14:56:32 RRSAgent has joined #rd 14:56:32 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/07/21-rd-irc 14:56:34 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:56:34 Zakim has joined #rd 14:56:36 Zakim, this will be 7394 14:56:36 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 14:56:37 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 14:56:37 Date: 21 July 2011 14:57:50 agenda+ Welcome 14:57:50 agenda+ Revisit research topics - http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki 14:57:50 agenda+ Selection of first topic 14:57:59 chair: shadi 14:58:09 zakim, call shadi-617 14:58:09 ok, shadi; the call is being made 14:58:10 WAI_RDWG()11:00AM has now started 14:58:11 +Shadi 15:02:55 +??P29 15:02:59 -??P29 15:02:59 giorgio has joined #rd 15:03:01 +??P29 15:03:06 zakim, ? is Mate 15:03:10 yeliz has joined #rd 15:03:19 +Mate; got it 15:04:00 Joshue has joined #rd 15:04:01 +??P43 15:04:10 zakim, ??P43 is yeliz 15:04:41 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:04:46 +yeliz; got it 15:05:16 agendum 1. "Welcome" taken up [from shadi] 15:06:34 regrets: Charles, Vivienne, Simon, Markel, Klaus 15:08:04 scribe: yeliz 15:09:12 hi there; I'm having the usual pbms with voip 15:09:20 :( 15:09:51 +??P15 15:10:01 zakim, ??P15 is Joshue 15:10:01 +Joshue; got it 15:10:22 no 15:10:44 :-) 15:11:43 :-) 15:11:46 +??P27 15:12:07 zakim, ? is Giorgio 15:12:07 +Giorgio; got it 15:12:39 zakim, mute me 15:12:39 Joshue should now be muted 15:13:06 shadi, you've got a whole Studio One Dub echo going on :-) 15:13:23 zakim, mute yeliz 15:13:23 yeliz should now be muted 15:13:58 thats better 15:14:38 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:14:38 On the phone I see Shadi, Mate, yeliz (muted), Joshue (muted), Giorgio 15:14:53 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/scribes 15:16:36 zakim, unmute yeliz 15:16:36 yeliz should no longer be muted 15:16:49 agenda? 15:17:26 shadi: we wil take turns in scribing 15:17:30 zakim, mute me 15:17:31 yeliz should now be muted 15:17:53 shadi: the list is alphabetical here but we will take turns: http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/scribes 15:18:17 shadi: if you cannot scribe or don't want to scribe, please let me know and I will take you off from the list 15:18:35 The new SIP thing is working pretty well. 15:18:36 shadi: if you experience any problems with the telecon. system, let us know, we want to improve the system 15:18:48 zakim, unmute me 15:18:48 Joshue should no longer be muted 15:19:05 shadi: anybody is aware of accessible SIP clients, let me know 15:19:22 shadi: haven't been successful, let me know if you find an accessible client 15:19:28 zakim, take up next 15:19:28 agendum 2. "Revisit research topics - http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki" taken up [from shadi] 15:19:32 shadi: they all seem to have different accessibility issue 15:19:41 shadi: moving on to the next topic 15:19:43 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/ 15:19:50 shadi: Simon has emailed the steps 15:19:58 shadi: this week would be used to add/expand topics 15:20:18 shadi: so that we can take a candidate topic so that we can explore that topic 15:20:30 shadi: some people have been active on the wiki 15:20:40 shadi: new topics added and some expanded 15:20:49 shadi: not so much activity though 15:21:07 shadi: what do you think? do you have any observation 15:21:27 Joshua: difficult to say, we need to get a feel, 15:21:42 Joshua: I am interested in finding out topics that I am not currently involved with 15:21:51 -yeliz 15:21:56 Joshua: hoping to chat, discuss people who are not on the list 15:22:12 scribe: Joshue 15:22:16 shadi: Part of the issues is that people are waiting 15:22:38 SAZ: We need to get people out of their comfort zone and use the wiki 15:22:53 SAZ: I encourage others to start using the wiki as much as poss. 15:22:59 \me sorry lost the connection :( 15:23:04 SAZ: Simples things can be added 15:23:34 SAZ: I have added a line or two here and there, the webpage sampling. 15:23:52 Its a little chicken or egg 15:24:08 SAZ: How can we get people to talk? 15:24:57 SAZ: These are problems with international group. 15:26:09 Mate: We could pick a topic every week, talk about that etc. 15:26:49 zakim, who is noisy? 15:27:00 I guess it's me again sorry! 15:27:01 shadi, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Giorgio (29%), Mate (5%) 15:27:09 yes 15:28:11 I could not hear it 15:28:21 +??P37 15:28:25 ok 15:28:27 zakim, ??P37 is yeliz 15:28:27 +yeliz; got it 15:28:33 we need to discuss each issue first 15:28:44 find overlaps between them 15:28:47 scribe: yeliz 15:28:52 zakim, mute yeliz 15:28:52 yeliz should now be muted 15:28:59 zakim, mute me 15:28:59 Joshue should now be muted 15:29:01 and only then in the end decide to focus for 2 months or so on the first one 15:29:11 +1 15:29:20 perhaps shadi could read it 15:29:24 +1 to discussing and seeing overlaps 15:29:57 SAZ: we need to discuss and find the overlaps, and only in the end decide to focus on one topic more closely 15:30:12 SAZ: I think Simon had a different hope, 15:30:22 If I was to pick one I'd suggest Metrics? 15:30:32 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Benchmarking_Web_Accessibility_Metrics 15:30:34 SAZ: but as the Joshua says the wiki is empty and people don't know each other 15:30:46 SAZ: lets start looking at a topic 15:30:51 zakim, unmute me 15:30:51 Joshue should no longer be muted 15:30:55 and Joshua is suggesting one now 15:31:21 Joshua: this ties in really well with something that I will do later 15:31:42 Joshua: if SAZ you want to focus on something else, then we can focus on someting else 15:31:58 SAZ: I don't want to be biased though, as you know I am interested in evaluation 15:32:23 SAZ: what do others think? Shall we look at this topic and looks for the overlap with other topics 15:32:24 Yes 15:32:25 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Benchmarking_Web_Accessibility_Metrics 15:32:33 SAZ: lets look at this topic first 15:32:40 SAZ: what does it contain? 15:33:03 zakim, mute me 15:33:03 yeliz was already muted, yeliz 15:33:16 if needed I could tell something more about the experiments markel and I did 15:33:57 Joshua: can I put somebody's name here who is interested in this? 15:34:05 SAZ: ofcourse 15:34:20 SAZ: you are welcome to add a small parag about you 15:34:32 SAZ: ofcourse you can link directly to your home page as well 15:34:49 SAZ: Joshua, what's your view on this topic? 15:35:40 Joshua: I think the area of metrics, evaluation benchmarking, I think I am thinking about case studies, etc, I am wondering as well the user experience, and usability testing 15:35:56 Joshua: interested in fleshing out a framework 15:36:17 Joshua: I am also interested in usability metrics to support inclusive design 15:36:37 SAZ: that's interesting, but I undertsood to measuring the level accessibility 15:36:53 SAZ: but I guess you are talking about the perceived benefits, etc... 15:37:01 may i say something? 15:37:20 q+ 15:37:21 Joshua: I guess where I am coming is from assessing accessibility technically 15:37:31 q+ 15:37:34 ack me 15:37:40 ack g 15:38:15 I can not understand, sorry 15:38:18 GB: the experiments we have done with Markel 15:38:48 zakim, unmute yeliz 15:38:49 yeliz should no longer be muted 15:39:06 zakim, mute yeliz 15:39:06 yeliz should now be muted 15:39:12 i think we should first fous on measuring acc 15:39:19 then on measuring effects 15:39:32 that's because if metrics foracc are not valid, everything else 15:39:35 YY: I agree with Giorgio 15:39:39 would be random or so 15:40:01 Yes 15:40:16 I think the benefits would be an extra topic 15:40:21 SAZ: measuring accessibility is crucial, and then measuring the benefits would come later 15:40:35 yes, i agree with joshua 15:40:35 Joshua: benefit, business case, etc I think is another topics 15:41:18 SAZ: the way I add a page, I search for a topic and if it is not there then I add it 15:41:32 Joshua: I can add a new page talking about the benefit assessment 15:42:24 SAZ: two sides of measurement: validity (how accessible is the content) vs. the benefits of making a page accessible (certain level) 15:43:04 SAZ: those kind of research, they have a certain scope 15:43:29 SAZ: the majority of the topics suggested, fall into the category of midterm range topics 15:43:38 SAZ: some of them are even short term 15:43:50 SAZ: what is missing for sure is long term topics 15:43:59 SAZ: things for instance, gesture 15:44:19 SAZ: how is the change of interaction affecting the accessibility, requirements and paradigms 15:45:00 SAZ: this is definitely missing, and I know most of you have experience in that 15:45:18 SAZ: please fill free to add topics that do not have the same tone in the current topics 15:45:36 Joshua: as far as I know Chaals is interested in this and there is a group working on this 15:45:50 SAZ: there is also another group looking into this 15:46:07 SAZ: this group should have to watch for overlaps with other groups, do some complementary stuff 15:46:20 SAZ: and make sure that there is no repeatition 15:46:27 SAZ: gesture is one of the ideas 15:46:47 YY: affective computing 15:47:20 zakim, mute me 15:47:20 Joshue should now be muted 15:47:30 SAZ: please go ahead and add more 15:47:42 SAZ: topics that will become hot topics in future 15:48:00 SAZ: any other topic that would be interesting to look at? 15:48:14 SAZ: Lets look at web metrics 15:48:29 SAZ: Joshua mentioned that this is focused on automated testing 15:48:48 SAZ: even if we say measuring accessibility that does not say automated 15:49:02 SAZ: we can break them into: automated + non-automated 15:49:07 q+ 15:49:12 SAZ: what do you think about the non-automated part 15:49:18 ack m 15:49:47 I annot hear well 15:49:49 the fundamental pbm see with acc metrics is how to make it sure that they measure what we mean (validity) 15:50:00 the pbm is the same with auto &manual metrics 15:50:19 Mate: Its difficult 15:50:31 SAZ: objectively measurable and non-obejctively 15:51:02 SAZ: for example, how good is alt text? 15:51:29 SAZ: same problem again with automatic and manual 15:51:42 SAZ: Objective vs subjective, very different specturms 15:52:07 SAZ: when we talk about measuring accessibility, it's one of the things that will always come up 15:52:29 SAZ: any other observations from this topic? 15:52:45 Mate: accessibility is depends on the audiance 15:53:10 Mate: if thee site is targeting Hungarians, then the accessibility is related how many people can access it? 15:54:10 Mate: It would be good to give some ratings, say for example you cannot reach certain percentage of people 15:54:21 Mate: it would be good to have these in guidelines 15:54:50 SAZ: the idea of guidelines, is based on universal design, not to focus on certain user groups 15:55:13 SAZ: we do not want to miss any group, for example people who are deaf-blind are not well represented 15:55:21 I agree 15:55:23 SAZ: we don't have time to dwell into this 15:55:37 SAZ: measuring by numbers vs. measuring by people 15:55:55 SAZ: Giorgio's work is relevant to this -- Barrier Walkthrough method 15:56:11 SAZ: That goes into aggregation and impact of the accessibility barriers 15:56:17 I'm a bit confused: I thought that we needed to discuss topics/issues that would promote research/experiments in an area, rather than (just) proposing new research ideas. 15:56:37 SAZ: we need to still have a measurement 15:56:40 In the proposed entry in the wiki we suggested to set up a sort of competition between research gorups 15:56:52 to foster results, standardized results,etc 15:57:22 no no. that one 15:57:26 zakim, umute me 15:57:26 I don't understand 'umute me', Joshue 15:57:35 zakim, unmute me 15:57:35 Joshue should no longer be muted 15:57:37 where we say "... thesame type of competition" ... 15:57:40 SAZ: Giorgio I am not sure which topic you are referring to 15:58:12 bye 15:58:13 -Joshue 15:58:58 to anyone 15:59:10 SAZ: response to Giorgio's comment...Are you asking specifically about this topic or ? 15:59:24 SAZ: we really need research topics that will advance accessibility 15:59:39 SAZ: I really encourage people to add whatever they want to get a momentum 15:59:55 SAZ: then we can choose the ones which will have higher impact 15:59:59 SAZ: to make sure that the whole thing is moving fastre 16:00:07 so the output would be a researc agenda to give to researchers worldwide 16:00:54 SAZ: don't want to overclaim what we want to do in this group 16:01:05 SAZ: we certainly want to contribute to the research agenda 16:01:15 SAZ: but don't want to overclaim 16:01:42 SAZ: we need bigger impact topics 16:01:58 SAZ: we need to have a good combination of short, mid and long term researchers 16:02:07 so that we would be able to choose from them 16:02:12 yes it does 16:02:20 SAZ: does that answer your question Giorgio? 16:02:29 zakim, take up next 16:02:29 agendum 3. "Selection of first topic" taken up [from shadi] 16:02:29 SAZ: Lets come back to the final agenda item 16:02:57 SAZ: we were discussing selecting a topic to focus on 16:03:04 SAZ: this will be done in parallel to wiki 16:03:14 SAZ: we will continue to add wiki, expand topics, etc 16:03:32 SAZ: we want to have a menu card with lots of selection 16:03:37 SAZ: but we need to start somewhere 16:03:47 SAZ: The idea is to start a web based survey 16:03:58 SAZ: today is the deadline for adding a topic 16:04:08 SAZ: with this survey you will be asked to rate the topics 16:04:11 sorry, my wireless disconnected 16:04:29 SAZ: you will be able to say, combine them, focus on partial topic 16:04:40 SAZ: hopefully next week we will have the first topics 16:04:53 SAZ: so we will have a first webinar and working group note 16:04:59 SAZ: that is the plan for the upcoming week 16:05:19 SAZ: any question? comments? 16:05:23 SAZ: please do add to the wiki 16:05:39 SAZ: don't right now be too hesitant with the ideas you have 16:05:54 SAZ: think about the topics that will have high impact and will advance the accessibility 16:06:17 SAZ: the ideas which are important will buble up and the rest will stay there anyway 16:06:40 SAZ: wait for the survey and Simon will send the survey this week 16:06:43 ok bye 16:06:45 zakim, unmute me 16:06:45 yeliz should no longer be muted 16:06:52 ok 16:06:56 bye 16:07:18 -yeliz 16:07:19 -Shadi 16:07:29 trackbot, end meeting 16:07:29 Zakim, list attendees 16:07:29 As of this point the attendees have been Shadi, Mate, yeliz, Joshue, Giorgio 16:07:30 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:07:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/21-rd-minutes.html trackbot 16:07:31 RRSAgent, bye 16:07:31 I see no action items