IRC log of rd on 2011-07-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:56:32 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rd
- 14:56:32 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/07/21-rd-irc
- 14:56:34 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 14:56:34 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #rd
- 14:56:36 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 7394
- 14:56:36 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes
- 14:56:37 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference
- 14:56:37 [trackbot]
- Date: 21 July 2011
- 14:57:50 [shadi]
- agenda+ Welcome
- 14:57:50 [shadi]
- agenda+ Revisit research topics - http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki
- 14:57:50 [shadi]
- agenda+ Selection of first topic
- 14:57:59 [shadi]
- chair: shadi
- 14:58:09 [shadi]
- zakim, call shadi-617
- 14:58:09 [Zakim]
- ok, shadi; the call is being made
- 14:58:10 [Zakim]
- WAI_RDWG()11:00AM has now started
- 14:58:11 [Zakim]
- +Shadi
- 15:02:55 [Zakim]
- +??P29
- 15:02:59 [Zakim]
- -??P29
- 15:02:59 [giorgio]
- giorgio has joined #rd
- 15:03:01 [Zakim]
- +??P29
- 15:03:06 [shadi]
- zakim, ? is Mate
- 15:03:10 [yeliz]
- yeliz has joined #rd
- 15:03:19 [Zakim]
- +Mate; got it
- 15:04:00 [Joshue]
- Joshue has joined #rd
- 15:04:01 [Zakim]
- +??P43
- 15:04:10 [yeliz]
- zakim, ??P43 is yeliz
- 15:04:41 [shadi]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 15:04:46 [Zakim]
- +yeliz; got it
- 15:05:16 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Welcome" taken up [from shadi]
- 15:06:34 [shadi]
- regrets: Charles, Vivienne, Simon, Markel, Klaus
- 15:08:04 [shadi]
- scribe: yeliz
- 15:09:12 [giorgio]
- hi there; I'm having the usual pbms with voip
- 15:09:20 [shadi]
- :(
- 15:09:51 [Zakim]
- +??P15
- 15:10:01 [Joshue]
- zakim, ??P15 is Joshue
- 15:10:01 [Zakim]
- +Joshue; got it
- 15:10:22 [Mate]
- no
- 15:10:44 [Joshue]
- :-)
- 15:11:43 [Joshue]
- :-)
- 15:11:46 [Zakim]
- +??P27
- 15:12:07 [shadi]
- zakim, ? is Giorgio
- 15:12:07 [Zakim]
- +Giorgio; got it
- 15:12:39 [Joshue]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:12:39 [Zakim]
- Joshue should now be muted
- 15:13:06 [Joshue]
- shadi, you've got a whole Studio One Dub echo going on :-)
- 15:13:23 [yeliz]
- zakim, mute yeliz
- 15:13:23 [Zakim]
- yeliz should now be muted
- 15:13:58 [Joshue]
- thats better
- 15:14:38 [shadi]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:14:38 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Shadi, Mate, yeliz (muted), Joshue (muted), Giorgio
- 15:14:53 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/scribes
- 15:16:36 [yeliz]
- zakim, unmute yeliz
- 15:16:36 [Zakim]
- yeliz should no longer be muted
- 15:16:49 [shadi]
- agenda?
- 15:17:26 [yeliz]
- shadi: we wil take turns in scribing
- 15:17:30 [yeliz]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:17:31 [Zakim]
- yeliz should now be muted
- 15:17:53 [yeliz]
- shadi: the list is alphabetical here but we will take turns: http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/scribes
- 15:18:17 [yeliz]
- shadi: if you cannot scribe or don't want to scribe, please let me know and I will take you off from the list
- 15:18:35 [Joshue]
- The new SIP thing is working pretty well.
- 15:18:36 [yeliz]
- shadi: if you experience any problems with the telecon. system, let us know, we want to improve the system
- 15:18:48 [Joshue]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:18:48 [Zakim]
- Joshue should no longer be muted
- 15:19:05 [yeliz]
- shadi: anybody is aware of accessible SIP clients, let me know
- 15:19:22 [yeliz]
- shadi: haven't been successful, let me know if you find an accessible client
- 15:19:28 [shadi]
- zakim, take up next
- 15:19:28 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Revisit research topics - http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki" taken up [from shadi]
- 15:19:32 [yeliz]
- shadi: they all seem to have different accessibility issue
- 15:19:41 [yeliz]
- shadi: moving on to the next topic
- 15:19:43 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/
- 15:19:50 [yeliz]
- shadi: Simon has emailed the steps
- 15:19:58 [yeliz]
- shadi: this week would be used to add/expand topics
- 15:20:18 [yeliz]
- shadi: so that we can take a candidate topic so that we can explore that topic
- 15:20:30 [yeliz]
- shadi: some people have been active on the wiki
- 15:20:40 [yeliz]
- shadi: new topics added and some expanded
- 15:20:49 [yeliz]
- shadi: not so much activity though
- 15:21:07 [yeliz]
- shadi: what do you think? do you have any observation
- 15:21:27 [yeliz]
- Joshua: difficult to say, we need to get a feel,
- 15:21:42 [yeliz]
- Joshua: I am interested in finding out topics that I am not currently involved with
- 15:21:51 [Zakim]
- -yeliz
- 15:21:56 [yeliz]
- Joshua: hoping to chat, discuss people who are not on the list
- 15:22:12 [shadi]
- scribe: Joshue
- 15:22:16 [Joshue]
- shadi: Part of the issues is that people are waiting
- 15:22:38 [Joshue]
- SAZ: We need to get people out of their comfort zone and use the wiki
- 15:22:53 [Joshue]
- SAZ: I encourage others to start using the wiki as much as poss.
- 15:22:59 [yeliz]
- \me sorry lost the connection :(
- 15:23:04 [Joshue]
- SAZ: Simples things can be added
- 15:23:34 [Joshue]
- SAZ: I have added a line or two here and there, the webpage sampling.
- 15:23:52 [Joshue]
- Its a little chicken or egg
- 15:24:08 [Joshue]
- SAZ: How can we get people to talk?
- 15:24:57 [Joshue]
- SAZ: These are problems with international group.
- 15:26:09 [Joshue]
- Mate: We could pick a topic every week, talk about that etc.
- 15:26:49 [shadi]
- zakim, who is noisy?
- 15:27:00 [giorgio]
- I guess it's me again sorry!
- 15:27:01 [Zakim]
- shadi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Giorgio (29%), Mate (5%)
- 15:27:09 [giorgio]
- yes
- 15:28:11 [Mate]
- I could not hear it
- 15:28:21 [Zakim]
- +??P37
- 15:28:25 [giorgio]
- ok
- 15:28:27 [yeliz]
- zakim, ??P37 is yeliz
- 15:28:27 [Zakim]
- +yeliz; got it
- 15:28:33 [giorgio]
- we need to discuss each issue first
- 15:28:44 [giorgio]
- find overlaps between them
- 15:28:47 [shadi]
- scribe: yeliz
- 15:28:52 [yeliz]
- zakim, mute yeliz
- 15:28:52 [Zakim]
- yeliz should now be muted
- 15:28:59 [Joshue]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:28:59 [Zakim]
- Joshue should now be muted
- 15:29:01 [giorgio]
- and only then in the end decide to focus for 2 months or so on the first one
- 15:29:11 [Joshue]
- +1
- 15:29:20 [giorgio]
- perhaps shadi could read it
- 15:29:24 [Joshue]
- +1 to discussing and seeing overlaps
- 15:29:57 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we need to discuss and find the overlaps, and only in the end decide to focus on one topic more closely
- 15:30:12 [yeliz]
- SAZ: I think Simon had a different hope,
- 15:30:22 [Joshue]
- If I was to pick one I'd suggest Metrics?
- 15:30:32 [Joshue]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Benchmarking_Web_Accessibility_Metrics
- 15:30:34 [yeliz]
- SAZ: but as the Joshua says the wiki is empty and people don't know each other
- 15:30:46 [yeliz]
- SAZ: lets start looking at a topic
- 15:30:51 [Joshue]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:30:51 [Zakim]
- Joshue should no longer be muted
- 15:30:55 [yeliz]
- and Joshua is suggesting one now
- 15:31:21 [yeliz]
- Joshua: this ties in really well with something that I will do later
- 15:31:42 [yeliz]
- Joshua: if SAZ you want to focus on something else, then we can focus on someting else
- 15:31:58 [yeliz]
- SAZ: I don't want to be biased though, as you know I am interested in evaluation
- 15:32:23 [yeliz]
- SAZ: what do others think? Shall we look at this topic and looks for the overlap with other topics
- 15:32:24 [Joshue]
- Yes
- 15:32:25 [shadi]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Benchmarking_Web_Accessibility_Metrics
- 15:32:33 [yeliz]
- SAZ: lets look at this topic first
- 15:32:40 [yeliz]
- SAZ: what does it contain?
- 15:33:03 [yeliz]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:33:03 [Zakim]
- yeliz was already muted, yeliz
- 15:33:16 [giorgio]
- if needed I could tell something more about the experiments markel and I did
- 15:33:57 [yeliz]
- Joshua: can I put somebody's name here who is interested in this?
- 15:34:05 [yeliz]
- SAZ: ofcourse
- 15:34:20 [yeliz]
- SAZ: you are welcome to add a small parag about you
- 15:34:32 [yeliz]
- SAZ: ofcourse you can link directly to your home page as well
- 15:34:49 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Joshua, what's your view on this topic?
- 15:35:40 [yeliz]
- Joshua: I think the area of metrics, evaluation benchmarking, I think I am thinking about case studies, etc, I am wondering as well the user experience, and usability testing
- 15:35:56 [yeliz]
- Joshua: interested in fleshing out a framework
- 15:36:17 [yeliz]
- Joshua: I am also interested in usability metrics to support inclusive design
- 15:36:37 [yeliz]
- SAZ: that's interesting, but I undertsood to measuring the level accessibility
- 15:36:53 [yeliz]
- SAZ: but I guess you are talking about the perceived benefits, etc...
- 15:37:01 [giorgio]
- may i say something?
- 15:37:20 [shadi]
- q+
- 15:37:21 [yeliz]
- Joshua: I guess where I am coming is from assessing accessibility technically
- 15:37:31 [giorgio]
- q+
- 15:37:34 [shadi]
- ack me
- 15:37:40 [shadi]
- ack g
- 15:38:15 [Mate]
- I can not understand, sorry
- 15:38:18 [yeliz]
- GB: the experiments we have done with Markel
- 15:38:48 [yeliz]
- zakim, unmute yeliz
- 15:38:49 [Zakim]
- yeliz should no longer be muted
- 15:39:06 [yeliz]
- zakim, mute yeliz
- 15:39:06 [Zakim]
- yeliz should now be muted
- 15:39:12 [giorgio]
- i think we should first fous on measuring acc
- 15:39:19 [giorgio]
- then on measuring effects
- 15:39:32 [giorgio]
- that's because if metrics foracc are not valid, everything else
- 15:39:35 [yeliz]
- YY: I agree with Giorgio
- 15:39:39 [giorgio]
- would be random or so
- 15:40:01 [Joshue]
- Yes
- 15:40:16 [Joshue]
- I think the benefits would be an extra topic
- 15:40:21 [yeliz]
- SAZ: measuring accessibility is crucial, and then measuring the benefits would come later
- 15:40:35 [giorgio]
- yes, i agree with joshua
- 15:40:35 [yeliz]
- Joshua: benefit, business case, etc I think is another topics
- 15:41:18 [yeliz]
- SAZ: the way I add a page, I search for a topic and if it is not there then I add it
- 15:41:32 [yeliz]
- Joshua: I can add a new page talking about the benefit assessment
- 15:42:24 [yeliz]
- SAZ: two sides of measurement: validity (how accessible is the content) vs. the benefits of making a page accessible (certain level)
- 15:43:04 [yeliz]
- SAZ: those kind of research, they have a certain scope
- 15:43:29 [yeliz]
- SAZ: the majority of the topics suggested, fall into the category of midterm range topics
- 15:43:38 [yeliz]
- SAZ: some of them are even short term
- 15:43:50 [yeliz]
- SAZ: what is missing for sure is long term topics
- 15:43:59 [yeliz]
- SAZ: things for instance, gesture
- 15:44:19 [yeliz]
- SAZ: how is the change of interaction affecting the accessibility, requirements and paradigms
- 15:45:00 [yeliz]
- SAZ: this is definitely missing, and I know most of you have experience in that
- 15:45:18 [yeliz]
- SAZ: please fill free to add topics that do not have the same tone in the current topics
- 15:45:36 [yeliz]
- Joshua: as far as I know Chaals is interested in this and there is a group working on this
- 15:45:50 [yeliz]
- SAZ: there is also another group looking into this
- 15:46:07 [yeliz]
- SAZ: this group should have to watch for overlaps with other groups, do some complementary stuff
- 15:46:20 [yeliz]
- SAZ: and make sure that there is no repeatition
- 15:46:27 [yeliz]
- SAZ: gesture is one of the ideas
- 15:46:47 [yeliz]
- YY: affective computing
- 15:47:20 [Joshue]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:47:20 [Zakim]
- Joshue should now be muted
- 15:47:30 [yeliz]
- SAZ: please go ahead and add more
- 15:47:42 [yeliz]
- SAZ: topics that will become hot topics in future
- 15:48:00 [yeliz]
- SAZ: any other topic that would be interesting to look at?
- 15:48:14 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Lets look at web metrics
- 15:48:29 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Joshua mentioned that this is focused on automated testing
- 15:48:48 [yeliz]
- SAZ: even if we say measuring accessibility that does not say automated
- 15:49:02 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we can break them into: automated + non-automated
- 15:49:07 [Mate]
- q+
- 15:49:12 [yeliz]
- SAZ: what do you think about the non-automated part
- 15:49:18 [shadi]
- ack m
- 15:49:47 [yeliz]
- I annot hear well
- 15:49:49 [giorgio]
- the fundamental pbm see with acc metrics is how to make it sure that they measure what we mean (validity)
- 15:50:00 [giorgio]
- the pbm is the same with auto &manual metrics
- 15:50:19 [yeliz]
- Mate: Its difficult
- 15:50:31 [yeliz]
- SAZ: objectively measurable and non-obejctively
- 15:51:02 [yeliz]
- SAZ: for example, how good is alt text?
- 15:51:29 [yeliz]
- SAZ: same problem again with automatic and manual
- 15:51:42 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Objective vs subjective, very different specturms
- 15:52:07 [yeliz]
- SAZ: when we talk about measuring accessibility, it's one of the things that will always come up
- 15:52:29 [yeliz]
- SAZ: any other observations from this topic?
- 15:52:45 [yeliz]
- Mate: accessibility is depends on the audiance
- 15:53:10 [yeliz]
- Mate: if thee site is targeting Hungarians, then the accessibility is related how many people can access it?
- 15:54:10 [yeliz]
- Mate: It would be good to give some ratings, say for example you cannot reach certain percentage of people
- 15:54:21 [yeliz]
- Mate: it would be good to have these in guidelines
- 15:54:50 [yeliz]
- SAZ: the idea of guidelines, is based on universal design, not to focus on certain user groups
- 15:55:13 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we do not want to miss any group, for example people who are deaf-blind are not well represented
- 15:55:21 [Mate]
- I agree
- 15:55:23 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we don't have time to dwell into this
- 15:55:37 [yeliz]
- SAZ: measuring by numbers vs. measuring by people
- 15:55:55 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Giorgio's work is relevant to this -- Barrier Walkthrough method
- 15:56:11 [yeliz]
- SAZ: That goes into aggregation and impact of the accessibility barriers
- 15:56:17 [giorgio]
- I'm a bit confused: I thought that we needed to discuss topics/issues that would promote research/experiments in an area, rather than (just) proposing new research ideas.
- 15:56:37 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we need to still have a measurement
- 15:56:40 [giorgio]
- In the proposed entry in the wiki we suggested to set up a sort of competition between research gorups
- 15:56:52 [giorgio]
- to foster results, standardized results,etc
- 15:57:22 [giorgio]
- no no. that one
- 15:57:26 [Joshue]
- zakim, umute me
- 15:57:26 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'umute me', Joshue
- 15:57:35 [Joshue]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:57:35 [Zakim]
- Joshue should no longer be muted
- 15:57:37 [giorgio]
- where we say "... thesame type of competition" ...
- 15:57:40 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Giorgio I am not sure which topic you are referring to
- 15:58:12 [giorgio]
- bye
- 15:58:13 [Zakim]
- -Joshue
- 15:58:58 [giorgio]
- to anyone
- 15:59:10 [yeliz]
- SAZ: response to Giorgio's comment...Are you asking specifically about this topic or ?
- 15:59:24 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we really need research topics that will advance accessibility
- 15:59:39 [yeliz]
- SAZ: I really encourage people to add whatever they want to get a momentum
- 15:59:55 [yeliz]
- SAZ: then we can choose the ones which will have higher impact
- 15:59:59 [yeliz]
- SAZ: to make sure that the whole thing is moving fastre
- 16:00:07 [giorgio]
- so the output would be a researc agenda to give to researchers worldwide
- 16:00:54 [yeliz]
- SAZ: don't want to overclaim what we want to do in this group
- 16:01:05 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we certainly want to contribute to the research agenda
- 16:01:15 [yeliz]
- SAZ: but don't want to overclaim
- 16:01:42 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we need bigger impact topics
- 16:01:58 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we need to have a good combination of short, mid and long term researchers
- 16:02:07 [yeliz]
- so that we would be able to choose from them
- 16:02:12 [giorgio]
- yes it does
- 16:02:20 [yeliz]
- SAZ: does that answer your question Giorgio?
- 16:02:29 [shadi]
- zakim, take up next
- 16:02:29 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Selection of first topic" taken up [from shadi]
- 16:02:29 [yeliz]
- SAZ: Lets come back to the final agenda item
- 16:02:57 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we were discussing selecting a topic to focus on
- 16:03:04 [yeliz]
- SAZ: this will be done in parallel to wiki
- 16:03:14 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we will continue to add wiki, expand topics, etc
- 16:03:32 [yeliz]
- SAZ: we want to have a menu card with lots of selection
- 16:03:37 [yeliz]
- SAZ: but we need to start somewhere
- 16:03:47 [yeliz]
- SAZ: The idea is to start a web based survey
- 16:03:58 [yeliz]
- SAZ: today is the deadline for adding a topic
- 16:04:08 [yeliz]
- SAZ: with this survey you will be asked to rate the topics
- 16:04:11 [Mate]
- sorry, my wireless disconnected
- 16:04:29 [yeliz]
- SAZ: you will be able to say, combine them, focus on partial topic
- 16:04:40 [yeliz]
- SAZ: hopefully next week we will have the first topics
- 16:04:53 [yeliz]
- SAZ: so we will have a first webinar and working group note
- 16:04:59 [yeliz]
- SAZ: that is the plan for the upcoming week
- 16:05:19 [yeliz]
- SAZ: any question? comments?
- 16:05:23 [yeliz]
- SAZ: please do add to the wiki
- 16:05:39 [yeliz]
- SAZ: don't right now be too hesitant with the ideas you have
- 16:05:54 [yeliz]
- SAZ: think about the topics that will have high impact and will advance the accessibility
- 16:06:17 [yeliz]
- SAZ: the ideas which are important will buble up and the rest will stay there anyway
- 16:06:40 [yeliz]
- SAZ: wait for the survey and Simon will send the survey this week
- 16:06:43 [giorgio]
- ok bye
- 16:06:45 [yeliz]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:06:45 [Zakim]
- yeliz should no longer be muted
- 16:06:52 [Mate]
- ok
- 16:06:56 [Mate]
- bye
- 16:07:18 [Zakim]
- -yeliz
- 16:07:19 [Zakim]
- -Shadi
- 16:07:29 [shadi]
- trackbot, end meeting
- 16:07:29 [trackbot]
- Zakim, list attendees
- 16:07:29 [Zakim]
- As of this point the attendees have been Shadi, Mate, yeliz, Joshue, Giorgio
- 16:07:30 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, please draft minutes
- 16:07:30 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/21-rd-minutes.html trackbot
- 16:07:31 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 16:07:31 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items