W3C

Research and Development Working Group Teleconference

14 Jul 2011

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Simon, Markel, Shadi, Yeliz, Giorgio
Regrets
Vivienne, Rui, Arun, Charles, Klaus
Chair
Simon
Scribe
Simon

Contents


Evaluation topic - what to do first

SH: maybe editors should propose a topic taking into account parts or all of various wiki topics

SAZ: Don't want to direct this group based on the needs of the Evaluation group - which is Benchmarking

<yeliz> I agree with Shadi

<yeliz> discussing in the mailing list would be good

<yeliz> Ranking is a good idea

+1

<yeliz> +1

<yeliz> mailing list, survey, ranking is a good idea - this would involve all members of the group

<yeliz> I am sure when we start working on one topic, new topics will come up

<yeliz> and we can continue to improve/extend the list

http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Category:Evaluation

<yeliz> http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/wiki/Category:Evaluation

<markel> before we run the survey why we don't we ask members of the group to write in the wiki list of research challenges and wish-list of each topic -as a way to foster implication of members-

<markel> and then run the survey

<yeliz> +1 Shadi

<markel> b/c some of them are quite incomplete to have an idea to rank them

<shadi> "evaluation - testing - conformance testing - conformity assessement"

<yeliz> sounds good to me

<yeliz> I agree with Simon as well

<yeliz> I agree

<markel> agree with yeliz

+1

<yeliz> +1

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/showwb

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.136 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/07/26 13:12:09 $