12:27:26 RRSAgent has joined #er 12:27:26 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/09/07-er-irc 12:27:28 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:27:28 Zakim has joined #er 12:27:30 Zakim, this will be 3794 12:27:30 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot 12:27:31 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 12:27:31 Date: 07 September 2011 12:28:59 agenda+ Welcome 12:28:59 agenda+ Continue processing comments 12:28:59 agenda+ Upcoming meeting schedule 12:29:41 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Sep/0001.html 12:29:44 chair: Shadi 12:29:44 cstrobbe has joined #er 12:29:50 regrets: Kostas 12:31:15 zakim, call shadi-617 12:31:15 sorry, shadi, I don't know what conference this is 12:31:30 zakim, this will be ert 12:31:30 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, shadi 12:31:44 zakim, list conferences 12:31:44 I see Team_(w3m)12:08Z active 12:31:45 also scheduled at this time are Team_(mediaann)08:07Z, Team_(w3m)12:05Z 12:33:01 I get an error message using zakim: "this passcode is not valid" 12:33:33 carlosV has joined #er 12:33:40 zakim seems confused 12:33:43 btw. how can I make comments in irc? 12:34:46 zakim, are you awake? 12:34:46 I don't understand your question, cstrobbe. 12:34:55 zakim, are you on STRIKE?? 12:34:55 I don't understand your question, cstrobbe. 12:35:04 zakim, you are just useles 12:35:04 I don't understand 'you are just useles', cstrobbe 12:35:26 zakim, this is ert 12:35:26 sorry, shadi, I do not see a conference named 'ert' in progress or scheduled at this time 12:35:54 zakim, room for 8? 12:35:55 ok, shadi; conference Team_(er)12:35Z scheduled with code 26633 (CONF3) for 60 minutes until 1335Z 12:36:22 can people use the conference code "26633" for tdoay? 12:36:29 zakim, call shadi-617 12:36:29 ok, shadi; the call is being made 12:36:30 Team_(er)12:35Z has now started 12:36:31 +Shadi 12:36:45 agenda? 12:37:04 +??P8 12:37:15 +Christophe_Strobbe 12:37:20 +??P4 12:37:27 zakim, ?p8? is Philip 12:37:27 sorry, shadi, I do not recognize a party named '?p8?' 12:37:36 zakim, ??p8 is Philip 12:37:36 +Philip; got it 12:37:45 zakim, ??p4 is Carlos 12:37:45 +Carlos; got it 12:38:14 scribe: Philip 12:38:20 scribenick: philipA 12:38:38 zakim, take up agendum 1 12:38:38 agendum 1. "Welcome" taken up [from shadi] 12:41:34 zakim, take up next 12:41:34 agendum 2. "Continue processing comments" taken up [from shadi] 12:41:48 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0027.html 12:44:17 CarlosV: would leave it as it is 12:44:27 CarlosV: nothing wrong with it 12:45:58 Shadi: discussed this in the past, we would need a assertion container, that groups different assertions 12:46:12 Shadi: quite complex, so we decided to drop this 12:47:32 Shadi: verboose, but not redundant information 12:49:10 RESOLUTION: To reduce verbosity the complexity of the model would be far higher, group is not willing to take this step 12:49:16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0028.html 12:50:41 Shadi: within rdf schema you can use defined by to link 12:51:09 CarlosV: Would accept comment 12:51:32 Shadi: spec and schema cross references would be good 12:51:33 would that be rdfs:isDefinedBy ? 12:51:50 RESOLUTION: Accept the comment 12:51:59 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0029.html 12:52:35 CarlosV: Accept it 12:52:49 Shadi: Right, is a bug 12:52:59 RESOLUTION: Accept the comment 12:53:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0030.html 12:53:35 RESOLUTION: Accept the comment 12:53:39 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0031.html 12:54:16 RESOLUTION: Accept the comment 12:54:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0032.html 12:55:58 zakim, pick a victim 12:55:58 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Philip 12:56:49 ACTION: CarlosV to review xUnit 12:56:49 Created ACTION-132 - Review xUnit [on Carlos A. Velasco - due 2011-09-14]. 12:57:17 ACTION: CStrobbe to review TAP 12:57:18 Created ACTION-133 - Review TAP [on Christophe Strobbe - due 2011-09-14]. 12:58:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0033.html 12:59:41 Shadi: direct RDF to JSON conversion is really difficult 13:00:00 Shadi: if we would have an xml serialization, it would be much easier 13:00:40 Shadi: most important to have an xml schema 13:01:12 Shadi: RDF is not focused on the information structure 13:01:29 sinarmaya has joined #er 13:04:19 Shadi: which serialization would be most useful to tool developers 13:05:35 Shadi: there are no dependencies between the different serializations 13:06:38 Shadi: happy to have support to create those serializations 13:07:16 RESOLUTION: explain the current situation with respect to serialization 13:08:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0034.html 13:10:11 CarlosV: don't think it is a must for us 13:10:15 Shadi: agreed 13:10:52 Shadi: it's not part of the inital requirements 13:11:17 RESOLUTION: explain the current situation with respect to serialization 13:11:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0036.html 13:13:10 CarlosV: maybe thats right 13:13:49 CStrobbe: what are the reasons for making these other documents WG notes? 13:14:11 Shadi: HTTP in RDF seems really stable 13:14:51 Shadi: Content in RDF and Pointer in RDF needs more reviewing 13:15:10 CarlosV: Content in RDF is important part of EARL processing tool 13:18:31 Shadi: EARL guide does not contain the conformance requirement 13:18:44 Shadi: should not go to REC 13:18:53 Shadi: that it could updated more easily 13:19:03 s/EARL guide does/if EARL Guide does 13:19:29 s/should not go/then it should not go 13:19:43 s/that it could/so that it can be 13:20:29 Shadi: for the other parts we need to check with the implementations 13:21:02 Shadi: any we put in REC we need implementations for 13:21:19 CarlosV: we got Content and HTTP in RDF in full 13:21:47 CarlosV: in our implementation 13:22:29 RESOLUTION: group is considering putting some modules on REC trac 13:23:56 zakim, take up next 13:23:56 agendum 3. "Upcoming meeting schedule" taken up [from shadi] 13:25:07 meeting next week 13:25:11 probably no meeting on 21st 13:25:19 possibly meeting on 28th 13:25:37 regrets from CarlosV and Philip on 5th Oct 13:26:17 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline 13:28:11 -Carlos 13:28:12 -Christophe_Strobbe 13:28:13 -Philip 13:28:15 -Shadi 13:28:15 Team_(er)12:35Z has ended 13:28:17 trackbot, end meeting 13:28:17 Attendees were Shadi, Christophe_Strobbe, Philip, Carlos 13:28:17 Zakim, list attendees 13:28:17 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 13:28:18 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:28:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/09/07-er-minutes.html trackbot 13:28:19 RRSAgent, bye 13:28:19 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/09/07-er-actions.rdf : 13:28:19 ACTION: CarlosV to review xUnit [1] 13:28:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/09/07-er-irc#T12-56-49 13:28:19 ACTION: CStrobbe to review TAP [2] 13:28:19 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/09/07-er-irc#T12-57-17 13:28:21 philipA has left #er