16:56:21 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 16:56:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/06/23-tagmem-irc 16:56:29 zakim, this will be tag 16:56:29 ok, plinss; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 16:57:22 Participating will be tricky for me. On a bus, transferring to another in a few minutes 16:58:37 Will ring bridge now and then mute myself 16:59:22 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started 16:59:29 + +1.617.538.aaaa 16:59:40 +plinss 16:59:50 +DKA 17:00:01 +??P13 17:00:02 Zakim, aaaa is jrees 17:00:02 DKA has joined #tagmem 17:00:03 +jrees; got it 17:00:08 Zakim, ??P13 is me 17:00:09 +JeniT; got it 17:00:36 Chair: Noah Mendelsohn 17:00:36 Scribe: Peter Linss 17:00:36 Scribenick: plinss 17:00:58 Ashok has joined #tagmem 17:01:02 noah_away has joined #tagmem 17:01:17 +Yves 17:02:01 zakim, who is here? 17:02:01 On the phone I see jrees, plinss, DKA, JeniT, Yves 17:02:02 On IRC I see noah, Ashok, DKA, RRSAgent, Zakim, JeniT, jrees, timbl, jar, Yves, trackbot, plinss 17:02:10 +Noah_Mendelsohn 17:02:16 +Ashok_Malhotra 17:02:23 zakim, noah_mendelsohn is me 17:02:23 +noah; got it 17:04:20 plinss has left #tagmem 17:04:38 plinss has joined #tagmem 17:04:58 Topic: convene 17:05:03 zakim, who is here? 17:05:03 On the phone I see jrees, plinss, DKA, JeniT, Yves, noah, Ashok_Malhotra 17:05:04 regrets: larry 17:05:05 On IRC I see plinss, noah, Ashok, DKA, RRSAgent, Zakim, JeniT, jrees, timbl, jar, Yves, trackbot 17:05:21 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/23-agenda 17:05:35 nm: no call next week or week after 17:05:35 +??P6 17:06:13 nm: regrets from tbl for following three weeks 17:06:22 nm: next meeting on 14-jul 17:06:29 nm: scribe yl 17:06:33 yl: can do 17:06:53 nm: approve minutes of prior meetings 17:07:23 RESOLUTION: Minutes of 6-8 June 2011 F2F are approved http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-agenda 17:07:41 Minutes of 16 June: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/16-minutes 17:07:51 RESOLUTION: Minutes of 16 June 2011 are approved http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/16-minutes 17:08:08 nm: any other urgent matters? 17:09:18 http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hammer-hostmeta/?include_text=1 17:09:35 nm: any open actions that cover this? 17:09:41 NM: Any open actions on this? 17:09:50 AM: No, we looked at earlier drafts. 17:10:19 nm: can you take an action to read and summarize? 17:10:26 Sandro dislikes host meta... More later 17:10:26 am: sure 17:10:45 am: jar are you interested in this? 17:10:46 Muted 17:10:51 ht has joined #tagmem 17:10:59 ACTION: Ashok to review http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hammer-hostmeta/?include_text=1 in preparation for TAG review Due 2011-07-12 17:10:59 Created ACTION-574 - Review http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hammer-hostmeta/?include_text=1 in preparation for TAG review Due 2011-07-12 [on Ashok Malhotra - due 2011-06-30]. 17:11:30 zakim, code? 17:11:30 the conference code is 0824 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), ht 17:11:39 +??P7 17:11:44 zakim, ? is me 17:11:44 +ht; got it 17:12:03 topic: microdata and rdfa 17:12:17 Latest draft from Jeni: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html 17:12:33 nm: there's been discussion since then 17:12:40 Summary of things to cover today: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0089.html 17:12:51 nm: I wrote a summary email 17:13:43 -Ashok_Malhotra 17:14:54 +Ashok_Malhotra 17:17:21 ht: we're doing two things in this note, one raising the issue, two asking for a task force 17:17:42 ht: I think we should just make this note do two things 17:17:45 NM: My friendly ammendment is to make two notes, one addressed to HTML, and a smaller one to the W3C itself. 17:18:01 ht: sending to html to raise an issue, and sending to director to form task force 17:18:15 ht: more trouble than it's worth 17:18:27 I think one note is better than two. 17:19:01 tbl: this is just a note, not a finding, doesn't have to be perfectly balanced, just to express concern 17:19:32 nm: the note should be explicit about serving those purposes 17:19:57 nm: any objections to ht's proposal? 17:20:14 nm: ht proposed a small wording clarification 17:20:45 ht: we request the director to set up a task force 17:20:55 tbl: anyone against? 17:20:58 Change ""We suggest that the W3C sets up a task force." to " "We request the Director to set up a task force. . ." 17:21:09 Sounds good. 17:21:24 nm: no objections 17:21:51 nm: the proposal is that I will send this to the html working group and to the director 17:22:23 nm: anyone else to send this to? 17:22:31 jt: rdfa working group 17:22:57 nm: the spec we're commenting on is html and rdfs in html, correct? 17:23:16 jt: I thought it was jointly owned by html and rdfa 17:23:40 nm: I believe I saw this (rdfa+html) as html lc materials 17:23:51 NM: I'm specifically asking which WG is responsible for the RDFa + HTML specification. 17:24:06 jt: it says, "it has been jointly developed by html and rdfa, but published by html" 17:24:33 Propose: To Tim, public-html, public-html-comments, www-tag, RDFa working group 17:24:59 Propose: To Tim, public-html, public-html-comments, www-tag, public-rdfa-wg@w3.org 17:25:52 PROPOSAL: The TAG resolves that Noah send http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html, revised with Henry's proposed change, to open issues against the HTML last call drafts 17:26:20 PROPOSAL: The TAG resolves that Noah send http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html, revised with Henry's proposed change, to open issues against the HTML last call drafts and to ask the director to create a task force 17:26:41 RESOLVED: The TAG resolves that Noah send http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html, revised with Henry's proposed change, to open issues against the HTML last call drafts and to ask the director to create a task force 17:27:04 ACTION: Noah to send http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html as edited Due 2011-06-24 17:27:04 Created ACTION-575 - Send http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2011Jun/0082.html as edited Due 2011-06-24 [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-30]. 17:27:59 nm: anything else to do regarding microdata and rdfa today? 17:28:10 nm: thank you Jeni 17:28:14 ACTION-571? 17:28:14 ACTION-571 -- Jeni Tennison to write up comments on microdata and RDFa -- due 2011-06-16 -- OPEN 17:28:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/571 17:28:19 jrees_ has joined #tagmem 17:28:24 close ACTION-571 17:28:24 ACTION-571 Write up comments on microdata and RDFa closed 17:29:10 topic: 3023bis and IRI 17:29:15 NM: Grateful thanks to Jeni for a difficult task well done. 17:29:24 ht: there are three parts to this 17:29:59 ht: we had a long history of discussing 3023bis in the area of th +xml media types and the idea of generic processing 17:30:12 ht: we made a recommendation, but people pushed back 17:30:21 ht: no new draft of 3023bis 17:31:08 I have an action to write a document on fragids & what we should do with 3023bis 17:31:12 q+ 17:31:31 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/07-minutes.html#item01 17:31:38 ack next 17:31:54 tbl: my memory of where we got to is the problem is whether frag ids should be used at the low level or high level 17:32:07 jrees_ has joined #tagmem 17:32:11 tbl: should the two levels be broken out explicitly? 17:33:00 ?ACTION-567 17:33:02 T 17:33:11 ACTION-567? 17:33:11 ACTION-567 -- Jeni Tennison to draft a document describing problems around fragids and ways things should be changed -- due 2011-06-28 -- OPEN 17:33:11 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/567 17:33:29 ht: we also talked about the possibility of non overlapping fragment syntaxes 17:33:33 jrees_ has joined #tagmem 17:33:49 ht: for areas where there was potential for level crossing confusion 17:33:52 q? 17:34:02 ACTION-509? 17:34:02 ACTION-509 -- Jonathan Rees to communicate with RDFa WG regarding documenting the fragid / media type issue -- due 2011-06-15 -- OPEN 17:34:02 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/509 17:34:23 ACTION-543? 17:34:23 ACTION-543 -- Jeni Tennison to propose addition to MIME/Web draft to discuss sem-web use of fragids not grounded in media type -- due 2011-06-15 -- OPEN 17:34:23 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/543 17:34:55 ht: I think there are outstanding issues with frag ids we should settle within the tag before putting pressure outside 17:34:56 +Jonathan_Rees 17:35:03 -jrees 17:35:05 s/?ACTION-567// 17:35:30 nm: my recollection is that norm wanted any document in +xml to be able to do generic frag id per 3032bis 17:36:07 and they wanted errors to be detected too yes? or was that just our interpretation? 17:36:42 zakim, jar is jrees 17:36:42 sorry, jar, I do not recognize a party named 'jar' 17:36:49 q+ to note that XML Schema has exactly the property that TimBL just mentioned 17:36:55 tbl: suppose somebody else want to invent a new language using xml, say a programming language, that doesn't correspond to xml elments, should they not use xml or not use overlapping frag id syntax? 17:37:14 nm: one choice is to not name your media type +xml 17:37:18 s/that doesn't/whose use of IDs doesn't/ 17:37:40 ack ht 17:37:40 ht, you wanted to note that XML Schema has exactly the property that TimBL just mentioned 17:37:51 nm: that means the bare names get owned by 3023bis and you need something more complicated for higer level references 17:38:29 ht: there is an example of this for complex type definitions wrt xpointer 17:38:42 just like SVG does 17:39:04 ht: within that something close to a bare name means the top level thing with this name, but it does require more typing than just # type name 17:39:06 NM: Actually, what I said was: "if you use non +xml media types, you own everything; if you do use application/mylang+xml, then ids must be disjoint from IDs that resolve to elements per XPointer, and that I think means barenames aren't available to reference the higher level abstractions" 17:40:02 Norm has joined #tagmem 17:40:44 So XML Schema Component Designators [scd ref] defines an XPOinter scheme 17:41:19 ... Which allows you to say, roughly #scd(complexType,foo) 17:41:36 ... to identify the Complex Type whose name is foo 17:41:43 q? 17:41:52 That's distinct from the XML element which notates that definition 17:42:05 ... which you might get with #foo and a generic processor 17:42:27 ... The SCD spec doesn't give _any_ semantics to barenames 17:42:43 scd() doesn't appear in the registry of XPointer schemes http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/ 17:43:26 ... Hasn't been registered yet -- not sure how it's spelled in any case 17:44:22 We could say RDFa Core used only in non-+xml media types 17:44:46 s/[scd ref]/http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-ref// 17:45:06 tbl: for rdf to use xpointer is a problem, you want to use bare names 17:45:22 s/a problem/intolerable/ 17:45:48 I thought we had got to a point where we were grandfathering application/rdf+xml 17:46:13 me too, Tim. 17:46:23 ht: don't step on others' toes might be good advice going forward, but it doesn't address existing cases (rdf, rdfa) 17:46:34 New info since Dec is RDFa Core 17:46:39 q? 17:46:47 HT: Should we endorse the two level approach for future languages, I.e. barenames for XML references, something disjoint for higher level abstraction references. 17:47:32 nm: I thought the xpointer framework said this is an extensible framework 17:47:56 "An XPointer processor takes as input an XML resource and a string to be used as a pointer (for example, a fragment identifier, with escaping reversed, taken from the URI reference that was used to access the resource), attempts to evaluate the pointer with respect to the resource, and produces as output an identification of subresources, or one or more errors." 17:48:27 q+ jar to say RDFa Core is new information 17:49:14 ack next 17:49:15 jar, you wanted to say RDFa Core is new information 17:49:36 nm: i'm happy with what henry found 17:49:54 jar: the new information here is rdfa-core 17:50:07 jar: it's a mixin for any kind of document 17:50:31 jar: what can we say about media types in which rdfa-core is server under? 17:50:41 Here's another quote from XPointer Framework spec (http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/): "XPointer processor: A software component that identifies subresources of an XML resource by applying a pointer to it." 17:50:48 q? 17:50:58 jar: maybe it shouldn't be under xml media type 17:51:16 ht: rdfs-core conflicts with any media type registration 17:51:35 s/rdfs-core/rdfa-core/ 17:51:36 jar: their argument is that 3023 doesn't say much about frag ids 17:52:02 ht: the media type system is broken in terms of nested fragments, it doesn't manage mixed documents well 17:52:30 ht: rdfa is a particular form of that in that it's designed to be embedded in many types of documents 17:53:02 rdfa core could also say 3023 is irrelevant... 17:54:06 nm: I think I'm hearing we're butting up against wanting media type to have features it doesn't have 17:54:15 once again, compound documents and media types is not a good match, pretty much like html+js where fragments are used as js state 17:54:33 but that's different than the SVG case (without scripting) 17:55:35 17:55:43 that's the example 17:56:09 ACTION-567? 17:56:09 ACTION-567 -- Jeni Tennison to draft a document describing problems around fragids and ways things should be changed -- due 2011-06-28 -- OPEN 17:56:09 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/567 17:56:10 Norm has joined #tagmem 17:56:34 . ACTION: Jonathan with help from Henry to figure out impact of RDFa core on generic fragids story, especially in 3023bis Due 2011-7-12 17:56:34 bar means an element according to xpointer, but a drinking establishment according to rdfa core 17:56:45 ACTION: Jonathan with help from Henry to figure out impact of RDFa core on generic fragids story, especially in 3023bis Due 2011-7-12 17:56:45 Created ACTION-576 - With help from Henry to figure out impact of RDFa core on generic fragids story, especially in 3023bis Due 2011-7-12 [on Jonathan Rees - due 2011-06-30]. 17:57:50 ht: i'd like the two other bullet items scheduled for later 17:58:30 ACTION: Noah to schedule 3023bis discussion of processor profiles and "IRIbis and HTML5", leftover from 23 June discussion, when Larry is available DueL 2011-07-12 17:58:31 Created ACTION-577 - Schedule 3023bis discussion of processor profiles and "IRIbis and HTML5", leftover from 23 June discussion, when Larry is available DueL 2011-07-12 [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-30]. 17:58:56 Norm? 17:59:12 Never mind Norm, we're done. 17:59:14 Zakim, dial Norm_mobile 17:59:14 I am sorry, timbl; I do not know a number for Norm_mobile 17:59:16 topic: privacy 17:59:31 am: what's the question here? 17:59:44 Sorry, timbl. If you change your mind, I'm around, though I'm on another call for a few minutes right now 17:59:44 nm: review the w3c workshop report focusing on do not track 18:00:16 NM: See agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/23-agenda#privacy 18:00:19 am: there was a request form lm to list the architectural questions 18:00:49 AM: Prefer to leave this discussion until Larry is here and I'm better prepared. 18:00:50 am: I'd rather wait for larry 18:01:03 nm: ok 18:01:14 http://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2011/6/108645-identity-management-and-privacy 18:01:50 ht: the us dept of commerce has a privacy initiative they're pushing hard 18:01:54 NSTIC : National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace 18:02:11 am: this is completely new 18:02:51 topic: review of actions 18:03:03 nm: those pending review... 18:03:39 ACTION-33? 18:03:39 ACTION-33 -- Henry Thompson to revise naming challenges story in response to Dec 2008 F2F discussion -- due 2011-06-06 -- OPEN 18:03:39 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/33 18:05:00 ACTION-562? 18:05:00 ACTION-562 -- Henry Thompson to organize F2F session on IRIbis and 3023bis -- due 2011-06-02 -- OPEN 18:05:00 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/562 18:05:12 close ACTION-562 18:05:12 ACTION-562 Organize F2F session on IRIbis and 3023bis closed 18:05:51 ht: i'd rather takes these offline 18:06:03 topic: pending review take 2 18:06:04 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/pendingreview 18:06:12 ACTION-516? 18:06:12 ACTION-516 -- Noah Mendelsohn to talk with Thomas Roessler about organizing W3C architecture work on security -- due 2011-05-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:06:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/516 18:06:49 nm: I've sent him notes every month or two, not gotten an answer 18:07:21 nm: I'm re-opening this one 18:08:16 jar: is there anyone else to talk to to escalate this? 18:09:47 nm: I'm assigning 516 to Yves 18:09:50 ACTION-516? 18:09:50 ACTION-516 -- Yves Lafon to talk with Thomas Roessler about organizing W3C architecture work on security -- due 2011-07-19 -- OPEN 18:09:50 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/516 18:11:46 ACTION-522? 18:11:46 ACTION-522 -- Noah Mendelsohn to build Tracker product page for HTML/XML Unification -- due 2011-05-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:11:46 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/522 18:12:02 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/htmlxmlunification 18:12:23 close ACTION-516? 18:12:35 ACTION-526? 18:12:35 ACTION-526 -- Noah Mendelsohn to do first draft product stuff for MIME and related core web mechanisms -- due 2011-05-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:12:35 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/526 18:12:47 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/mimeweb.html 18:12:56 close 526 18:13:00 close ACTION-526 18:13:00 ACTION-526 Do first draft product stuff for MIME and related core web mechanisms closed 18:13:11 ACTION-546? 18:13:11 ACTION-546 -- Noah Mendelsohn to ask Jim Gettys about joining us for lunch at June F2F -- due 2011-05-31 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:13:11 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/546 18:13:28 close ACTION-546 18:13:28 ACTION-546 Ask Jim Gettys about joining us for lunch at June F2F closed 18:13:42 ACTION-548? 18:13:42 ACTION-548 -- Noah Mendelsohn to ask Norm about HTML/XML at June F2F -- due 2011-05-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:13:42 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/548 18:13:51 close ACTION-548 18:13:51 ACTION-548 Ask Norm about HTML/XML at June F2F closed 18:13:57 action-551? 18:13:57 ACTION-551 -- Noah Mendelsohn to create agenda for 6-8 June 2011 F2F [self-assigned] -- due 2011-05-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:13:57 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/551 18:14:00 close ACTION-551 18:14:00 ACTION-551 Create agenda for 6-8 June 2011 F2F [self-assigned] closed 18:14:11 ACTION-561? 18:14:11 ACTION-561 -- Noah Mendelsohn to ask Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML -- due 2011-06-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW 18:14:11 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/561 18:14:39 close ACTION-561 18:14:39 ACTION-561 Ask Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML closed 18:14:55 ACTION: Noah to make sure HTML/XML work gets TAG review when ready Due: 2011-08-01 18:14:55 Created ACTION-578 - Make sure HTML/XML work gets TAG review when ready Due: 2011-08-01 [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-30]. 18:17:29 close ACTION-522 18:17:29 ACTION-522 Build Tracker product page for HTML/XML Unification closed 18:17:47 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner 18:17:49 topic: overdue actions 18:17:59 ACTION-514? 18:17:59 ACTION-514 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft finding on API minimization -- due 2011-06-03 -- OPEN 18:17:59 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/514 18:18:10 ACTION: Jonathan to solicit review of issue-57 (definition discovery) document from readers of public-lod and/or semantic-web lists [self-assigned] 18:18:10 Created ACTION-579 - Solicit review of issue-57 (definition discovery) document from readers of public-lod and/or semantic-web lists [self-assigned] [on Jonathan Rees - due 2011-06-30]. 18:18:57 nm: just need to bump the date? 18:19:21 -ht 18:19:40 dka: yes, until a few days before the next call 18:19:48 ACTION-514 Due 2011-07-12 18:19:48 ACTION-514 Draft finding on API minimization due date now 2011-07-12 18:19:56 ACTION-480? 18:19:56 ACTION-480 -- Daniel Appelquist to draft overview document framing Web applications as opposed to traditional Web of documents -- due 2011-05-24 -- OPEN 18:19:56 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/480 18:20:54 ACTION-544? 18:20:54 ACTION-544 -- Daniel Appelquist to propose TAG input, if any, to possible workshop on packaged Web apps -- due 2011-05-31 -- OPEN 18:20:54 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/544 18:21:26 dka: 460 and 566 are redundant 18:21:40 ACTION-460 is redundant with 566, but TLR says Alissa cooper may not be the right contact anyway. 18:21:49 close ACTION-460 18:21:49 ACTION-460 Coordinate with IAB regarding next steps on privacy policy closed 18:21:55 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner 18:22:05 ACTION-544? 18:22:05 ACTION-544 -- Daniel Appelquist to propose TAG input, if any, to possible workshop on packaged Web apps -- due 2011-05-31 -- OPEN 18:22:05 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/544 18:24:00 dka: I'm working on this one, tpac week would be good for this 18:24:12 http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2011/installable-web-apps-and-interoperability/ 18:25:52 dka: I'm hoping to get people from chrome, mozilla, adobe, and hp (WebOS) 18:27:01 ACTION-544 Due 2011-08-01 18:27:01 ACTION-544 Propose TAG input, if any, to possible workshop on packaged Web apps due date now 2011-08-01 18:27:26 ACTION-437? 18:27:26 ACTION-437 -- Tim Berners-Lee to create a task force on XML / HTML convergence -- due 2011-06-01 -- OPEN 18:27:26 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/437 18:28:01 close ACTION-437 18:28:01 ACTION-437 Create a task force on XML / HTML convergence closed 18:28:10 ACTION-510? 18:28:10 ACTION-510 -- Tim Berners-Lee to write a note conveying the TAG's concerns re: the microdata -> RDF URI mappings in the HTML5 microdata draft Due: 2011-01-20 -- due 2011-04-26 -- OPEN 18:28:10 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/510 18:29:16 tim sent email, and the html editor replied 18:30:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Apr/0057.html 18:30:42 may 20 18:30:56 message:%3C3D3DBBA0-0F94-438D-AC23-EF1EC84E182F@w3.org%3E 18:31:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011May/0062.html 18:31:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0336.html 18:31:51 mid:3D3DBBA0-0F94-438D-AC23-EF1EC84E182F@w3.org 18:32:10 responses from aryeh, maciej, ian, julian 18:32:11 -DKA 18:33:10 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0364.html 18:33:59 ACTION: Noah to schedule discussion of resonses to TAG concerns expressed under ACTION-510, e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0364.html 18:33:59 Created ACTION-580 - Schedule discussion of resonses to TAG concerns expressed under ACTION-510, e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0364.html [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-30]. 18:34:19 ACTION-580 Due 2011-07-12 18:34:19 ACTION-580 Schedule discussion of resonses to TAG concerns expressed under ACTION-510, e.g. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011May/0364.html due date now 2011-07-12 18:34:26 close ACTION-510 18:34:26 ACTION-510 Write a note conveying the TAG's concerns re: the microdata -> RDF URI mappings in the HTML5 microdata draft Due: 2011-01-20 closed 18:34:38 -JeniT 18:34:45 JeniT has left #tagmem 18:34:55 -TimBL 18:35:06 nm: meeting adjourned, I'll be gone for two weeks 18:35:08 -Ashok_Malhotra 18:35:10 -Yves 18:35:11 -noah 18:35:14 -Jonathan_Rees 18:35:18 have a good vacation, Noah 18:35:19 -plinss 18:35:20 s/I'll be gone for two weeks// 18:35:21 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:35:23 Attendees were +1.617.538.aaaa, plinss, DKA, jrees, JeniT, Yves, Ashok_Malhotra, noah, TimBL, ht, Jonathan_Rees 18:35:38 rrsagent, make logs public 18:35:47 s/ave a good vacation// 18:37:35 s/Thanks Tim// 20:10:23 Zakim has left #tagmem 20:33:51 timbl__ has joined #tagmem 21:18:48 jar has left #tagmem 22:00:00 Norm has joined #tagmem