15:05:50 RRSAgent has joined #webid 15:05:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/08/01-webid-irc 15:05:52 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:05:52 Zakim has joined #webid 15:05:54 Zakim, this will be WEBID 15:05:54 ok, trackbot, I see INC_WEBID(WEBID)11:00AM already started 15:05:55 Meeting: WebID Incubator Group Teleconference 15:05:55 Date: 01 August 2011 15:06:04 RRSAgent, draft minute 15:06:04 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft minute', bblfish. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:06:15 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:06:37 +OpenLink_Software 15:06:43 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:06:44 +MacTed; got it 15:06:49 Who's on the phone 15:06:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:06:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/01-webid-minutes.html MacTed 15:07:05 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:07:05 On the phone I see +1.619.255.aaaa, ??P3, +1.650.450.aabb, MacTed 15:07:07 gaedke has joined #webid 15:07:11 RRSAgent, make minutes public 15:07:11 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', MacTed. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:07:15 +??P16 15:07:16 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:07:24 Zakim, P16 is me 15:07:24 sorry, bergi, I do not recognize a party named 'P16' 15:07:27 Zakim, mute me 15:07:27 MacTed should now be muted 15:07:34 Zakim, +??P16 is me 15:07:34 sorry, bergi, I do not recognize a party named '+??P16' 15:07:43 zakim, +1.650.450.aabb is jeffsayre 15:07:43 +jeffsayre; got it 15:07:44 is there a URL web service URL for the irc channel? 15:07:46 Zakim. ??p16 is bergi 15:07:57 Zakim, ??p16 is bergi 15:07:58 +bergi; got it 15:08:48 bblfish - by web service URL, do you mean a public web-served IRC client? 15:08:57 Zakim, who's here? 15:08:57 On the phone I see +1.619.255.aaaa, ??P3, jeffsayre, MacTed (muted), bergi 15:09:01 yes MacTed 15:09:27 if so could you please add a link from the wiki and post me the link to the wiki here 15:09:33 so I can give this to our guest speaker 15:10:33 this may work -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2008Aug/0038.html 15:10:57 (that page has details specific to a different group, but points out mibbit) 15:11:10 Francisco has joined #WebID 15:11:36 +??P20 15:12:11 zaim, agenda? 15:12:19 zakim, adenda? 15:12:19 I don't understand your question, bblfish. 15:12:20 zakim, ??P20 is me 15:12:20 +gaedke; got it 15:12:30 zakim, mute me 15:12:30 gaedke should now be muted 15:12:40 Web site of NSTIC: http://www.nist.gov/nstic/ 15:12:40 zakim, agenda? 15:12:40 I see nothing on the agenda 15:12:44 Zakim, who's here? 15:12:44 On the phone I see +1.619.255.aaaa, ??P3, jeffsayre, MacTed (muted), bergi, gaedke (muted) 15:13:37 agenda +"accept minutes of previous two meetings http://www.w3.org/2011/07/18-webid-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2011/07/25-webid-minutes.html" 15:13:42 agendum next 15:13:47 next agendum 15:15:55 +! 15:15:58 +! 15:16:00 +1 15:16:07 +1 15:16:08 +1 15:16:26 +1 15:16:57 agenda +"alk with Corella Francisco on his work at NSTIC 15:16:58 "National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace" 15:16:59 and "Proposed NSTIC Architecture" 15:16:59 http://pomcor.com/whitepapers/ProposedNSTICArchitecture.pdf" 15:17:11 RESOLVED: Minutes approved 15:17:17 next agendum 15:18:48 pomcor is small research institution in San Diego (2 people) 15:18:56 Nascar was started in April 15th 15:19:06 RESOLVED: Minutes approved 15:19:15 zakim, pick a scribe 15:19:15 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose gaedke (muted) 15:19:55 NSTIC started in April 20th is open to many people and was only $20 to participate 15:20:07 is trying to solve the password problem 15:20:34 next meeting is in September probable be September 19 in bay area 15:21:06 300 people at first meeting, 150 at MIT next meeting 15:22:56 francisco likes the emphasis on privacy at NSTIC 15:23:17 one should not be able to track the user 15:23:35 3 requirements of NSTIC 15:23:49 - should not be able to track the user form one session to the next 15:24:17 - should not be able to exchange information between Relying Party 15:24:31 (UProof Microsoft, IBM Idemix) 15:25:20 - different use cases of authentication require different types of trust. Many use cases require multiple credentials and multiple elves of trust 15:25:35 eg: going to buy wine at a wine merchants 15:25:54 needs 2 credentials: 15:26:13 - requires proof of age, without revealing date of brith 15:28:09 - credit card certificate (not sure what info is in the cert) 15:28:23 Other situation: 15:28:30 - your bank needs you id 15:28:36 - your social security number 15:28:58 (this is the bank scenario from the architecture) 15:30:00 There is also a part of the paper consider for session 15:30:31 and how one could use a public key there 15:30:52 The notion of a login certificate 15:31:59 so the notion of a personal data site 15:32:28 which would allow you to not have to re-enter the information in every site you log in 15:34:09 How much change to the browser is needed for this to be enabled? 15:34:17 Ie: what are the mechanisms 15:34:55 -??P3 15:35:11 oops lost contact 15:36:11 +??P3 15:36:25 zakim ??P3 is me 15:36:29 zakim, ??P3 is me 15:36:29 +bblfish; got it 15:36:32 I am back 15:39:48 yes 15:39:55 zakim, unmute me 15:39:55 gaedke should no longer be muted 15:40:13 zakim, mute me 15:40:13 gaedke should now be muted 15:41:17 discussion on idea: From the login button to cgi to tls connection 15:42:03 problem when does connection start 15:42:07 q+ 15:43:35 server has to ask client for tls connection (part of the handshake) 15:44:05 question to address - can we do this at any time or without changing the state of the art 15:44:48 one way could be breaking session on the server side (bblfish is working this) 15:46:57 another approach (as we are currently working on) would to take the power of the semantic web / FOAF - but this comes with privacy issues 15:47:30 interesting scenario: setting up a site for collaboration 15:48:22 requires to set all roles in the early beginning (has also privacy implications) 15:48:35 Topic: Trustmarks 15:50:32 US citizen trust in US banks, French trust in in their banks etc. - for most banks this might be ok on a global scale, but not for all. 15:50:55 Scenario: Different groups trust different authorities 15:51:49 Question: Relying party takes social graph into account 15:53:44 So, authorities could define groups whom to trust (or whom they rate as trustworthy), just by setting up groups of URIs to these trusted parties 15:54:12 qiuestions? 15:56:19 Privacy is a main concern at the US approach. BUT Paper says if you have three attributes of someone - you can identify that person. Reference required (can someone add this please) 15:56:39 some paper says that yes 15:56:43 M$ 15:56:50 I have lost connection 15:56:55 So, is privacy an issue that is possible to address at all? 15:56:56 someone ask a question 15:57:10 -bblfish 15:57:33 zakim, unmute me 15:57:33 gaedke should no longer be muted 15:57:49 +??P3 15:58:25 Zakim, who's here? 15:58:25 On the phone I see +1.619.255.aaaa, jeffsayre, MacTed (muted), bergi, gaedke, ??P3 15:59:29 zakim, mute me 15:59:29 gaedke should now be muted 16:00:18 Question: how much privacy is possible - or is it just a topic to put on paper, but is not possible from the technological way 16:00:49 Approaches must be flexible for the different scenarios, including also different privacy aspects 16:02:10 scenario very close to privacy: Login. The login service does not need to know **where** you login 16:05:06 have you seen http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/identity-in-the-browser-firefox/ 16:05:13 q+ 16:06:16 bergi? 16:08:14 different approaches for cookie / certificate / session handling. need to have a user-friendly approach that makes clear what identity the user is using 16:08:47 I must run to another meeting 16:09:25 -jeffsayre 16:10:11 tracking is difficult problem - need to discuss this in more detail 16:12:39 another approach: A Web Server integrated in every browser. Than you could address the certificate/attributes with a global namespace/URI http://myserver.in.the.browser.example.org 16:14:42 2 privacy enhanced protocol problems 16:14:56 UProof is trackable 16:15:34 (says Francisco) 16:15:58 same token used in multiple parties 16:15:59 Francisco: idemix has a different problem - it is not revocable by traditional means 16:16:40 more recent credentials … (lost connection) 16:16:48 -??P3 16:17:40 oops can't get back in 16:17:59 we're over time -- may have to end 16:18:14 please say thanks from me 16:18:19 Zakim, unmute me 16:18:19 MacTed should no longer be muted 16:18:21 looks like one can't join the conf call after time 16:18:53 zakim unmute me 16:18:59 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:18:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/01-webid-minutes.html MacTed 16:19:04 trackbot, end meeting 16:19:04 Zakim, list attendees 16:19:04 As of this point the attendees have been +1.619.255.aaaa, MacTed, jeffsayre, bergi, gaedke, bblfish 16:19:05 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:19:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/01-webid-minutes.html trackbot 16:19:06 RRSAgent, bye 16:19:06 I see no action items