13:56:38 RRSAgent has joined #sparql 13:56:38 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/08/16-sparql-irc 13:56:40 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:56:42 Zakim, this will be 77277 13:56:43 Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference 13:56:43 Date: 16 August 2011 13:56:45 Zakim has joined #sparql 13:56:59 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0186.html 13:57:58 zakim super slow today. 13:58:14 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:58:14 sorry, AndyS, I don't know what conference this is 13:58:15 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Olivier, cbuilara, AxelPolleres, LeeF, AndyS, iv_an_ru, kasei, trackbot, NickH, ericP 13:58:19 regrets: chime, alexandrepassant, birte (at risk) 13:58:28 zakim, this is SPARQL 13:58:28 ok, AndyS; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM 13:58:34 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:58:34 On the phone I see ??P10, ??P13 13:58:37 chair: Axel Polleres 13:58:41 zakim, ??P10 is me 13:58:43 zakim, ??P13 is me 13:58:46 +AndyS; got it 13:58:47 +cbuilara; got it 13:58:59 +kasei 13:59:42 +[Sophia] 13:59:53 Zakim, who is on the phone? 13:59:54 +AxelPolleres 14:00:01 MattPerry has joined #sparql 14:00:04 On the phone I see AndyS, cbuilara, kasei, [Sophia], AxelPolleres 14:00:25 [Sophia] .... is that Olivier? 14:01:05 +MattPerry 14:01:06 scribe: Olivier 14:01:49 [Sophia] is Olivier 14:02:09 Zakim, who is on the phone? 14:02:10 On the phone I see AndyS, cbuilara, kasei, [Sophia], AxelPolleres, MattPerry 14:02:11 zakim, [Sophia] is temporarily Olivier 14:02:11 +Olivier; got it 14:02:42 topic: admin 14:02:49 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0186.html 14:03:04 +LeeF 14:03:13 bglimm has joined #sparql 14:03:36 PROPOSED: approve minutes from last TC http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-08-09 14:04:24 RESOLVED: approve minutes from last TC http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-08-09 14:05:23 alexpassant has joined #sparql 14:05:46 Zakim, passcode? 14:05:52 the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), bglimm 14:05:54 next weeks regrets Birte, Andy, Axel, sandro, Alex... 14:05:57 + +3539149aaaa 14:06:03 Zakim, +3539149aaaa is me 14:06:04 +alexpassant; got it 14:06:14 next TC is supposed to be 23rd. 14:06:18 + +44.186.598.aabb 14:06:29 Zakim, +44.186.598.aabb is me 14:06:29 +bglimm; got it 14:06:34 Zakim, mute me 14:06:34 bglimm should now be muted 14:06:58 I can do it 14:07:15 matt to scribe next week... 14:07:16 pgearon has joined #sparql 14:07:32 topic: liason with RDF 14:08:06 +pgearon 14:08:15 issues at the moment around escape sequences, relates to richard's comment 14:08:22 See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Aug/0010.html 14:08:49 1) continue on test case coverage, 14:08:50 2) try to approve some of the new test cases and 14:08:50 3) look at the status of documents/publishing 14:08:50 4) look over open actions and comments 14:09:01 topic: test coverage 14:09:12 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage 14:09:45 q+ to ask when we can discuss Michael Schneider's comments 14:09:54 Zakim, unmute me 14:09:54 bglimm should no longer be muted 14:10:00 Zakim, mute me 14:10:00 bglimm should now be muted 14:10:12 federated query test 14:10:19 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage#Federated_Query 14:10:52 still need to be populated 14:11:00 ACTION: carlos to complete http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage#Federated_Query on what's missing on coverage 14:11:00 Created ACTION-520 - Complete http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage#Federated_Query on what's missing on coverage [on Carlos Buil Aranda - due 2011-08-23]. 14:11:21 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage#JSON_Results 14:11:30 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage#TSV.2FCSV_Results 14:12:09 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ 14:13:01 :jsonres01 - :jsonres04 14:13:18 I pass all json tests 14:13:54 3 implementations for JSON 14:14:01 PROPOSED: Approve :jsonres01 - :jsonres04 test cases in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ 14:14:04 +1 14:14:10 +1 14:14:12 +1 14:14:18 +1 14:14:27 RESOLVED: Approve :jsonres01 - :jsonres04 test cases in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/json-res/ 14:14:52 ACTION: to update test case status for :jsonres01 - :jsonres04 14:14:52 Sorry, couldn't find user - to 14:15:09 ACTION: axel to update test case status for :jsonres01 - :jsonres04 14:15:09 Created ACTION-521 - Update test case status for :jsonres01 - :jsonres04 [on Axel Polleres - due 2011-08-23]. 14:15:45 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/TestSuiteCoverage#TSV.2FCSV_Results 14:15:52 csv tsv test cases 14:15:58 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/csv-tsv-res/ 14:16:47 :csv01 14:16:48 :tsv01 14:16:48 :csv02 14:16:48 :tsv02 14:16:48 ... 14:16:49 I only run TSV tests. 14:17:16 everything but csv03 look good to me 14:17:43 q+ 14:17:50 corner case in csv3 tsv3 14:17:59 Zakum, unmute me 14:18:09 birte? 14:18:17 Zakim, unmute bglimm 14:18:17 bglimm should no longer be muted 14:18:46 Zakim, ack me 14:18:46 bglimm, you wanted to ask when we can discuss Michael Schneider's comments 14:18:49 I see kasei on the speaker queue 14:18:53 Zakim, mute me 14:18:53 bglimm should now be muted 14:19:18 csv : pb with canonicalization of literals 14:19:30 csv 3 indeed 14:19:48 cvs03 ... corner cases 14:19:51 :s1 :p1 "1"^^xsd:decimal . 14:19:51 :s2 :p2 "2.2"^^xsd:decimal . 14:19:52 :s3 :p3 "-3"^^xsd:negativeInteger . 14:19:52 :s4 :p4 "4,4"^^xsd:string . 14:19:52 :s5 :p5 "5,5"^^:myCustomDatatype . 14:19:53 :s6 :p6 "1.0e6"^^xsd:double . 14:19:54 :s7 :p7 "a7"^^xsd:hexBinary . 14:20:45 result 1 is ambiguous 14:20:48 q+ 14:21:01 query is ... WHERE{ ?s ?p ?o } ... 14:21:03 q- 14:21:29 q+ 14:21:31 greg: result for ?o could be 1 or 1.0, both valid 14:21:43 q- 14:21:51 ... depending on canonicalization. 14:22:43 maybe not completely "separate", but SPARQL doesn't specify. there are several valid options. 14:22:56 paul: load in update touches upon canonicalization. 14:23:01 Entailment with datatypes also has this issue 14:23:55 from memory, the SPARQL 1.0 tests contains alternative tests, whereby a store will pass one or the other, but not both 14:24:07 kasei: proposal ... to mark test case with mf:requires ... 14:24:24 Andy: XSD1.0 and 1.1 treat these cases differently. 14:24:50 Just don't test for legal variances. 14:25:16 currently mf:requies is still (I think) just talking about "open world" tests, but we're using it for more than that in 1.1 14:25:43 I agree with Andy. Just remove that triple from the dataset. 14:26:09 right. LOTS of answers :) 14:26:41 q+ 14:26:48 q- 14:27:07 axel: least path of resistence would be dropping first line. 14:27:19 -3 could also be canonicalised to decimal 14:27:27 or integer 14:27:45 well, decimal is the base type 14:28:29 "3"^^xsd:string should be non-ambiguous 14:28:42 yes 14:29:18 pb with testing bnode in csv 14:29:20 can I replace "1"^^xsd:decimal with "1"^^xsd:string ? 14:30:52 PROPOSED: approve csv01-csv03 and tsv01-tsv03 modulo changing "1"^^xsd:decimal with "1"^^xsd:string in data2.ttl 14:31:18 q+ 14:31:25 q- 14:31:27 ack kasei 14:31:57 I agree with the strangeness of the differences. Didn't notice until very late in the game. 14:32:15 Leef: I will abstian on that one, since I still find some weird aspects in CSV/TSV. 14:33:04 +1 14:33:08 +1 14:33:19 (prefer to see the change) 14:33:29 RESOLVED: approve csv01-csv03 and tsv01-tsv03 modulo changing "1"^^xsd:decimal with "1"^^xsd:string in data2.ttl 14:33:38 (with one abstention by LeeF) 14:34:01 ACTION: to change test case status for csv/tsv tests01-03. 14:34:01 Sorry, couldn't find user - to 14:34:24 ACTION: axel to change test case status for csv/tsv tests01-03. 14:34:24 Created ACTION-522 - Change test case status for csv/tsv tests01-03. [on Axel Polleres - due 2011-08-23]. 14:35:13 update test cases with silent 14:35:24 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/update-silent/ 14:35:37 note, the just approved proposal also needs to change csvtsv03.tsv along with data2.ttl. 14:37:16 I can hav a look 14:37:19 have 14:37:38 ACTION: Olivier to look into test cases at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/update-silent/ for approval next time. 14:37:39 Created ACTION-523 - Look into test cases at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/update-silent/ for approval next time. [on Olivier Corby - due 2011-08-23]. 14:38:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0183.html 14:39:43 q+ 14:39:56 " an empty graph being retrieved will not create a new graph in the graph store." 14:40:15 q- 14:41:51 q- 14:43:42 plesae check re-wording suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0183.html 14:44:27 "an empty graph being retrieved will not create a new graph in the graph store." will removing this be problematic for LC? 14:45:19 AndyS: the sentence is ambiguous, and removing it in favor of the formal def overriding it should be ok as "editorial" 14:46:15 let's get back to those test cases next time. 14:46:42 topic: publishing other docs 14:47:33 Axel and lee to push fwd on JSON and CSV/TSV results publication by next week. 14:47:45 ACTION: Axel and lee to push fwd on JSON and CSV/TSV results publication by next week. 14:47:45 Created ACTION-524 - And lee to push fwd on JSON and CSV/TSV results publication by next week. [on Axel Polleres - due 2011-08-23]. 14:48:52 close ACTION-501 14:48:52 ACTION-501 Review updates in Fed query doc (particularly section 2.4 and 4) for LC readiness closed 14:49:30 action-514 continued... 14:50:14 Overview doc now located here http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/ 14:50:40 ACTION: axel to fix references in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/ 14:50:40 Created ACTION-525 - Fix references in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/ [on Axel Polleres - due 2011-08-23]. 14:51:07 Review by Matt 14:51:35 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0179.html 14:51:48 axel will try to address matt's review to mayb vote for pub in the next week or two 14:52:16 topic: comments & actions 14:52:27 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments 14:52:46 I updated it today for RC-4. 14:54:34 Security issue in update 14:55:56 Zakim, unmute me 14:55:56 bglimm should no longer be muted 14:57:08 Comment on D-Entailment regime, about the chosen name 14:57:35 "D-Entailment for XSD datatypes" 14:57:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jul/0013 14:58:24 and other nasty DTs like XML literal (boo, hiss) 14:59:16 Birte: suggests we either don't specify any prescribed datatypes or use RIF/OWL intersection. 14:59:32 bye ... have another meeting 14:59:38 -MattPerry 15:00:29 Birte will take the discussion on MS-6 on email. 15:00:55 BTW: rdf:PlainLiteral link goes to RDF concepts for XML Literal 15:00:58 :-) 15:01:20 adjourned 15:01:21 -bglimm 15:01:23 -cbuilara 15:01:25 bye 15:01:25 -pgearon 15:01:26 -LeeF 15:01:26 -alexpassant 15:01:28 -Olivier 15:01:33 -AndyS 15:01:34 rrsagent, make records public 15:01:49 -kasei 15:01:51 -AxelPolleres 15:01:51 SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended 15:01:53 Attendees were AndyS, cbuilara, kasei, AxelPolleres, MattPerry, Olivier, LeeF, alexpassant, bglimm, pgearon 15:06:52 the link is now corrected, thanks Andy 15:11:52 Greg? 15:12:08 yeah? 15:12:50 just committed csvtsv03 change as discussed... can you quickly confirm before I mark the test cases as approved? 15:13:15 yeah, hold on. 15:15:52 yeah, I'm passing all the csvtsv tests now. 15:16:00 also, i had a question about the fed tests. 15:16:25 we agreed to drop the requirement (and formal defn.) of variable-endpoint service blocks, right? 15:17:09 if so, is either dropping :service5 (the var-endpoint test) from the manifest or marking it with an mf:requires sensible paths forward? 15:53:03 alex has joined #sparql 15:55:39 alex_ has joined #sparql 15:56:34 I suggest to contact carlos on the fed-tests... and/or put that on the coverage wiki. 15:56:50 thanks forconfirming the csvtsv tests. 15:59:50 ok. i added a note on the coverage page. 16:54:51 alex_ has joined #sparql 17:16:31 Zakim has left #sparql 17:36:34 alex has joined #sparql 18:21:54 iv_an_ru_ has joined #sparql