13:48:00 RRSAgent has joined #lld 13:48:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc 13:48:09 zakim, this will be LLD 13:48:09 ok, emma; I see INC_LLDXG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes 13:48:56 Meeting: LLD XG 13:50:12 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Jul/0002.html 13:50:31 Previous: 2011-06-30 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/06/30-lld-minutes.html 13:51:37 Chair: Emma 13:51:48 rrsagent, please bookmark 13:51:48 I'm logging. I don't understand 'please bookmark', emma. Try /msg RRSAgent help 13:51:58 rrsagent, bookmark 13:51:58 See http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T13-51-58 13:52:10 rrsagent, please draft minutes 13:52:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-minutes.html emma 13:52:22 rrsagent, please make record public 13:53:31 Regrets: Tom, Jodi, Lars, Uldi, Jeff, Monica 13:53:47 s/Uldi/Uldis 13:54:04 AlexanderH has joined #lld 13:56:13 Hi Emma, I only can follow via IRC today 13:56:33 Hi Alex, thanks for being online anyway ! 13:57:18 rrsagent, please draft minutes 13:57:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-minutes.html emma 13:57:28 INC_LLDXG()10:00AM has now started 13:57:36 +emma 13:59:23 pmurray has joined #lld 13:59:49 lai has joined #lld 13:59:54 + +1.678.235.aaaa 14:00:00 zakim, aaaa is me 14:00:00 +pmurray; got it 14:00:10 zakim, mute me 14:00:10 pmurray should now be muted 14:00:16 +AZ 14:00:20 kcoyle has joined #lld 14:00:24 zakim, AZ is me. 14:00:24 +lai; got it 14:00:52 antoine has joined #lld 14:01:03 hmm, a typo in my name ;-) 14:01:12 digikim_ has joined #lld 14:01:22 +??P31 14:01:26 ARGH... how can it be that skype always wants to install something when I'm in a hurry 14:01:36 +??P30 14:01:37 ed_ has joined #lld 14:01:42 zakim, zakim, ??P31 is kcoylme 14:01:50 I don't understand 'zakim, ??P31 is kcoylme', emma 14:01:50 zakim, ??P30 is me 14:02:00 +antoine; got it 14:02:04 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:02:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-minutes.html antoine 14:02:05 zakim, ??P31 is kcoyle 14:02:22 +kcoyle; got it 14:02:40 @digikim: Dialing in with google talk is for free and works very good 14:02:46 +[LC] 14:02:49 zakim, [lc] is edsu 14:03:01 jeff_ has joined #lld 14:03:22 regrets+: ross 14:03:23 +edsu; got it 14:04:11 dvilasuero has joined #lld 14:04:12 + +49.4.aabb 14:04:12 jneubert has joined #lld 14:04:37 zakim, aabb is jneubert 14:04:40 +??P48 14:04:46 zakim, ??P48 is digikim 14:04:54 +jneubert; got it 14:05:03 +digikim; got it 14:05:07 Hi, again having problems with my ip call 14:06:21 +??P51 14:07:11 thanks antoine 14:07:16 zakim, mute me 14:07:16 dvilasuero should now be muted 14:07:21 Scribe: Karen 14:07:28 Scribenick: kcoyle 14:08:12 Topic: Admin minutes of previous telecon 14:08:12 Chair: Antoine 14:08:20 resolved: accept minutes of previous teleconference 14:08:53 No call next week; next call 21 July 14:09:09 topic: final report 14:09:35 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Dissemination_Lists 14:09:51 calls have been sent to most/all lists in link 14:10:10 digress.it plugin is installed, there are a few issues connecting 14:10:21 kefo has joined #lld 14:10:28 +[LC] 14:10:28 zakim, LC is me 14:10:32 +kefo; got it 14:10:37 zakim, mute me please 14:10:43 kefo should now be muted 14:11:10 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportReviewerAssignments 14:11:19 keeping track of comments and reviews 14:12:01 volunteers are keeping track of comments on the page 14:12:22 ACTION: Monica to keep track of comments between July 1 and July 8 14:12:25 -- DONE 14:12:42 nice work on the blog btw, http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/, i totally missed that it got done 14:12:56 Next, kcoyle for the next week, and then Jeff for the following week 14:13:12 zakim, +q 14:13:12 I see dvilasuero on the speaker queue 14:13:20 zakim, unmute me 14:13:20 dvilasuero should no longer be muted 14:13:49 ACTION: Daniel to keep track of comments from July 23-July 30 14:13:50 zakim, mute me 14:13:50 dvilasuero should now be muted 14:16:12 Kcoyle: section "scope of this report not commented" 14:16:29 kcoyle: i don't recall comments about that, other than we should be talking about memory institutions and not cultural institutions, which should be included in the scope 14:16:35 ... need to take into account general comments 14:16:40 There has been a comment that we should use 'memory institutions' rather than 'cultural institutions' 14:17:14 antoine: do you think we need to mention non-rdf linked data? 14:17:24 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Benefits#.22Library_Linked_Data.22:_Scope_of_this_report 14:17:37 kcoyle: i think we could say it *generally* uses rdf, rather than it *does* use rdf 14:17:45 antoine: ok, i think that was included 14:18:57 kcoyle: we could say library linked data is any library data that is expressed as linked data 14:19:06 +1 14:19:13 +1 14:19:23 antoine: perhaps nuancing the rdf stuff, or removing it all together 14:19:32 kcoyle: yeah, i can fit that in there 14:19:39 ... LLD = any library data expressed as linked data 14:19:46 q+ 14:19:56 zakim, ack emma 14:19:56 I see dvilasuero on the speaker queue 14:19:56 zakim, q- 14:19:57 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:20:54 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Jun/0085.html 14:22:08 mentions research use of data 14:22:12 q+ 14:22:35 kcoyle: this is the type of use case that makes me uneasy about using 'memory institutions' 14:22:40 q+ 14:23:00 Dikson's review proposes a specific use case on researchers publishing their data and model as well as their papers 14:23:13 kcoyle: the emphasis is on keeping an archive, whereas current uses seem to be really important ... not so much about access to archives 14:23:44 I'm wondering if it fits in "benefits" or elsewhere in the report 14:23:51 antoine: perhaps if we just say they are sometimes called 'memory institutions' that will do the trick 14:24:11 kcoyle: they 'function' as memory institions, but that's not all they do 14:24:15 emma: cultural organization is more neutral and broader; memory institution seems limited to archiving 14:24:23 -pmurray 14:24:40 +1 for cultural institution 14:24:41 +1 kcoyle they could function as memory institutions 14:24:47 +1 for cultural 14:24:51 emma: include definition of memory and cultural in the scope statement 14:25:09 +1 for cultural, could function as memory institutions 14:25:20 q+ 14:25:30 zakim, ack edsu 14:25:30 I see kcoyle, antoine on the speaker queue 14:26:09 edsu: memory institution is more inclusive of the sciences; cultural feels more like history, literature, art (humanities) 14:26:09 +1 edsu, memory is more inclusive 14:26:17 edsu: there is also short-term memory 14:27:14 we should define it anyway. cultural could also be something like theatre. memory is only one aspect for me, access would be another. 14:27:15 antoine: define them together in scope 14:27:42 I just recorded a comment on the blog ;-) 14:27:56 will need to be turned into a sentence 14:28:05 i can try to write a sentence 14:28:25 ok 14:28:28 ok 14:29:04 ACTION: Karen and Emma to write a sentence adding cultural and memory institutions together in some way 14:29:32 Dickson's comment about using research data 14:29:38 q+ 14:29:50 q- 14:30:13 zakim, ack kcoyle 14:30:13 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:31:33 q+ 14:31:57 zakim, ack dvilasuero 14:31:57 unmuting dvilasuero 14:31:59 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:31:59 zakim, unmute me 14:31:59 dvilasuero was not muted, dvilasuero 14:32:04 q+ 14:32:11 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Citation_of_Scientific_Datasets 14:32:20 daniel: there are some use cases talking about research and scientific data sets 14:33:09 antoine: issue of scope - not sure we should say that libraries should be curators of scientific data 14:33:21 zakim, unmute me 14:33:21 dvilasuero was not muted, dvilasuero 14:33:22 q+ 14:33:26 zakim, mute me 14:33:26 dvilasuero should now be muted 14:33:37 zakim, ack antoine 14:33:37 I see emma on the speaker queue 14:33:48 zakim, ack emma 14:33:48 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:33:49 emma: this is a scope issue - it is a benefit of LLD to link to scientific and research data 14:33:50 emma: +1 14:34:17 i don't think libraries are the only players in library linked data 14:34:31 antoine: this makes a connection between libraries and research data, but doesn't say that libraries need to manage the data 14:34:40 emma: will add a sentence 14:35:35 antoine: and make a link to the citation use case; try to relate to use cases elsewhere also 14:35:37 emma if you need a more comprehensive list of research data use cases just let me know 14:35:56 antoine: section on available vocabularies and data sets 14:36:36 antoine: some editorial comments have been received; also question of division between vocabularies and data sets 14:36:42 antoine: we already have discussed that 14:37:10 antoine: value vocabs are datasets with a specific function 14:37:18 q+ 14:37:26 zakim, ack kcoyle 14:37:26 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:37:53 kcoyle: i think even we find this to be ambiguous, i thought that we covered it in our wording, but if we acknowledge there is ambiguity then I think that takes care of it 14:38:05 antoine: wording needs to be more explicit 14:38:54 antoine: we agree that the definitions are not fixed but may depend on context or use 14:39:44 relevant technologies section: Jeff has made changes based on Jon's comments 14:41:11 next: implementation challenges 14:43:45 both issues and recommendations sections will have many comments 14:45:02 ACTION: Karen will convene issues and recommendations group to identify things that need to be discussed with larger group for July 21 meeting 14:45:45 ACTION: Karen and Antoine to relate Library Data Resources and Library Standards and Linked data 14:45:50 -- ConTINues 14:46:44 ACTION: Tom to ask Dickson and Guenther if they could contribute curriculum issues to the Recommendations Section 14:46:48 --CONTINUES 14:47:13 next: separate deliverable on vocabularies and datasets 14:47:27 nothing new to discuss here 14:47:54 zakim, unmute me 14:47:54 dvilasuero should no longer be muted 14:47:56 next: use cases (Daniel) 14:48:24 daniel: adding comments to the clusters and use cases from discussions 14:48:34 antoine: use case owners should be able to help 14:49:21 kai: are you at the provenance f2f? 14:49:46 edsu: unfortunately not 14:50:03 kai: i guess there's no mtg today? 14:50:21 dvilasuero: will create a new wiki page with links to use cases; this can go into the running agenda 14:50:40 edsu: I don't think so 14:51:02 dvilasuero: could someone go through the report and give some feedback? 14:51:58 I'd like to do it, but I'm not sure I'll make it by july 22 14:52:05 antoine: best not to wait until end of comment period -- there won't be much time to do the edits at that point 14:52:11 maybe ask on the list? 14:52:47 ok so put me an action ;-) 14:52:52 thanks, karen maybe I could ask more explictly as I have already done but in other review emails 14:53:49 ACTION: Emma to review use cases and make comments 14:54:01 thanks a lot emma!! 14:54:15 zakim, mute me 14:54:15 dvilasuero should now be muted 14:54:50 kcoyle: executive summary? 14:55:45 antoine: no one yet assigned to work on this. Should be done at the very end 14:56:21 ACTION: chairs to send email to list asking for volunteers to write the executive summary 14:56:52 thanks 14:56:56 thanks! 14:57:03 bye 14:57:05 bye 14:57:07 -lai 14:57:08 -edsu 14:57:10 -digikim 14:57:11 bye 14:57:14 -dvilasuero 14:57:14 zakim, please list attendees 14:57:14 meeting adjourned 14:57:15 As of this point the attendees have been emma, +1.678.235.aaaa, pmurray, lai, antoine, kcoyle, edsu, +49.4.aabb, jneubert, digikim, dvilasuero, kefo 14:57:20 -jneubert 14:57:21 -kefo 14:57:25 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:57:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-minutes.html antoine 14:57:25 rrsagent, please draft minutes 14:57:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-minutes.html emma 14:59:07 -kcoyle 14:59:10 -emma 14:59:17 -antoine 14:59:18 INC_LLDXG()10:00AM has ended 14:59:20 zakim, bye 14:59:20 Zakim has left #lld 14:59:25 rrsagent, bye 14:59:25 I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-actions.rdf : 14:59:25 ACTION: Monica to keep track of comments between July 1 and July 8 [1] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-12-22 14:59:25 ACTION: Daniel to keep track of comments from July 23-July 30 [2] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-13-49 14:59:25 ACTION: Karen and Emma to write a sentence adding cultural and memory institutions together in some way [3] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-29-04 14:59:25 ACTION: Karen will convene issues and recommendations group to identify things that need to be discussed with larger group for July 21 meeting [4] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-45-02 14:59:25 ACTION: Karen and Antoine to relate Library Data Resources and Library Standards and Linked data [5] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-45-45 14:59:25 ACTION: Tom to ask Dickson and Guenther if they could contribute curriculum issues to the Recommendations Section [6] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-46-44 14:59:25 ACTION: Emma to review use cases and make comments [7] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-53-49 14:59:25 ACTION: chairs to send email to list asking for volunteers to write the executive summary [8] 14:59:25 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/07/07-lld-irc#T14-56-21