15:59:37 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y
15:59:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-irc
15:59:39 MichaelC has changed the topic to: HTML-A11Y Task Force
15:59:39 RRSAgent, make logs world
15:59:39 Zakim has joined #html-a11y
15:59:41 Zakim, this will be 2119
15:59:41 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute
15:59:42 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
15:59:42 Date: 10 November 2011
15:59:43 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Nov/0050.html
15:59:54 janina has joined #html-a11y
16:00:25 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM has now started
16:00:32 paulc has joined #html-a11y
16:00:33 +??P65
16:00:43 +Michael_Cooper
16:00:51 zakim, ??P65 is Janina_Sajka
16:00:51 +Janina_Sajka; got it
16:01:04 +[Microsoft]
16:01:11 richardschwerdtfe has joined #html-a11y
16:01:16 zakim, [Microsoft] has paulc
16:01:16 +paulc; got it
16:01:17 Zakim, call Mike
16:01:17 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made
16:01:19 +Mike
16:06:59 +??P88
16:07:31 +Cynthia_Shelly
16:08:49 lwatson has joined #html-a11y
16:09:01 +John_Foliot
16:09:21 zakim, ??P88 is Léonie_Watson
16:09:23 +Léonie_Watson; got it
16:10:07 Stevef has joined #html-a11y
16:11:01 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger
16:11:10 scribe: MikeSmith
16:11:26 Topic: Bug triage subteam
16:12:00 zakim, mute rich
16:12:00 Rich_Schwerdtfeger should now be muted
16:12:11 zakim, unmute rich
16:12:11 Rich_Schwerdtfeger should no longer be muted
16:12:19 +??P16
16:12:54 lwatson: on call on Tuesday, discussed changing priority of a particular bug, and looked a some bugs that were lacking keywords, as well as looking at "needs info" bugs to make sure they have an assigned person
16:13:04 RRSAgent, make minutes
16:13:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith
16:13:06 zakim, P16 is me
16:13:06 sorry, Stevef, I do not recognize a party named 'P16'
16:13:20 zakim, ??P16 is Steve_Faulkner
16:13:20 +Steve_Faulkner; got it
16:13:43 janina: I suspect our priority over the next month will be following up on various bugs and that more of us need to be helping do hat
16:13:48 s/hat/that
16:14:35 richardschwerdtfe: about canvas, Frank asked to write a modified version of the hit-testing proposal
16:14:46 ... I asked him to base it on the current draft
16:15:00 ... and I asked if we really need to change focus ring
16:15:12 ... my take on it is, could we live with what's already in there
16:15:25 ... and I think we could
16:15:41 JF has joined #html-a11y
16:16:06 ... so I think Frank is writing it up and we want to run it by Jonas Sicking and Ted O'Connor
16:16:35 ... some other things that came up is that we've been talking about the component model that will help on this down the road
16:16:47 ... but in the mean time, we need to deal specifically with canvas for now
16:16:52 RRSAgent, make minutes
16:16:52 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith
16:17:46 janina: the text-alternatives subteam did not meet this week
16:17:59 ... and there are a couple of items that are waiting on me to complete
16:18:13 ... I expect that we will meet next Tuesday
16:19:05 cynthia: about the a11y API mappings subteam, Stevef, are we going to meet next Tuesday?
16:19:25 Stevef: yeah, can, but have to leave at half-past
16:21:37 John: about the Media subteam, we need to get the subteam re-convened; we should probably do that next week
16:22:17 ... we have the poster-alt issue that has a Formal Objection from me logged against it
16:22:50 ... I talked with Frank about the ARIA-based solution for the poster-alt issue
16:23:04 ... and I need to follow up with David Bolter about it
16:23:25 ... and if we could get that added to ARIA 1.1, would like to do that
16:24:08 cynthia: Why would we need new ARIA markup for this, instead of just aria-describedat?
16:24:38 John: describedat would be the long textual description for the movie itself
16:25:01 ... we need a dedicated long textual description just for the poster
16:25:26 cynthia: let's talk about this later
16:25:54 [some discussion about details]
16:26:05 RRSAgent, make minutes
16:26:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith
16:26:37 John: we have been thinking about this as a foreground image, but perhaps we need to think of it as a background image
16:27:27 ... and the ability to describe a background image has other utility than just the poster-alt case
16:27:43 ... lots of uses
16:28:41 ... so if we were to add this new role, it would be abstracted out for general use
16:29:09 richardschwerdtfe: we are trying to get ARIA through CR, I am a little concerned about this parallel effort
16:29:31 janina: can we talk about timing and process on Monday's PF call?
16:29:38 ... I think we have some good options
16:30:18 ... the concern about going sequentially was that we would have to re-do all our testing, but according to Judy that's not necessarily so
16:30:28 richardschwerdtfe: well, we still have to get implementations in browsers
16:30:41 RRSAgent, make minutes
16:30:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith
16:31:16 cynthia: could we do it during the last 30 minutes of the call, please?
16:31:20 Judy has joined #html-a11y
16:31:41 +Judy
16:32:32 janina: so let's to the process-timing discussion ahead of that?
16:33:06 janina: and I want to remind everybody that the user-agent implementation guide is a joint deliverable of the PFWG and HTML WG
16:33:34 q?
16:34:39 JF has joined #html-a11y
16:35:44 http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html#ISSUE-142
16:36:25 MikeSmith: any other business?
16:36:45 richardschwerdtfe: wanted to ask Judy, do we need to go through a full CR on ARIA 1.1 again?
16:37:12 Judy: you have all the evidence for all the tests you did for ARIA 1.0
16:37:26 ... so all of your evidence for 1.0 would still be valid
16:37:52 ... it would be unusual if you were trying to run the timeline so that they were done at the same time
16:38:11 ... but maybe we don't need to drive the details here
16:38:32 ... you would not be free of the obligations for 1.1, but you would need to cover the new features
16:38:43 Ian Hickson responds over HTML5 getting 'time' element back http://www.netmagazine.com/news/ian-hickson-responds-over-html5-getting-time-element-back-111552
16:38:45 ... the length of CR is not proscribed anywhere
16:39:00 ... it is instead based on whether you met your exit criteria
16:39:27 ... in some cases it's possible to have a sort of zero-time CR, if the group has done its preperation
16:39:36 got to drop
16:39:39 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger
16:40:00 s/proscribed/prescribed/
16:40:49 q+
16:40:50 Paul: I assume the TF is not meeting on US Thanksgiving?
16:40:53 janina: yeah
16:41:11 lwatson: I can scribe next week
16:41:15 ack Stevef
16:42:14 Stevef: as I can't make it to the HTML WG meeting, I wanted to bring up the status on the