15:39:38 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #css
15:39:38 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/18-css-irc
15:39:43 <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
15:39:43 <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 21 minutes
15:39:49 <glazou> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:52:54 <arronei> arronei has joined #CSS
15:54:19 <stearns> stearns has joined #css
15:54:38 <glazou> Zakim, code?
15:54:38 <Zakim> the conference code is 78953 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), glazou
15:55:22 <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
15:55:30 <Zakim> +stearns
15:55:39 <Zakim> +plinss
15:56:25 <Zakim> +??P33
15:56:32 <glazou> Zakim, ?P33 is me
15:56:32 <Zakim> sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named '?P33'
15:56:40 <glazou> Zakim, ??P33 is me
15:56:40 <Zakim> +glazou; got it
15:56:43 <Zakim> + +1.415.290.aaaa
15:57:52 <Zakim> -glazou
15:58:02 <Zakim> +??P33
15:58:14 <glazou> Zakim, ??P33 is me
15:58:14 <Zakim> +glazou; got it
15:58:21 <plinss> zakim, aaaa is fantasai
15:58:21 <Zakim> +fantasai; got it
15:58:25 <vhardy> vhardy has joined #css
15:58:37 <glazou> Zakim, who is here?
15:58:37 <Zakim> On the phone I see stearns, plinss, fantasai, glazou
15:58:39 <Zakim> On IRC I see vhardy, stearns, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, Martijnc, arno, kojiishi, unomi, szilles, shepazu, CSSWG_LogBot, karl, lhnz, krijnh, TabAtkins, hober, fantasai,
15:58:41 <Zakim> ... plinss, Bert, Hixie, gsnedders, jgraham, trackbot
15:58:44 <stearns> zakim, aaa is vhardy
15:58:44 <Zakim> sorry, stearns, I do not recognize a party named 'aaa'
15:59:00 <smfr> smfr has joined #css
15:59:02 <stearns> zakim, aaaa is vhardy
15:59:02 <Zakim> sorry, stearns, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'
15:59:10 <glazou> Zakim, aaaa is vhardy 
15:59:10 <Zakim> sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa'
15:59:17 <plinss> zakim, fantasai is vhardy
15:59:17 <Zakim> +vhardy; got it
15:59:28 <plinss> zakim, who is here?
15:59:28 <Zakim> On the phone I see stearns, plinss, vhardy, glazou
15:59:29 <Zakim> On IRC I see smfr, vhardy, stearns, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, Martijnc, arno, kojiishi, unomi, szilles, shepazu, CSSWG_LogBot, karl, lhnz, krijnh, TabAtkins, hober,
15:59:31 <Zakim> ... fantasai, plinss, Bert, Hixie, gsnedders, jgraham, trackbot
15:59:41 <oyvinds> oyvinds has joined #css
15:59:49 <Zakim> +smfr
16:00:28 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
16:00:29 <arronei> zakim, microsoft has me
16:00:30 <Zakim> +arronei; got it
16:00:52 <Zakim> +[Apple]
16:01:01 <hober> Zakim, Apple has me
16:01:01 <Zakim> +hober; got it
16:01:12 <Zakim> +[Microsoft.a]
16:01:13 <johnjan> johnjan has joined #css
16:01:33 <johnjan> zakim, microsoft has johnjan
16:01:33 <Zakim> +johnjan; got it
16:01:52 <bradk> bradk has joined #css
16:03:28 <Zakim> +bradk
16:03:58 <Zakim> + +1.415.920.aabb
16:04:10 <glazou> Zakim, aabb is fantasai 
16:04:10 <Zakim> +fantasai; got it
16:04:43 <Zakim> +??P11
16:04:50 <kojiishi> zakim, ??p11 is me
16:04:50 <Zakim> +kojiishi; got it
16:04:56 <glazou> ScribeNick: vhardy 
16:05:09 <Zakim> -bradk
16:05:26 <TabAtkins> Last-minute regrets - in a meeting.
16:05:28 <Zakim> + +1.415.832.aacc
16:05:36 <glazou> Zakim, aacc is arronei 
16:05:42 <glazou> Zakim, aacc is arno
16:05:54 <Zakim> +arronei; got it
16:06:00 <Zakim> sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named 'aacc'
16:06:13 <fantasai> is there an agenda?
16:06:15 <murakami> murakami has joined #css
16:06:19 <arno> Zakim, aacc is arno
16:06:22 <Zakim> sorry, arno, I do not recognize a party named 'aacc'
16:06:26 <howcome> howcome has joined #css
16:06:31 <Zakim> +howcome
16:06:45 <vhardy> glazou: The listserv at W3C has issues. I sent the agenda yesterday evening. It can take a ong time to see an email in your inbox.
16:07:07 <vhardy> glazou: this is for W3C mailing lists in general, not just the CSS lists.
16:07:23 <vhardy> arno: some of the email just seem to never make it to my inbox.
16:07:35 <vhardy> glazou: this happened to me too.
16:07:43 <vhardy> arno: yes, I do not see other people's email.
16:08:01 <vhardy> glazou: other agenda items?
16:08:11 <Zakim> +bradk
16:08:17 <vhardy> vhardy: will we have a meeting next week?
16:08:33 <vhardy> glazou: not sure, we have a chairing problem. 
16:08:45 <vhardy> fantasai: may be Bert can char?
16:08:57 <vhardy> glazou; yes, I'lll try to find a replacement.
16:08:59 <glazou> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/32061/css-ftf-2011-06
16:09:25 <vhardy> glazou: please respond to the questionaire about the next F2F.
16:09:33 <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/planning/japan-2011
16:09:59 <vhardy> glazou: please also fill out the information about your flight and arrival/departure info.
16:10:43 <vhardy> glazou: agenda items for Kyoto meeting. For now, we have CSS Regions/Exclusions, etc... (see above link).
16:10:49 <vhardy> glazou: are there other items?
16:10:49 <Zakim> -bradk
16:12:13 <vhardy> Hakon: could we discuss the multi-col test suite?
16:12:39 <Zakim> +bradk
16:12:45 <vhardy> hakon: the test suite is a start. 
16:12:50 <vhardy> glazou: how complete is it?
16:13:01 <vhardy> hakon: it is a bit short on functionality.
16:13:11 <vhardy> hakon: we need more test cases for edge cases.
16:13:35 <vhardy> hakon: we would like to reach about 200 tests.
16:13:55 <vhardy> hakon: we currently have about 20.
16:14:11 <vhardy> hakon: I think Microsoft has between 50 and 100 tests.
16:14:55 <vhardy> johnjan: It is Microsoft's intention to contribute the tests.
16:15:16 <vhardy> glazou: other agenda items?
16:15:23 <johnjan> we just want to make sure we're not going to submit a bunch of duplicates to the opera tests
16:15:35 <vhardy> glazou: anything else about Kyoto?
16:15:45 <smfr> smfr has joined #css
16:15:48 <vhardy> plinss: I'll be there a few days in advance.
16:16:07 <alexmog> alexmog has joined #css
16:16:47 <vhardy> vhardy: the SVG WG will not meet in Kyoto.
16:16:56 <vhardy> glazou: yes, we had a message from them.
16:17:30 <vhardy> glazou: Cameron McCormak sent a message on May 12th. The SVG WG will reschedule the meeting likely late July in the US.
16:18:00 <vhardy> glazou: next agenda item. CSS 2.1 review period ended yesterday. 
16:18:12 <vhardy> glazou: 23 answers. 21 are ok-go ahead. 2 are requesting changes.
16:18:35 <vhardy> glazou: some of the changes sent by Mohamed are related to references.
16:19:10 <vhardy> glazou: David from Mozilla had a comment about issue 225. Nokia mentioned it to. Saying we could add it to the document since it is resolved.
16:19:33 <vhardy> glazou: if we have add the resolution to the document, it could delay things. I would propose to move as fast as possible.
16:19:46 <vhardy> fantasai: Bert said the director could agree to make that change.
16:20:03 <vhardy> glazou: I am worried about a technical change that is not just editorial.
16:20:13 <vhardy> fantasai: I think the Director should make that decision.
16:20:26 <vhardy> fantasai: nobody objects to the change. 
16:20:53 <vhardy> glazou: the Director could also be worried that not everybody reviewed the issue 225 resolution.
16:21:20 <fantasai> fantasai: That should be the director's call.
16:21:21 <vhardy> glazou: our responsibility as chairs is to decide on what we should recommend for the director.
16:21:34 <vhardy> glazou: unfortunately, Bert is not on the call. 
16:21:43 <fantasai> fantasai: I don't think we should recommend against the chagne
16:21:48 <fantasai> s/chagne/change/
16:22:02 <vhardy> glazou: If we can make some of the changes Mohamed recommended.
16:22:36 <vhardy> glazou: please remind your AC rep. about PR release about 2.1
16:22:49 <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/planning/agenda
16:22:49 <vhardy> glazou: let's move to other agenda items.
16:23:51 <vhardy> vhardy: what do I need to do to prepare for WD publication. 
16:24:22 <vhardy> fantasai: talk to me and Bert off-line.
16:24:27 <vhardy> vhardy: ok, will do.
16:24:56 <vhardy> glazou: did you incorporate comments in the draft.
16:25:05 <vhardy> vhardy: I am in the process to do that.
16:25:23 <vhardy> glazou: we cannot make a decision to publish to WD because we do not have enough attendance in that call. 
16:25:36 <vhardy> glazou: I propose we wait until next week if we have a call or decide during the F2F.
16:25:49 <vhardy> glazou: next item, we can talk about namespaces.
16:26:04 <vhardy> glazou: I had an AI to ping the i18n WG.
16:26:34 <vhardy> kojiishi: Actually, this was just discussed in the i18n meeting earlier today.
16:26:58 <vhardy> kojiishi: we should have an answer by next week.
16:27:17 <vhardy> glazou: I hope it will not imply a lot of changes. If it does not, we can publish.
16:27:23 <vhardy> glazou: anything else on that topic?
16:27:31 <vhardy> glazou: anything else we should discuss today?
16:27:46 <fantasai> zakim, who is here?
16:27:46 <Zakim> On the phone I see stearns, plinss, vhardy, glazou, smfr, [Microsoft], [Apple], [Microsoft.a], fantasai, kojiishi, arronei, howcome, bradk
16:27:48 <Zakim> [Microsoft] has johnjan
16:27:48 <Zakim> [Apple] has hober
16:27:50 <Zakim> On IRC I see alexmog, smfr, murakami, bradk, johnjan, oyvinds, vhardy, stearns, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, Martijnc, arno, kojiishi, unomi, szilles, CSSWG_LogBot, karl,
16:27:52 <Zakim> ... lhnz, krijnh, TabAtkins, hober, fantasai, plinss, Bert, Hixie, gsnedders, jgraham, trackbot
16:29:17 <vhardy> fantasai: I have a question about what to do about the intric width of multi-col elements.
16:29:35 <vhardy> hakon: I do not think this is a multi-col specific issue.
16:29:53 <vhardy> hakon: I think this is an issue that we need to address, just not as a multi-col issue.
16:30:40 <vhardy> glazou: do you mean that the algorithm to compute the width of columns is orthogonal to the widht of the elements themselves.
16:30:47 <vhardy> s/widht/width
16:30:57 <vhardy> fantasai: where should I address this?
16:31:22 <vhardy> fantasai: we need to define the shrink wrap algorithm for table and other use cases.
16:32:01 <vhardy> fantasai: I would like if this issue should be left undefined or if we should add it to the appendix of wrapping mode.
16:32:27 <vhardy> hakon: yes, I think you should do.
16:33:13 <vhardy> fantasai: multi-col has special considerations, such as the max-content-width that is different for multi-col elements.
16:34:35 <vhardy> hakon: I do not think we should single out the multi-col elements.
16:35:50 <vhardy> fantasai: describes a use case with multi-column where there are specificities.
16:36:22 <vhardy> hakon: we have simplified the multi-column specification. 
16:36:43 <vhardy> fantasai: I would like to address these use cases. 
16:41:41 <fantasai> we have 3 options
16:41:44 <vhardy> fantasai: we have 3 options:
16:41:54 <fantasai> a) leave shrinkwrap undefined, as currently in css3-multicol
16:42:16 <fantasai> b) define shrinkwrap to ignore multi-col properties, calculate as if columns weren't there
16:42:31 <fantasai> c) define shrinkwrap with consideration of multicol properties
16:44:29 <vhardy> hakon: there is already interoperable implementations of shrinkwrap in multi-col. It is not documented, but it is interoperably implemented.
16:44:48 <vhardy> hakon: if we document it, it should document current implementation.
16:45:06 <vhardy> galzou: fantasai says that the current impls. do not cover all scripts.
16:45:19 <vhardy> fantasai: yes, and other more complicated use cases we have not though of yet.
16:45:29 <vhardy> glazou: so we are not ready yet to standardize that?
16:45:59 <vhardy> fantasai: no, it is just that shrinkwrapping multi-col elements is that it is more important than we thought.
16:46:19 <vhardy> glazou: we have a pretty stable multi-col spec. that we can move along the spec. track.
16:46:39 <vhardy> glazou: the shrinkwrap algorithm needs to be extended separately, and implementors will have to do their work.
16:46:48 <vhardy> hakon: yes, I agree.
16:47:06 <vhardy> hakon: if there are new use cases, we could address them in a later spec. 
16:47:25 <vhardy> glazou: yes, if we wait to address all use cases, we will drag the effort.
16:47:37 <vhardy> fantasai: I am not asking to modify the multi-col spec. 
16:47:51 <vhardy> hakon: but you are asking to specifiy multi-col functionality in a different spec.
16:48:15 <vhardy> glazou: do we have a proposal?
16:48:20 <vhardy> fantasai: yes.
16:48:33 <vhardy> glazou: we need the whole group to be present for this discussion.
16:48:53 <vhardy> glazou: we cannot resolve it today. We can discuss it next week or during the F2F.
16:49:17 <vhardy> glazou: changing something in the feature related to the relation between two specification is something we can still discuss.
16:49:54 <vhardy> glazou: in the meantime, I propose we make progress on the multi-col spec. and make progress on the test suite, move it along as it is today. We have implementations, use cases on the web.
16:49:59 <vhardy> fantasai: ok with me.
16:50:04 <vhardy> hakon: ok with me.
16:51:04 <vhardy> glazou: no change in the multi-col spec. for now. We will discuss shrinkwrap issues related to multi-col with hakon present.
16:51:45 <vhardy> plinss: I proposed change to mercurial. Did not hear any objection. Planning to make the change today.
16:52:04 <vhardy> fantasai: do we have documentation on the mercurial client.
16:52:50 <vhardy> arronei: I have concerned about the documentation as well. We would need a place with documentation.
16:53:03 <vhardy> fantasai: we would need instructions for common functionality.
16:53:15 <vhardy> plinss: I can put this together.
16:53:26 <vhardy> fantasai: documenting merge process would be great.
16:54:38 <vhardy> (discussion about CVS/SVN merits)
16:56:45 <vhardy> glazou: any objection to move to mercurial?
16:56:51 <vhardy> fantasai: none if we have instructions.
16:56:57 <vhardy> (no objection)
16:57:01 <fantasai> very simple, clear, easy-to-follow instructions
16:57:08 <vhardy> RESOLUTION: moving test suite to mercurial.
16:57:08 <fantasai> not "here's a link to the manual" :)
16:58:27 <Zakim> -[Microsoft.a]
16:58:29 <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
16:58:30 <Zakim> -smfr
16:58:30 <Zakim> -[Apple]
16:58:31 <Zakim> -vhardy
16:58:32 <Zakim> -glazou
16:58:34 <Zakim> -kojiishi
16:58:36 <Zakim> -plinss
16:58:41 <Zakim> -stearns
16:58:43 <Zakim> -howcome
16:58:44 <Zakim> -bradk
16:58:46 <Zakim> -fantasai
16:59:25 <vhardy> vhardy has left #css
17:03:04 <Zakim> -arronei
17:03:05 <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
17:03:07 <Zakim> Attendees were stearns, plinss, glazou, +1.415.290.aaaa, vhardy, smfr, arronei, hober, [Microsoft], johnjan, bradk, +1.415.920.aabb, fantasai, kojiishi, +1.415.832.aacc, howcome
17:14:33 <smfr> smfr has left #css
17:39:54 <arno> arno has joined #css
17:40:09 <nimbupani> nimbupani has joined #css
17:40:31 <nimbupani> nimbupani has left #css
18:08:51 <arno> arno has joined #css
18:30:51 <arno> arno has joined #css
19:03:38 <Zakim> Zakim has left #css
19:07:12 <arno> arno has joined #css
19:18:15 <arno> arno has joined #css
20:05:17 <arno> arno has joined #css
20:28:44 <karl> karl has joined #CSS