See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 23 June 2011
<scribe> scribe: jallan
<kford> JA: Face to face 11/3-4, register.
Next face to face Meeting: 3-4 November 2011 at W3C Technical Plenary
in Santa Clara, CA, USA. - http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/
HTML 5 review http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/work/wiki/Instructions_for_commenting_on_HTML5
Proposals for definition of user agents
current timeline in charter http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2010/uawg_charter
js: W3 overall has gotten criticism about slow guideline creation
kf: having read new WD, where do folks think we are?
jr: still have a way to go. problem...we don't know what we don't know. Issues can pop up at any time. its all still a guess
gl: most delays on our end come from us. haven't gotten much feed back.
kf: in process of writing review of WD. looking pretty good.
discussion of process
current charter: lc-aug 2010, cr-feb 2011, pr- aug 2011, rec-0ct 2011
js: don't need 2 implementations until CR
kf: Guidelines is good. they are aspirational. getting implementations may be difficult.
jr: meeting GLs can be met by addons. there are lots out there.
js: testing materials must be
done by CR
... must test implementations before we can get out of CR
kf: GL and SC need about 2 months
work to be ready for LC
... October at earliest.
... implementing document feels rougher than the GL doc
... don't think we can get both docs ready by October
ja: have f2f coming up
js: add extra month for fudge.
then 3 months for LC. do a WD pub in the next week or 2.
... do we want another WD before LC
jr: have a pile of things to go over from the current review.
js: publish WD in Sept.
kf: pub 1st week of July then
early Sept.
... will we be happy with content by mid Sept.
gl: we have to watch for slippage.
kf: need to move into 'ship
mode', start locking things down.
... no more smithing, discussing, etc. on some issue.
... finish last bit of review. need to stop reorganizing. need
to change group behavior. We have a descent set of
guideline.
... propose: 2 WD in July and Sept. work at f2f, lc in late
november
jr: want developers to review the
WD in Sept. work on comments in Oct., final edits at f2f, WD in
late Nov. then LC in Jan.
... haven't have many comments from developers at any time
gl: look at calendar, to check on
conflicts. we are supposed to be reviewing html5 for next few
weeks.
... getting reviews in Aug. from Europeans will be
difficult.
... whats going on the end of September. will we get a good
review?
kf: Jan 2012 is doable
... Sep. WD can push for UA developers to review. then WD in
Nov. after f2f, and LC in Jan.
js: generally don't get lots of comments till LC
kf: shares his plans for internal MS review
js: are we in agreement for LC in January?
kf: any objections to 3 WD in July, Sept. and Nov, with LC in January.
gl: where do tests and implementations come in.
js: should have some done by last call. create test cases to make sure SC make sense.
kf: thinks we can work through those. implementation doc has helped with thinking about testing.
Resolved: 3 WD in July, Sept. and Nov, with LC in January.
js: ATAG has been a year in getting to second last call
jr: but had to do substantial rewrites, etc.
js: thinks we will have to do a second LC, because few comments so far.
kf: sept?
js: yes, Oct 2012 is better. then second last call in July 2013
kf: PR?
js: CR test all implementations
for all SC (WCAG was 9 months)
... wcag was complex. so is UAAG, we have more SC
kf: thinks testing will be quick
gl: finding addons, extensions, etc. may slow down process. or having them created may take a while also.
kf: between now and Jan, need to find implementations to prepare for LC/CR
ja: implementations may help in resolving issues during last call.
Corrections: second LC June/July 2012. CR in Oct. 2012.
kf: PR March 2013.
... RC in May 2013
js: we could save lots of time if get comments and implementation commitments.
kf: comfortable with this schedule. any objections?
[silence]
<jeanne> ACTION: Jeanne to bring the new timeline to Rec to WAI and W3M. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/06/23-ua-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-572 - Bring the new timeline to Rec to WAI and W3M. [on Jeanne F Spellman - due 2011-06-30].
kf: if any body knows anybody new to recruit to group...
review emails on review
js: KP and JS to do editors pass
on small changes tomorrow.
... wants to generate questions for status of WD
ja: new organization
kf: Focus work.
gl: focus is more granular. does it make more sense.
js: media section fleshed out.
kf: things deleted.
js: they were not a11y related.
<Jan> brb
<Greg> Work on keyboard focus and navigation was primarily distributing the success criteria into several more specific guidelines, and addressing asymmetries (e.g. where something had been applied to content that should lso have applied to user agent user interface).
<Jan> back
kf: recycle previous questions
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011AprJun/0079.html
kf: whack sentence about things that UA doesn't support (braille production)
all agree
kf: 1.2.3 The user can specify
whether or not the user agent should attempt to predict
associations from author-specified presentation attributes
(i.e. position and appearance). (Level AAA)
... should delete. screen readers have tried this for
years...usually not well.
ja: SH may have objections. this is his SC.
kf: no UA does this.
jr: depends of def of UA.
kf: 1.3.1 editorial. doesn't make sense. makes a rewrite.
gl: right, there are problems.
js: let kim and I thrash through this.
kf: do we want summary for all GL
ja: +1
kf: will need to write them.
gl: need to resynch GL and summarys
kf: 1.10.2 Note: 1st sentence make no sense.
jr: Note serves no purpose.
gl: delete ok, but capture note in examples in the IER
ja: 1.1.2 mentions longdesc rendered inplace of image. is this right? how to make it happen.
kf: and JR - yes, longdesc in
place of img with reflow was the intent.
... don't we have a reflow SC. (all looking)
issue: need some SC about reflow of content when alternatives put in the document.
<trackbot> Created ISSUE-87 - Need some SC about reflow of content when alternatives put in the document. ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/issues/87/edit .
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: jallan Inferring ScribeNick: JAllan Default Present: jallan, Jan, Greg, Jeanne, kford, Mark_Hakkinen Present: kelly greg jim jan jeanne Regrets: MarkH SimonH Found Date: 23 Jun 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/23-ua-minutes.html People with action items: jeanne[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]