16:54:21 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 16:54:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/09/29-tagmem-irc 16:54:22 JeniT has joined #tagmem 16:54:41 zakim, this will be tag 16:54:41 ok, plinss; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 16:54:54 trackbot, start telcon 16:54:56 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:54:58 Zakim, this will be TAG 16:54:58 ok, trackbot; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 16:54:59 Meeting: Technical Architecture Group Teleconference 16:54:59 Date: 29 September 2011 16:58:47 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started 16:58:52 ht has joined #tagmem 16:58:53 +Masinter 16:59:06 +DKA 16:59:20 +??P10 16:59:28 Zakim, ??P10 is me 16:59:30 +JeniT; got it 16:59:49 +plinss 17:00:22 +??P13 17:00:31 +Jonathan_Rees 17:00:32 noah has joined #tagmem 17:02:12 +TimBL 17:03:19 +Yves 17:03:38 Noah, wassup? 17:03:43 +Noah_Mendelsohn 17:04:03 zakim, Noah_Mendelsohn is me 17:04:03 +noah; got it 17:04:16 Zakim, call Noah_Mendelsohn 17:04:16 I am sorry, timbl; I do not know a number for Noah_Mendelsohn 17:05:07 Regrets: Ashok 17:05:11 zakim, who is here? 17:05:11 On the phone I see Masinter, DKA, JeniT, plinss, ht, Jonathan_Rees, TimBL, Yves, noah 17:05:14 On IRC I see noah, ht, JeniT, RRSAgent, Zakim, Larry, jar, trackbot, timbl, plinss, Yves 17:06:13 I have read them, and there are errors 17:06:34 oh wait, i did look at one and saw an error i wanted to fix 17:06:38 I have only looked at a tiny bit 17:07:23 NM: Putting off approval of F2F minutes until next week 17:07:27 scribenick: noah 17:07:35 DKA has joined #tagmem 17:07:46 Scribe: Dan 17:07:49 ScribeNick: DKA 17:08:06 Noah: propose a resolution that the TAG will meet in south of France 2-4 april. 17:08:07 RESOLUTION: the TAG will meet in South of France 2-4 April 2012 hosted by Yves 17:08:08 +1 17:08:19 +1 17:08:42 NM: Meet in Sophia? 17:08:45 Noah: We will meet at Sofia? 17:08:46 YL: Most probably 17:08:51 +1 17:08:51 Yves: most probably yes. 17:09:10 Thank you YL for offering 17:09:13 Noah: Other meeting we need to discuss: TPAC. 17:09:30 noah: Ashok has announced the draft on application state. 17:09:37 ACTION-596? 17:09:37 ACTION-596 -- Jonathan Rees to copy edit the finding on application state Due: 2011-09-21 -- due 2011-09-20 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:09:37 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/596 17:09:45 close ACTION-596 17:09:45 ACTION-596 Copy edit the finding on application state Due: 2011-09-21 closed 17:09:48 Noah: in relation to that action-596. Any objection to close? 17:10:24 Noah: for those who don't follow public html/xml list, check the public list... 17:10:33 scribenick: DKA 17:10:47 Noah: Admin items complete... 17:11:51 Topic: TPAC 17:12:04 Noah: who's coming? 17:12:06 I am 17:12:07 I'm coming. 17:12:08 I am not 17:12:09 I am 17:12:11 Ht: Yes. 17:12:13 I am not 17:12:16 i will be at TPAC 17:13:39 Noah: Do we want phone or flip charts? Default is no. 17:14:18 Noah: I am working with Ian to encourage the community to nominate candidates for the upcoming TAG election. There is a proposal for a breakout session on the TAG. 17:15:11 HT: possibly better to break up into different sessions and have a BoF at launch. 17:15:21 Right, Larry, from the F2F minutes: "larry: suggest presentation to AC about TAG priorities and ask for feedback" 17:16:08 Noah: The proposal is to not do a breakout but do a BoF. 17:16:13 +1 to that 17:16:24 The W3C in general gets feedback from the community about priorities, so during TPAC plenary day, it twasn't as important for the TAG to meet 17:16:31 Ht: It would be appropriate for you [noah] to send mail to Ian suggesting that. 17:17:45 Noah: My impression is that the AC agenda is locked down... 17:18:06 I think a dinner discussion about TAG priorities and suggests would be fine 17:18:58 . ACTION: Noah to respond to Ian suggesting a BOF but not a breakout on TAG focus, and ask again about dinner. 17:19:28 give Ian more choices of things we might do, collectively or individually, to get more feedback from AC members who don't normally talk to us 17:19:30 ACTION: Noah to respond to Ian suggesting a BOF but not a breakout on TAG focus, and ask again about dinner. 17:19:31 Created ACTION-612 - Respond to Ian suggesting a BOF but not a breakout on TAG focus, and ask again about dinner. [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-10-06]. 17:19:56 Noah: 2 more things related to copyright and deep linking, suggested by DKA. 17:20:21 Noah: First you suggested we have discussion of copyright and deep linking, second you suggested inviting Rigo to join us on Friday. 17:20:54 DKA: The first proposal was to do a breakout on copyright and linking 17:21:03 NM: You willing to organize it 17:21:12 DKA: Yes, but this week is bad. 17:22:02 ACTION: Appelquist to organize deep linking breakout at TPAC 17:22:03 Created ACTION-613 - Organize deep linking breakout at TPAC [on Daniel Appelquist - due 2011-10-06]. 17:22:32 Topic: Microdata and RDFA 17:22:40 Email from Thomas Roessler: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Sep/0026.html 17:23:00 "Based on private consultations of the W3C Team with interested parties, and the community feedback and reactions we got, we concluded that the most productive course of action at this point is to analyze and clarify the relationship between the two formats from a purely technical perspective. 17:23:00 We have therefore proposed an HTML Data Task Force to the Semantic Web Interest Group (SWIG), with the following charter:" 17:23:27 timbl__ has joined #tagmem 17:23:35 http://www.w3.org/wiki/Html-data-tf 17:23:50 Noah: open the floor for discussion on this topic - are we happy with this proposal? 17:24:06 Noah: and then I believe we don't have any open actions on this topic - are we happy with that? 17:24:58 Ht: Anyone know - any existing members of SWIG are on the micoformats side of the [issue]? 17:25:30 I have no trouble with the task force itself, but rather the apparent idea that the task force chartered owuld satisfied the TAG's feedback to the HTML working group about their producing two overlapping specs. 17:25:57 More from TLR's email: "At the same time, we have proposed another SWIG Task Force devoted to practical issues around data schemas for large-scale use in the public Web, the Web Schemas task force:" 17:26:14 ack next 17:26:17 Jeni: One of the concerns I had of making the taskforce of the SWIG - the membership of the task force should not be limited to members of SWIG. The other task force proposed in that email - that is very definitely open to all sorts of people. SWIG has traditionally been an RDF places but that doesn't necesarilly limit membership of these task forces. 17:26:40 Yves: the fact that it is attached to SWIG is mostly administrative. The task force is pretty much disconnected from SWIG. 17:26:46 Do we have any early reading of who will get involved? 17:26:53 Larry: Why wasn't the link to the HTML working group? 17:26:57 s/of who/on who/ 17:27:02 Yves: because it was easier maybe? 17:27:03 q? 17:27:24 Jeni: If it was attached to the HTML working group then I believe that the participants would all have to be members of the html working group. 17:27:26 ok 17:30:21 q? 17:30:41 q+ to repeat what i typed earlier 17:30:52 ack next 17:30:53 Larry, you wanted to repeat what i typed earlier 17:30:57 Noah: What I'm hearing is we've had useful discussion but implicitly the TAG is not asking for changes at this point. 17:31:21 Larry: I'm happy with the task force but wanted to be clear that establishing the task force doesn't address our original concerns to the HTML wg. 17:31:34 Noah: We've raised bugs and those bugs remain unresolved. 17:31:53 Noah: having discussed this, the TAG is not going to do anything at this point. 17:32:51 Noah: having verified there are no actions, what is our comfort level with this? 17:33:15 Jeni: If it helps you with tracking, why not give me an action to report back on progress in a month? 17:33:57 ACTION: Jeni to report on progress relating to RDFa and Microdata Due 2011-10-27 17:33:57 Created ACTION-614 - Report on progress relating to RDFa and Microdata Due 2011-10-27 [on Jeni Tennison - due 2011-10-06]. 17:34:19 Topic: SPDY 17:35:21 Noah: SPDY is a google proposal to be more aggressive in multiplexing http - but it changes http. It opens a single session and more aggressively interleaves, and tends to do this over SSL. 17:35:29 What's the relationship between SPDY and WebSockets? 17:35:56 Noah: I've linked some of the discussion from the agenda. We've heard from Jim Gettys about buffer bloat [this could be related]... 17:36:27 Noah: SPDY is like http 1.2 - it is the protocol that the browser would use when you click on a link. Websockets is the protocol used only by javascript. 17:36:29 HTTP-NG was an earlier W3C effort, certainly in scope for W3C to encourage more standards work here 17:36:42 It's worth noting that SPDY is apparently used between the device and cloud in Amazon Silk 17:36:51 Yves: SPDY still has the request-response model. 17:37:07 Yves: it's a profile of http. There are some things removed for efficiency. 17:37:15 Noah: It has content type and response codes... 17:37:17 Yves: yes. 17:37:57 Noah: a firefox implementation might push adoption... 17:38:16 s/a firefox/the recent availability of a Firefox/ 17:39:20 DKA: Is the track of this somewhat like Gears, which had a proprietary implementation, and then was replaced by something related but different in the standards? 17:39:35 -DKA 17:39:39 zakim, mute DKA 17:39:39 sorry, noah, I do not know which phone connection belongs to DKA 17:39:45 zakim, who is talking? 17:39:56 noah, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ht (100%), Jonathan_Rees (37%), noah (4%), Yves (74%) 17:40:07 +DKA 17:40:08 Zakim, mute ht 17:40:08 ht should now be muted 17:40:08 zakim, mute ht 17:40:10 ht should now be muted 17:40:39 Yves: some people have asked Google to release SPDY as an internet draft. But as of now there is no submission to the IETF. 17:41:37 My impression was that SPDY is already in use between chrome and Google servers? 17:41:44 larry, yes it is 17:41:55 Noah: SPDY is intened to be usable by all web traffic... 17:41:57 and that Google is responsible for 5% of internet traffic? 17:42:05 Noah: Does anyone know - is it in the firefox base? 17:42:12 maybe more now 17:42:12 Jeni: I think it was just experimental. 17:42:34 Noah: At the very least the TAG [should keep tabs on it] 17:42:35 The blog post about the Firefox immplementation does not mention it being available at all 17:42:48 q+ to talk about what the TAG might do 17:42:52 Noah: this is pretty fundamental to what the Web is. 17:42:54 ack next 17:42:55 Larry, you wanted to talk about what the TAG might do 17:43:09 Larry: we could invite someone to come talk to us about SPDY and the requirements it's trying to satisfy. 17:43:28 Hmm..at least many of us will be in Santa Clara 17:43:29 ... I don't think we want to interfere with it. It's more that w3c could be more on top of [the topic]. 17:43:30 +1 17:43:47 Noah: Where are the folks doing SPDY located? Some of us will be in santa clara pretty soon. 17:43:50 Yves: I can check. 17:44:09 Noah: Should we go further and see if we can get some of them to join us monday morning at TPAC? 17:44:10 +1 17:44:18 +1 17:44:24 this is something W3C tried to do 10 years ago, and it's great they're doing work here 17:44:38 +1 17:44:38 q+1 17:44:53 s/q// 17:45:02 Dan: I do think we should be paying attention to this. 17:45:08 I take it back -- McManus includes a link to a patch file in his blog post 17:45:47 ACTION: Yves to check on possible meeting with SPDY folks on 31 Oct at TPAC 17:45:47 Created ACTION-615 - Check on possible meeting with SPDY folks on 31 Oct at TPAC [on Yves Lafon - due 2011-10-06]. 17:46:19 The blog post mentions presentations by Google to IETF 17:46:24 Noah: Propose to wrap up on SPDY. 17:46:39 Topic: overdue actions 17:47:03 ACTION-528? 17:47:03 ACTION-528 -- Henry Thompson to create and get consensus on a product page and tracker product page for persistence of names -- due 2011-08-10 -- OPEN 17:47:03 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/528 17:47:46 ACTION-477? 17:47:46 ACTION-477 -- Henry Thompson to organize meeting on persistence of domains -- due 2011-08-10 -- OPEN 17:47:46 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/477 17:47:59 HT: I'm meeting with the person who has to agree to the workshop tomorrow. 17:48:01 HT: Prefer to do ACTION-528 after ACTION-477 17:48:22 ACTION-477 Due 2011-10-04 17:48:22 ACTION-477 Organize meeting on persistence of domains due date now 2011-10-04 17:48:28 ACTION-528 Due 2011-10-04 17:48:28 ACTION-528 Create and get consensus on a product page and tracker product page for persistence of names due date now 2011-10-04 17:48:39 ACTION-547? 17:48:40 ACTION-547 -- Daniel Appelquist to ask on www-tag and Web Apps mailing lists for advice on moving forward with http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/APIMinimization.html -- due 2011-05-17 -- OPEN 17:48:40 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/547 17:48:58 DKA: I think this is done. 17:49:07 NM: Remind me, where did we leave this after F2F? 17:49:17 DKA: This was pre-f2f, but I did reach out to people. 17:49:36 close ACTION-547 17:49:37 ACTION-547 Ask on www-tag and Web Apps mailing lists for advice on moving forward with http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/APIMinimization.html closed 17:49:49 ACTION-537? 17:49:49 ACTION-537 -- Daniel Appelquist to reach out to Web apps chair to solicit help on framing architecture (incluing terminology, good practice) relating to interaction -- due 2011-07-15 -- OPEN 17:49:49 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/537 17:50:39 DKA: Reached out, got no feedback. Not sure what to do. 17:51:02 ACTION-537 Pending Review 17:51:49 ACTION-566? 17:51:49 ACTION-566 -- Daniel Appelquist to contact Alissa Cooper, organize a future joint discussion on privacy with IAB. -- due 2011-07-19 -- OPEN 17:51:49 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/566 17:52:30 DKA: Got various unclear feedback on this...not quite sure how to proceed 17:53:06 ACTION-566 Pending Review 17:54:11 ACTION-604? 17:54:11 ACTION-604 -- Daniel Appelquist to propose TPAC breakout on copyright and linking -- due 2011-09-27 -- OPEN 17:54:11 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/604 17:54:19 ACTION-613? 17:54:19 ACTION-613 -- Daniel Appelquist to organize deep linking breakout at TPAC -- due 2011-10-06 -- OPEN 17:54:19 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/613 17:54:49 close ACTION-604 17:54:49 ACTION-604 Propose TPAC breakout on copyright and linking closed 17:55:00 ACTION-544? 17:55:00 ACTION-544 -- Daniel Appelquist to propose TAG input, if any, to possible workshop on packaged Web apps -- due 2011-08-01 -- OPEN 17:55:00 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/544 17:55:24 NM: Is this the post-TPAC workshop 17:55:26 DKA: Yes. 17:55:46 NM: I'm attending, but not bringing any particular TAG story. 17:55:56 DKA: I think we said at F2F that TAG didn't need a TAG mission statement. 17:56:01 close ACTION-544 17:56:01 ACTION-544 Propose TAG input, if any, to possible workshop on packaged Web apps closed 17:56:33 ACTION-480? 17:56:33 ACTION-480 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft overview document framing Web applications as opposed to traditional Web of documents -- due 2011-07-05 -- OPEN 17:56:33 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/480 18:00:07 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/480/edit 18:00:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/postponed 18:02:19 ACTION-280 Due 2011-03-20 18:02:19 ACTION-280 (with John K) to enumerate some CSRF scenarios discussed in Jun in Cambridge due date now 2011-03-20 18:02:39 ACTION-514? 18:02:39 ACTION-514 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft finding on API minimization -- due 2011-07-12 -- OPEN 18:02:39 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514 18:03:48 ACTION-514 Due 2011-10-11 18:03:48 ACTION-514 Draft finding on API minimization due date now 2011-10-11 18:04:03 ACTION-537? 18:04:03 ACTION-537 -- Daniel Appelquist to reach out to Web apps chair to solicit help on framing architecture (incluing terminology, good practice) relating to interaction -- due 2011-07-15 -- OPEN 18:04:03 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/537 18:04:30 ACTION-480? 18:04:30 ACTION-480 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft overview document framing Web applications as opposed to traditional Web of documents -- due 2011-07-05 -- OPEN 18:04:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/480 18:05:49 topic: Pending Review Actions 18:06:20 ACTION-350? 18:06:20 ACTION-350 -- Henry Thompson to revise http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Oct/0075.html based on feedback on www-tag and the feedback from TAG f2f 2009-12-09 discussion -- due 2011-08-10 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:06:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/350 18:06:51 close ACTION-350 18:06:51 ACTION-350 Revise http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Oct/0075.html based on feedback on www-tag and the feedback from TAG f2f 2009-12-09 discussion closed 18:06:58 HT: I just ran out of time for 350 18:08:32 Noah: larry is this something you want to spend time on? 18:08:49 Larry: is there something we can do to publish this as a note if not a finding? 18:10:23 Noah: looking at the record, there was pretty substantial discussion following henry's email. We should decide whether we want to push this forward or not. Volunteers? 18:11:08 Noah: the context for this - where were specifications, e.g xml schema... 18:11:44 Noah: there were working groups that were trying to make references to other specs... 18:12:08 ... if we get back to this we want to be careful about keeping to that scope. This is about telling people who write specs what good practices are. 18:12:17 what remains to be done? 18:13:08 Larry: assign the action to me. 18:13:14 Assigning ACTION-350 to Larry 18:15:04 ACTION-508? 18:15:04 ACTION-508 -- Larry Masinter to draft proposed bug report against HTML5 media type registration regarding interpretation of fragid in HTML-based AJAX apps -- due 2011-07-19 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:15:04 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/508 18:15:15 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13257 18:15:15 submitted as a bug, please comment on the bug if you have more to say 18:15:34 Noah: I think we can close this action. Larry? 18:15:48 -plinss 18:15:50 -ht 18:16:01 close ACTION-508 18:16:01 ACTION-508 Draft proposed bug report against HTML5 media type registration regarding interpretation of fragid in HTML-based AJAX apps closed 18:16:09 +plinss 18:16:12 ACTION-509? 18:16:12 ACTION-509 -- Jonathan Rees to communicate with RDFa WG regarding documenting the fragid / media type issue -- due 2011-09-15 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:16:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/509 18:16:47 JAR: I can't do anything else on this. So i set it pending review. 18:16:53 Noah: should we bump the date? 18:17:06 JAR: we have to have discussion or someone has to do more analysis or something... 18:17:24 Noah: We should schedule some telcon discussion? 18:17:26 JAR: Yes. 18:18:53 ACTION-539? 18:18:53 ACTION-539 -- Larry Masinter to coordinate with Thomas Roessler about the registries issue background -- due 2011-03-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:18:53 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/539 18:19:17 LM: Overtaken 18:19:25 close ACTION-539 18:19:25 ACTION-539 Coordinate with Thomas Roessler about the registries issue background closed 18:19:36 action-549? 18:19:36 ACTION-549 -- Larry Masinter to (with help from Henry and Yves) make proposals for topics to be pursued with IAB -- due 2011-06-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:19:36 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/549 18:19:53 "the topics were proposed, the meeting happened, this action is done 18:19:53 Larry Masinter, 14 Jul 2011, 17:56:48" 18:20:07 close ACTION-549 18:20:08 ACTION-549 (with help from Henry and Yves) make proposals for topics to be pursued with IAB closed 18:20:24 ACTION-568? 18:20:24 ACTION-568 -- Noah Mendelsohn to draft note for Jeff Jaffe listing 5 top TAG priorities as trackable items. -- due 2011-07-26 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:20:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/568 18:20:28 Noah: I believe I have an action to talk to our liaisons about participation in upcoming IETF meetings. 18:20:56 Reopening, bumping due date 18:21:00 ACTION-568? 18:21:00 ACTION-568 -- Noah Mendelsohn to draft note for Jeff Jaffe listing 5 top TAG priorities as trackable items. -- due 2011-10-11 -- OPEN 18:21:00 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/568 18:21:14 ACTION-572? 18:21:14 ACTION-572 -- Yves Lafon to look at appcache in HTML5 -- due 2011-07-29 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:21:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/572 18:21:37 Comments say: "Discuss when Dan is avaialble, but not at F2F. Marking PENDING REVIEW per discussion on 11 Aug 2011" 18:22:35 ACTION-572? 18:22:36 ACTION-572 -- Yves Lafon to look at appcache in HTML5 -- due 2011-10-04 -- OPEN 18:22:36 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/572 18:22:59 ACTION-580? 18:22:59 ACTION-580 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule discussion (on 4 Aug 2011) of resonses to TAG concerns expressed under ACTION-510, e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0364.html -- due 2011-08-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:22:59 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/580 18:23:21 I did it. 18:23:26 close ACTION-580 18:23:26 ACTION-580 Schedule discussion (on 4 Aug 2011) of resonses to TAG concerns expressed under ACTION-510, e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0364.html closed 18:23:37 ACTION-584? 18:23:37 ACTION-584 -- Noah Mendelsohn to ask Norm to participate in next TAG call regarding clarifying what the TAG wants out of the task force. -- due 2011-08-30 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:23:37 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/584 18:23:43 close ACTION-584 18:23:43 ACTION-584 Ask Norm to participate in next TAG call regarding clarifying what the TAG wants out of the task force. closed 18:23:51 ACTION-585? 18:23:51 ACTION-585 -- Larry Masinter to meet with Yves prior to the IETF document to review this draft-freed-media-type-regs-00. -- due 2011-07-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:23:51 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/585 18:24:17 "Will tee up draft-freed-media-type-reg as another MIME and Web document for TAG to review." 18:24:29 close ACTION-585? 18:24:50 i only set things "pending revie" if think they can be closed 18:25:23 Noah: 3/4 of these overdue actions we could deal with if people would deal with their own actions... so please review your actions in the future. 18:26:17 Noah: Ajourned. 18:26:18 -noah 18:26:20 thanks! 18:26:21 -Jonathan_Rees 18:26:23 -plinss 18:26:23 -Yves 18:26:29 -DKA 18:26:32 -JeniT 18:26:35 rrsagent, make minutes 18:26:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/09/29-tagmem-minutes.html DKA 18:26:53 rrsagent, make logs public 18:27:07 -TimBL 18:35:00 disconnecting the lone participant, Masinter, in TAG_Weekly()1:00PM 18:35:04 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:35:06 Attendees were Masinter, DKA, JeniT, plinss, ht, Jonathan_Rees, TimBL, Yves, noah 20:10:39 timbl_ has joined #tagmem 20:17:20 timbl has joined #tagmem 20:36:03 Zakim has left #tagmem 21:15:09 ht has left #tagmem 21:15:27 ht has joined #tagmem