14:57:04 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webtv
14:57:04 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/08/11-webtv-irc
14:57:12 <kaz> zakim, call kazuyuki-617
14:57:12 <Zakim> ok, kaz; the call is being made
14:57:13 <Zakim> UW_WebTVIG()11:00AM has now started
14:57:15 <Zakim> +Kazuyuki
14:57:23 <Zakim> +??P32
14:57:50 <kaz> zakim, ??P32 is Clarke_Stevens
14:57:50 <Zakim> +Clarke_Stevens; got it
14:58:39 <Zakim> +??P19
14:59:23 <francois_> francois_ has joined #webtv
15:00:03 <francois> trackbot, start telcon
15:00:14 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
15:00:15 <Zakim> +??P8
15:00:16 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 
15:00:17 <trackbot> Meeting: Web and TV Interest Group Teleconference
15:00:17 <trackbot> Date: 11 August 2011
15:00:18 <Zakim> I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
15:00:27 <aizu> aizu has joined #webtv
15:00:47 <kaz> zakim, ??P8 is duncan
15:00:49 <Zakim> +??P28
15:00:55 <kaz> zakim, ??P19 is Bob
15:00:56 <francois> zakim, ??P28 is me
15:00:59 <Zakim> +duncan; got it
15:01:06 <Zakim> +Bob; got it
15:01:09 <Zakim> +francois; got it
15:01:10 <kaz> zakim, who is here?
15:01:23 <Zakim> On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke_Stevens, Bob, duncan, francois
15:01:39 <Zakim> On IRC I see aizu, francois, RRSAgent, duncanr, Clarke, Zakim, kaz, trackbot
15:01:48 <francois> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Agenda_Telco_11th_August_2011
15:01:59 <francois> Chair: Clarke
15:02:02 <kaz> Meeting: Media Pipeline Task Force teleconf
15:05:27 <Zakim> +rberkoff
15:05:50 <Zakim> +JanL
15:05:56 <kaz> zakim, mute me
15:05:56 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should now be muted
15:06:32 <Zakim> +??P50
15:06:38 <r_berkoff> r_berkoff has joined #webtv
15:06:41 <francois> zakim, mute me
15:06:42 <kaz> zakim, ??P50 is Aizu
15:06:44 <Zakim> francois should now be muted
15:06:46 <Zakim> +Aizu; got it
15:07:04 <kaz> zakim, unumute me
15:07:04 <Zakim> I don't understand 'unumute me', kaz
15:07:08 <kaz> zakim, unmute me
15:07:08 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should no longer be muted
15:07:14 <francois> Topic: Draft statement on HTML5 LC bugs
15:07:48 <Juhani> Juhani has joined #webtv
15:07:52 <francois> Clarke: action from co-chairs to draft statement on HTML5 LC bugs
15:07:57 <francois> ... Kaz, status?
15:08:30 <francois> Kaz: Discussed with co-chairs. But in the end, we won't need comments sent by the IG since comments have already been sent.
15:08:46 <francois> Clarke: so we won't send an endorsement from the Media Pipeline TF?
15:09:10 <francois> Kaz: for HTML5 LC bugs, endorsement is not really needed. What's important is to fill out the bugs, which was done.
15:09:24 <francois> ... I'll point the interest of the IG to Paul Cotton.
15:09:26 <Zakim> +Tatsuya_Igarashi
15:09:43 <francois> Clarke: so the result is that anyone here should be encouraged to send comments themselves.
15:10:46 <francois> Jan: If I wanted to get further clarification about proposed solutions, should I take it in bugzilla or discuss it here?
15:10:52 <narm_gadiraju> narm_gadiraju has joined #webtv
15:11:10 <kaz> zakim, mute me
15:11:10 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should now be muted
15:11:12 <Zakim> -rberkoff
15:11:13 <Clarke> So those interested in the outcome of LC bugs should join the LC discussion directly to make specific comments
15:11:17 <francois> Clarke: That was 13333. Been escalated as an issue, I think.
15:12:05 <Zakim> +rberkoff
15:12:07 <francois> Jan: The solution makes reference to objects. I'd like to work with what they initiated. I don't want to be detrimental to the comment.
15:12:16 <kaz> zakim, unmute me
15:12:17 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should no longer be muted
15:12:45 <R_Berkoff> R_Berkoff has joined #webtv
15:12:49 <kaz> zakim, mute me
15:12:50 <francois> Kaz: There is likely to be a second LC period. The working group will accept further comments.
15:12:50 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should now be muted
15:13:01 <francois> Jan: your proposal is to go to the mailing-list directly.
15:13:22 <kaz> zakim, unmute me
15:13:22 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should no longer be muted
15:13:51 <kaz> zakim, mute me
15:13:51 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should now be muted
15:13:55 <francois> Kaz: not 100% sure about the procedure. I can investigate if you prefer.
15:14:01 <Zakim> + +358.405.81aaaa
15:14:06 <Clarke> Kaz to check on preferred procedure to address "closed" bug
15:14:08 <kaz> zakim, mute aaaa
15:14:08 <Zakim> +358.405.81aaaa should now be muted
15:14:49 <francois> zakim, aaaa is Juhani
15:14:49 <Zakim> +Juhani; got it
15:15:34 <francois> ACTION: kaz to check on exact procedure to submit comments to HTML5 LC bugs
15:15:35 <trackbot> Created ACTION-70 - Check on exact procedure to submit comments to HTML5 LC bugs [on Kazuyuki Ashimura - due 2011-08-18].
15:16:05 <francois> zakim, who makes noise?
15:16:05 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, francois.
15:16:13 <francois> zakim, who is making noise?
15:16:23 <Zakim> francois, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: duncan (29%), JanL (50%)
15:16:36 <kaz> zakim, mute duncan
15:16:36 <Zakim> duncan should now be muted
15:16:51 <Clarke> That's much better
15:17:11 <duncanr> appologies, my phone says it is muted
15:17:22 <francois> Topic: Create new issue in MPTF for issue-18 (which was in HNTF)
15:17:43 <kaz> issue-18?
15:17:43 <trackbot> ISSUE-18 -- Video tag support of MPEG2-TS -- raised
15:17:43 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/18
15:17:47 <francois> Jan: [scribe missed beginning of discussion because of echo]
15:18:16 <francois> ... Trying to map what was done in Open IPTV Forum. It's possible that most of it is covered.
15:18:22 <francois> ... One issue was identified.
15:18:51 <francois> ... The ability to retrieve which components are available and if there's any change to components that are available.
15:19:09 <francois> ... Right now, you only get "change" events on the default track, but not on others.
15:19:20 <francois> ... That's higlighted in point number 1.
15:19:30 <francois> s/higlighte/highlighte
15:19:58 <francois> ... The second one is fairly well covered. I don't think there is any issue.
15:20:16 <kaz> i/Jan: [/-> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Discussions/VideoTagSupportMpeg2-ts VideoTagSupportMpeg2-ts
15:20:24 <francois> ... The third one, there are two aspects. What you set the system preferences, and the playout preferences.
15:20:47 <francois> ... [example given with subtitles]
15:21:09 <francois> ... There may need to be something to be done here. If we thing it's at the system level, we may not need to do anything in the browser.
15:21:46 <Clarke> q+ bob
15:21:54 <francois> ... Fourth point: I haven't been able to map precisely what's available. Something to do here, I think.
15:22:03 <francois> ... Fifth point is similar to fourth point.
15:22:25 <francois> ... Sixth point is that I'd like to explore something similar to the video tag in SVG.
15:22:47 <francois> ... so that you don't need to embed an HTML video tag. What can we expect W3C to do here?
15:23:03 <francois> ack bob
15:23:15 <kaz> zakim, who is here?
15:23:15 <Zakim> On the phone I see Kazuyuki (muted), Clarke_Stevens, Bob, duncan (muted), francois (muted), JanL, Aizu, Tatsuya_Igarashi, rberkoff, Juhani (muted)
15:23:17 <Zakim> On IRC I see R_Berkoff, narm_gadiraju, Juhani, aizu, francois, RRSAgent, duncanr, Clarke, Zakim, kaz, trackbot
15:23:41 <francois> [Bob seems muted]
15:23:42 <Zakim> -duncan
15:24:13 <kaz> Present: Kazuyuki, Clarke_Stevens, Bob, Duncan, Francois, JanL, Aizu, Tatsuya_Igarashi, Russell, Juhani 
15:24:31 <francois> Jan: I made a reference to the DAE spec where we have an appendix that explained what was available. Now the video tag is more complete, should be updated.
15:24:36 <Zakim> +??P8
15:24:52 <francois> ... Shall we first conclude ISSUE-18?
15:24:53 <kaz> zakim, ??P8 is Bob
15:24:53 <Zakim> +Bob; got it
15:25:50 <kaz> Bob: happy to provide use cases
15:25:50 <francois> Bob: I had a couple of comments and questions. In general, we take a deep look at requirements at American requirements for multi-video and multi-audio. I think they are covered, now. Don't have any problem with a use case even if it's covered.
15:26:00 <kaz> s/Bob: happy to provide use cases//
15:26:32 <francois> ... I filed 3 bugs for HTML5, and one of the bugs covers what you describe.
15:26:42 <francois> Jan: missed that, could you reply on the mailing-list and send a pointer?
15:27:08 <francois> Bob: yes, will do that. Last point is that I don't know what it means for the video tag to be in SVG, could you clarify?
15:27:26 <francois> Jan: I'd like to have the same semantics for SVG as well.
15:27:40 <Zakim> + +1.404.242.aabb
15:27:40 <francois> ... SVG has its own video tag, but it's not the same.
15:27:44 <francois> Bob: Oh, I see.
15:28:25 <francois> ... From a use case perspective, if you want to use SVG as part of the UI, you could use that separately, right?
15:28:37 <francois> Jan: yes, but then you're embedding, not using SVG natively.
15:28:44 <francois> q+
15:28:50 <francois> zakim, mute aabb
15:28:50 <Zakim> +1.404.242.aabb should now be muted
15:29:04 <francois> ... Maybe W3C has a plan to merge both video.
15:30:04 <francois> Bob: the more global issue is we've identified, at CableLabs, that it would be valuable to take advantage of new media rendering capabilities in the user agent, but have all the API and infrastructure provided by the video tag.
15:30:20 <francois> ... One example is content protection via a plugin mechanism.
15:30:35 <kaz> q+
15:30:41 <francois> ... You'd still have support for tracks, etc.
15:30:50 <francois> ... It sounds that this concept could also apply to SVG.
15:30:53 <kaz> q-
15:31:08 <kaz> q+ to ask if we want to meet with SVG WG during TPAC2011
15:31:19 <francois> Jan: I'm wondering how transparent we can make this.
15:32:16 <francois> ... There might be an advantage to make the video tag a child of your object in order to capture what is not covered by the video tag.
15:32:35 <francois> ... I'm just exploring this possibility, to see if it might work with browser manufacturers.
15:32:49 <francois> ... I suspect it might be preferable for them.
15:32:49 <Clarke> q?
15:33:04 <francois> ... I haven't checked, so that's why I'm still in exploring phase.
15:33:51 <francois> Bob: OK. One other thing the group could be interested in. A comment from Philipp from Opera where he references an experience in the WhatWG about streaming and Peer2Peer media
15:34:18 <francois> ... It introduces a local stream that can be associated with a media element such as a video tag.
15:34:25 <Clarke> Bob to send out link to MediaStream object
15:34:32 <francois> ... Will provide a pointer.
15:34:53 <francois> Jan: Can we allocate time in the third workshop to do some brainstorming about it?
15:34:55 <kaz> q_
15:34:57 <kaz> q+
15:35:03 <francois> ... For the technical discussion, useful to exchange ideas.
15:35:04 <francois> q?
15:35:09 <kaz> ack k
15:35:10 <Zakim> kaz, you wanted to ask if we want to meet with SVG WG during TPAC2011 and to 
15:35:15 <francois> ack fran
15:35:19 <francois> zakim, mute me
15:35:20 <Zakim> francois should now be muted
15:35:50 <francois> Kaz: We'd like you to send a position paper around that to hold a panel session around that.
15:36:00 <francois> q+
15:36:59 <francois> ... Preparing agenda with OC right now, good topic.
15:37:10 <francois> ... Also, why don't we hold a joint meeting with SVG during TPAC?
15:37:39 <francois> ... SVG will hold a F2F meeting there, so might be useful to hold a joint meeting.
15:38:01 <francois> Clarke: could be interesting. By that time, we might have a better idea to bring the two tags together.
15:38:51 <francois> Kaz: there is no plan to hold a Web and TV IG F2F meeting during TPAC since we have one in September, but it still makes sense to hold joint meetings with other groups.
15:39:01 <francois> ... TPAC is last week of October.
15:39:02 <francois> ack francois 
15:39:09 <kaz> zakim, mute me
15:39:09 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should now be muted
15:40:51 <kaz> q+
15:42:01 <kaz> fd: Sep. 19-20 for workshop
15:42:10 <kaz> ... Sep. 21-22 for IG f2f meeting
15:42:16 <francois> zakim, mute me
15:42:16 <Zakim> francois should now be muted
15:43:04 <kaz> [ kaz will send out an announcement about the f2f and ask you all for agenda idea, etc. ]
15:43:20 <duncanr> zakim, unmute me
15:43:20 <Zakim> sorry, duncanr, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
15:43:28 <kaz> zakim, who is here?
15:43:28 <Zakim> On the phone I see Kazuyuki (muted), Clarke_Stevens, Bob, francois (muted), JanL, Aizu, Tatsuya_Igarashi, rberkoff, Juhani (muted), Bob.a, +1.404.242.aabb (muted)
15:43:32 <Zakim> On IRC I see R_Berkoff, narm_gadiraju, Juhani, aizu, francois, RRSAgent, duncanr, Clarke, Zakim, kaz, trackbot
15:43:34 <francois> Clarke: the table we have for discussion today may address some of your needs, but we should address Duncan's point before.
15:43:52 <francois> Topic: ViewPort-Support (ISSUE-37)
15:44:00 <francois> Duncan: lots of discussion on the mailing-list.
15:44:19 <kaz> issue-37?
15:44:19 <trackbot> ISSUE-37 -- View-Port support for Video Window -- raised
15:44:19 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/37
15:44:20 <francois> ... One way is to have a canvas tag around a video tag and then do all sorts of tricks.
15:44:34 <kaz> s/... One/Duncan: One/
15:44:39 <francois> ... There was one comment that is was not dynamic though.
15:44:57 <francois> ... Also use of SVG was mentioned linked trough a metadata track.
15:45:19 <francois> ... Standardization possible around use of metadata to incorporate SVG to manipulate video.
15:45:47 <giuseppep> giuseppep has joined #webtv
15:45:53 <kaz> -> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/MPTF_Discussions/ViewPort-Support ViewPort-Supprot
15:46:14 <francois> ... The background for merging SVG and HTML video tags was completely different, but some overlap.
15:46:31 <kaz> s/... The/Duncan: The/
15:46:34 <Clarke> Issue 34 is adaptive video. the e-mails used the wrong issue number
15:46:45 <kaz> ok :)
15:46:52 <francois> Duncan: wondering if anyone has any other thoughts on this.
15:47:28 <francois> Bob: Continuing to refer to it as "viewport" issue is good. There seems to be general agreement that the use case is valid.
15:47:37 <francois> ... That's my personal feeling.
15:48:14 <francois> Clarke: In one of the email discussions, it's linked to ISSUE-34, so maybe we need to recapture that as part of ISSUE-37
15:48:45 <francois> ... What I would really like is if we could test some of these and see if they really work so that we can clean up whether that's covered or whether it generates new requirements.
15:48:58 <francois> Duncan: yes, we'll try.
15:49:45 <francois> Bob: Two of the subcases have predominated. One if to extend map to video. The other is to take a subportion of a mosaic and manipulate as you could with the full video stream.
15:49:50 <francois> ... Perhaps worth documenting.
15:50:33 <francois> Jan: When referring to SVG, it seems that we embed, shouldn't we highlight that it would be better not to have to embed SVG in your HTML?
15:50:42 <francois> Duncan: which way do you embed?
15:50:54 <francois> Jan: well, the point is not to embed, but do it natively
15:50:55 <francois> q+
15:51:17 <francois> ... and then it's supported more natively instead of working around it.
15:51:52 <kaz> q-
15:51:57 <francois> Duncan: sounds like a separate issue in itself, probably worth calling for a separate issue.
15:52:00 <francois> ack francois 
15:53:06 <francois> zakim, mute me
15:53:06 <Zakim> francois should now be muted
15:53:25 <francois> francois: SVG in HTML5 is not really "embedding" anymore. It's included.
15:53:44 <Clarke> Table under discussion: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/MPTF_Discussions
15:53:53 <francois> Topic: TV Services and Media Transport Mapping
15:54:30 <francois> Bob: We've taken a look at various events and application data are carried in media transport.
15:54:44 <francois> ... looking at different common formats used throughout the world.
15:55:02 <francois> ... [going through the table]
15:55:20 <kaz> s/MPTF_Discussions/MPTF_Discussions#Other_Discussions
15:55:31 <kaz> rrsagent, make log public
15:55:37 <kaz> rrsagent, draft minutes
15:55:37 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/11-webtv-minutes.html kaz
15:55:54 <francois> ... e.g. Play an advertisement in the middle of a stream, ability to have a descriptive audio track designed for the visually-impaired.
15:56:23 <francois> ... could be added as an audio description track. Closed captions for similar purpose.
15:56:32 <francois> ... This data is transported in-band.
15:56:45 <francois> ... It's up to the user-agent to expose this data in different ways to the video tag.
15:57:01 <francois> ... The first three would be application data that comes in-band.
15:57:11 <francois> ... They would be acted on only by script.
15:57:36 <francois> ... The others would be exposed as additional audio/text tracks. They are handled well, I think, described in some details in the HTML5 spec.
15:57:59 <francois> ... The columns list the different media transports we may have to deal with.
15:58:35 <francois> ... There is MPEG TS2, MPEG4 ISOBMFF, the DASH work, or other manifest files.
15:58:55 <francois> ... The question is: how do the user agent recognizes a secondary audio track or a DTV trigger as part of application data?
15:59:32 <francois> ... There are a number of aspects that need to be defined. One is for the various transport formats how the data is carried upon.
16:00:04 <francois> ... Then there's what formats need to be supported, and third issue is how you expose the information in HTML5 to the application.
16:00:21 <francois> ... The HTML5 alludes to that when they talk about in-band tracks.
16:00:35 <francois> ... This work needs to be done.
16:00:53 <Clarke> q?
16:00:59 <francois> ... One of the questions raised: how should this be considered within the context of W3C?
16:01:27 <francois> ... We had some discussion with Ian Hickson and WhatWG. He seems to be supportive of this.
16:01:37 <kaz> q+
16:02:17 <francois> Jan: Do you expect to, as an exercise, maybe create an annex to a W3C document, make a mapping?
16:02:29 <francois> ... I would think it's a good implementation guide.
16:02:33 <francois> q+
16:03:20 <francois> Bob: I don't have much insight as to how this should be specified in a W3C spec. We would welcome working with W3C in a broader context to work on this.
16:03:35 <francois> ... We'd be very supportive of that if W3C wants to take this on.
16:03:38 <kaz> ack k
16:04:38 <francois> Kaz: Several options. HTML WG is one of them. Another group named MMI working group, working on EMMA, which includes several different types with strong support for extensions.
16:05:01 <francois> ... Another possibility could be creating a Business group or a community group for the discussion on the mapping.
16:05:26 <francois> ... The venue is important, but the discussion on the possible mapping is much more important.
16:05:44 <francois> ... Do you think it makes sense to continue discussion in the Media Pipeline TF?
16:05:48 <JanL> JanL has joined #webtv
16:05:50 <francois> ... Other options will take more time.
16:06:17 <francois> Bob: We can do that. Over the lifetime of this TF, we are going to fill out some of the cells.
16:06:39 <francois> ... As we get more details, I would like to come back to the TF and share more insights as to what needs to be done.
16:06:48 <francois> Clarke: we'll try to update the table as we move along.
16:07:01 <francois> ack francois 
16:07:02 <Clarke> q?
16:07:06 <kaz> zakim, mute me
16:07:06 <Zakim> Kazuyuki should now be muted
16:07:49 <Zakim> -rberkoff
16:08:12 <kaz> francois: the goal of the IG is generating suggestions for WGs
16:08:58 <Zakim> - +1.404.242.aabb
16:09:07 <francois> zakim, mute me
16:09:07 <Zakim> francois should now be muted
16:10:03 <francois> Bob: Yes, we'd looking for broader input than the group of companies that started this effort. To the point of starting working on a standard, we do need the technical work of this table to be reflected in a standard.
16:10:12 <francois> ... There are a variety of places where this could be done.
16:10:58 <francois> ... Both discussions are good to help making this standardized. IETF could be an option as well, for instance.
16:11:00 <Zakim> -Clarke_Stevens
16:11:01 <Zakim> -Bob.a
16:11:02 <Zakim> -Aizu
16:11:03 <Clarke> -Clarke
16:11:04 <Zakim> -Bob
16:11:10 <Zakim> -Kazuyuki
16:11:10 <francois> Clarke: good. Running out of time, so suggest to close the call.
16:11:13 <Zakim> -Juhani
16:11:15 <francois> [Call adjourned]
16:11:22 <Zakim> -francois
16:11:26 <Zakim> -JanL
16:11:36 <duncanr> duncanr has left #webtv
16:11:44 <francois> RRSAgent, list attendees
16:11:44 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'list attendees', francois.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
16:11:49 <francois> Zakim, list attendees
16:11:49 <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been Kazuyuki, Clarke_Stevens, duncan, Bob, francois, rberkoff, JanL, Aizu, Tatsuya_Igarashi, +358.405.81aaaa, Juhani, +1.404.242.aabb
16:11:54 <francois> RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:11:54 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/11-webtv-minutes.html francois
16:12:28 <giuseppep> kaz, francois, have you by any chance discussed about the mail to the HMTML group?
16:13:13 <kaz> rrsagent, stop