16:19:43 RRSAgent has joined #css 16:19:43 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/02-css-irc 16:19:54 Zakim, this will be Style 16:19:54 ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 41 minutes 16:19:59 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:29:50 shan has joined #css 16:46:58 bradk has joined #css 16:53:48 sylvaing has joined #css 16:54:02 dsinger_ has joined #css 16:55:32 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 16:55:39 +dsinger 16:57:09 johnjan has joined #CSS 16:57:16 zakim, microsoft is johnjan 16:57:16 sorry, johnjan, I do not recognize a party named 'microsoft' 16:57:31 zakim, who is here? 16:57:35 On the phone I see dsinger 16:57:41 On IRC I see johnjan, dsinger_, sylvaing, bradk, shan, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, homata_, Ms2ger, karl, davve, myakura, arronei, lhnz, jgraham, jdaggett, fantasai, hober, 16:57:46 ... CSSWG_LogBot, plinss, krijnh, gsnedders, Hixie, Bert, TabAtkins, trackbot 16:58:13 oyvind has joined #css 16:59:13 +[Microsoft] 16:59:15 zakim, microsoft is me 16:59:15 +arronei; got it 16:59:33 +[Microsoft] 16:59:53 +??P44 16:59:57 zakim, microsoft is johnjan 16:59:57 +johnjan; got it 17:00:04 Zakim, ?P44 is me 17:00:04 sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named '?P44' 17:00:06 +[Microsoft] 17:00:12 Zakim, ??P44 is me 17:00:12 +glazou; got it 17:00:16 Zakim, [Microsoft] has sylvaing 17:00:16 +sylvaing; got it 17:00:22 cesar has joined #css 17:00:38 +bradk 17:01:46 +??P53 17:02:01 + +1.561.024.aaaa 17:02:43 Zakim, ??P53 is me 17:02:43 +shan; got it 17:02:49 zakim, aaaa is me 17:02:49 +cesar; got it 17:03:41 smfr has joined #css 17:04:02 +fantasai 17:04:21 +smfr 17:04:39 dbaron has joined #css 17:05:03 dsinger_: lol 17:05:15 Is anyone using SIP? Neither zakim@voip.w3.org or 123@voip.w3.org are working for me (and my SIP configuration seems to be right, since I'm calling through it to the Boston number). 17:05:20 cesar: yes 17:05:29 works for me 17:05:38 but cuts every 15mins apparently, no idea why 17:05:56 cesar: most probably a bad config on your side if 123 does not answer 17:05:58 I see. I'll have to investigate further. 17:06:15 Zakim, who is here? 17:06:15 On the phone I see dsinger (muted), arronei, johnjan, glazou, [Microsoft], bradk, shan, cesar, fantasai, smfr 17:06:18 [Microsoft] has sylvaing 17:06:20 On IRC I see dbaron, smfr, cesar, oyvind, johnjan, dsinger_, sylvaing, bradk, shan, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, homata_, Ms2ger, karl, davve, myakura, arronei, lhnz, jgraham, 17:06:23 ... jdaggett, fantasai, hober, CSSWG_LogBot, plinss, krijnh, gsnedders, Hixie, Bert, TabAtkins, trackbot 17:06:25 +Bert 17:06:28 I'm getting "this passcode is not valid" 17:06:50 I tried about 10 times 17:06:55 dbaron: use SIP? 17:07:24 -bradk 17:07:28 +plinss 17:08:12 +bradk 17:08:26 howcome has joined #css 17:08:27 Zakim, you're painful 17:08:27 I don't understand 'you're painful', glazou 17:08:39 ScribeNick: fantasai 17:08:52 glazou: F2F meeting next week 17:09:04 glazou: 3 items for today: CSS2.1 Issues, the F2F itself, Tokyo F2F + workshop 17:09:15 glazou: Unclear to me if there is anything we should spend on 2.1 now 17:09:22 glazou: since we are going to meet f2f next week 17:09:29 glazou: Let's start with next week's agenda and agenda items 17:09:33 glazou: thoughts? 17:09:35 17:09:49 Bert: Let's do f2f 17:09:53 +howcome 17:09:57 Topic: F2F Topics and Agenda 17:10:09 +[Mozilla] 17:10:26 glazou: Several people sent arrival and departure information to mailing list. If you haven't yet, please do so so dbaron can compile the attendance list 17:11:05 glazou: Anything else people should note for Monday morning? 17:11:11 dbaron: Don't think so. Put 9am on the meeting page. 17:11:42 glazou: Some ppl interested in dinner plans for Sunday. Let's try to gather somewhere, we'll discuss through email on Sunday. 17:12:08 http://wiki.csswg.org/planning/mountain-view-2011 17:12:33 glazou: We have a few options here. We could start discussing agenda now, or keep as 1st item for Monday morning 17:13:01 glazou: It's helpful to note which days people are around. I believe John is leaving early, on Tuesday evening 17:13:20 dbaron: I copied data from the wiki onto meeting page, along with information sent via meeting survey and email 17:13:23 http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/2011/MountainView#participants 17:13:25 'http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/2011/MountainView 17:13:59 glazou: John, since you're mostly the only one who won't make all three days, which items do you want to addressed during your time? 17:14:08 johnjan: CSS2.1 17:14:27 sylvaing: Markus and Phil are coming in to discuss layout on Tuesday, would be best to put related topics all on Tuesday 17:15:05 -glazou 17:15:14 glazou, you dropped off 17:15:24 +??P70 17:15:44 glazou: Can you describe what you want to discuss for multi-col? 17:15:51 howcome: Want to get closure on the pseudo-algorithm 17:16:00 glazou: If you would add to the wiki the time you would need for that... 17:16:06 glazou: Everybody please add estimated times for your topics 17:17:13 glazou: A couple of NTT participants didn't send information, maybe Koji can follow up. 17:17:20 dbaron: There are four participants registered from NTT 17:17:28 Topic: CSS2.1 17:17:38 glazou: John, you sent a long email listing blocking issues 17:18:02 glazou: You list 5 blocking tests 17:18:11 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/quotes-035.htm 17:18:26 John's email: 17:18:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2011Jan/0095.html 17:18:29 I believe we should get as much of CSS2.1 complete before the Face-2-Face as we can. Ideally, I think we all agree that we should spend only a short time during the face-to-face making sure we're complete on CSS2.1. If we leave too many open issues until then, we will run over which will be detrimental to the remaining agenda items. 17:18:34 To that end, I think we should use the conference call tomorrow to discuss Blocking Tests and Spec Issues. It would probably be best if everyone reviewed these ahead of time as well, so we can effectively discuss on the phone. I'm including a list of the blocking tests and spec issues below. 17:18:39 The remaining blocking tests look like this: 17:18:41 Quotes-35: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/quotes-035.htm 17:18:44 Status: Gecko passes. 17:18:46 ACTION: Howcome: Where is Opera on their fixes? If it's not fixed in their nightlies, I propose we remove the test. Address in errata. 17:18:46 Created ACTION-299 - Where is Opera on their fixes? If it's not fixed in their nightlies, I propose we remove the test. Address in errata. [on HÃ¥kon Wium Lie - due 2011-03-09]. 17:18:50 Replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001.htm 17:18:53 Status: No passes. 17:18:56 ACTION: I propose we remove the test. Address in errata. 17:18:56 Sorry, couldn't find user - I 17:18:58 Forced-page-break-000: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/forced-page-breaks-000.htm 17:19:01 Status: Prince passes. 17:19:04 ACTION: I propose we remove the test. Address in errata. 17:19:04 Sorry, couldn't find user - I 17:19:06 Orphans-004a: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/orphans-004a.htm 17:19:09 Status: Trident and Prince pass this test. 17:19:11 ACTION: Why is the test in the test harness different from the one above? I propose we simply use the old test. 17:19:11 Sorry, couldn't find user - Why 17:19:14 Bidi-004a: Does not exist. Bidi-004: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/bidi-004.htm 17:19:17 Status: Trident Passes. 17:19:20 ACTION: If Prince or WebToPdf do not pass, I propose we remove the test. Address in errata. 17:19:20 Sorry, couldn't find user - If 17:19:23 The remaining Spec issues look like this: 17:19:25 60 - Sylvain and Bert Edit 17:19:28 142 - Bert Edit 17:19:30 153 - Bert Edit 17:19:33 159 - Bert Edit 17:19:35 181 - Bert Edit 17:19:38 192 - Tab - Summarize 17:19:40 197 - Closed 17:19:43 198 - Closed 17:19:45 199 - ALL REVIEW 17:19:48 204 - NEEDS PROPOSAL. I suggest we move to Errata. 17:19:50 205 - NEEDS DISCUSSION. I suggest we move to Errata. 17:19:53 206 - Bert needs to respond. 17:19:55 207 - NEEDS DISCUSSION. I suggest we move to Errata (clearance is under-spec'd). 17:19:58 208 - NEEDS DISCUSSION. I suggest we move to Errata. 17:20:00 209 - Closed 17:20:01 should someone kick fantasai? 17:20:03 210 - Bert Edit 17:20:04 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2011Jan/0095.html 17:20:05 211 - DBaron made a proposal. Approve? Bert Edit 17:20:08 212 - NEEDS DISCUSSION. I suggest we leave it as is. 17:20:10 213 - Bert Edit 17:20:13 214 - Closed 17:20:15 215 - Bert Edit 17:20:18 216 - Bert Edit 17:20:20 218 - Bert Edit 17:20:23 219 - Fantasai - Proposal. 17:20:25 220 - Bert Edit 17:20:28 221 - Bert Edit 17:20:30 222 - Trivial. Suggest to leave as is. 17:20:33 223 - Trivial. Suggest to leave as is. 17:20:35 224 - Fantasai - review 17:20:38 glazou: First item is quotes-035 17:20:40 glazou: Only one browser passes: Gecko 17:20:43 johnjan: last I looked at this, someone mentioned was only a couple small fixes 17:20:45 johnjan: but if they're not made, we should remove the test 17:20:55 -Bert 17:21:03 dbaron: It's a very comprehensive test, so we should just simplify the test a bit instead of removing it 17:21:26 dbaron: Also if we are making those things undefined, we should make them a SHOULD and say that they will be defined in a future level 17:21:37 +Bert 17:21:54 ?: Who edits that test? 17:22:17 TabAtkins_ has joined #css 17:22:22 (The test belongs to hixie.) 17:24:14 fantasai: Do we have any contact with the developer responsible at Opera? 17:24:30 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/replaced-intrinsic-ratio-001.htm 17:24:31 No, we only have bugs filed in the tracker, nobody has talked to the developer who knows the code. 17:24:42 johnjan: I think we should just remove it, not rely on Opera to fix it. 17:25:10 dbaron: I've been working on that fix this week. 17:25:19 glazou: That's only one implementation. 17:25:31 smfr: I haven't had time to work on this. 17:25:40 glazou: Do you think you will have time to work on this? 17:25:49 smfr: No 17:25:52 glazou: So we should remove the test 17:26:19 fantasai: So what are we going to do, put in the spec that the behavior of SVG is undefined? 17:26:57 Officially, it is. 17:27:10 We know what it *should* say, but it's not present in SVG at the moment. 17:27:35 I move for "undefined, but with a note about the expected behavior once SVG is updated appropriately". 17:28:04 SVG doesn't need an update, Tab. Our spec needs to say that the sizing of replaced elements with an intrinsic ratio and no width or height is undefined. 17:28:23 dsinger has joined #css 17:28:27 Because that's what the test is testing. 17:28:36 sylvaing: So where are we moving the definition to? 17:28:40 Ah, right, just a ratio. Sorry. Yeah, undefined. 17:28:42 +[Apple] 17:28:48 -dsinger 17:28:49 It should be in Image Values, imo. 17:28:52 yes 17:28:56 zakim, [apple] has dsinger 17:28:56 +dsinger; got it 17:29:33 RESOLVED: Sizing of replaced elements with intrinsic ratio but no width or height (i.e. scalable SVG) is UNDEFINED in CSS2.1. 17:29:47 -glazou 17:29:50 ACTION: fantasai write a proposal to remove the definition! 17:29:50 Created ACTION-300 - Write a proposal to remove the definition! [on Elika Etemad - due 2011-03-09]. 17:29:57 +??P6 17:30:19 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/forced-page-breaks-000.htm 17:30:40 johnjan: Prince passes this test 17:30:49 Does Web2PDF pass? 17:31:44 plinss: We have a pass. 17:32:16 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110111/html4/orphans-004a.htm 17:32:24 johnjan: orphans-004a is different now in the harness than in the last suite 17:33:35 plinss: Web2PDF and Prince pass 004a 17:33:52 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/orphans-004a.htm 17:33:55 plinss: The link pasted is RC5, the harness is running on the nightly builds 17:34:03 glazou: Do we have passes for 004b? 17:34:11 plinss: Opera, IE, and Web2PDF 17:34:29 johnjan: bidi-004 17:34:54 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/bidi-004a.htm 17:37:02 kennyluck has joined #CSS 17:38:04 ACTION: fantasai remove remaining white-space processing portion of test 17:38:04 Created ACTION-301 - Remove remaining white-space processing portion of test [on Elika Etemad - due 2011-03-09]. 17:38:26 glazou: Still have issues that need editing. Bert? 17:38:38 glazou: Will you be able to make the edits before the F2F? 17:38:49 Bert: I got stuck on the first two, sent messages to the mailing list. 17:39:00 Bert: Not sure I can finish all of them, but should have a story any remaining ones 17:40:34 glazou asks about 206 17:40:53 Bert explains that the lexer is not context-sensitive, which is why there is only one token 17:41:02 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-206 17:41:24 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-60 17:41:32 sylvaing: That was the big z-index issue with Anton Prowse 17:41:44 sylvaing: We agreed on the resolution 17:41:51 sylvaing: Bert changed things in the edits 17:41:57 sylvaing: Anton disagreed with some of the edits 17:42:01 sylvaing: But it went in anyway 17:42:17 sylvaing: In the process of checking the edits, fantasai noticed some problems 17:42:39 sylvaing: Rather than editing this further, I think we should revert to the original proposal 17:42:50 sylvaing: I'm not comfortable messing with this so close to finishing the spec 17:44:09 fantasai: I don't mind working from Bert's version, as long as the errors are fixed and Anton approves the result. 17:44:37 -glazou 17:44:46 +??P2 17:44:48 -??P2 17:44:58 +??P2 17:45:03 Zakim, ??P2 is me 17:45:03 +glazou; got it 17:45:27 fantasai: So, Bert, I suggest you work on Issue 60 first, go through the messages I posted and Anton posted to the mailing list on the review and address all of the comments there. 17:45:45 fantasai: Then post the editor's draft to the mailing list and ask Anton to review and suggest any further edits he feels necessary 17:45:57 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-222 17:46:03 -bradk 17:46:48 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0329.html 17:46:53 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Feb/0409.html 17:46:58 (z-index review) 17:47:25 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0027.html 17:47:36 +bradk 17:48:12 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-223 17:48:14 -bradk 17:48:43 +bradk 17:50:09 I think "further content" means "content after the float's placeholder" 17:50:59 johnjan: Should we work on another issue, or assign people to work on issues? 17:51:13 glazou: If the issues require a lot of time to discuss, it may delay things again. 17:51:59 This is probably a stupid question, but... in order to call Zakim using SIP, do I just have to enter zakim@voip.w3.org instead of a phone number in my SIP client? 17:52:11 http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-204 17:52:22 cesar: yes 17:52:35 Hmmm... 17:52:40 cesar: you on mac ? 17:53:02 Yes. Indeed, now I've joined the telcon using X-Lite, but calling to the usual phone number. 17:53:17 cesar: use Telephone from the Mac App Store, works great with SIP 17:53:41 (even if I keep being disconnected after 15mns, probably a weak implem of SIP timeouts) 17:53:56 I've tried too, with no success: I get an "Address not found" error when I enter a SIP address instead of a number. 17:54:40 cesar: then your SIP server is not correctly configured 17:54:53 :( 17:56:57 Issues 204 and 205 assumed editorial;. 17:57:14 207 deferred to F2F (clearance) 17:58:53 Meeting closed. 17:58:54 -dbaron 17:58:55 -johnjan 17:58:55 -smfr 17:58:56 -howcome 17:58:57 -glazou 17:58:58 -[Microsoft] 17:58:58 -arronei 17:58:59 -fantasai 17:59:01 -shan 17:59:04 -cesar 17:59:06 -plinss 17:59:07 -[Apple] 17:59:14 -bradk 17:59:17 -Bert 17:59:18 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 17:59:20 Attendees were dsinger, arronei, johnjan, glazou, sylvaing, bradk, +1.561.024.aaaa, shan, cesar, fantasai, smfr, Bert, plinss, howcome, dbaron 17:59:51 smfr has left #css 18:00:12 johnjan: see /query 18:07:46 TabAtkins: does WebKit have the equivalent of http://mxr.mozilla.org/ ? 18:08:00 (i.e. searching the codebase) 18:10:40 fantasai: http://google.com/codesearch?vert=chromium 18:51:05 howcome has left #css 19:11:46 dbaron has joined #css 19:56:39 Zakim has left #css 20:08:16 shepazu has joined #css 20:18:04 dbaron_ has joined #css 21:03:37 Martijnc has joined #css 21:11:44 sylvaing has joined #css 21:50:35 karl has joined #CSS 21:56:39 fantasai, is the right thing to do with the original quotes-035.htm to move it back to incoming/ but otherwise with the same path? 21:56:51 (and then I'd make the new one as, say, quotes-035a) 21:58:24 fantasai, or maybe it should remain as a 'should' test? 21:58:51 howcome has joined #css 22:07:56 howcome has left #css 22:26:39 dbaron_: I'd leave it as a should test 22:26:50 fantasai, yep, I did that 22:27:27 because I think the test is valuable to have, and it's already there... 22:31:03 krijnh has joined #css 22:31:56 Our upcoming meeting has attendees with family names beginning with all letters of the alphabet in the range A-O. 22:52:49 homata_ has joined #CSS 23:26:02 homata_ has joined #CSS 23:55:10 kennyluck_ has joined #CSS