13:56:37 RRSAgent has joined #lld 13:56:37 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-irc 13:56:42 zakim, who is on the call 13:56:42 I don't understand 'who is on the call', pmurray 13:56:48 zakim, this will be LLD 13:56:48 ok, emma, I see INC_LLDXG()10:00AM already started 13:56:51 zakim, who is on the phone 13:56:51 I don't understand 'who is on the phone', pmurray 13:57:05 Chair: Emmanuelle 13:57:06 - +1.404.892.aaaa 13:57:07 INC_LLDXG()10:00AM has ended 13:57:07 Attendees were +1.404.892.aaaa 13:57:09 kcoyle has joined #lld 13:57:18 zakim, this will be lld 13:57:18 ok, emma; I see INC_LLDXG()10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 13:57:22 INC_LLDXG()10:00AM has now started 13:57:29 +[IPcaller] 13:57:33 +??P5 13:57:36 GordonD has joined #lld 13:57:41 + +1.404.892.aaaa 13:57:47 zakim, IPcaller is me 13:57:47 +antoine; got it 13:57:48 zakim, aaaa is me 13:57:49 +pmurray; got it 13:57:49 +emma 13:57:58 +boris 13:58:14 zakim, who is here? 13:58:17 On the phone I see antoine, ??P5, pmurray (muted), emma, boris 13:58:18 +[IPcaller] 13:58:36 zakim, IPcaller is AlexanderH 13:58:36 +AlexanderH; got it 13:58:45 marcia has joined #lld 13:58:51 +michaelp 13:58:52 +[IPcaller] 13:58:55 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Mar/0088.html 13:59:01 zakim, michaelp is me 13:59:01 +jeff_; got it 13:59:04 zakim, ??P5 is TomB 13:59:04 +TomB; got it 13:59:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html TomB 13:59:16 +rsinger 13:59:30 fsasaki has joined #lld 13:59:31 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/24-lld-minutes.html 13:59:33 +marcia 13:59:40 zakim, mute me 13:59:40 jeff_ should now be muted 13:59:46 rrsagent, please draft minutes 13:59:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html emma 14:00:01 rrsagent, please make record public 14:00:10 Scribe: Gordon 14:00:23 kai has joined #lld 14:00:35 Zakim, mute me 14:00:35 scribenick:GordonD 14:00:38 marcia should now be muted 14:00:46 uldis has joined #lld 14:00:52 +??P19 14:00:55 rrsagent, please make record public 14:00:56 +??P20 14:01:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html TomB 14:01:11 +??P22 14:01:18 Uldis here. regrets, i can only participate via IRC today. 14:01:20 zakim, who's here 14:01:20 emma, you need to end that query with '?' 14:01:29 zakim, ??P33 is ww 14:01:29 sorry, antoine, I do not recognize a party named '??P33' 14:01:31 zakim, who's here ? 14:01:33 On the phone I see antoine, TomB, pmurray (muted), emma, boris, AlexanderH, jeff_ (muted), [IPcaller], rsinger, marcia (muted), felix, ??P20, ??P22 14:01:36 zakim, ??P22 is ww 14:01:36 +ww; got it 14:01:39 zakim, +??P20 is me 14:01:39 sorry, kai, I do not recognize a party named '+??P20' 14:01:43 zakim, this will be lld 14:01:43 ok, TomB, I see INC_LLDXG()10:00AM already started 14:01:45 zakim, who is here? 14:01:45 On the phone I see antoine, TomB, pmurray (muted), emma, boris, AlexanderH, jeff_ (muted), [IPcaller], rsinger, marcia (muted), felix, ??P20, ww 14:01:45 zakim, ??P20 is me 14:01:48 +kai; got it 14:01:48 + +1.763.463.aabb 14:01:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html TomB 14:01:53 zakim, aabb is Jodi 14:01:54 +Jodi; got it 14:01:59 zakim, IPcaller is GordonD 14:01:59 +GordonD; got it 14:02:01 zakim, who is here? 14:02:01 On the phone I see antoine, TomB, pmurray (muted), emma, boris, AlexanderH, jeff_ (muted), GordonD, rsinger, marcia (muted), felix (muted), kai, ww, Jodi 14:02:26 Gordon laughs ... 14:02:56 michaelp has joined #lld 14:03:08 Meeting: LLD XG 14:03:30 Topic: ADMIN 14:03:50 +??P26 14:04:18 zakim, ??P26 is kcoyle 14:04:18 +kcoyle; got it 14:04:27 RESOLVED: Accept minutes of previous conference http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/24-lld-minutes.html 14:05:01 Topic: FINAL REPORT DRAFT 14:05:44 ACTION: For Gordon and Karen to consider relation between problems and limitation section and the library resource wiki page. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/24-lld-minutes.html#action01] 14:05:49 -- continues 14:06:14 +[IPcaller] 14:06:18 Topic: Benefits of LD for libraries 14:06:29 Zakim, +[IPcaller] is digikim. 14:06:29 sorry, digikim, I do not recognize a party named '+[IPcaller]' 14:06:30 +[LC] 14:06:34 ACTION: emma and ed to start curating a section on benefits of LLD for libraries [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/02/24-lld-minutes.html#action06] 14:06:37 Zakim, LC is edsu 14:06:38 +edsu; got it 14:06:44 Zakim, IPcaller is digikim. 14:06:44 +digikim; got it 14:06:51 great timing, edsu :-) 14:06:57 antoine: :-) 14:07:16 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Benefits#Draft 14:07:46 -- done 14:08:02 ACTION: edsu, rsinger, emma to create a few bullet points on the benefits of linked data in libraries for the call on March 31st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/17-lld-minutes.html#action01] 14:08:18 hello, I would like to read the whole report and provide my/our comments -- can I download the report as a single web page (or pdf file) somewhere? 14:08:28 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReport <-- I'm aware of this URL 14:08:30 edsu: Held skype call to brainstorm benefits 14:08:51 ... Discussed who benefits 14:08:52 Gordon, the ACTION on emma and ed may need to be closed manually after the call (by editing the HTML) 14:10:32 rsinger: Identified four categories 14:10:42 s/edsu/rsinger/ 14:10:46 @digikim: that would be great, but there's no full report now! Perhaps a topic for the AOB part at the end of the call? 14:11:08 ... Biggest promise is that each community can describe its world in the way it wants to 14:11:11 zakim, mute me 14:11:12 ww should now be muted 14:11:38 +jeff_.a 14:12:33 antoine: ok 14:13:03 ... Libraries may have a central role in linked data for cultural heritage communities 14:14:43 ... LD allows layered creation of metadata, starting with identifiers 14:15:13 q+ to remind that identifiers for authority records not only holdings are extremely valuable 14:15:33 ... LD allows end-users to see integration with data they are more familiar with 14:15:34 q- because edsu just made my point 14:15:39 q- 14:16:22 edsu: LD easier for developers to work with 14:17:12 jneubert has joined #lld 14:17:32 +1 "infinitely expandable description" is great. Is the phrase new? 14:17:34 rsinger: is probably best/most hope for opening data to other domains 14:17:52 +jneubert 14:18:28 the predicates should also be dereferencable for cases where they aren't named intuitively 14:18:31 q+ 14:18:33 ... Web provides infrastructure, so need to develop another one 14:19:03 ... We are not alone; others can/will help 14:20:55 ... LD provenance problem is being resolved 14:22:41 q+ on "opening data" in Organization section 14:22:52 ... Organizations need to understand that their data is more valuable if openly-published for others to work on 14:23:16 ... a counter-argument to concerns about revenue streams, IPR, etc. 14:24:46 ... Considered differences between digital library and LD 14:25:24 ... LD allows finer granularity for re-use of metadata and use in resource discovery 14:26:16 q+ open world or open data? 14:26:26 q+ to ask about open world or open data? 14:27:21 ... Library authorities data can be managed on a distributed basis 14:28:26 q+ on take an action on cluster editors to check emma's list 14:28:33 Emma: initial bullet-points will be used to double-check other areas of report 14:29:11 q+ to mention prose idea 14:30:22 RESOLVED: Action on cluster owners to check the bullet-point list reflects their understanding and covers relevant points 14:30:47 ACTION: Cluster owners to check the bullet-point list reflects their understanding and covers relevant points 14:30:50 ack karen 14:30:57 ack kc 14:31:49 kcoyle: End-user category should be expanded; this is the most important group that decision-makers will consider 14:31:49 + 1 Karen's point 14:32:42 (for me, integration *is* a goal -- because it prevents libraries being lost in the shuffle) 14:32:53 ... Also expand point about integration with the Web for resource discovery 14:34:13 edsu: This is a real challenge for LD 14:34:15 There are users that could create data: researcher, general annotators (flickr-like platforms) 14:34:30 kcoyle: Libraries are service organizations 14:35:05 s/create data/create and remix data 14:35:49 rsinger: Leap of faith that LD resource discovery interfaces will happen - other benefits are more obvious and immediate 14:36:31 kcoyle: We should emphasis user-centric benefits 14:36:47 kcoyle: please feel free to move things that yo~u think should be moved 14:37:22 s/emphasis/emphasise/ 14:37:59 maybe those objections are worth listing! 14:38:10 to make a kind of Q&A -- with the responses to those objections... 14:38:12 kcoyle: Experience shows a lot of objections when discussing LD with libraries 14:38:19 kcoyle++ 14:38:31 "respond to those objections in the final report" 14:38:54 ... Final report should acknowledge and respond to such objections 14:39:27 +1 karen's point 14:39:36 ack ant 14:39:36 antoine, you wanted to comment on "opening data" in Organization section and to ask about open world or open data? and to comment on take an action on cluster editors to check 14:39:40 ... emma's list 14:39:42 rsinger: Agrees with kcoyle that social benefits are important 14:39:44 kcoyle: just added "How to get there from here" in the General section, but it might be better suited for the Recommendations 14:40:13 edsu: thanks 14:40:23 antoine: What does Open world mean - it is ambiguous 14:40:53 rsinger: Bullet-point probably refers to open data, not Open World Assumption 14:41:11 yes, that's one of the big objections that always comes up 14:41:33 q+ to challenge the "RDF is cross-domain" assumption 14:41:36 ... Point needs to be tightened up 14:42:11 q+ 14:43:11 antoine: Organizations don't have to release all their data, openly 14:43:20 ack ed 14:43:20 edsu, you wanted to mention prose idea 14:43:20 +1 to clearly distinguish between benefits of open data and benefits of linked data, and of course benefits of linked open data. 14:43:38 rsinger: Agree, open data can act like an advertisement for the organization and its data 14:44:38 q+ on organization of section 14:44:41 -felix 14:44:43 edsu: Would like another week to create narrative text from the bullet-points, which are not user-friendly 14:45:00 I think it's useful to keep the bullet points as well -- so please don't overwrite them 14:45:08 (sometimes people prefer bullet points for some purposes) 14:45:14 jodi: we won't! 14:45:19 thanks Ross! :) 14:45:27 ACTION: edsu, emma, rsinger to create narrative text and add to bullet-points 14:45:33 ack me 14:45:33 emma, you wanted to challenge the "RDF is cross-domain" assumption 14:45:35 jodi: ok :) 14:46:20 +1 re distinction b/w linked data and linked open data -- both can be useful to libraries 14:46:42 +1 # about the model 14:46:45 TomB: great, i guess we should talk again on skype 14:46:46 +1 on the idea that RDF is about the model 14:46:52 +1 on Skype 14:46:56 emma: Challenge assumption that RDF makes everything easy - it is no different from XML in that respect 14:47:07 there may be cases when linked data is used inside an organisation (between its information systems) without necessarily being open to everyone. (though open would be better :) 14:47:08 +1 to "common data model" 14:47:32 ... It is the common data model that makes things easy 14:48:08 I think the idea of OWL is important when we talk about models 14:48:30 there is an identifier you can use to overlay your own description -- so that's not quite as static as MARC, I think 14:48:50 edsu: RDF and XML cannot be said to be mutually exclusive 14:49:22 q+ to point out that thinking of rdf in terms of xml causes a lot of confusion and misunderstanding 14:49:24 ... Use of identifiers is the big advantage of RDF over XML 14:49:29 ack marc 14:49:58 q- 14:51:05 marcia: Librarians are end-users, so LD can reduce workload, etc., but are also intermediaries and can fall into two categories 14:51:24 We are ALL end-users 14:51:28 ack ant 14:51:28 antoine, you wanted to comment on organization of section 14:51:37 zakim, mute me 14:51:37 marcia should now be muted 14:51:47 q? 14:52:26 antoine: Will group categories be kept in the final version of this section? They are very helpful 14:53:10 zakim, who is here? 14:53:10 On the phone I see antoine, TomB, pmurray (muted), emma, boris, AlexanderH, jeff_ (muted), GordonD (muted), rsinger, marcia (muted), kai, ww (muted), Jodi, kcoyle, digikim, edsu, 14:53:13 ... michaelp (muted), jneubert (muted) 14:53:15 edsu: Yes, intention is that each group will have its own narrative paragraph 14:54:24 developers are not part of society ? ;-) 14:54:34 antoine: they aren't civilized, that's for sure 14:54:51 :-) 14:55:09 emma: Suggest presenting in the form of stories aimed at different consumers 14:55:19 edsu: Would need to be short stories! 14:55:24 ack tom 14:55:38 q? 14:56:50 emma: Should think about prioritising/ordering bullets 14:56:56 If the number of items is not big per category, order won't matter too much I think 14:57:54 emma: Need to address audience beyond the library community 14:58:12 Daniel! 14:58:22 Hi 14:58:23 close enough :) 14:58:32 emma: Introduces Daniel, our new member 14:58:51 Great that you are taking on the UC report, Daniel. Welcome! 14:58:56 +1 14:59:28 dvilasuero: I will be producing the use-case/clusters overview, and welcome any assistance 14:59:40 dvilasuero++ 14:59:53 ... Hopes to report on progress next week 15:00:07 -TomB 15:00:08 -edsu 15:00:15 oops, i just got disconnected :-) 15:00:16 bye 15:00:17 -marcia 15:00:17 thanks! 15:00:19 +??P27 15:00:21 jodi has left #LLD 15:00:22 -jeff_ 15:00:24 -kcoyle 15:00:24 me too! 15:00:24 -pmurray 15:00:25 thank you very much! 15:00:25 -michaelp 15:00:26 thanks! bye bye for now 15:00:27 jeff_ has left #lld 15:00:28 -AlexanderH 15:00:30 -ww 15:00:31 -digikim 15:00:31 -kai 15:00:32 rsaget please draft minutes 15:00:33 -Jodi 15:00:35 thnx 15:00:37 I'm still here, so "TomB" must have been a different handle 15:00:39 -boris 15:00:41 -jneubert 15:00:44 rrsagen, please draft minutes 15:00:45 rsagent, please draft minutes 15:00:46 zakim, please list attendees 15:00:53 As of this point the attendees have been +1.404.892.aaaa, antoine, pmurray, emma, boris, AlexanderH, jeff_, TomB, rsinger, marcia, felix, ww, kai, +1.763.463.aabb, Jodi, GordonD, 15:00:56 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:00:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html emma 15:00:58 ... kcoyle, edsu, digikim, michaelp, jneubert 15:01:42 michaelp has left #lld 15:01:54 -GordonD 15:01:56 -??P27 15:02:04 -emma 15:02:08 -antoine 15:02:30 zakim, ??P27 was really TomB 15:02:35 pmurray has left #lld 15:02:43 I don't understand '??P27 was really TomB', TomB 15:02:57 zakim, ??P27 was TomB 15:03:04 zakim, ??P27 is really TomB 15:03:07 I don't understand '??P27 was TomB', TomB 15:03:15 +TomB; got it 15:03:31 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:03:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-minutes.html TomB 15:03:31 zakim, sometimes you're really stubborn 15:03:37 I don't understand 'sometimes you're really stubborn', emma 15:03:38 :-) 15:04:08 zakim, go away ! 15:04:08 I don't understand 'go away !', emma 15:04:13 zakim, bye 15:04:13 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.404.892.aaaa, antoine, pmurray, emma, boris, AlexanderH, jeff_, TomB, rsinger, marcia, felix, ww, kai, +1.763.463.aabb, Jodi, 15:04:13 Zakim has left #lld 15:04:15 are you addicted to talking to zakimn, now?! 15:04:25 I just love zakim :-) 15:04:35 zakim, list attendees 15:04:42 You seem ready for a t-shirt (if they still have them) ;-) 15:04:53 I may ask Coralie ;-) 15:05:03 Sorry Tom, I dissmissed zakim 15:05:08 Tom is even talking to him after he's been dismissed. Cute :-) 15:05:25 May I dissmiss rrsagent too ? or you still have to talk to hiĆ¹ 15:05:36 I don't have anything to say to rrsagent 15:05:45 neither have I 15:05:51 ok, right, he's not so smart as zakim ;-) 15:05:52 Ask zakim 15:05:56 rrsagent, bye 15:05:56 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-actions.rdf : 15:05:56 ACTION: For Gordon and Karen to consider relation between problems and limitation section and the library resource wiki page. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/24-lld-minutes.html#action01] [1] 15:05:56 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-irc#T14-05-44 15:05:56 ACTION: emma and ed to start curating a section on benefits of LLD for libraries [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/02/24-lld-minutes.html#action06] [2] 15:05:56 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-irc#T14-06-34 15:05:56 ACTION: edsu, rsinger, emma to create a few bullet points on the benefits of linked data in libraries for the call on March 31st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/17-lld-minutes.html#action01] [3] 15:05:56 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-irc#T14-08-02 15:05:56 ACTION: Cluster owners to check the bullet-point list reflects their understanding and covers relevant points [4] 15:05:56 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-irc#T14-30-47 15:05:56 ACTION: edsu, emma, rsinger to create narrative text and add to bullet-points [5] 15:05:56 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/31-lld-irc#T14-45-27 15:06:24 byebye, rrsagent...!