Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

02 May 2011

See also: IRC log


Alessandro, Alex, Cherie, Jutta, Jeanne
Jan, Sarah, Tim


<trackbot> Date: 02 May 2011

<scribe> scribe: Jeanne

Level AA Success Criteria Comments

Jutta: What is the best course for completing the review of the Last Call Comments

Alex: A survey helps with this information. Having all the information on one page would be more convenient.

Jutta: Or a table with a column for comments

ATAG Implementations

Alessandro: I will be ready to discuss this in a few weeks.

Jutta: NIAC is working on mobile web apps which would include authoring tools. I am approaching them about ATAG 2.0 implementation. It is an organization that helps with device independents. Device independence often can lead to accessibility.
... We will need two examples of every success criteria when we reach the CR phase. It is also an advantage to have implementations that meet all of Level A, level AA and level AAA.
... The homework is to complete the Level AA and AAA comments so we can review them rapidly next week. We are falling behind in completing the review. There will come a point where we will have to send out the comments regardless of review by the WG.
... Next meeting is next Monday.

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/05/02 20:35:04 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Jeanne
Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne
Default Present: Jeanne, Cherie, Alex, Alessandro
Present: Alessandro Alex Cherie Jutta Jeanne
Regrets: Jan Sarah Tim
Found Date: 02 May 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/05/02-au-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]