15:57:11 RRSAgent has joined #html-wg 15:57:11 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/06/16-html-wg-irc 15:57:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:57:13 Zakim has joined #html-wg 15:57:15 Zakim, this will be html_wg 15:57:15 ok, trackbot; I see HTML_WG()12:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 15:57:16 Meeting: HTML Weekly Teleconference 15:57:16 Date: 16 June 2011 15:58:03 dsinger_ has joined #html-wg 15:58:12 HTML_WG()12:00PM has now started 15:58:13 Julian has joined #html-wg 15:58:16 +Sam 15:58:20 +[Microsoft] 15:58:21 -[Microsoft] 15:58:21 +[Microsoft] 15:58:27 +dsinger 15:58:34 zakim, [Microsoft] has paulc 15:58:34 +paulc; got it 15:58:57 chair: paulc 15:59:00 scribenick: rubys 15:59:16 zakim, who is here? 15:59:16 On the phone I see [Microsoft], Sam, dsinger (muted) 15:59:17 [Microsoft] has paulc 15:59:18 On IRC I see Julian, dsinger_, Zakim, RRSAgent, rubys, paulc, dveditz, jsoref, MikeSmith, davidb, plh, Martijnc, cjones, Lachy, webben, Dashiva, jmb, CIA-1, arronei, jgraham, 15:59:23 ... gavin_, krijnh, pingo, Lutoma, shepazu_away, heycam|away, trackbot, inimino, [tm], Philip, gsnedders, hober, pimpbot, hsivonen, ed, Hixie 15:59:34 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2011AprJun/0021.html 15:59:35 Title: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-06-16 CfC status, Call status, New Information status from Paul Cotton on 2011-06-15 (public-html-wg-announce@w3.org from April to June 2011) (at lists.w3.org) 15:59:53 + +1.251.280.aaaa 16:00:01 Zakim, +1.251.280.aaaa is me 16:00:02 +Julian; got it 16:01:09 +[Apple] 16:01:12 mjs has joined #html-wg 16:02:10 nonge has joined #html-wg 16:02:26 adrianba has joined #html-wg 16:02:56 +[Microsoft.a] 16:03:00 Zakim, I assume apple has mjs 16:03:00 I don't understand 'I assume apple has mjs', dsinger_ 16:03:10 zakim, [Microsoft.a] has adrianba 16:03:10 +adrianba; got it 16:03:29 ScribeNick: adrianba 16:03:33 Scribe: Adrian Bateman 16:03:37 Chair: Paul Cotton 16:03:40 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2011AprJun/0021.html 16:03:41 Title: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-06-16 CfC status, Call status, New Information status from Paul Cotton on 2011-06-15 (public-html-wg-announce@w3.org from April to June 2011) (at lists.w3.org) 16:03:45 Regrets+ Eliot_Graff 16:04:09 Zakim, call Mike 16:04:10 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 16:04:11 +Mike 16:04:38 Zakim, who is on the call? 16:04:38 On the phone I see [Microsoft], Sam, dsinger (muted), Julian, [Apple], [Microsoft.a], Mike 16:04:40 [Microsoft.a] has adrianba 16:04:40 [Microsoft] has paulc 16:04:43 +??P15 16:05:02 janina has joined #html-wg 16:05:25 Zakim, Mike is me 16:05:25 +MikeSmith; got it 16:05:27 zakim, who's here? 16:05:27 On the phone I see [Microsoft], Sam, dsinger (muted), Julian, [Apple], [Microsoft.a], MikeSmith, ??P15 16:05:29 [Microsoft.a] has adrianba 16:05:29 [Microsoft] has paulc 16:05:30 On IRC I see janina, adrianba, nonge, mjs, Julian, dsinger_, Zakim, RRSAgent, rubys, paulc, dveditz, jsoref, MikeSmith, davidb, plh, Martijnc, cjones, Lachy, webben, Dashiva, jmb, 16:05:35 ... CIA-1, arronei, jgraham, gavin_, krijnh, pingo, Lutoma, shepazu_away, heycam|away, trackbot, inimino, [tm], Philip, gsnedders, hober, pimpbot, hsivonen, ed, Hixie 16:05:49 topic: ACTION items due by Thursday, June 16 16:05:55 paulc: none 16:05:58 ScribeNick:rubys 16:06:02 zakim, ??P15 is Janina 16:06:02 +Janina; got it 16:06:12 Scribe: Sam Ruby 16:06:17 topic: New Issues This Week 16:06:31 +hober 16:07:11 paulc: there are two TrackerRequests that will likely be converted to issues; this does not require chairs to do that 16:07:30 paulc: in all likelihood, the chairs will move to a call for change proposals 16:07:39 topic: Items Closed Last Week 16:07:41 paulc: none 16:07:53 topic: Items Closing This Week 16:08:09 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0092.html 16:08:10 Title: CfC: Publish HTML5 Edition for Web Authors as First Public Working Draft from Sam Ruby on 2011-06-07 (public-html@w3.org from June 2011) (at lists.w3.org) 16:08:42 paulc: although it has been published, it has never been published as a public working draft 16:08:53 q+ 16:08:57 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Jun/0195.html 16:08:59 Title: CfC addendum: Status wording for HTML5 Edition for Web Authors from Maciej Stachowiak on 2011-06-14 (public-html@w3.org from June 2011) (at lists.w3.org) 16:09:18 paulc: maciej sent out two options, and so far we have input that some can't live with option 2 16:09:31 paulc: the chairs will likely process this item on monday 16:09:35 ack j 16:09:35 ack julian 16:10:05 julian: will we make any effort to make the content of the author spec consistent with the last call spec? 16:10:29 q+ to say yeah, doable 16:11:03 paulc: mike has been traveling so we haven't been able to close this, but he has said that it was generated from an incorrect version 16:11:14 +1 on both 16:11:28 paulc: furthermore, it is our intent to make it look like a working draft (frontmatter, status, etc) 16:11:48 ack M 16:11:48 MikeSmith, you wanted to say yeah, doable 16:12:13 MikeSmith: I've been with unpredictable connectivity, the fact the documents were out of sync was not intentional 16:13:10 MikeSmith: it is easy enough to do 16:13:48 MikeSmith: as to style, we probably will need to do that, but part of the intent is to make it more author friendly, and the standard W3C style is not particularly friendly.... but we are likely to be stuck with that 16:14:19 MikeSmith: this may make some more happy and some less happy, but I can get that work done 16:14:20 can't we improve the style consistently for both? 16:14:47 Julian, yeah, wish we could, but that's a bigger fish to fry 16:14:57 paulc: we want to thank you for doing all of the heavy lifting for the publication cycle; it takes a lot of work to produce 9 docs 16:15:35 :) 16:15:59 topic: Items Closing Next Week 16:16:03 issue-30? 16:16:03 ISSUE-30 -- Should HTML 5 include a longdesc attribute for images -- open 16:16:03 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/30 16:16:04 Title: ISSUE-30: Should HTML 5 include a longdesc attribute for images - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:16:21 paulc: call for counter proposals closes on the 25th... a week saturday 16:16:27 issue-133? 16:16:27 ISSUE-133 -- Add a modal attribute to html5 to indicate a modal segment of the DOM (modal dialog) -- open 16:16:27 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/133 16:16:28 Title: ISSUE-133: Add a modal attribute to html5 to indicate a modal segment of the DOM (modal dialog) - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:16:39 paulc: call for counter proposals also closes on the 25th 16:16:45 issue-153? 16:16:45 ISSUE-153 -- link type "external" either not useful or underspecified -- raised 16:16:45 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/153 16:16:46 Title: ISSUE-153: link type "external" either not useful or underspecified - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:17:00 paulc: call for proposals due June 25 16:17:04 issue-154? 16:17:04 ISSUE-154 -- "sidebar" might not be a proper use of a link relation -- raised 16:17:04 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/154 16:17:05 Title: ISSUE-154: "sidebar" might not be a proper use of a link relation - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:17:13 paulc: call for proposals due June 25 16:17:27 I will 16:17:28 paulc: who on the call is actively working on these items? 16:17:57 ted: I'm looking into doing a change proposal for issue 133; might be a zero edit proposal; I may ask for an extension 16:18:19 paulc: please respond on the mailing list 16:18:26 ted: will do 16:18:32 I will work on CPs for ISSUE-153 and ISSUE-154 (which will be similar) 16:18:53 paulc: responding on the mailing list will reduce duplicate work 16:19:15 s/ted/hober/ 16:19:38 paulc: did you respond on the list? 16:19:48 julian: I will do that 16:20:29 paulc: if people need extensions, we encourage these requests to be made in advance 16:20:54 paulc: we now have volunteers for all four calls 16:21:03 topic: New Calls this week 16:21:06 paulc: none 16:21:11 topic: New Surveys this week 16:21:13 paulc: none 16:21:18 topic: Decisions this week 16:21:22 paulc: None 16:21:35 topic: Other Business 16:21:36 dsinger has joined #html-wg 16:21:46 http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/new-information-status.html 16:21:47 Title: New Information Status (at dev.w3.org) 16:21:51 q+ to talk about http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 which has TrackerRequest keyword 16:21:52 1112952: shelleyp, P3, RESOLVED WONTFIX, 13remove typemustmatch 16:21:57 +[Apple.a] 16:22:06 zakim, [apple.a] has dsinger 16:22:06 +dsinger; got it 16:22:12 -dsinger 16:22:20 paulc: can anybody give us status on any of the particular items? 16:22:40 paulc: several of these are worked on by a11y subteams... janina can you provide status? 16:22:47 janina: yes 16:23:00 issue-31? 16:23:00 ISSUE-31 -- Author conformance requirements for the alt attribute on images -- closed 16:23:00 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/31 16:23:01 Title: ISSUE-31: Author conformance requirements for the alt attribute on images - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:23:11 paulc: there were two items on this issue 16:23:31 paulc: first was "Adopt the REQUIREMENTS portion of the "Provide detailed instructions and examples for doing so to all readers of the HTML specification." 16:23:50 paulc: "The presence of makes missing alt conforming" 16:24:20 janina: don't know of any discussion on the first one, we do have intent to clean up Leif's change proposal and submit it. 16:24:26 paulc: which subgroup? 16:24:30 janina: text subteam 16:25:00 paulc: can you take this one back to the a11y TF? 16:25:04 janina: will do 16:25:07 issue-32? 16:25:07 ISSUE-32 -- how to provide a summary of a table, e.g. for unsighted navigation? -- closed 16:25:07 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/32 16:25:09 Title: ISSUE-32: how to provide a summary of a table, e.g. for unsighted navigation? - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:25:48 janina: we have found others to pick this item back up 16:25:58 janina: again, the text subteam 16:26:04 issue-56? 16:26:04 ISSUE-56 -- Bring "URLs" section/definition and IRI specification in alignment. -- closed 16:26:04 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56 16:26:05 Title: ISSUE-56: Bring "URLs" section/definition and IRI specification in alignment. - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:26:23 paulc: does anyone on the call know the status of this? 16:27:08 julian: the IRI wg has a new co-chair, but I don't know if this has produced any concrete action yet 16:27:40 paulc: I believe that the IRI WG wants to decrease the difference between the IRI spec and the HTML5 spec 16:27:51 issue-80? 16:27:51 ISSUE-80 -- document conformance and device dependent display of title attribute content -- closed 16:27:51 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/80 16:27:53 Title: ISSUE-80: document conformance and device dependent display of title attribute content - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:28:29 janina: this is from the text subteam, the proposal from Steve Faulkner is the one from the subteam 16:28:37 paulc: we have two, one from Steve and one from Leif 16:28:59 paulc: it would be helpful to converge on one within the subteam 16:29:17 issue-120? 16:29:17 ISSUE-120 -- Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology -- closed 16:29:17 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/120 16:29:18 Title: ISSUE-120: Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:29:38 paulc: does anyone know if they are continuing to work on this? 16:29:52 paulc: will mark that one for the chairs to follow up on 16:29:57 issue-131? 16:29:57 ISSUE-131 -- Should we add a caret location API to canvas, or is the focus API sufficient? -- closed 16:29:57 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 16:29:58 Title: ISSUE-131: Should we add a caret location API to canvas, or is the focus API sufficient? - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:30:23 paulc: we have one change proposal from Richard 16:30:34 janina: the canvas subteam is working on this 16:30:48 janina: I don't know what the current status is 16:31:04 issue-142? 16:31:04 ISSUE-142 -- No alternative text description for video key frame (poster) -- closed 16:31:04 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/142 16:31:06 Title: ISSUE-142: No alternative text description for video key frame (poster) - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:31:21 janina: this is the media subteam... we have a markup proposal 16:31:47 janina: we are trying to think this through end to end 16:32:17 janina: I have an action item to get some people into a meeting next week 16:32:24 paulc: good sign that you are making progress 16:32:28 issue-155? 16:32:28 ISSUE-155 -- make conforming -- closed 16:32:28 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/155 16:32:29 Title: ISSUE-155: make conforming - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org) 16:33:10 paulc: this came from Tab.... I haven't seen any progress... anybody know what the status is? 16:33:26 janina: the text subteam will look into this 16:33:56 mjs: Given what he said, I'm not sure that tab intends to produce a reopen request on this one 16:34:04 paulc: the chairs will follow up with Tab 16:34:44 paulc: I'll explicity copy janina on the status 16:35:07 paulc: you have a lot of items, we encourage you to spring loose as many as you can as early as possible 16:35:17 paulc: any other items? 16:36:47 janina: one more on issue-31 dealing with figcaption.... we generally agree with the decision, but there are other specific cases where figcaption is not acceptable as a fallback (e.g. in epub and scientific pubs). 16:37:46 paulc: it either is a reconsider or a new bug 16:37:57 janina: we will raise it more broadly on the WG lists 16:38:21 paulc: once we see it on the list, we will start to track it 16:38:41 paulc: this discussion has been useful, and the chairs will follow up on the remaining two items 16:38:42 q? 16:39:00 ack j 16:39:00 Julian, you wanted to talk about http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12952 which has TrackerRequest keyword 16:39:01 1112952: shelleyp, P3, RESOLVED WONTFIX, 13remove typemustmatch 16:39:03 ack Julian 16:39:36 julian: we can avoid having this one be a tracker item if it is reverted 16:40:24 paulc: the chairs will look into this...we are working on the decision policy 16:40:50 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12935 16:40:51 1112935: bzbarsky, P2, RESOLVED WONTFIX, 13 should not auto-close ancestors 16:41:58 rubys: the status on this one looks confused... TrackerRequest was added and removed 16:42:08 paulc: any other business? 16:42:20 topic: chair and scribe for next week 16:42:34 mjs: I will chair next week 16:42:44 paulc: volunteer to scribe? 16:43:01 paulc: I'll scribe 16:43:09 topic: adjournment 16:43:18 paulc: we are adjourned 16:43:24 rrsagent, publish minutes 16:43:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/06/16-html-wg-minutes.html rubys 16:43:30 -Sam 16:43:33 -[Microsoft.a] 16:43:34 -Julian 16:43:34 -MikeSmith 16:43:35 -hober 16:43:35 -Janina 16:43:36 -[Apple.a] 16:43:38 janina has left #html-wg 16:44:04 -[Apple] 16:45:07 -[Microsoft] 16:45:08 HTML_WG()12:00PM has ended 16:45:10 Attendees were Sam, dsinger, paulc, Julian, [Apple], [Microsoft], adrianba, MikeSmith, Janina, hober 16:48:54 pdr has joined #html-wg 16:49:45 pdr has joined #html-wg 16:54:46 bugmail: "[Bug 12935] should not auto-close ancestors" (4 messages in thread) <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0595.html> 16:59:01 MikeSmith has joined #html-wg 17:11:06 arronei_ has joined #html-wg 17:24:54 bugmail: [Bug 12963] hola no se k es un feedakv <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0602.html> 4** "[Bug 12935] should not auto-close ancestors" (2 messages in thread) <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0601.html> 4** [Bug 12949] click() shouldn't have special powers over dispatching click event manually <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0599.htm 17:55:00 bugmail: "[Bug 12949] click() shouldn't have special powers over dispatching click event manually" (3 messages in thread) <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0607.html> 4** [Bug 12973] New: The IDL parts in this section contain what I believe to be non-valid WebIDL, specifically "Element?" and "object?" - both interface types and object are already nullable, so the ? is invalid. <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/publ 18:07:31 mjs_ has joined #html-wg 18:08:46 mjs_ has joined #html-wg 18:15:28 html-spec: 03ianh@340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74 * 24301afe22c4 r6240 10/ (index complete.html source): 18:15:28 html-spec: [giow] (1) Make textarea and input consistent. (Interop here is a disaster currently, so we can change this with impunity.) 18:15:28 html-spec: Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12423 18:15:28 html-spec: 03ianh@340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74 * f29983f52246 r6241 10/ (index complete.html source): [e] (0) typo 18:15:29 1112423: contributor, P3, RESOLVED FIXED, 13Setting .value on a textarea should set the dirty flag to true 18:25:09 bugmail: [Bug 12901] Keep up the great work... One suggestion. Could you please align the Microdata part of the spec with Microformats and/or RDFa, instead of jnust defining yet another random markup. It would be really helpful for alot of developers who have invested time an <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0620.html> 4** [Bug 12429] Should cloning properties preserve configurability, readonlyness, etc? <11http://list 18:26:50 mjs has joined #html-wg 18:30:24 html-spec: 03ianh@340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74 * c08679519c32 r6242 10/ (index complete.html source): 18:30:24 html-spec: [e] (0) Apparently it isn't entirely clear that margins at the top and bottom of an element must be vertical margins. 18:30:24 html-spec: Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12470 18:30:25 1112470: contributor, P3, RESOLVED FIXED, 13In the last paragraph, please add the word "vertical", since the intent is apparently that _vertical_ margins at the top or bottom of body, td, or th elements be collapsed to zero. That's what browsers do in quirks mode. But horizontal margins are honored 18:32:23 MikeSmith_ has joined #html-wg 18:52:58 MikeSmith__ has joined #html-wg 18:53:08 MikeSmith___ has joined #html-wg 18:55:16 bugmail: [Bug 12971] A lot of times, perhaps the majority of the time, authors use or to make text italic or bold, when in fact the intention has nothing to do with emphasizing or strongly emphasizing the text. The result is terrible in aural browsers and extrem <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0632.html> 4** "[Bug 12949] click() shouldn't have special powers over dispatching click event manually" (2 messa 19:09:13 Zakim has left #html-wg 19:51:32 planet: Tantek: registration open @W2E NYC Oct 10-13 (I'm speaking on #HTML5) http://web2expo.com/webexny2011 25% discount: webny11pc2 <11http://tantek.com/2011/167/t1/registration-w2e-nyc-html5-discount-code> 20:25:37 bugmail: [Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0633.html> 21:01:42 Lutoma has joined #html-wg 21:05:28 mjs has joined #html-wg 21:06:39 mjs has joined #html-wg 21:25:51 bugmail: [Bug 12948] New feature request: GROUP tag What I'd like to achieve in HTML is to easily access a group of elements via Javascript using a single parent element (GROUP). The GROUP element would not under any circumstance affect the layout of the page, and would not b <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Jun/0635.html> 4** [Bug 12885] Add a new input type=numeric <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzi 21:45:00 Lachy has joined #html-wg 21:45:30 html-spec: 03ianh@340c8d12-0b0e-0410-8428-c7bf67bfef74 * 29ed5bf5b1d0 r6243 10/ (index complete.html source): 21:45:30 html-spec: [giow] (0) Clarify media fragment video track selection. 21:45:30 html-spec: Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12364 21:45:31 1112364: contributor, P3, RESOLVED FIXED, 13