12:23:50 RRSAgent has joined #er 12:23:50 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/07/13-er-irc 12:23:52 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:23:52 Zakim has joined #er 12:23:54 Zakim, this will be 3794 12:23:54 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 12:23:55 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 12:23:55 Date: 13 July 2011 12:27:30 chair: shadi 12:27:32 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Jul/0002.html 12:28:26 agenda+ Welcome 12:28:31 agenda+ Continue processing comments 12:28:33 agenda+ Upcoming meeting schedule 12:30:12 carlosV has joined #er 12:30:16 zakim, call shadi-617 12:30:16 ok, shadi; the call is being made 12:30:17 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 12:30:18 +Shadi 12:32:51 i come in two mins 12:33:47 sinarmaya has joined #er 12:34:16 +??P4 12:34:46 zakim, ? is CarlosI 12:34:46 +CarlosI; got it 12:35:14 carlos has joined #er 12:37:49 -CarlosI 12:38:23 +??P4 12:38:45 zakim, ? is CarlosI 12:38:45 +CarlosI; got it 12:43:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0010.html 12:44:36 +??P5 12:44:50 zakim, ? is CarlosV 12:44:50 +CarlosV; got it 12:45:47 scribe: shadi 12:46:03 SAZ: potentially allows recurrsions and endless loops 12:47:50 ...one suggestion it to have main assertor be foaf:Group and sub assertors be foaf:Agent, and make these disjoint 12:49:03 ...but there could be cases when there are sub-groups of groups (for instance tester team for an accessibility expert team) 12:50:55 ...another suggestion is to add a conformance requirement which would be on a semantical level rather than on a syntactical level 12:51:14 CV: could use foaf:Agent as the range 12:51:36 SAZ: would only remove first-level loops but would still need a conformance requirement 12:55:19 CV: MainAssertor class that has the mainAssertor property but is essentially the same as Assertor class 12:57:03 CV: use isMainAssertorOf 12:58:37 ...isMainAssertor only, as a "flag" to mark main assertors 13:00:41 {A, B, C}; {A -> D, E}; {B -> F, G} 13:01:02 {A, B, C}; {A -> D, E}; {B -> F} 13:01:34 current approach: {A, B, C}; {A -> D, E}; {B -> F} 13:01:58 sugestion: {A+, B+, C, D, E, F} 13:04:32 {A, B+, C}; {A -> D, E}; {B -> F} 13:05:10 or: {A+, B+, C}; {A+, D, E}; {B+, F} 13:06:05 {A+, B+, C}; {A-> D, E}; {B->F} 13:07:21 or: {A+, B+, C}; A={A", D, E}; B={B", F} 13:08:21 or: {A+, B+, C}; A+={X, D, E}; B+={Y, F} 13:11:22 CI: not in favor of flags; does not seem to be the semantic web approach 13:13:15 action: shadi to send two options to the group by mail to seek more input 13:13:15 Created ACTION-128 - Send two options to the group by mail to seek more input [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-07-20]. 13:13:41 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0012.html 13:15:36 SAZ: want more description and examples 13:15:51 ...can add more in the Schema and/or to the Guide 13:16:37 CV: can add the descriptions that are in the tables into the main body 13:16:45 ...but keep the Schema concise 13:17:11 CI: examples and additional background belong in the Guide 13:17:43 ...but the complete definition itself should be in the Schema 13:19:19 RESOLUTION: add the descriptions from the appendecies and insert them into the main body, then review before publication whether the Schema sections provide sufficient definitions; and consider adding any additional explanations and background into the Guide 13:20:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0013.html 13:20:44 -CarlosI 13:22:55 SAZ: so far sorting alphabetically 13:23:16 CV: keep alphabetically in the Schema but not necessarily in the Guide 13:23:29 SAZ: think should be consistent 13:24:28 RESOLUTION: keep alphabetical for now, then revisit when the Guide is more complete to decide what sorting approach to take 13:24:40 trackbot, end meeting 13:24:40 Zakim, list attendees 13:24:40 As of this point the attendees have been Shadi, CarlosI, CarlosV 13:24:41 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:24:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/13-er-minutes.html trackbot 13:24:42 RRSAgent, bye 13:24:42 I see 1 open action item saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/13-er-actions.rdf : 13:24:42 ACTION: shadi to send two options to the group by mail to seek more input [1] 13:24:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/13-er-irc#T13-13-15