15:54:54 RRSAgent has joined #rd 15:54:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/03-rd-irc 15:54:56 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:54:58 Zakim, this will be 7394 15:54:58 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()12:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 15:54:59 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 15:54:59 Date: 03 November 2011 15:55:05 Chair: Harper_Simon 15:55:06 Agenda+ Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) 15:55:06 Agenda+ Editors update on submissions and preparations 15:55:06 Agenda+ Look Over New Topic Proposals 15:55:06 Agenda+ Any Other Business 15:55:15 zakim, save agenda 15:55:22 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/03-rd-agenda.rdf 15:55:25 zakim, take up item 1 15:55:25 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from sharper] 15:55:45 regrets+ Conway_Vivienne 15:56:00 regrets+ Kouroupetroglou_Christos 15:56:21 present+ Harper_Simon 15:56:32 present+ Brajnik_Giorgio 15:56:44 present+ Vigo_Markel 15:56:55 present+ Abou-Zahra_Shadi 15:57:09 regrets+ Yesilada_Yeliz 15:57:51 WAI_RDWG()12:00PM has now started 15:57:57 +??P2 15:58:16 zakim, ??p2 is me 15:58:16 +shadi; got it 15:58:19 present+ Batusic_Mario 15:58:35 rrsagent, make logs public 15:58:35 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:58:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/03-rd-minutes.html sharper 15:58:54 shadi has changed the topic to: 16:00:33 Peter has joined #rd 16:01:35 markel has joined #rd 16:01:56 +??P7 16:02:11 can't seem to get in via sip 16:02:12 Zakim, ??P7 is me 16:02:12 +Peter; got it 16:02:19 Zakim, mute me 16:02:19 Peter should now be muted 16:02:41 +Mario-Batusic 16:03:01 +??P6 16:03:18 Zakim, ??P6 is me 16:03:18 +markel; got it 16:03:23 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:03:23 On the phone I see shadi, Peter (muted), Mario-Batusic, markel 16:03:25 Zakim, unmute 16:03:25 I don't understand 'unmute', Peter 16:03:52 +??P8 16:04:05 Zakim, un mute 16:04:05 I don't understand 'un mute', Peter 16:04:11 errr 16:04:23 Zakim, unmute me 16:04:23 Peter should no longer be muted 16:04:34 zakim, ??p8 is mine 16:04:34 +mine; got it 16:05:11 zakim, mine is giorgio 16:05:11 +giorgio; got it 16:05:41 Zakim, mute me 16:05:43 Peter should now be muted 16:06:01 zakim, mute me 16:06:01 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:09:23 sharper: Have you tried turning it off and on again :-) 16:09:44 Let me try a systems reboot - please start without me. 16:10:30 Zakim, scribe peter 16:10:30 I don't understand 'scribe peter', Peter 16:10:32 lol 16:10:34 hmm worth a try 16:10:41 scribe: Peter 16:10:44 ah 16:10:47 got it 16:10:53 agenda? 16:11:08 got it 16:11:13 zakim, take up agendum 1 16:11:13 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from sharper] 16:11:44 not me 16:12:01 zakim, take up next 16:12:01 agendum 1 was just opened, shadi 16:12:04 q+ 16:12:13 zakim, close agendum 1 16:12:13 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, shadi 16:12:21 q- g 16:12:23 zakim, close agendum 1 16:12:24 agendum 1, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), closed 16:12:26 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:12:27 2. Editors update on submissions and preparations [from sharper] 16:12:30 zakim, take up next 16:12:30 agendum 2. "Editors update on submissions and preparations" taken up [from sharper] 16:13:23 giorgio: have received 15 submissions but 2 false submissions ... 16:13:51 1 cancelled the other 2 wrong submissions - leave 12 16:13:55 q+ 16:13:56 submissions ... 16:14:34 I collected all the author information in a spreadsheet and will send to the chairs soon and a list of reviewers... 16:15:08 would like to be clear about issues such as conflict of interest ... 16:15:29 +??P11 16:15:37 will send out a map of submissions ... 16:15:45 it was clear 16:16:00 zakim, ??p11 is Simon 16:16:00 +Simon; got it 16:16:05 sharper has joined #rd 16:16:29 (for scribbing should each line prefix the speaker?) 16:17:22 zakim, minutes? 16:17:22 I don't understand your question, sharper. 16:17:32 rrsagent, pointer? 16:17:32 See http://www.w3.org/2011/11/03-rd-irc#T16-17-32 16:17:42 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:17:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/03-rd-minutes.html shadi 16:18:09 simon: could you give me a summary ... 16:18:24 giorgio: …goes over summary... 16:18:48 zakim, unmute me 16:18:48 Mario-Batusic should no longer be muted 16:18:56 :-) 16:18:57 Need 4 other people for submission for which Markel is the author 16:19:04 do you already have them? 16:19:32 zakim, mute me 16:19:32 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:19:40 Integration of Web Accessibility Metrics into a Semi-Automatic evaluation process 16:19:41 girogio: goes over titles of submissions... 16:19:47 Measuring accessibility barriers on large scale sets of pages 16:19:51 Web Accessibility Metrics - A Continuing Conundrum 16:19:55 A Template-aware Web Accessibility metric 16:19:59 A metrics to make different DTDs documents evaluations comparable 16:20:03 Lexical Quality as an Accessibility Metric for the Textual Web 16:20:06 Attaining Metric Validity and Reliability with the Web Accessibility Quantitative Metric 16:20:10 The case for a WCAG-based evaluation scheme with a graded rating scale 16:20:14 A zero in AChecker means 10 in eXaminator: a comparison between two metrics by their scores 16:20:19 Context-Tailored Web Accessibility Metrics 16:20:24 Web Accessibility Metrics For A Post Digital World 16:20:29 Web Accessibility Metrics For A Post Digital World 16:20:35 Towards a score function for WCAG 2.0 benchmarking 16:20:36 giorgio: they talk bout web accessibility metrics 16:20:55 simon: have you a feel for how well the submissions fit in with the broader aim of the Wiki 16:21:12 giorgio: haven't read the submissions yet 16:21:26 simon: will you handle the admin details of the sumbissions 16:21:39 giorgio: Markel created a reviewing template 16:22:08 markel: I wrote a text file for reviewers and asses quality based on defined criteria from past weeks. 16:22:46 …if a deadline concern because of scheduling (too early vs too late) 16:23:00 …can we schedule another slot 16:23:07 shadi: yes its possible 16:23:13 simon: good idea 16:23:36 (shadi your breaking up) 16:23:41 q+ 16:23:44 simon: wil work on it 16:23:58 …takes 2 to 3 days to setup a phone meeting bridge 16:23:58 q- 16:23:59 ack mar 16:24:19 ack gio 16:24:23 previous scribe line: replace simon with shadi 16:24:34 giorgio: could be a meeting on Wed 9th 16:24:50 …another could be next RD meeting 16:24:54 +1 16:24:57 simon: agrees 16:25:00 +1 16:25:00 zakim, unmute me 16:25:00 Mario-Batusic should no longer be muted 16:25:09 sure 16:25:11 q+ 16:25:19 zakim, mute me 16:25:19 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:25:24 simon: going out on txt file but how will coordinate? 16:25:37 …will be some kind of wiki or doc? 16:26:07 markel: initially email with template and then reviewers have to send back to group 16:26:25 simon: ok for now, perhaps open conf in the future 16:26:36 shadi has joined #rd 16:26:41 q+ 16:26:50 giorgio: would have been great to have an electronic system in place but the overhead was too much for now. 16:26:55 …email should work 16:27:29 …we have 12 papers and reviewed at least 3 times … (lots of work to do :) 16:27:42 …used this criteria so chairs get some work 16:27:56 …goes over details of who's doing what... 16:28:06 ….waiting on your feedback 16:28:11 simon: sounds good 16:28:19 …next time sort something out in advance 16:28:27 …what about length of reviews? 16:28:49 …writing an in-depth review might be rough 16:29:22 giorgio: not much reason for a detailed review because quite a short paper 16:29:28 markel: agrees 16:29:32 ack gio 16:29:45 markel: I would be able to put template on irc 16:29:57 simon: sounds good 16:30:04 Paper title: 16:30:04 Authors: 16:30:05 _______________________________ 16:30:05 Paper review: 16:30:07 _______________________________ 16:30:08 Mark with an X how the paper satisfies the following criteria. You can find the definition of the criteria at http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Paper_Selection_Criteria: 16:30:09 1. Relevance/appropriateness 16:30:10 [ ] disagree 16:30:12 [ ] mild disagreement 16:30:13 [ ] neutral 16:30:15 [ ] mild agreement 16:30:18 [ ] agreement 16:30:19 2. Contribution/significance 16:30:21 [ ] disagree 16:30:23 [ ] mild disagreement 16:30:26 [ ] neutral 16:30:27 [ ] mild agreement 16:30:30 [ ] agreement 16:30:32 3. Clarity/presentation 16:30:34 [ ] disagree 16:30:35 [ ] mild disagreement 16:30:37 yes simon 16:30:38 [ ] neutral 16:30:40 [ ] mild agreement 16:30:40 zakim unmute mario 16:30:42 [ ] agreement 16:30:43 4. Soundness/correctness 16:30:45 zakim, unmute mario 16:30:45 Mario-Batusic should no longer be muted 16:30:45 [ ] disagree 16:30:47 [ ] mild disagreement 16:30:50 [ ] neutral 16:30:52 [ ] mild agreement 16:30:54 [ ] agreement 16:30:56 5. Impact 16:30:58 [ ] disagree 16:30:58 mario: time is too short to make system but we could use open conf system 16:30:59 Joshue108 has joined #rd 16:31:00 [ ] mild disagreement 16:31:02 [ ] neutral 16:31:03 [ ] mild agreement 16:31:04 ack mar 16:31:06 [ ] agreement 16:31:06 …used in CSUN and works well 16:31:07 Apologies! 16:31:08 6. Generality of results and claims 16:31:09 [ ] disagree 16:31:11 [ ] mild disagreement 16:31:13 [ ] neutral 16:31:15 [ ] mild agreement 16:31:17 [ ] agreement 16:31:19 7. Relation to other work 16:31:21 [ ] disagree 16:31:23 [ ] mild disagreement 16:31:26 [ ] neutral 16:31:27 q+ 16:31:27 [ ] mild agreement 16:31:30 [ ] agreement 16:31:32 OVERALL RECOMMENDATION 16:31:34 [ ] Accept 16:31:36 [ ] Accept with minor revisions 16:31:38 [ ] Reject 16:31:47 I got caught up and missed meeting... 16:31:52 simon: it works well and has a fast setup period and also know Robert at open conf and could help us out 16:32:02 q+ 16:32:15 ack shadi 16:32:23 zakim, mute me 16:32:23 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:32:36 shadi: put me in contact with Robert for details on how 16:32:49 …mario had warned me about using a conf system 16:33:08 …the submission was not going well with read access and confidentiallity 16:33:14 simon: I'll do that 16:33:21 ack mark 16:33:36 markel: agrees about open conf 16:33:51 …but lets leave it for the next time 16:34:24 q+ 16:34:31 q+ 16:34:36 simon: pleased with the submissions and since a very specific call this is encouraging that people wanted to write these papers and send them to us 16:34:45 … encouraging for future submissions 16:34:49 zakim, unmute 16:34:49 I don't understand 'unmute', Mario-Batusic 16:35:08 (Zakim, unmute me) 16:35:11 zakim, unmute mario 16:35:11 Mario-Batusic should no longer be muted 16:35:11 ack mario 16:35:15 zakim, unmute me 16:35:15 Mario-Batusic was not muted, Mario-Batusic 16:35:34 mario: if 12 submissions are ok is it possible to hear them all in symposium? 16:35:40 q+ 16:35:43 q+ 16:35:45 simon: that would be my feeling but not sure what editors think? 16:35:48 q- later 16:35:57 ack gi 16:36:01 giorgio: yes I think we could accept all of them 16:36:11 …no more than 10 minutes each 16:36:24 …I would review them anyway with criteria 16:36:44 …to use as a filter 16:36:50 mario: wanted to know if have enough time 16:37:03 zakim, unmute me 16:37:03 Mario-Batusic was not muted, Mario-Batusic 16:37:04 simon: think will have enough time or make time 16:37:08 zakim, mute me 16:37:08 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:37:19 simon: even if run out of time still accept them if possible 16:37:20 ack mar 16:37:38 markel: I think we have more than enough time but we shouldn't accept anything 16:37:47 I agree with markel 16:37:50 …lets be cautious based on minimal quality 16:37:57 simon: agrees 16:38:14 …encouraged because I know a lot of the authors 16:38:21 ack shadi 16:38:45 shadi: on the positive note, is at W3C planning meeting, and has been approached by 16:39:01 …technical planery meeting 16:39:10 …approached by 2 or 3 people that wanted to write a paper 16:39:25 simon: talk of RD there? 16:39:30 i'm lost, to write a paper about what? 16:39:37 shadi: has been promoting it and an agenda update 16:39:59 q+ 16:40:00 …even though a focussed call still received attention and suspect people willow ant to listen in on the symposium 16:40:09 simon: can only get better 16:40:11 ack mar 16:40:33 markel: more details about who approached you shadi 16:40:52 shadi: interested in subject and wanted to write a paper but ran out of paper 16:41:07 q+ 16:41:09 yup 16:41:13 ack gio 16:41:27 giorgio: should we decide on names of additional reviewers? 16:41:35 simon: trust you guys to decide on editors 16:41:42 shadi: are they outside group? 16:41:46 giorgio: yes 16:42:07 shadi: we want to recognize them and give credit 16:42:26 giorgio: if we want to be clear about conflict of interest it would be better if Markel wouldn't know 16:42:30 simon: agrees 16:42:46 …can give credit in note 16:42:54 q+ 16:43:01 ack mario 16:43:02 zakim, unmute me 16:43:05 Mario-Batusic was not muted, Mario-Batusic 16:43:15 mario: would appreciate to be among regular reviewers 16:43:19 giorgio: yes 16:43:36 zakim, mute me 16:43:36 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:43:44 (should I put a command in for that?) 16:43:57 zakim, take up next 16:43:57 agendum 3. "Look Over New Topic Proposals" taken up [from sharper] 16:44:04 (ah ok) 16:44:20 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki 16:44:34 shadi: want to say something about new topics on wiki? 16:44:43 scribe: shadi replace with simon 16:45:09 that sounds good 16:45:10 shadi: would like to report on discussion with (missed who) and working on markup languages 16:45:18 simon: is on wiki? 16:45:27 shadi: no discussion was yesterday 16:45:38 …3v web consortium 16:45:47 3D 16:45:53 (oh sorry :) 16:46:07 Is it this one? http://www.web3d.org/realtime-3d/ 16:46:07 …they've been working on accessibility of 3D stuff 16:46:33 shadi: suggest have one of 3D join us as a guest on upcoming call 16:46:39 that'd be great 16:46:42 …to introduce work for potential interest 16:46:52 simon: yes and could they add to our wiki? 16:47:06 …could suggest research work 16:47:18 …as opose to a suggestion 16:47:35 shadi: yes am following up on proposal and putting up generic research topics 16:47:42 …they also have a topic for a symposium 16:48:00 …why would like to have them join in as a guest to introduce topic(s) 16:48:07 …3D and virtual reality stuff 16:48:16 (lost a bit) 16:48:27 …and are very aware of accessibility and want to get invovled 16:48:37 simon: sounds good 16:48:49 …especially if they already have some ideas 16:49:05 …especially if they could put something on the wiki to reference while they're talking 16:49:32 simon:9 new topics on wiki 16:49:45 …do we want to create a survey? 16:49:51 …any that look interesting 16:49:59 CSS3 perhas 16:50:02 perhaps 16:50:07 but its perhaps too rough 16:50:13 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/wiki/CSS/Spec_Review 16:50:26 simon: perhaps and touch events 16:50:36 …accessibility security 16:50:39 12http://www.w3.org/community/cssacc/ 16:50:59 …css accessibility community group and liaison with them might be interesting 16:51:17 …Steve Falkner is doing a lot of the CSS3 work 16:51:32 simon: ok to move on? 16:51:41 markel: are we running a survey? 16:51:53 …agree with shadi perhaps too cold 16:52:00 …can use next thursday? 16:52:10 simon: thing about survey is that last time it got things going 16:52:36 …it would go off to entire list an non-attendees could respond 16:52:58 simon: next thursday is reserved for scientific community? 16:53:07 markel: yes 16:53:11 giorgio: yes 16:53:17 ?mario:yes? 16:53:28 simon: goes over submission details 16:53:41 …then return to wiki discussion 16:53:47 markel: sounds good 16:53:49 +1 16:53:51 yes 16:53:51 +1 16:53:53 simon: everyone happy? 16:53:54 sure 16:53:54 +1 16:54:12 simon: will send out an email for the scientific committee 16:54:25 …could someone send me a list of the scientific ... 16:54:32 giorgio: is in call for paper 16:54:41 …somewhere in wiki 16:54:43 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/cfp.html 16:55:05 simon: will add one more to list - mario 16:55:30 simon: will send this out … 12 submissions … list of titles ... 16:55:34 q+ 16:55:52 giogrio: note sure what to do with 12 submissions 16:56:01 simon: will put titles of submissions in email 16:56:06 …more of an advertising thing 16:56:34 q+ 16:56:38 …reaching out to list to try to get participation from large companies 16:56:43 ack giorgio 16:56:45 giorgio: breaking confidentiality? 16:56:50 …making public 16:56:58 i would only announce the accepted ones 16:57:03 simon:topics on agenda anyways so is public already 16:57:09 q+ 16:57:15 simon: will think about it 16:57:21 zakim, unmute me 16:57:21 Mario-Batusic should no longer be muted 16:57:24 giorgio: details about paper not public 16:57:32 simon: titles are public 16:57:38 oh yeah 16:57:41 …in munutes 16:57:42 i did that 16:57:49 ack mario 16:57:52 mario: submissions shouldn't be public before accepted 16:58:00 simon: public in IRC 16:58:03 .minutes 16:58:09 markel: sorry yes 16:58:30 shadi: (will take them off the minutes) 16:58:50 …are planning to make 17 nov announcement when agenda ready 16:59:08 …here are the accepted papers addition participants are welcome to participate by phone 16:59:11 zakim, mute me 16:59:11 Mario-Batusic should now be muted 16:59:12 (lost rest) 16:59:28 good 16:59:31 simon: if will remove titles from minutes then don't need in email 17:00:00 bye 17:00:04 cool 17:00:04 cheers :) 17:00:05 bye! 17:00:14 thanks Peter! 17:00:16 (np was fun would be happy to scribe more in the future) 17:00:17 bye 17:00:22 thanks and bye 17:00:25 -shadi 17:00:27 markel has left #rd 17:00:31 -markel 17:00:33 -giorgio 17:00:39 shadi are you OK to sort the minutes out 17:00:50 -Mario-Batusic 17:01:00 -Simon 17:03:08 -Peter 17:03:09 WAI_RDWG()12:00PM has ended 17:03:10 Attendees were shadi, Peter, Mario-Batusic, markel, giorgio, Simon 17:03:12 zakim, list attendees 17:03:12 sorry, shadi, I don't know what conference this is 17:03:18 zakim, who is on the phone? 17:03:18 apparently WAI_RDWG()12:00PM has ended, shadi 17:03:19 On IRC I see shadi, sharper, RRSAgent, Zakim, Mario-Batusic, Joshue, Mate, nonge_, trackbot 17:03:28 trackbot, end meeting 17:03:28 Zakim, list attendees 17:03:28 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 17:03:29 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:03:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/03-rd-minutes.html trackbot 17:03:30 RRSAgent, bye 17:03:30 I see no action items 17:03:33 zakim, bye 17:03:33 Zakim has left #rd