13:50:09 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 13:50:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/24-rdfa-irc 13:50:11 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:50:11 Zakim has joined #rdfa 13:50:13 Zakim, this will be 7332 13:50:13 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes 13:50:14 Meeting: RDFa Working Group Teleconference 13:50:14 Date: 24 March 2011 13:50:57 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0089.html 13:51:12 Chair: Manu 13:55:08 Benjamin has joined #rdfa 14:02:17 SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started 14:02:18 +[IPcaller] 14:02:23 zakim, i am IPcaller 14:02:23 ok, manu1, I now associate you with [IPcaller] 14:02:40 +??P22 14:02:41 -??P22 14:02:41 +??P22 14:02:49 Zakim, I am ??P22 14:02:49 +webr3; got it 14:02:51 +??P24 14:02:55 yes, give me a minute 14:02:57 zakim, ??P24 is me 14:02:58 +ivan; got it 14:04:25 +ivan.a 14:05:05 zakim, ivan.a is benjamin 14:05:05 +benjamin; got it 14:05:22 manu1 has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0089.html (manu1) 14:05:26 scribenick: benjamin 14:05:39 Regrets: Steven, ShaneM, Knud 14:06:04 zakim, who is on the call? 14:06:04 On the phone I see [IPcaller], webr3, ivan, benjamin 14:07:08 Topic: RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 2nd Last Call 14:07:55 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/products/8 14:12:34 PROPOSAL: Close the following issues, official response was sent, multiple reminders to respond were sent to each comment submitter: ISSUE-46, ISSUE-66, ISSUE-67, ISSUE-69, ISSUE-70, ISSUE-72, ISSUE-73, ISSUE-74, ISSUE-76, ISSUE-78, ISSUE-79, ISSUE-80, ISSUE-81, ISSUE-82, ISSUE-84. 14:12:48 +1 14:12:50 +1 14:12:52 +1 14:12:53 +1 14:12:55 RESOLVED: Close the following issues, official response was sent, multiple reminders to respond were sent to each comment submitter: ISSUE-46, ISSUE-66, ISSUE-67, ISSUE-69, ISSUE-70, ISSUE-72, ISSUE-73, ISSUE-74, ISSUE-76, ISSUE-78, ISSUE-79, ISSUE-80, ISSUE-81, ISSUE-82, ISSUE-84. 14:13:31 manu: next issue is described on mailing list 14:13:38 Subtopic: XML+RDFa spec bug 14:13:40 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0100.html 14:17:21 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/#evaluation-context 14:18:31 Step 13: the parent subject is set to the value of new subject, if non-null, or the value of the parent subject of the current evaluation context; 14:19:32 step 6: "otherwise, if parent object is present, new subject is set to the value of parent object. Additionally, if @property is not present then the skip element flag is set to 'true';" 14:21:39 Ivan: The tests are correct and the spec is consistent. 14:21:52 markbirbeck has joined #rdfa 14:22:44 rrsagent, make minutes 14:22:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/24-rdfa-minutes.html Benjamin 14:23:29 Ivan: Separate concern - do we want to set the new subject to the document for XML+RDFa? 14:23:40 Ivan: Concerned about adding this at such a late stage. 14:23:59 @manu1 Sorry but had a meeting forced on me. Can keep looking at IRC though, if I can help, or you need a vote or something. :) 14:24:58 Ok. Can see screen from where I'm sitting. :) 14:25:38 PROPOSAL: XML+RDFa does not assume an about="" on the root element. If authors want to generate a triple, they must explicitly set the subject. 14:25:47 +1 14:25:48 +1 14:25:49 +1 14:25:52 +1 14:25:57 RESOLVED: XML+RDFa does not assume an about="" on the root element. If authors want to generate a triple, they must explicitly set the subject. 14:26:27 Ivan: Do we want to resolve the issues that Mischa raised? 14:29:02 manu: URI references are string sequences of characters 14:29:43 URI-ref = ../ 14:29:59 the issue of mischa is: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/87 14:31:00 "URI" 14:31:10 IRI or URI (no reference) 14:33:17 manu: We should wait for Shane to be on the call for resolving this, if it is an editorial change. 14:34:03 -benjamin 14:35:29 +benjamin 14:37:48 Ivan: This is editorial in my view 14:37:51 Manu: I agree 14:37:51 ivan: The change is editorial, we should leave it to Shane in my view 14:38:40 I agree too, editorial 14:39:12 benjamin: as far as i understood it, it seems to be editorial 14:40:11 manu: Any other open issues before the second last call? 14:41:08 the group is not aware of any open issues 14:41:34 These are the documents we're asserting should go to 2nd Last Call: 14:41:43 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/ 14:41:49 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/xhtml-rdfa/ 14:43:47 manu: Publication date will be march, 29 14:44:24 PROPOSAL: RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 should proceed into the 2nd Last Call with a publication date targeted at March 29th with a Last Call period of 3 weeks from the publication date. 14:44:45 +1 14:44:46 +1 14:44:46 +1 14:44:48 +1 14:44:55 markbirbeck, ping 14:45:05 Sorry... 14:45:08 +1 14:45:29 Knud: +1 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Mar/0099.html) 14:45:49 RESOLVED: RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 should proceed into the 2nd Last Call with a publication date targeted at March 29th with a Last Call period of 3 weeks from the publication date. 14:47:19 manu: do we have to bupliosh on the W3C blog? 14:47:22 ivan yes 14:47:31 Topic: RDFa API 14:47:32 Topic: RDFa API changes review 14:48:24 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/ 14:49:31 document.getItemsByType(type) 14:50:01 ivan: how do i know what types are availlable in the document 14:50:48 document.getSubjects() 14:51:03 ivan: you need a method like that 14:51:18 why does HTML not have that? document.getElementByID(id) how do I know the id's ? 14:51:33 how do you know which rel's, classes etc? 14:52:25 ivan: For example I want to highlight the RDF triples in the document. But were do I start? 14:52:57 use the RDF API?? 14:53:17 s/were/where 14:54:31 document.data.getItemsByWhatever( s , p , o ) 14:54:50 (leave all null to get all objects) :) 14:55:44 q+ 14:56:33 ack ivan 14:56:54 q+ 14:57:09 it's just merging the functions .getItemBySubject(type) and .getItemsByProperty(property, optional value) together though? still cuts in two 14:59:41 not the getElements... RDF API doesn't handle them, only RDFa api does 15:00:29 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-api/#document-data 15:01:59 var obj = document.data.parse("http://example.com"); 15:02:08 document.data.rdfa.parse("http://example.com"); 15:02:26 var doc = CreateDocument(XMLHttpRequest("http://example.com")); 15:02:33 doc.data.query(...); 15:02:57 the keep can of worms closed approach :) 15:05:44 -webr3 15:06:03 rrsagent, make minutes 15:06:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/24-rdfa-minutes.html Benjamin 15:09:33 s/bupliosh/publish 15:09:34 rrsagent, make minutes 15:09:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/24-rdfa-minutes.html Benjamin 15:10:51 -benjamin 15:11:17 http://www.w3.org/blog/admin.php?blog=13 15:12:16 zakim, mute me 15:12:16 ivan should now be muted 15:12:18 -[IPcaller] 15:12:18 -ivan 15:12:18 SW_RDFa()10:00AM has ended 15:12:20 Attendees were [IPcaller], webr3, ivan, benjamin 17:30:24 Zakim has left #rdfa 17:40:04 trackbot bye 17:40:08 rrsagent, bye 17:40:08 I see no action items 17:40:10 trackbot, bye