15:49:27 RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf 15:49:27 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-irc 15:49:29 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:49:29 Zakim has joined #rdb2rdf 15:49:31 Zakim, this will be 7322733 15:49:31 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 15:49:32 Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference 15:49:32 Date: 30 August 2011 15:49:57 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0167.html 15:50:00 Chair: Michael 15:50:05 scribenick: mhausenblas 15:50:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:50:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:50:18 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:50:29 Zakim, this will be SW_RDB2RDF 15:50:29 ok, mhausenblas; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 15:55:42 juansequeda has joined #RDB2RDF 15:56:23 regrets+ Marcelo 15:56:35 regrets+ Percy 15:57:12 regrets+ Nuno 15:57:52 boris has joined #rdb2rdf 15:58:49 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 15:58:53 dmcneil has joined #RDB2RDF 15:58:57 + +3539149aaaa 15:59:03 Zakim, aaaa is me 15:59:05 +mhausenblas; got it 15:59:14 +Philippe 15:59:18 Zakim, I unfortunately have cygri with me 15:59:18 I don't understand 'I unfortunately have cygri with me', mhausenblas 15:59:21 +Kingsley_Idehen 15:59:27 Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software 15:59:27 +OpenLink_Software; got it 15:59:30 Zakim, I have cygri with me 15:59:30 I don't understand 'I have cygri with me', mhausenblas 15:59:32 Ashok has joined #rdb2rdf 15:59:33 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:59:33 +MacTed; got it 15:59:33 Zakim, Philippe is temporarily juansequeda 15:59:34 +juansequeda; got it 15:59:36 Zakim, mute me 15:59:36 MacTed should now be muted 15:59:39 + +1.314.394.aabb 15:59:41 Zakim, cygri is with me 15:59:41 +cygri; got it 15:59:47 present+ Michael 15:59:50 present+ Juan 15:59:57 present+ Ted 16:00:07 present+ Boris 16:00:07 +EricP 16:00:11 present+ David 16:00:15 present+ Eric 16:00:20 Zakim, who's here? 16:00:20 On the phone I see mhausenblas, juansequeda, MacTed (muted), +1.314.394.aabb, EricP 16:00:22 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, cygri 16:00:23 On IRC I see Ashok, dmcneil, boris, juansequeda, Zakim, RRSAgent, mhausenblas, cygri, MacTed, LeeF, ivan, trackbot, iv_an_ru_, betehess, ericP 16:00:50 +Ashok_Malhotra 16:00:51 Zakim, aabb is dmcneil 16:00:51 +dmcneil; got it 16:00:56 present+ Ashok 16:00:58 zakim, dial ivan-voip 16:00:58 ok, ivan; the call is being made 16:01:00 +Ivan 16:01:04 present+ Ivan 16:01:11 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:01:11 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:01:25 zakim, mhausenblas is with boris 16:01:25 sorry, boris, I do not recognize a party named 'boris' 16:01:50 Zakim, boris is with me 16:01:50 +boris; got it 16:02:15 dmcneil, i just wrote a reply to your mail 16:03:12 Topic: Admin 16:03:17 PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/08/23-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:03:28 +1 16:03:30 +1 16:03:33 RESOLUTION: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/08/23-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:03:43 Topic: Postpone LC deadline 16:03:55 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Aug/0135.html 16:04:47 Seema has joined #rdb2rdf 16:05:20 Ashok: Richard, how much more work is needed for R2RML? 16:05:33 Richard: From my POV it is feature-complete 16:06:07 + +1.603.897.aacc 16:06:21 Zakim, aacc is Seema 16:06:21 +Seema; got it 16:06:28 present+ Seema 16:06:41 Ashok: same question for DM, Juan? 16:06:50 Juan: good to go 16:06:55 + +1.603.897.aadd 16:06:57 Souri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:07:10 Zakim, aadd is Souri 16:07:10 +Souri; got it 16:07:25 present+ Souri 16:08:08 i believe that reflects the current plan modulo a possible dispute around using '.' in place of ',' 16:08:39 i believe that reflects the current plan modulo a possible dispute around using '.' in place of ',' 16:08:51 Souri: Modulo last-moments addition, I think 15 Sep should be doable 16:09:27 PROPOSAL: The working group postpones the last call publication to the 16th of September 16:09:41 We are going to do a rewrite of the ISSUE-57 related note by end of this week 16:10:05 q+ 16:10:12 I am out next Tuesday 16:11:26 q- 16:11:31 PROPOSAL: The working group postpones the last call publication to the 16th of September (frozen at 16, publish on 20 Sep) 16:11:33 q? 16:12:15 Ashok: When will the document be available, finally 16:12:26 q+ 16:12:44 q? 16:12:47 ack Souri 16:14:41 Souri: I'd consider the translation table as out of scope for mid-September 16:15:24 PROPOSAL: If WG is okay with eliminating some of the recently added content (such as, Translation Scheme) and any new additions, then we can try putting out the LC document by Sep 16. 16:15:51 q+ 16:16:10 ack ivan 16:16:35 Ivan: The proposal is too vague for me to vote, sorry 16:16:39 q? 16:16:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:16:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:17:35 PROPOSAL: The working group postpones the last call publication to the 16th of September beside translation scheme 16:18:15 Translation Scheme, editing the content on many-to-many mapping, ISSUE-57 note rewriting, graphMap associating with POmap 16:18:46 Richard: I'd like to understand why to remove the feature (translation scheme) 16:18:55 Souri: only timing-wise 16:18:56 1+ 16:19:03 s/1+/q+ 16:19:04 q? 16:19:10 q+ 16:19:27 ack me 16:19:31 zakim, mute me 16:19:31 juansequeda should now be muted 16:19:56 q+ 16:20:18 -1 to giving them an idea that we have not thought enough about 16:20:18 q? 16:20:30 ack Souri 16:20:47 Michael: treat it like ISSUE-57, let the community decide? 16:20:50 Souri: no 16:22:08 q+ 16:22:14 q+ 16:22:20 Michael: What is exactly the plan, Souri? 16:22:30 q- 16:22:41 Souri: Just render the idea, not spell it out 16:22:43 q? 16:22:54 Ivan: this is not LC then 16:22:59 ack Ashok 16:23:03 +q 16:23:07 Ashok: Agree with Ivan 16:23:08 q? 16:23:36 Ashok: I was gonna ask if we can add features after LC and the answer was no IIUC 16:24:08 Ivan: Just to clarify - beyond editorial changes we'd need to issue a second LC 16:24:42 2 questions to ask re: whether LC comments bring you back to WG status: 16:24:47 does this change implementations? 16:24:50 is this likely to change the mind of commentors? 16:24:50 . 16:25:03 Ashok: Looks like we could treat the translation scheme like ISSUE-57? 16:25:16 Michael: That's what I suggested, but Souri said no? 16:25:24 q+ 16:25:40 David: I agree with Michael/Ashok 16:25:44 ack cygri 16:25:51 ack dmcneil 16:25:52 We can come up with an alternate scheme for translation and then discuss it. 16:26:17 it sounds like dmcneil is willing to push up the risk of a 2nd LC a bit in order to include the feature 16:26:32 Richard: I'd be OK with the idea to add it as a 'feature-at-risk' ala ISSUE-57 16:26:43 q? 16:26:46 q+ 16:26:51 q+ 16:26:56 q- 16:27:01 q? 16:27:17 Richard: Re Souri's point concerning polishing 16:27:58 ... I think the public doesn't pay much attention before LC 16:28:11 ... so we can expect some good comments 16:28:26 ... would be open to changes 16:28:34 q? 16:28:40 ack ivan 16:28:54 Ivan: So, impl. are less of my concern 16:29:05 ... that in CR phase, really 16:29:20 note that losing the CR gamble is expensive 16:29:27 ... but going out there with a lack of consensus is definitely not good 16:30:15 Ivan: If there are too many comments re a LC feature (such as translation scheme) we should be open to simply remove 16:30:17 q? 16:30:44 q+ 16:30:54 ack cygri 16:31:43 Richard: ISSUE-57 re Turtle is in the same space, in fact 16:31:50 q+ 16:32:02 ack Souri 16:32:24 Souri: We can discuss an alternate proposal for TS 16:33:06 q+ 16:33:20 q? 16:33:23 ack Souri 16:34:08 PROPOSAL: The working group postpones the last call publication to the 16th of September beside translation schemes where a note describes the issue behind it 16:34:50 +1 16:35:52 q+ 16:36:18 Ashok: we can remove it now and risk a 2nd LC, then 16:36:20 q? 16:36:34 Ivan: I'd be rather unhappy with it 16:36:42 ack cygri 16:36:42 +1 to revising the Translation Scheme proposal (to make it simpler) and them going to LC by 16-SEP-2011 16:37:03 s/them going/then going/ 16:38:15 q+ 16:38:26 ack Souri 16:39:01 Souri: So, we went through the latest write-up yesterday but didn't have time to change 16:39:33 q? 16:40:37 Richard: I'll be around theoretical but only have very limited time to devote to W3C stuff 16:41:16 Richard: it would be great to have issues raised for the Translation Scheme 16:41:23 makes sense 16:41:52 Souri: we can provide these issues by end of week 16:42:00 PROPOSAL: The working group postpones the last call publication to the 16th of September beside translation schemes where a note describes the issue behind it 16:45:18 we had those four points only: translation scheme (we need a simpler scheme for mapping: ), ISSUE-57 refinement of the note regarding the alternate proposal, correcting Sec 2.6 example, graphMap association with POMap 16:45:48 +q 16:46:19 Ashok: If Souri, Seema and Richard sort out the issue this week, we can take the resolution next week 16:46:22 ack dmcneil 16:46:47 (David asks a clarification question re feature-freeze) 16:46:49 q? 16:47:46 Richard: What we could say is that there are four issues (which we need to raise), then we could say after all these are resolved we're LC ready 16:47:48 q? 16:47:58 ISSUE: Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping 16:47:58 Created ISSUE-66 - Translation Scheme as proposed seems too complicated for the simple task of mapping ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/66/edit . 16:48:25 Ashok: Do the Editors think you can resolve it this week? 16:49:46 (discussion around what the issues are and if it is feasible to resolve it) 16:49:58 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:49:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:51:16 +q 16:51:30 Michael: So, I understand that if W3C management now asks me when we go LC, I will say: once we're done with the issues, yes - we can not give any exact date ...? 16:51:32 q? 16:51:36 I have raised ISSUE-66 for the translation scheme 16:51:56 ack dmcneil 16:52:18 I am on vacation Fri and Tue 16:52:43 David: I don't see a lot of changes to get the work done (with the availability of Richard and Souri ...) 16:52:45 q? 16:53:02 q+ 16:53:07 q? 16:53:11 ack Souri 16:53:26 Souri: I'm positive to be able to resolve it this week 16:53:30 q? 16:54:26 Souri: Is it OK to resolve ISSUE via mailing list? 16:54:37 Ivan: Yes, up to us to define the policy 16:54:59 -dmcneil 16:55:00 -Ivan 16:55:01 -Souri 16:55:02 [meeting adjourned] 16:55:02 -mhausenblas 16:55:04 -Seema 16:55:05 -Ashok_Malhotra 16:55:07 -MacTed 16:55:11 -juansequeda 16:55:45 juansequeda, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/explicitFK#definition 16:56:08 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:56:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:57:37 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/explicitFK#emp-addr-ex1 16:58:13 trackbot, end telecon 16:58:13 Zakim, list attendees 16:58:13 As of this point the attendees have been +3539149aaaa, mhausenblas, MacTed, juansequeda, +1.314.394.aabb, cygri, EricP, Ashok_Malhotra, dmcneil, Ivan, boris, +1.603.897.aacc, 16:58:14 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:58:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-rdb2rdf-minutes.html trackbot 16:58:15 RRSAgent, bye 16:58:15 I see no action items 16:58:16 ... Seema, +1.603.897.aadd, Souri