Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference

Welcome

<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Apr/0037

approve publication on next weeks call

Shadi: approve publication on next weeks call
... very urgent
... review specs until next week
... basically review the changes

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline

Shadi: discuss open issues today
... changes to the specs where mostly minor, mostly editorial changes
... EARL guide with substantial changes
... Conformance section moved from the specs

[EARL 1.0 Schema] reviewing open notes

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note1

Shadi: suggestions: keep editor note and wait for feedback or remove it
... keep it or remove it?
... anybody objects?

Kostas: wonder why do we need foaf:Document?

CarlosV: equivalent to cnt:Content, so better remove it

Shadi: leave it for this publication so we can still discuss it?
... change editor's note to "ERT WG plans to remove foaf:Document....."
... foaf:Document is widely used
... would like see more arguments for removing it
... what if you have your library already using foaf:Document? then you have to rewrite it, if we remove it
... suggestion to discuss this later

Kostas: ok

<shadi> ACTION: shadi to change editor note 1 in EARL 1.0 Schema to say "ERT is considering removing foaf:Document" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-121 - Change editor note 1 in EARL 1.0 Schema to say "ERT is considering removing foaf:Document" [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-05-04].

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note2

Shadi: continue with this approach?

Kostas: think, it is nice to have it.

Shadi: keep editor note?

CarlosV: would remove it

Shadi: objections for removing it?

<shadi> ACTION: shadi to remove editor note 2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-122 - Remove editor note 2 [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-05-04].

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Schema/#note3

Shadi: objection: reusing DOAP vs. DOAP is to broad for our use
... publish with open issue? objections?
... Software as subclass of doap:Project?

CarlosV: would prefer not to subclass

Carlos: same position, not using DOAP
... but would not object if somebody find it useful

Shadi: I think it would be a compromise to subclass daop:Project
... Keep editor's note
... No response until now from Edd Dumbill
... Any comments? Any objections?

RESOLUTION: Make Software a subclass of doap:Project and keep editor's note

Shadi: Any other comments?

[HTTP-in-RDF] reviewing open notes

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/#introduction

Shadi: potential conflict HTTP in RDF 1.0 and HTTP 1.1
... Any other comments on this document?

[Content-in-RDF] reviewing open notes

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/Content-in-RDF/#ContentClass

Shadi: Change dct:source to dct:hasFormat and dct:isFormatOf
... editor's note outdated. Should we still ask for feedback?

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Content/issues#ContentClass

Shadi: For example text from a server could be recorded in different ways. dct:hasFormat and dct:isFormatOf could relate those instances.
... suggestion to keep the editor's note and also ask for comments on the use of dct:hasFormat and dct:isFormatOf

CarlosV: do we have the latest version of the RDF files on the web?

<shadi> ACTION: carlosv to update editor note in content-in-rdf but keep it [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-123 - Update editor note in content-in-rdf but keep it [on Carlos A. Velasco - due 2011-05-04].

<shadi> ACTION: shadi to check with carlosV and philip on the latest versions of content-in-rdf drafts [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-124 - Check with carlosV and philip on the latest versions of content-in-rdf drafts [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2011-05-04].

Shadi: Any other comments on this document?

[Pointers-in-RDF] reviewing open notes

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/TR/Pointers-in-RDF/#namespaceMappingClass

Shadi: Keep that note?

Carlos: It was there for a long time, so I would remove it now. There is not much feedback.

Shadi: anybody objects?

<shadi> ACTION: carlosI to remove editor note from pointers-in-rdf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - carlosI

Shadi: Any other comments on this document?

[EARL 1.0 Guide] review outline

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Guide-20110427#toc

Shadi: section two is from the current document, section three the conformance sections of the current specs, section four discussed later
... priority to import conformance sections
... Any other comments on this document?

Any other business

Shadi: Please review the documents this week. Beginning next week discussion on mailing list. Approve on next meeting.
... Any other comments?

Upcoming meeting schedule

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/timeline#meeting

<carlos> ACTION: ciglesia to remove editor note from pointers-in-rdf [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/27-er-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-125 - Remove editor note from pointers-in-rdf [on Carlos Iglesias - due 2011-05-04].