I need to follow up with David Bolter about it 16:23:25 ... and if we could get that added to ARIA 1.1, would like to do that 16:24:08 cynthia: Why would we need new ARIA markup for this, instead of just aria-describedat? 16:24:38 John: describedat would be the long textual description for the movie itself 16:25:01 ... we need a dedicated long textual description just for the poster 16:25:26 cynthia: let's talk about this later 16:25:54 [some discussion about details] 16:26:05 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:26:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 16:26:37 John: we have been thinking about this as a foreground image, but perhaps we need to think of it as a background image 16:27:27 ... and the ability to describe a background image has other utility than just the poster-alt case 16:27:43 ... lots of uses 16:28:41 ... so if we were to add this new role, it would be abstracted out for general use 16:29:09 richardschwerdtfe: we are trying to get ARIA through CR, I am a little concerned about this parallel effort 16:29:31 janina: can we talk about timing and process on Monday's PF call? 16:29:38 ... I think we have some good options 16:30:18 ... the concern about going sequentially was that we would have to re-do all our testing, but according to Judy that's not necessarily so 16:30:28 richardschwerdtfe: well, we still have to get implementations in browsers 16:30:41 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:30:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 16:31:16 cynthia: could we do it during the last 30 minutes of the call, please? 16:31:20 Judy has joined #html-a11y 16:31:41 +Judy 16:32:32 janina: so let's to the process-timing discussion ahead of that? 16:33:06 janina: and I want to remind everybody that the user-agent implementation guide is a joint deliverable of the PFWG and HTML WG 16:33:34 q? 16:34:39 JF has joined #html-a11y 16:35:44 http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html#ISSUE-142 16:36:25 MikeSmith: any other business? 16:36:45 richardschwerdtfe: wanted to ask Judy, do we need to go through a full CR on ARIA 1.1 again? 16:37:12 Judy: you have all the evidence for all the tests you did for ARIA 1.0 16:37:26 ... so all of your evidence for 1.0 would still be valid 16:37:52 ... it would be unusual if you were trying to run the timeline so that they were done at the same time 16:38:11 ... but maybe we don't need to drive the details here 16:38:32 ... you would not be free of the obligations for 1.1, but you would need to cover the new features 16:38:43 Ian Hickson responds over HTML5 getting 'time' element back http://www.netmagazine.com/news/ian-hickson-responds-over-html5-getting-time-element-back-111552 16:38:45 ... the length of CR is not proscribed anywhere 16:39:00 ... it is instead based on whether you met your exit criteria 16:39:27 ... in some cases it's possible to have a sort of zero-time CR, if the group has done its preperation 16:39:36 got to drop 16:39:39 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger 16:40:00 s/proscribed/prescribed/ 16:40:49 q+ 16:40:50 Paul: I assume the TF is not meeting on US Thanksgiving? 16:40:53 janina: yeah 16:41:11 lwatson: I can scribe next week 16:41:15 ack Stevef 16:42:14 Stevef: as I can't make it to the HTML WG meeting, I wanted to bring up the status on the