IRC log of eval on 2011-11-10
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:55:49 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #eval
- 14:55:49 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-eval-irc
- 14:55:51 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 14:55:51 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #eval
- 14:55:53 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 3825
- 14:55:53 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes
- 14:55:54 [trackbot]
- Meeting: WCAG 2.0 Evaluation Methodology Task Force Teleconference
- 14:55:54 [trackbot]
- Date: 10 November 2011
- 14:56:07 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has now started
- 14:56:15 [Zakim]
- + +1.301.975.aaaa
- 14:56:26 [houtepen]
- houtepen has joined #eval
- 14:56:27 [shadi]
- zakim, call shadi-617
- 14:56:27 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; the call is being made
- 14:56:28 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 14:56:30 [Ryladog]
- Ryladog has joined #eval
- 14:56:41 [Wilco]
- Wilco has joined #eval
- 14:57:09 [Liz]
- Zakim, aaaa is Liz
- 14:57:09 [Zakim]
- +Liz; got it
- 14:57:59 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 14:58:18 [vivienne]
- zakim, ??[IPcaller] is me
- 14:58:18 [Zakim]
- sorry, vivienne, I do not recognize a party named '??[IPcaller]'
- 14:58:35 [Zakim]
- + +1.978.443.aabb
- 14:58:38 [vivienne]
- zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- 14:58:38 [Zakim]
- +vivienne; got it
- 14:58:45 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 14:58:46 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 14:59:16 [Kathy]
- zakim, aabb is Kathy
- 14:59:16 [Zakim]
- +Kathy; got it
- 14:59:28 [ericvelleman]
- ericvelleman has joined #eval
- 14:59:41 [AmyChen]
- AmyChen has joined #eval
- 14:59:54 [Zakim]
- +Katie_Haritos-Shea
- 15:00:22 [Zakim]
- + +31.30.239.aacc
- 15:00:22 [Zakim]
- + +1.510.522.aadd
- 15:00:31 [AmyChen]
- zakim, aadd is me
- 15:00:31 [Zakim]
- +AmyChen; got it
- 15:00:32 [ssirois]
- ssirois has joined #eval
- 15:00:47 [AmyChen]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:00:59 [Zakim]
- AmyChen should now be muted
- 15:01:01 [ericvelleman]
- Zakim, aacc is ericvelleman
- 15:01:07 [kerstin]
- kerstin has joined #eval
- 15:01:23 [Zakim]
- +ericvelleman; got it
- 15:01:57 [Zakim]
- +??P37
- 15:02:05 [Kathy]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:02:07 [Zakim]
- + +31.30.239.aaee
- 15:02:12 [ssirois]
- zakim, ??p37 is me
- 15:02:18 [houtepen]
- zakim, aaee is me
- 15:02:34 [Zakim]
- Kathy should now be muted
- 15:02:46 [houtepen]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:02:48 [Zakim]
- +??P43
- 15:02:52 [Zakim]
- +ssirois; got it
- 15:02:58 [Zakim]
- +houtepen; got it
- 15:03:05 [ssirois]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:03:09 [Zakim]
- +houtepen.a
- 15:03:15 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:03:16 [kerstin]
- zakim, mute
- 15:03:26 [kerstin]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:03:41 [Zakim]
- houtepen should now be muted
- 15:04:01 [Zakim]
- ssirois should now be muted
- 15:04:07 [vivienne]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:04:13 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Liz, Shadi, vivienne (muted), Kathy (muted), Katie_Haritos-Shea, ericvelleman, AmyChen (muted), ssirois (muted), houtepen (muted), ??P43, houtepen.a
- 15:04:18 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'mute', kerstin
- 15:04:30 [Zakim]
- sorry, kerstin, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- 15:04:34 [shadi]
- zakim, ??p43 is Kerstin
- 15:04:57 [kerstin]
- zakim, ??P43 is me
- 15:05:00 [Zakim]
- vivienne should no longer be muted
- 15:05:07 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:05:08 [Zakim]
- +Kerstin; got it
- 15:05:15 [kerstin]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:05:22 [Zakim]
- I already had ??P43 as Kerstin, kerstin
- 15:05:22 [ssirois]
- was darth vader i guess
- 15:05:28 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 15:05:36 [Zakim]
- Kerstin should now be muted
- 15:05:42 [shadi]
- zakim, houtepen.a is Wilco
- 15:05:51 [shadi]
- scribe: Katie
- 15:05:56 [shadi]
- scribenick: Ryladog
- 15:06:01 [Zakim]
- +Wilco; got it
- 15:06:04 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:06:13 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 15:06:44 [shadi]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2011Nov/0031.html
- 15:06:51 [shadi]
- chair: Eric
- 15:07:02 [shadi]
- agenda+ Table of Contents
- 15:07:06 [Ryladog]
- Chair: Eric
- 15:07:14 [shadi]
- agenda+ Specific discussion
- 15:07:22 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 15:07:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Table of Contents" taken up [from shadi]
- 15:08:10 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111109.html
- 15:08:40 [Wilco]
- Wilco has joined #eval
- 15:09:03 [Ryladog]
- EV: Tried to add more explanantion for the Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodology for WCAG 2.0. Please try to review
- 15:09:32 [Ryladog]
- EV: Want to publish before the end of the year
- 15:10:10 [Ryladog]
- EV: We Want to be ready for WCAG and EART to review
- 15:10:20 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:10:22 [shadi]
- s/EART/ERT
- 15:10:33 [Ryladog]
- EV: I will try to captutre all by next Tues
- 15:10:48 [Ryladog]
- EV: The send to WCAG as a First DRFAT
- 15:10:55 [vivienne]
- ack me
- 15:10:57 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:11:01 [Kathy]
- q+
- 15:11:02 [kerstin]
- I'm fine with that
- 15:11:02 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:11:05 [Kathy]
- ack me
- 15:11:06 [Ryladog]
- EV: Any Comments?
- 15:11:37 [Vincent_]
- Vincent_ has joined #eval
- 15:11:41 [Ryladog]
- Kathy: Do we want to keep it general?
- 15:11:46 [Ryladog]
- EV: Yes
- 15:12:09 [Ryladog]
- Kathy: Do we want to re-arrange the order - did we do that?
- 15:12:17 [Zakim]
- + +1.514.312.aaff
- 15:12:27 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:12:32 [Vincent_]
- zakim, aaff is Vincent
- 15:12:32 [Zakim]
- +Vincent; got it
- 15:12:34 [shadi]
- q?
- 15:12:36 [Ryladog]
- EV: I thougth we agreed to do a split - but we will do that later
- 15:12:37 [shadi]
- ack v
- 15:12:40 [Kathy]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:12:40 [Zakim]
- Kathy should now be muted
- 15:12:47 [Vincent_]
- Hi, sorry to be late
- 15:12:59 [Vincent_]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:12:59 [Zakim]
- sorry, Vincent_, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- 15:12:59 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: How are we editing individually?
- 15:13:08 [kerstin]
- q+
- 15:13:22 [Tim]
- Tim has joined #eval
- 15:13:31 [kerstin]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:13:31 [Zakim]
- Kerstin was already muted, kerstin
- 15:13:37 [Ryladog]
- EV: I will add the text for how to do it. Please send an emailk to the list with your comments
- 15:13:40 [kerstin]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:13:40 [Zakim]
- Kerstin should no longer be muted
- 15:13:41 [Vincent_]
- zakim, aaff is Vincent_
- 15:13:42 [Zakim]
- sorry, Vincent_, I do not recognize a party named 'aaff'
- 15:13:43 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:13:43 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 15:14:23 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:14:23 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 15:14:33 [Vincent_]
- zaim, mute me
- 15:14:36 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:14:36 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Liz, Shadi (muted), vivienne (muted), Kathy (muted), Katie_Haritos-Shea, ericvelleman, AmyChen (muted), ssirois (muted), houtepen (muted), Kerstin, Wilco,
- 15:14:40 [Zakim]
- ... Vincent
- 15:14:42 [Vincent_]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:14:42 [Zakim]
- sorry, Vincent_, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- 15:14:44 [Ryladog]
- EV: Other questions about doc so far?
- 15:14:46 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:14:56 [shadi]
- zakim, Vincent is Vincent_
- 15:14:56 [Zakim]
- +Vincent_; got it
- 15:15:00 [Wilco]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:15:00 [Zakim]
- Wilco should now be muted
- 15:15:04 [Vincent_]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:15:04 [Zakim]
- Vincent_ should now be muted
- 15:15:12 [Vincent_]
- Thank you
- 15:15:13 [Ryladog]
- Kerstin: I don't understand the need for splitting the document
- 15:15:32 [Ryladog]
- EV: We will not do that now. We will make that determination later
- 15:15:45 [Zakim]
- +Tim_Boland
- 15:15:59 [Ryladog]
- EV: Seperate documents may be a risk
- 15:16:14 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:16:18 [kerstin]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:16:18 [Zakim]
- Kerstin should now be muted
- 15:16:25 [Ryladog]
- Kerstin: I am very fine with not seperating it
- 15:16:30 [Ryladog]
- EV: OK
- 15:17:30 [Ryladog]
- EV: I will add. Please be a bit more specific in your comments. Hopefully will finish it on Tues and Shadi will be able to put the new Draft on Wed
- 15:17:42 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:17:56 [shadi]
- q- k
- 15:17:59 [vivienne]
- that sounds fine to me, Eric
- 15:17:59 [kerstin]
- dont unterstand why?
- 15:18:28 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:18:37 [Ryladog]
- EV: There are a number of versions. What about that Shadi?
- 15:18:49 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/methodology/
- 15:18:57 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: There is a link for the latest internal verson
- 15:19:19 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: from that you can always go back to the previous version
- 15:19:46 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111109.html
- 15:19:59 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: Eric will notify the list when there is a new draft, with a specific dedicated URI
- 15:21:06 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:23:19 [Ryladog]
- zakim, take up agendum 3
- 15:23:20 [Zakim]
- I only see 2 items on the agenda
- 15:23:36 [Ryladog]
- zakim, take up agendum 2
- 15:23:36 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Specific discussion" taken up [from shadi]
- 15:23:55 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/#changes
- 15:24:22 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: You can see the specs
- 15:24:37 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:24:38 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 15:24:39 [Ryladog]
- EV: Specific discussion in the mil
- 15:24:49 [Tim]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:24:49 [Zakim]
- Tim_Boland should now be muted
- 15:24:56 [Ryladog]
- EV: Section 7 needs much more work
- 15:25:09 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111109.html#expertiseforevaluating
- 15:25:09 [Ryladog]
- EV: Lets start with Section 6
- 15:25:58 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:26:09 [vivienne]
- ack me
- 15:26:13 [Ryladog]
- EV: I have a short description (from the evaluation suite). We need to add text for using persons with disabilities. Any questions about section 6?
- 15:27:01 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: I think we need to spell ot out a bit more clearly for a person to be tasked as an expert. Difference between novice and expert
- 15:27:19 [Vincent_]
- q+
- 15:27:48 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: You need a basic understanding of HTML, CSS, Code Validation, AT - we need to have a list in order to do a successful eval
- 15:28:09 [shadi]
- q+
- 15:28:13 [Vincent_]
- q?
- 15:28:24 [Ryladog]
- EV: I agree, but there is already a nice description in the eval suite
- 15:28:52 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:28:52 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 15:28:52 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:29:07 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:29:23 [Vincent_]
- ack me
- 15:29:23 [shadi]
- q+
- 15:30:04 [Ryladog]
- Vincent: I want to point out that we can have a questions that need some expertise in order to give an answer
- 15:30:36 [Ryladog]
- Vincent: We should explain that some questions need an expert and some do not
- 15:31:08 [Ryladog]
- Vincent: I think we should offer a way for the people who are new to make a first step into this process
- 15:31:54 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:31:56 [Vincent_]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:31:56 [Zakim]
- Vincent_ should now be muted
- 15:31:57 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:32:24 [Ryladog]
- EV: Maybe we did not explain well enough between the full and the quick evaluation - so for people who do not have alot of skills - we should point them to the quick eval
- 15:32:44 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: I agree with you and Vivienne
- 15:32:58 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/reviewteams.html#expertise
- 15:33:06 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: Recommended Expertise
- 15:33:56 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: For carrying out this methodology - use this list -
- 15:34:06 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: This is still open
- 15:34:29 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: It is not really clear what we are suggesting here
- 15:34:57 [Ryladog]
- EV: I will provide information for people with less skills and a link
- 15:35:30 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: Quoted text. Lets check with Shaun.
- 15:35:56 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:35:56 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 15:35:56 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:36:08 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: Basde rwquirements - an evaluator with expertise
- 15:36:35 [Ryladog]
- EV: Section 6.1
- 15:36:56 [Ryladog]
- EV: Here I copied part of the Eval Suite
- 15:37:10 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:37:19 [Ryladog]
- EV: Would this be enough - or do we need to be more specific or provide a link?
- 15:37:26 [vivienne]
- ack me
- 15:38:01 [AmyChen]
- q+
- 15:38:29 [Kathy]
- q+
- 15:38:39 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:38:41 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:38:41 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 15:38:43 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: We wnat to link to other resources but we want people to feel that this is a reource. We should provide guidance on how to include different pefsons with disabilities
- 15:38:45 [AmyChen]
- ack me
- 15:39:14 [Ryladog]
- Amy: I actaully like the section the way it is. I don't think we should use numbers on how or who
- 15:39:24 [Ryladog]
- Amy: Examples might be good
- 15:40:07 [Ryladog]
- Amy: Should the text include "if you don't have the expertise. See here"
- 15:40:13 [Ryladog]
- EV: I agree
- 15:40:31 [Ryladog]
- EV: Skills for evaluator
- 15:40:43 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:40:46 [Kathy]
- ack me
- 15:40:47 [AmyChen]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:40:50 [Zakim]
- AmyChen should now be muted
- 15:40:51 [Ryladog]
- EV: I will try to provide more freindly text
- 15:41:07 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:41:07 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Liz, Shadi (muted), vivienne (muted), Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, ericvelleman, AmyChen (muted), ssirois (muted), houtepen (muted), Kerstin (muted), Wilco
- 15:41:10 [AmyChen]
- q+
- 15:41:11 [Zakim]
- ... (muted), Vincent_ (muted), Tim_Boland (muted)
- 15:41:23 [shadi]
- zakim, drop ssirois
- 15:41:23 [Zakim]
- ssirois is being disconnected
- 15:41:24 [Zakim]
- -ssirois
- 15:41:35 [Ryladog]
- Kathy: Also, good to ask for feedback from current users as well as PWD
- 15:41:51 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:41:59 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:42:00 [shadi]
- q- a
- 15:42:07 [Ryladog]
- Kathy: Explain the more informal process - ask them for their feeedback
- 15:42:13 [vivienne]
- ack me
- 15:42:19 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:42:21 [shadi]
- q+
- 15:42:24 [AmyChen]
- q+
- 15:42:25 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 15:42:30 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:42:32 [ssirois]
- zakim, ??P1 is me
- 15:42:32 [Zakim]
- +ssirois; got it
- 15:42:36 [ssirois]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:42:36 [Zakim]
- ssirois should now be muted
- 15:42:44 [Kathy]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:42:45 [Zakim]
- Kathy should now be muted
- 15:43:02 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: I agree with Amy - newer website ask for feedback from users
- 15:43:09 [AmyChen]
- I think it was Kathy
- 15:43:25 [AmyChen]
- +1 to what Kathy said for me too
- 15:43:37 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: If there is a link do you have suggestions
- 15:43:42 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:43:45 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:43:45 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 15:43:50 [shadi]
- q- v
- 15:43:52 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:44:21 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: linking out to existing resources, how much oveflap do we want
- 15:45:08 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:45:27 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: I think what you have copied is good - the Eval Suite should be suplemental - the most content should be in the spec. I will talk with Shawn about what is best.
- 15:45:46 [Ryladog]
- EV: I had thsat problem when writing this stuff
- 15:46:37 [Ryladog]
- EV: I was unsure about rephrasing text that has already been well thought out. But i think the recommended expertise belongs here
- 15:46:51 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: I understand the dilemma
- 15:47:24 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: Short sentence and then link to resource
- 15:47:48 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: Some amount of overlap may be necessary
- 15:47:49 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:48:03 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:48:03 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 15:48:05 [AmyChen]
- ack me
- 15:48:47 [Ryladog]
- Amy: I agree - lets not repeat what is in other document. We encourage using PWD and then link to resoucres
- 15:49:01 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:49:08 [AmyChen]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:49:08 [Zakim]
- AmyChen should now be muted
- 15:49:52 [Ryladog]
- EV: I have ideas for the text. At least for the first part of Sections - add another subsection as Shadi proposed. Add more direct links
- 15:50:52 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:50:53 [AmyChen]
- q+
- 15:50:56 [Ryladog]
- EV: Lets stop here at Section 6. Review Section 7 if the idea is clear. Anyone have any ideas?
- 15:50:57 [AmyChen]
- ack me
- 15:52:26 [Ryladog]
- Amy: I think it is a hard question - scope for full or partial product
- 15:52:27 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:52:47 [Ryladog]
- EV: In the document we are talking about full websites
- 15:53:04 [Ryladog]
- Amy: One could talk about what has been tested
- 15:53:14 [vivienne]
- ack me
- 15:53:21 [vivienne]
- q+
- 15:53:29 [Ryladog]
- EV: Maybe we should make that division in the document now?
- 15:53:49 [Ryladog]
- EV: Maybe we should discuss later
- 15:54:16 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:54:17 [shadi]
- q+
- 15:54:29 [AmyChen]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:54:29 [Zakim]
- AmyChen should now be muted
- 15:54:49 [Tim]
- q+
- 15:54:49 [shadi]
- q- v
- 15:55:13 [Ryladog]
- Viveinne: are we eval the inernet, intranet, extranet, etc. They will have very different sets of requirements
- 15:55:50 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:55:57 [vivienne]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:55:57 [Zakim]
- vivienne should now be muted
- 15:56:00 [Ryladog]
- Vivienne: Identify the number of levels, whether they are starting from a base URI and going three clicks form thrre etc
- 15:56:00 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:56:31 [AmyChen]
- q+
- 15:57:00 [shadi]
- [[Other target audiences of the Methodology include]] -> [[Other audiences who may benefit from the Methodology include]]
- 15:57:04 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: I think there is a misunderstanding of the scope of the target audience. Maybe we need to change that in Section C
- 15:57:31 [vivienne]
- That sounds better to me, Shadi
- 15:57:40 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: other audiences may benefit from....
- 15:57:44 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:58:20 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: The scope for us is done completed website - not developing websites
- 15:58:24 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:58:24 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 15:58:26 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 15:58:30 [Ryladog]
- EV: That would save us
- 15:58:35 [AmyChen]
- +1 to what Shadi said
- 15:58:40 [Kathy]
- +1
- 15:58:42 [Vincent_]
- +1
- 15:58:45 [vivienne]
- +1
- 15:58:46 [Ryladog]
- +1
- 15:58:47 [kerstin]
- +1 :-)
- 15:58:53 [Tim]
- +1
- 15:59:05 [Tim]
- ack me
- 15:59:25 [shadi]
- q- t
- 15:59:27 [ssirois]
- +1, new proposal is worded more on what i have understood of our agreement
- 15:59:53 [Ryladog]
- Tim: Are we specifically excluding third party content? And, are we excluding open sources?
- 16:00:25 [Ryladog]
- Tim: 1.Are we specifically excluding third party and user-submitted content?
- 16:00:37 [Ryladog]
- Tim: 2> Colaborative content
- 16:00:54 [Wilco]
- q+
- 16:00:58 [Wilco]
- zakin, ack me
- 16:01:02 [Ryladog]
- Tim: Are we going ti include these two ?
- 16:01:11 [shadi]
- zakim, close queue
- 16:01:11 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi, the speaker queue is closed
- 16:01:12 [Ryladog]
- EV: Not excluding
- 16:01:46 [shadi]
- ack me
- 16:01:46 [Ryladog]
- EV: It is something we will have to cover or look to WCAG
- 16:02:28 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: This is a tough question. The website owner has to decide what the evaluation covers
- 16:03:00 [Tim]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:03:02 [Zakim]
- Tim_Boland should now be muted
- 16:03:31 [ericvelleman]
- q?
- 16:03:44 [Ryladog]
- Shadi: The EM will just doicuemnt is this part of the evaluation or not
- 16:03:49 [shadi]
- zakim, mute me
- 16:03:49 [Zakim]
- Shadi should now be muted
- 16:04:01 [AmyChen]
- ack me
- 16:04:02 [Wilco]
- zakim, ack me
- 16:04:02 [Zakim]
- unmuting Wilco
- 16:04:06 [Zakim]
- I see no one on the speaker queue
- 16:04:30 [Ryladog]
- Amy: 1. Otyher target audience. Not intende to be used for prodcuts in developement
- 16:05:21 [Ryladog]
- Amy: 2. Back to Tims question. What we do at Oracle - we own the whole product -
- 16:06:23 [Ryladog]
- Amy: Some third party content we can't controll - if accessible - we just warp it up - if there is a problem - we say that this contnet is not included in our conformance claim
- 16:07:11 [Ryladog]
- Wilco: Must evaluate full website. Different projects with different team. Different report for different teams
- 16:07:47 [vivienne]
- bye now
- 16:07:50 [kerstin]
- thx, bye
- 16:07:51 [Zakim]
- -Tim_Boland
- 16:07:51 [houtepen]
- houtepen has left #eval
- 16:07:52 [Zakim]
- -Kathy
- 16:07:52 [Zakim]
- -Wilco
- 16:07:53 [Ryladog]
- RRSAgent, set logs world-visible
- 16:07:53 [Zakim]
- -ericvelleman
- 16:07:53 [AmyChen]
- thanks everyone, bye!
- 16:07:55 [Zakim]
- -Liz
- 16:07:55 [ssirois]
- bye
- 16:07:56 [ericvelleman]
- ericvelleman has left #eval
- 16:07:58 [vivienne]
- -vivienne
- 16:07:58 [Zakim]
- -houtepen
- 16:08:00 [Kathy]
- bye
- 16:08:02 [Vincent_]
- Bye
- 16:08:02 [vivienne]
- vivienne has left #eval
- 16:08:05 [Ryladog]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 16:08:05 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-eval-minutes.html Ryladog
- 16:08:06 [Zakim]
- -Vincent_
- 16:08:07 [Zakim]
- -Kerstin
- 16:08:08 [Zakim]
- -AmyChen
- 16:08:22 [Zakim]
- -vivienne
- 16:08:31 [Zakim]
- -Katie_Haritos-Shea
- 16:08:52 [ssirois]
- ssirois has left #eval
- 16:09:06 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 16:09:06 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shadi (muted), ssirois (muted)
- 16:09:11 [shadi]
- zakim, drop me
- 16:09:12 [Zakim]
- Shadi is being disconnected
- 16:09:12 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 16:09:17 [shadi]
- zakim, drop s
- 16:09:19 [Zakim]
- ssirois is being disconnected
- 16:09:21 [Zakim]
- WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has ended
- 16:09:24 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.301.975.aaaa, Shadi, Liz, +1.978.443.aabb, vivienne, Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, +31.30.239.aacc, +1.510.522.aadd, AmyChen, ericvelleman, +31.30.239.aaee, ssirois,
- 16:09:28 [Zakim]
- ... houtepen, Kerstin, Wilco, +1.514.312.aaff, Vincent_, Tim_Boland
- 16:09:30 [shadi]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 16:09:30 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 16:09:30 [Zakim]
- sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
- 16:09:31 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 16:09:31 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-eval-minutes.html trackbot
- 16:09:32 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 16:09:32 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items