16:49:15 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #tagmem
16:49:15 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc
16:49:30 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #tagmem
16:50:20 <JeniT> Zakim, this will be TAG_Weekly
16:50:20 <Zakim> ok, JeniT; I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM scheduled to start in 10 minutes
16:50:58 <JeniT> Topic: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/26-agenda
16:51:27 <JeniT> Scribe: Jeni Tennison
16:52:02 <JeniT> ScribeNick: JeniT
16:52:43 <JeniT> Meeting: W3C TAG Teleconference of 26 May 2011
16:52:57 <JeniT> Chair: Noah Mendelsohn
16:53:04 <JeniT> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/26-agenda
16:59:56 <Ashok> Ashok has joined #tagmem
17:00:17 <noah> noah has joined #tagmem
17:00:18 <Zakim> TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has now started
17:00:26 <Zakim> +??P0
17:00:27 <DKA> DKA has joined #tagmem
17:00:37 <noah> zakim, who is here?
17:00:38 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P0
17:00:40 <Zakim> On IRC I see DKA, noah, Ashok, Zakim, RRSAgent, jar, JeniT, ht, plinss_, Yves, trackbot
17:00:45 <Zakim> +Noah_Mendelsohn
17:00:46 <JeniT> Zakim, ??P0 is me
17:00:47 <Zakim> +JeniT; got it
17:01:00 <noah> zakim, noah_mendelsohn is me
17:01:00 <Zakim> +noah; got it
17:01:12 <Zakim> +DKA
17:01:21 <Zakim> +Masinter
17:01:25 <DKA> ahoy-hoy
17:01:55 <noah> zakim, who is here?
17:01:55 <Zakim> On the phone I see JeniT, noah, DKA, Masinter
17:01:57 <Zakim> On IRC I see DKA, noah, Ashok, Zakim, RRSAgent, jar, JeniT, ht, plinss_, Yves, trackbot
17:02:05 <Larry> Larry has joined #tagmem
17:02:16 <Larry> agenda?
17:02:23 <Zakim> +??P2
17:02:30 <ht> zakim, ? is me
17:02:30 <Zakim> +ht; got it
17:02:40 <JeniT> Topic: Convene
17:02:43 <Zakim> +Ashok_Malhotra
17:02:52 <Larry> agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/26-agenda
17:03:02 <noah> zakim, who is here?
17:03:02 <Zakim> On the phone I see JeniT, noah, DKA, Masinter, ht, Ashok_Malhotra
17:03:03 <Zakim> On IRC I see Larry, DKA, noah, Ashok, Zakim, RRSAgent, jar, JeniT, ht, plinss_, Yves, trackbot
17:03:35 <Zakim> + +1.650.294.aaaa
17:03:35 <Zakim> +Yves
17:03:41 <JeniT> Noah: Approval of minutes?
17:03:56 <noah> topic: Approval of minutes
17:04:00 <noah> May 5: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/05-minutes
17:04:02 <jar> zakim, aaaa is jar
17:04:02 <Zakim> +jar; got it
17:04:24 <noah> RESOLUTION: Minutes of 5 May 2011 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/05-minutes are approved.
17:04:33 <noah> May 12: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/12-minutes
17:04:45 <noah> RESOLUTION: Minutes of 12 May 2011 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/12-minutes
17:04:52 <JeniT> Topic: Administrative Items
17:05:09 <JeniT> noah: Please tell me about summer schedules
17:05:27 <JeniT> noah: HTML5 has just gone to last call, due date for comments August 3rd
17:05:39 <JeniT> ... we have been specifically asked for TAG review
17:06:31 <JeniT> ... Should we have telcon next week?
17:06:51 <JeniT> ... Hold time for now, and I will try to cancel if we can
17:07:16 <jar> I cannot make a June 2 telecon
17:07:31 <JeniT> ... Regrets for June 2
17:08:30 <JeniT> Topic: HTML5 Last Call
17:08:54 <JeniT> noah: in the agenda is a link to a press release
17:09:04 <noah> Press release: http://www.w3.org/2011/05/html5lc-pr.html.en
17:10:30 <JeniT> ... there should be a mail somewhere but I haven't found it
17:10:31 <DKA> q+ to talk about "language reference"
17:11:05 <Larry> q+ to discuss prioritizing TAG topics to "architectural" issues
17:11:18 <JeniT> noah: when we met 2 weeks ago, DKA and ht volunteered to review selected items
17:11:26 <JeniT> ... DKA to review with an eye toward mobile
17:11:52 <Larry> I think the TAG should give priority to helping resolve review comments from other W3C working groups and other standards organizations
17:12:01 <JeniT> DKA: I'm confused about language reference: was it previously the TAG's view that the language reference should be a normative document?
17:12:11 <JeniT> ... it's non-normative in this last call
17:12:26 <JeniT> noah: There are two documents, one by Mike Smith which is non-normative
17:12:35 <JeniT> ... what should be normative is the author-only view of the main spec
17:13:18 <JeniT> ... let me ask chairs about where that stands
17:14:03 <JeniT> DKA: The spec has a link to the 'web-developer edition'
17:14:17 <JeniT> noah: it does say it's non-normative
17:14:21 <noah> ACTION: Noah to follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/
17:14:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-555 - Follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/ [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-02].
17:15:14 <noah> ACTION: Noah to follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/ is not normative
17:15:14 <trackbot> Created ACTION-556 - Follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/ is not normative [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-02].
17:15:51 <noah> close ACTION-555
17:15:51 <trackbot> ACTION-555 Follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/ closed
17:15:58 <JeniT> noah: the web-author view is generated from the same source as the main spec
17:16:08 <JeniT> ... we said that was an acceptable compromise
17:16:27 <JeniT> ... The TAG's position was that if this was published as normative, we're OK with it.
17:16:37 <Larry> The IANA registration says the "Published specification" is "This document" but appears in both the language reference document and the main document
17:16:57 <JeniT> noah: DKA, are you looking to review things from the perspective of mobile?
17:17:35 <JeniT> DKA: Yes, specifically app cache stuff, to the extent that's still in the spec
17:18:12 <JeniT> noah: What should the TAG's top priorities be for this last call?
17:18:47 <Larry> q?
17:19:10 <noah> q?
17:19:23 <JeniT> ht: I was going to review the list of acceptable strings within the DOCTYPE.
17:19:45 <JeniT> ... I want to review carefully the description of prefix binding.
17:20:21 <noah> ack next
17:20:23 <noah> ack next
17:20:23 <Zakim> DKA, you wanted to talk about "language reference"
17:20:28 <Zakim> Larry, you wanted to discuss prioritizing TAG topics to "architectural" issues
17:20:29 <Larry> q-
17:20:52 <JeniT> masinter: I think we should prioritise comments from other Working Groups and standards groups
17:21:16 <noah> I'm sympathetic, but we need a process for doing that. Are you available to review those comments?
17:21:23 <JeniT> ... We could communicate this to other groups that are commenting on the spec, that we would help if they want help.
17:21:43 <JeniT> noah: There are some comments that are being carried forward, and there will be more as last call proceeds.
17:24:25 <JeniT> Larry: I'm suggesting we should give higher priority to topics suggested by others rather than within the TAG.
17:24:41 <jar> q?
17:24:48 <jar> q+ jar to agree with lm
17:24:53 <ht> +1 to requests from WGs
17:24:59 <noah> q?
17:25:03 <noah> ack next
17:25:05 <Zakim> jar, you wanted to agree with lm
17:25:09 <JeniT> JAR: I agree with Larry.
17:25:18 <JeniT> ht: I agree wrt W3C Working Groups.
17:25:50 <JeniT> noah: We could leave this in the minutes, and perhaps a WG will turn up and ask for help
17:25:57 <JeniT> ... or we could reach out and tell people?
17:26:07 <JeniT> Larry: Note to the WG chairs
17:26:43 <JeniT> noah: Let's get consensus over such a note.
17:29:20 <noah> . ACTION: Larry to draft note for chairs list on TAG interest in hearing of architectural issues and comments relating to HTML5...draft to be sent to tag@w3.org
17:30:34 <noah> ACTION: Larry to draft note for chairs list on TAG interest in hearing of architectural issues and comments relating to HTML5...draft to be sent to tag@w3.org
17:30:34 <trackbot> Created ACTION-557 - Draft note for chairs list on TAG interest in hearing of architectural issues and comments relating to HTML5...draft to be sent to tag@w3.org [on Larry Masinter - due 2011-06-02].
17:31:03 <JeniT> noah: There's a lot that we have no one assigned to read or comment on.
17:31:33 <noah> Jeni: Is microdata part of last call.
17:31:36 <noah> Yves: yes
17:31:37 <noah> http://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/
17:31:47 <noah> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-microdata-20110525/
17:32:35 <noah> ACTION: Jeni to review Microdata last call Due 2011-06-06
17:32:35 <trackbot> Created ACTION-558 - Review Microdata last call Due 2011-06-06 [on Jeni Tennison - due 2011-06-02].
17:33:15 <noah> NM: F2F session on HTML5 last call?
17:33:56 <JeniT> noah: Anyone else?
17:34:06 <noah>     HTML5
17:34:06 <noah>     HTML+RDFa 1.1
17:34:06 <noah>     HTML Microdata
17:34:06 <noah>     HTML Canvas 2D Context
17:34:06 <noah>     Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents
17:34:06 <noah>     HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives
17:35:07 <noah> ACTION: Jeni to review HTML+RDfa last call Due 2011-06-06
17:35:08 <trackbot> Created ACTION-559 - Review HTML+RDfa last call Due 2011-06-06 [on Jeni Tennison - due 2011-06-02].
17:35:27 <noah> JAR: Discussion time may be useful
17:35:30 <JeniT> JAR: I predict we'll be able to make good use of discussion time at the F2F
17:36:03 <JeniT> noah: Let's see what the other things are that we want to talk about at the F2F.
17:36:19 <jar> that is, specifically about RDFa and microdata, even if we're not all really well prepared
17:36:44 <JeniT> noah: I think we should look at Polyglot.
17:36:54 <Yves> polyglot should indeed be on the reading list
17:36:57 <DKA> +1 to us commenting on polyglot
17:36:58 <JeniT> ht: There's been a long thread in xml-dev about it.
17:37:01 <JeniT> +1
17:37:06 <noah> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/
17:38:08 <noah> ACTION: Henry to review HTML polyglot last call Due 2011-06-06
17:38:09 <trackbot> Created ACTION-560 - Review HTML polyglot last call Due 2011-06-06 [on Henry Thompson - due 2011-06-02].
17:38:30 <noah> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/
17:39:06 <JeniT> noah: Does alt text relate to accessibility?
17:39:13 <JeniT> ... is this a priority?
17:39:14 <ht> Here's the xml-dev thread on polyglot: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/201105/msg00128.html
17:39:46 <JeniT> Larry: Maybe there's a meta-issue about the proper working group for this document.
17:40:33 <JeniT> ht: The chairs have said they're going to last call without the accessibility area nailed down.
17:41:43 <JeniT> Larry: I'd like to read it wrt is this the right way to specify accessibility techniques.
17:42:54 <JeniT> Larry: IETF have documents about internationalisation, security, privacy etc
17:43:05 <JeniT> ... W3C has a group that handles accessibility.
17:43:33 <JeniT> ... What guidelines should we give for expressing these techniques: should they be normative? how do we deal with contradictions?
17:44:25 <JeniT> noah: These folks have been wrestling with this for years.
17:45:09 <Larry> I think that the main function of the tag is to "go meta"
17:45:11 <JeniT> ... They went to last call; no one is asking us to go meta; how are we going to get these large documents reviewed?
17:45:40 <JeniT> Larry: I think we could do this in 15 minutes.
17:46:59 <noah> q?
17:47:15 <JeniT> DKA: I was at the AC meeting last week, there was a lot of controversy around HTML5
17:47:21 <Larry> I think you can "go meta" in 15 minutes, it's not necessarily an endless task, but 15 minutes isn't optimal
17:47:29 <JeniT> ... Paul Cotton stated he expected it to go to 2nd/3rd Last Call
17:47:47 <JeniT> ... There are a bunch of open issues, a lot to do with accessibility, a lot of controversy around those issues.
17:48:33 <Larry> I think the issue really has to do with disagreement about how accessibility techniques are made normative, and that commenting specifically on the meta-issue would be appropriate for the TAG
17:48:43 <JeniT> s|Paul Cotton stated he expected it to go to 2nd/3rd Last Call||
17:49:10 <JeniT> Topic: F2F Agenda Review
17:49:23 <noah> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/05/11F2FAgendaPlanning.html
17:49:28 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-minutes.html Yves
17:50:17 <JeniT> noah: Let's read through rapidly, and then we'll go back over
17:50:49 <JeniT> ... First establish top priorities.
17:51:10 <JeniT> ... Commit to 2/3 deliverables.
17:51:15 <Larry> shouldn't HTML5 topics be a "Top Priority" of the F2F?
17:51:26 <JeniT> ... Move client-side state to publication.
17:52:00 <Larry> I'd give technical topics a higher priority than "align product pages", which is a task in service
17:52:36 <JeniT> Larry: The third topic is not a technical priority, and I'd give technical topics a priority.
17:52:55 <ht> q+ to ask about the XML/HTML report wrt its previous state
17:53:08 <JeniT> noah: I'll make note with HTML5 as a priority.
17:53:21 <JeniT> ... Starting to make list of required reading.
17:54:12 <JeniT> noah: Is ACTION-531 going to be ready for the F2F?
17:54:25 <JeniT> Larry: Having trouble getting input from other people.
17:54:49 <ht> q+ ht2 to ask for 1/2 a slot to discuss 3023bis and IRIbis status
17:54:49 <JeniT> noah: We will have some administration.
17:55:02 <Larry> well, I haven't pushed hard on Philippe and Thomas, but i imagine they're busy with HTML5 and Privacy
17:55:07 <JeniT> noah: General Topics
17:55:27 <jar> q+ jar to get a word in edgewise
17:55:36 <JeniT> ... Discussed having lunch with Jim to see what he has to say.
17:56:28 <JeniT> ... Scope is that HTTP is not designed properly to run on these network stacks, so we have serious work to do to rework HTTP.
17:56:40 <JeniT> +1
17:57:08 <JeniT> noah: IAB telcon while we're at the F2F
17:57:37 <JeniT> ... ACTION-549 on Larry/Henry/Yves to create agenda
17:58:39 <JeniT> noah: Copyright & deep linking
18:00:12 <JeniT> JeniT: Would like to go through document
18:00:28 <JeniT> ... and identify places where TAG has opinion about impact of legal decisions
18:00:39 <Larry> q+ to strongly urge avoiding recommending legal positions, and instead document customary & ordinary practice
18:00:56 <JeniT> ... dated version of document will be done shortly and email sent to Noah.
18:01:50 <jar> larry, we've been over that ground.  the tag is unanimous in not wanting to give legal opinion. this goes without saying
18:02:03 <JeniT> noah: Privacy
18:02:14 <Larry> not what JeniT said
18:02:43 <JeniT> Larry, I'm not saying make legal recommendations at all...
18:03:11 <JeniT> Larry, I'm saying as we discussed and agreed a few weeks ago, stating the technical impact of particular legal decisions that governments and lawyers could make.
18:04:10 <JeniT> DKA: We should read Privacy Report and try to understand impact.
18:04:38 <JeniT> noah: Ashok, could you lead us in discussion on privacy workshop?
18:04:59 <JeniT> Ashok: Yes
18:05:02 <noah> q?
18:05:22 <JeniT> ... This is a large and complicated topic, do-not-track is one aspect of it.
18:05:43 <JeniT> ... Need to also talk about Dan's stuff on minimisation etc.
18:05:55 <DKA> q?
18:05:59 <DKA> q+ 
18:06:35 <noah> ack next
18:06:37 <Zakim> ht, you wanted to ask about the XML/HTML report wrt its previous state
18:07:08 <JeniT> ht: We reviewed XML/HTML report last F2F, talked about it with Norm, quick look it doesn't look changed -- can we find out how much it's changed?
18:07:15 <noah> ACTION: Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML
18:07:15 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Norm
18:07:22 <noah> ACTION: Noah to ask Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML
18:07:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-561 - Ask Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2011-06-02].
18:07:40 <JeniT> noah: I think the report has come since the last F2F.
18:07:49 <noah> ack next
18:07:50 <Zakim> ht2, you wanted to ask for 1/2 a slot to discuss 3023bis and IRIbis status
18:08:24 <JeniT> ht: Need to know about what to do about 3023bis, XML Core is getting antsy.
18:08:41 <noah> ACTION: Henry to organize F2F session on IRIbis and 3023bis
18:08:41 <trackbot> Created ACTION-562 - Organize F2F session on IRIbis and 3023bis [on Henry Thompson - due 2011-06-02].
18:08:43 <noah> ack next
18:08:45 <Zakim> jar, you wanted to get a word in edgewise
18:09:46 <JeniT> jar: On Issue-27 -- I'm not asking for F2F time necessarily on this.
18:10:35 <JeniT> ... Also, most of my time since last F2F has been on Issue-57
18:10:47 <JeniT> ... Would be nice to have a bit of feedback from the TAG on it.
18:10:49 <Larry> issue-57?
18:10:49 <trackbot> ISSUE-57 -- Mechanisms for obtaining information about the meaning of a given URI -- open
18:10:49 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57
18:11:11 <ht> HST leaving
18:11:18 <Zakim> -ht
18:11:33 <JeniT> jar: There's a document that's in draft to read.
18:13:00 <JeniT> noah: DKA: Can you keep in mind ACTION-460
18:13:17 <DKA> q?
18:13:35 <noah> ack next
18:13:37 <Zakim> Larry, you wanted to strongly urge avoiding recommending legal positions, and instead document customary & ordinary practice
18:13:42 <jar> replace "JAR hopes to have an ISSUE-57 document" with "JAR will have an ISSUE-57 document"
18:13:47 <noah> ack next
18:14:15 <JeniT> DKA: Hopping back to Ashok's comment on privacy and do-not-track, but think it might be most timely way that we can focus attention at the F2F.
18:14:35 <noah> q?
18:14:37 <JeniT> ... We could provide some input into the process.
18:14:58 <JeniT> Ashok: We're in agreement.
18:15:13 <JeniT> noah: HTML/XML Unification
18:15:30 <JeniT> ... Assume we do want to discuss this, unless there's not much new.
18:15:43 <JeniT> ... Web Apps
18:16:09 <JeniT> ... Should be new draft on client-side state, big priority to complete that.
18:16:23 <JeniT> ... API minimisation
18:16:41 <JeniT> DKA: On agenda on DEP(?) call next week
18:16:59 <JeniT> ... better draft going to be last minute thing, but it's a small document.
18:17:45 <noah> ACTION-514 Due 2011-06-03
18:17:45 <trackbot> ACTION-514 Draft finding on API minimization due date now 2011-06-03
18:17:46 <JeniT> s/DEP(?)/DAP/
18:18:16 <JeniT> noah: Interaction (ACTION-537)
18:18:35 <JeniT> DKA: Not time to do this.
18:18:48 <noah> ACTION-537 Due 2011-07-15
18:18:48 <trackbot> ACTION-537 Reach out to Web apps chair to solicit help on framing architecture (incluing terminology, good practice) relating to interaction due date now 2011-07-15
18:19:04 <JeniT> noah: Packaged Web Apps
18:19:46 <JeniT> DKA: Probably nothing to comment on until later in the summer.
18:20:17 <JeniT> noah: F2F is opportunity for you to explain the issues?
18:20:33 <JeniT> DKA: Maybe 20 minutes talking about the different approaches?
18:20:45 <JeniT> ... Fits in with HTML5 review, because one approach is app cache.
18:21:11 <JeniT> noah: Security
18:21:25 <JeniT> ... Our expertise is spotty.
18:21:43 <JeniT> ... John Kemp started something, Larry took it on.
18:22:26 <JeniT> Larry: I need to get hold of John Kemp.
18:23:18 <JeniT> noah: Security is even worse than privacy.
18:23:31 <JeniT> ... We were educating ourselves on perma-cookies etc.
18:23:49 <JeniT> ... Should we have a session and brainstorm?
18:23:49 <DKA> q?
18:24:25 <JeniT> DKA: Would be useful to a TAG statement on the web security model.
18:24:32 <Larry> q+ to talk about IETF websec
18:24:37 <JeniT> noah: No one has stepped up to do this.
18:24:58 <JeniT> Larry: There's a websec WG with chairs and agendas
18:25:20 <JeniT> noah: Thomas Roessler is supposed to be heading W3C's security agenda.
18:25:27 <Larry> where is the W3C security work in the process?
18:25:54 <JeniT> jar: Web security model is basically CORS, and we're waiting for their Last Call, and they haven't done a heartbeat for a year.
18:26:15 <JeniT> Larry: This needs to be an action item for the web security group in W3C.
18:26:33 <JeniT> noah: Does the TAG have a stake in this?
18:26:51 <jar> s/Web security model/if Web security model/
18:27:15 <jar> s/and we're waiting/then we're waiting/
18:27:38 <JeniT> Larry: Nothing on the F2F, I'll work on getting something into the WG.
18:27:56 <Larry> ack
18:28:00 <Larry> q?
18:28:03 <Larry> ack Larry
18:28:03 <Zakim> Larry, you wanted to talk about IETF websec
18:28:37 <JeniT> noah: Fragment IDs inc. #! and RDFa
18:28:47 <JeniT> ... Action on Jeni & JAR
18:29:30 <JeniT> JeniT: I will draft something for JAR.
18:29:43 <JeniT> noah: Dropping Issue-27 for F2F
18:30:04 <JeniT> noah: Persistence of references
18:30:19 <JeniT> JAR: I'm not going to have a draft finding but I will have some stuff to present and talk about
18:30:34 <JeniT> ... Probably not until a few days before.
18:30:58 <Zakim> -DKA
18:31:16 <JeniT> noah: Not planning to schedule... ACTION-531
18:31:35 <JeniT> ... similarly ACTION-543
18:32:07 <Larry> I owe action on mime-web
18:32:21 <JeniT> noah: ACTION-510
18:32:32 <Larry> action-510?
18:32:32 <trackbot> ACTION-510 -- Tim Berners-Lee to write a note conveying the TAG's concerns re: the microdata -> RDF URI mappings in the HTML5 microdata draft Due: 2011-01-20 -- due 2011-04-26 -- OPEN
18:32:32 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/510
18:32:45 <JeniT> noah: JeniT should look into ACTION-510
18:33:13 <JeniT> Larry: Perhaps we could meet with Jeff in Boston? Perhaps Thomas?
18:33:21 <JeniT> ... other W3C staff members?
18:33:56 <jar> how about Sandro for issue-57 ?
18:35:04 <JeniT> noah: Larry, please see if you can get W3C people involved to talk about registeries
18:35:58 <JeniT> ... Happy to invite Sandro.
18:36:30 <JeniT> ... Will try for more formal agenda for next Tue/Wed
18:36:47 <Zakim> -Ashok_Malhotra
18:37:06 <Zakim> -Yves
18:37:20 <JeniT> noah: Adjourned
18:37:22 <Zakim> -noah
18:37:23 <Zakim> -Masinter
18:37:27 <Zakim> -JeniT
18:37:29 <Zakim> -jar
18:37:29 <Zakim> TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended
18:37:30 <Zakim> Attendees were JeniT, noah, DKA, Masinter, ht, Ashok_Malhotra, +1.650.294.aaaa, Yves, jar
18:40:05 <JeniT> zakim, bye
18:40:05 <Zakim> Zakim has left #tagmem
18:40:41 <JeniT> Present: JeniT, noah, DKA, Masinter, ht, Ashok_Malhotra, +1.650.294.aaaa, Yves, jar
18:41:27 <JeniT> rrsagent, draft minutes
18:41:27 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-minutes.html JeniT
18:42:11 <JeniT> rrsagent, bye
18:42:53 <JeniT> rrsagent, make log public
18:43:03 <JeniT> rrsagent, bye
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-actions.rdf :
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Noah to follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/ [1]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T17-14-21
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Noah to follow up with HTML WG chairs as to why http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/author/ is not normative [2]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T17-15-14
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Larry to draft note for chairs list on TAG interest in hearing of architectural issues and comments relating to HTML5...draft to be sent to tag@w3.org [3]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T17-30-34
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jeni to review Microdata last call Due 2011-06-06 [4]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T17-32-35
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jeni to review HTML+RDfa last call Due 2011-06-06 [5]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T17-35-07
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Henry to review HTML polyglot last call Due 2011-06-06 [6]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T17-38-08
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML [7]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T18-07-15
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Noah to ask Norm to tell us how much has changed on HTML/XML [8]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T18-07-22
18:43:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Henry to organize F2F session on IRIbis and 3023bis [9]
18:43:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/05/26-tagmem-irc#T18-08-41