15:02:00  RRSAgent has joined #htmlt
15:02:00  logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/09/06-htmlt-irc
15:02:17  zakim, this is htmlt
15:02:17  sorry, krisk, I do not see a conference named 'htmlt' in progress or scheduled at this time
15:03:49  Looks like this will be all on IRC
15:04:26  Normal given the past meetings...
15:04:46  Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Sep/0001.html
15:05:48  Looks like a light meeting agenda...
15:06:01  Item #1 Check for and bugs on approved tests
15:06:22  Bug #12896 (old)
15:06:51  I recall that we were going to have plh come back to confirm that this is true
15:07:18  I'll send this out in the meeting notes since it's been a little while
15:07:56  I presume that Ms2ger believes that this is a valid bug since he opened the bug
15:08:32  If anyone else has feedback please respond either to the IRC, Meeting notes or in the bug itself
15:09:05  I'll add this to the next meeting to help drive this bug to closure
15:09:14  Actually
15:09:41  getElementsByClassName is now defined in DOM Core instead of HTML
15:10:13  So I'll move these tests to the WebApps repo
15:10:43  You should ping the Opera folks since the wrote most of the tests
15:11:04  jgraham, ^
15:11:57  IMHO standard practice is to remove tests if they are no longer normative
15:12:23  Bug #13875
15:13:25  Ms2ger could you send something to the list or add to the bug maybe a use case using httpd.js vs php?
15:13:49  Haven't had time to spend on that yet
15:14:19  Ok
15:20:53  Looks like you fixed/updated some canvas tests
15:21:01  (you meaning ms2ger)
15:21:08  I did
15:22:14  The TYPE_MISMATCH_ERR should be noted
15:22:25  Do you want to add more to the IRC on these changes?
15:22:51  No
15:25:52  Any reason?
15:26:20  The reason I ask is that this error case had really good browser interop (chrome, IE, Firefox, Opera) 
15:26:30  Oh
15:27:00  No this is not the case...the IDL spec is leading - which seems odd
15:27:28  It would be alot easier to have the IDL spec just match all the browsers and canvas content on the web
15:28:40  It doesn't really matter which exception is thrown, IMO
15:28:51  Might as well pick a logical one
15:31:39  e.code == 17 (TYPE_MISMATCH_ERR) seems just fine
15:33:05  Anyway, if you think it's an issue, it's a spec issue
15:34:08  If we just care that an assert is thrown then the HTML test should be updated as such
15:34:37  Seems like it would be more valid to have some IDL cases in webapps rather then trying to test the web IDL spec via HTML tests
15:35:03  WebIDL is a normative dependency for HTML, so we should test the implications of that
15:37:23  That is fine just ned to call this out - better to be clear that this is a web IDL test case and not a HTML test case
15:37:37  It is an HTML test case
15:37:49  It is testing an interface defined in HTML
15:38:33  Still seems like a spec bug in IDL
15:39:37  I think TypeError makes more sense when you pass a value that doesn't match the type of the parameter, but please file a bug on WebIDL
15:40:42  Moving on Agenda Item #2 new test submissions
15:43:18  Any comments on test submission that people may want to be informed of?
15:45:12  Nothing in particular
15:45:28  OK - people can always look at the 'shortlog' http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/shortlog
15:46:03  Thats the end of the agenda
15:46:08  shall we adjourn?
15:46:18  OK
15:47:38  RRSAgent, make logs public
15:47:46  rrsagent, generate minutes
15:47:46  I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/09/06-htmlt-minutes.html krisk
15:53:10  Oops
15:53:15  Forgot about this...
15:53:59  While you're here, you can move these getElementsByClassName tests: )
15:54:35  Or I could pretend that I didn't hear you
15:57:35  This is IRC, sticking fingers in your ears won't help :)
16:14:45  It's OK I stuck them in my eyes too
17:24:25  Ms2ger has joined #HTMLT
17:30:48  Zakim has left #htmlt
17:33:48  RRSAgent, bye
17:33:48  I see no action items