19:28:34 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #svg
19:28:34 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc
19:28:36 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
19:28:38 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be GA_SVGWG
19:28:38 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see GA_SVGWG(SVG1)2:30PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
19:28:39 <trackbot> Meeting: SVG Working Group Teleconference
19:28:39 <trackbot> Date: 02 February 2011
19:29:11 <Zakim> GA_SVGWG(SVG1)2:30PM has now started
19:29:17 <Zakim> +tbah
19:30:13 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
19:30:26 <ed> Zakim, [IP is me
19:30:26 <Zakim> +ed; got it
19:30:35 <Zakim> +Shepazu
19:32:29 <Zakim> +??P4
19:32:31 <heycam> Zakim, ??P4 is me
19:32:31 <Zakim> +heycam; got it
19:32:49 <ed> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMar/0102.html
19:33:49 <ChrisL> ChrisL has joined #svg
19:34:11 <ChrisL> ChrisL has joined #svg
19:35:08 <ed> Zakim, pick a victim
19:35:08 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose tbah
19:35:20 <ed> Zakim, pick a victim
19:35:20 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ed
19:35:24 <ed> Zakim, pick a victim
19:35:24 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose heycam
19:35:32 <Zakim> + +39.524.9.aaaa
19:35:44 <heycam> Scribe: Cameron
19:35:47 <ChrisL> zakim, +39 is me
19:35:47 <Zakim> +ChrisL; got it
19:35:47 <heycam> ScribeNick: heycam
19:36:07 <heycam> Topic: SVG 1.1 Second Edition progress
19:36:20 <heycam> CL: i've finally finished off the abbra test, which helps with a few i think
19:36:27 <heycam> ... you just checked them in erik?
19:36:32 <heycam> ED: yes i updated the tables
19:36:53 <heycam> CL: i've also got another implementation from ekioh, which is a 1.2T implementation, but he claims that it passes 5 tests that we currently have listed as not being passed
19:36:54 <ChrisL> Ekioh
19:36:55 <ChrisL> > PW> animate-elem-46-t
19:36:55 <ChrisL> > PW> fonts-desc-02-t
19:36:55 <ChrisL> > PW> fonts-glyph-02-t
19:36:55 <ChrisL> > PW> painting-stroke-10-t
19:36:55 <ChrisL> > PW> text-intro-05-t
19:37:07 <heycam> ... I haven't run it yet
19:37:45 <heycam> ... i've also been talking with another company, they do an svg to pdf converter, and they're interested in running the test suite
19:37:55 <heycam> ... that won't help us with any dom tests, but it may help with some of the static ones
19:38:15 <heycam> ... lastly i can talk to alex, if we have a shortlist of items we don't pass, we could get him to work on those to fix them
19:38:55 <heycam> CM: i think we should see which ones we should go for implementations, and which ones we should drop
19:39:09 <heycam> CL: animate-elem-46-t we've already got one passing then
19:39:11 <ChrisL> animate-elem-46-t one pass from Opera and Ekioh claim a pass too
19:40:52 <heycam> CM: the issue is font-weight animation with discrete/interpolated values
19:41:35 <ed> <animate attributeName="font-weight" values="bold;normal;bold" dur="3s" fill="freeze"/>
19:41:44 <heycam> CL: ask jdagett about whether you can interpolate these
19:41:55 <ed> that's what the test is doing, so depends on how the interpolation there is meant to work
19:42:00 <heycam> ... I think it should interpolate from 0 to 1000
19:42:09 <heycam> ... because there are fonts existing that say their weights that are not multiples of 100
19:42:16 <heycam> ... 250s, 750s, etc.
19:43:21 <heycam> CL: maybe we could just drop that sub-test, split it out
19:43:30 <heycam> ... clarify the issue, and then bring it back as a separate test
19:43:44 <heycam> ... if we think it's correct and we've got two passes then we're all right...
19:44:02 <heycam> ED: afaics from firefox it's a timing issue rather than a font weight issue
19:45:09 <Zakim> +??P9
19:45:10 <heycam> ... we did recently make a change to animation interpolation code that we had a bug on, not sure if it affected this test, but i can check internal builds to see how it goes
19:45:17 <heycam> ... it's possible it looks more like what firefox is doing now
19:45:32 <anthony_work> Zakim, ??P9 is me
19:45:32 <Zakim> +anthony_work; got it
19:46:14 <heycam> CM: after the call i will test batik/firefox/webkit with the last subtest removed
19:46:33 <heycam> ACTION: Chris to read css3 fonts and ask jdaggett about interpolating font-weight animations
19:46:34 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2936 - Read css3 fonts and ask jdaggett about interpolating font-weight animations [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-09].
19:46:50 <heycam> ACTION: cameron to test batik/firefox/webkit with the last subtest removed (animate-elem-46-t)
19:46:53 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2937 - Test batik/firefox/webkit with the last subtest removed (animate-elem-46-t) [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
19:47:05 <ChrisL> filters-light-02-f
19:47:27 <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
19:47:36 <heycam> ED: is this something that's been changed because of errata?
19:47:40 <heycam> s/ED/CL/
19:47:43 <heycam> ED: yes, from memory
19:47:52 <heycam> CL: so some of this is stable stuff and some just changed 6 months ago
19:47:52 <pdengler> pdengler has joined #svg
19:48:15 <heycam> CM: is this one affected by anthony's direction of the light erratum?
19:48:20 <heycam> ED: it might be
19:48:23 <heycam> AG: i will check
19:48:38 <heycam> ED: it's about the same thing
19:48:43 <ed> ISSUE-2339?
19:48:43 <trackbot> ISSUE-2339 -- Last Call Comment: definition of azimuth, elevation for feDistantLight -- open
19:48:43 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2339
19:49:00 <heycam> CL: opera is the only one that passes
19:49:08 <heycam> ... so we should lean on someone to fix it
19:49:18 <heycam> AG: i think in the spec we've got it wrong
19:49:21 <heycam> TB: inkscape does it backwards
19:49:32 <heycam> ... let me check
19:49:59 <heycam> CL: if the spec is wrong or ambiguous, and inkscape has copied the spec, and we've now corrected the spec...
19:50:09 <heycam> TB: i ran the test automatically and with our test harness it failed
19:50:17 <heycam> ... but when i open it in inkscape it passes, but the reference image is just a bit lighter
19:50:25 <heycam> CL: i wouldn't worry about that too much
19:50:29 <heycam> TB: we pass, then
19:50:38 <heycam> CL: what about -03?
19:50:54 <heycam> TB: that one we don't get the primitiveUnits=objectBoundingBox one correct
19:51:52 <heycam> ED: so from our experience, the primitiveUnits thing is a day of work, not too hard, mostly just converting the coordinates
19:51:59 <heycam> ... if you have everything else in place it shouldn't be that hard to implement
19:52:17 <heycam> TB: i'm not sure whether we do objectBoundingBox correct anywhere
19:53:14 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-light-03-f.svg
19:53:26 <ChrisL> file://localhost/D:/WWW/dev/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-light-03-f.svg
19:55:52 <heycam> AG: looking at filters-light-02 i think we should be fine re the erratum
19:56:01 <heycam> ... since the test is testing azimuth, but the erratum is about elevation
19:56:26 <heycam> ... the difference might be a darker or lighter arc
19:56:44 <heycam> action: cameron to look at batik for filters-light-03
19:56:45 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2938 - Look at batik for filters-light-03 [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
19:57:45 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/filters-overview-01-b.svg
19:57:46 <ChrisL> filters-overview-01-b.svg
19:58:39 <heycam> CM: firefox doesn't implement those four inputs
19:58:44 <heycam> TB: inkscape doesn't do fillpaint/strokepaint
19:59:12 <heycam> CL: i noticed the ones that fail in firefox are different from those that fail in batik
19:59:23 <heycam> ... firefox doesn't do backgroundimage/backgroundalpha
19:59:28 <heycam> CM: and fillpaint/fillstroke
20:00:33 <heycam> CM: not sure how easy batik is to fix
20:00:39 <heycam> ... backgroundimage/backgroundalpha are harder to implement
20:01:22 <heycam> action: cameron to look into batik failing filters-overview-01
20:01:22 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2939 - Look into batik failing filters-overview-01 [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:02:01 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-desc-04-t.svg
20:02:24 <heycam> CL: abbra only has some small problems with italic/oblique
20:02:26 <heycam> ... maybe it can be fixed
20:03:02 <heycam> CM: seems like this test might be passed by some tiny implementations
20:03:07 <heycam> ED: for opera it's the last line that fails
20:03:27 <heycam> CL: and i think that's a css 2.1 conformance failure
20:03:38 <heycam> CM: what's it testing specifically?
20:03:46 <ChrisL>  Italic can match against oblique or italic, but all other values must match exactly.
20:04:23 <heycam> CM: seems like it should be a simple fix then
20:04:53 <heycam> action: erik to look at opera failing fonts-desc-04
20:04:54 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2940 - Look at opera failing fonts-desc-04 [on Erik Dahlström - due 2011-02-09].
20:05:25 <adrianba> adrianba has joined #svg
20:06:05 <heycam> action: cameron to look into batik failing fonts-desc-04
20:06:05 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2941 - Look into batik failing fonts-desc-04 [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:06:08 <Zakim> +[Microsoft.a]
20:06:17 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-desc-05-t.svg
20:06:32 <adrianba> zakim, [Microsoft.a] is me
20:06:32 <Zakim> +adrianba; got it
20:06:45 <heycam> ED: fonts-desc-05, is that testing the same thing? or something different?
20:07:09 <heycam> CL: this is testing smallcaps or not, also testing the oblique thing
20:07:49 <heycam> CM: seems to be testing precedence of the font descriptors too, looking at the pass criteria
20:08:20 <heycam> action: cameron to check batik for fonts-desc-05
20:08:20 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2942 - Check batik for fonts-desc-05 [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:08:31 <heycam> ED: might be hard for us to deal with, we do synthesis of smallcaps
20:08:40 <heycam> ... i think the fonts don't have uppercase glyphs
20:08:53 <heycam> ... so we would go to the missing glyph
20:09:02 <heycam> CL: so you never use the real small cap font, only the synthesized one?
20:09:23 <heycam> ACTION: Erik to check opera for fonts-desc-05, but no promises!
20:09:24 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2943 - Check opera for fonts-desc-05, but no promises! [on Erik Dahlström - due 2011-02-09].
20:09:31 <Zakim> -tbah
20:09:47 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-glyph-02-t.svg
20:10:04 <heycam> ED: i know this one passes in internal builds
20:10:11 <heycam> CL: it should be fairly easy, if you do svg fonts
20:10:25 <Zakim> +tbah
20:10:27 <heycam> ... on the <glyph> element there's an arabic-form attribute
20:10:36 <heycam> ... which says whether it's isolated, medial, etc.
20:10:40 <heycam> ... that's what it's testing
20:11:25 <heycam> ED: we could change it to use text-anchor=middle
20:12:59 <pdengler> pdengler has joined #svg
20:13:02 <heycam> ED: same in opera, it will pass with text-anchor=middle
20:13:42 <ChrisL> I just checked in the change on CVS
20:13:43 <heycam> CM: not sure about this text-anchor issue
20:13:49 <heycam> ED: the text has been backported from 1.2T
20:15:28 <heycam> CL: the tests need fixing for those text-anchor issues
20:15:46 <heycam> ACTION: erik to regenerate reference image for fonts-glyph-02
20:15:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2944 - Regenerate reference image for fonts-glyph-02 [on Erik Dahlström - due 2011-02-09].
20:15:48 <Zakim> -ChrisL
20:16:01 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-glyph-03-t.svg
20:16:21 <Zakim> +ChrisL
20:17:13 <heycam> CM: huh, i didn't know <glyph> had lang=""
20:17:45 <heycam> CL: it's because of CJK unification, to select between different versions of character for chinese and japanese etc.
20:21:48 <heycam> ACTION: cameron to look into fonts-glyph-03 with no guarantees
20:21:48 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2945 - Look into fonts-glyph-03 with no guarantees [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:21:57 <heycam> ACTION-2945: for batik
20:21:57 <trackbot> ACTION-2945 Look into fonts-glyph-03 with no guarantees notes added
20:23:07 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/interact-pevents-04-t.svg
20:23:17 <heycam> ED: i could live with fonts-glyph-03 being dropped for now
20:26:15 <heycam> ACTION: Erik to change the font in fonts-glyph-03 to make the space glyphs be blank
20:26:16 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2946 - Change the font in fonts-glyph-03 to make the space glyphs be blank [on Erik Dahlström - due 2011-02-09].
20:27:54 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/linking-uri-01-b.svg
20:28:02 <heycam> CL: this is also affected by errata
20:28:07 <heycam> ... svg use to say bare fragments mean nothing
20:28:15 <heycam> ... we changed it to mean centered on the thing with that id
20:28:28 <heycam> ... there's a seaprate issue about highlighting it, which i think we decided you shouldn't have to
20:28:35 <heycam> ... but the moving the viewport probably would be an easy thing
20:28:43 <heycam> ... if you already do views, it should be easy
20:28:53 <shepazu> q+ to ask about CSS highlighting behavior
20:29:21 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/linking.html
20:30:07 <shepazu> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/linking.html#SVGFragmentIdentifiers
20:35:19 <heycam> DS: there may be UAs out there that do this, maybe we can change the spec to say "UAs can do highlighting if they support :target"
20:35:23 <heycam> Zakim, who is making noise?
20:35:34 <Zakim> heycam, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ChrisL (54%), adrianba (35%)
20:36:08 <heycam> ACTION: Chris to propose wording for highlighting and :target
20:36:09 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2947 - Propose wording for highlighting and :target [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-09].
20:36:26 <ChrisL> viewTarget = "XML_Name [XML_NAME]*"
20:36:26 <ChrisL>     Indicates the target object associated with the view. If provided, then the target element(s) will be highlighted.
20:37:36 <heycam> ACTION: Chris to change linking-uri-01 and linking-uri-02 to remove the requirement to highlight
20:37:36 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2948 - Change linking-uri-01 and linking-uri-02 to remove the requirement to highlight [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-09].
20:38:17 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/painting-render-02-b.svg
20:39:43 <heycam> CM: it should be testing alpha compositing with color-interpolation
20:39:53 <heycam> ... nobody passes, and comments saying that the test is wrong
20:39:57 <heycam> CL: let's unapprove it
20:40:10 <heycam> ACTION: Cameron to unapprove painting-render-02-b
20:40:10 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2949 - Unapprove painting-render-02-b [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:40:30 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/painting-stroke-10-t.svg
20:40:44 <ChrisL> This tests that stroking of zero length subpaths will result in
20:40:44 <ChrisL>         some rendering if the 'stroke-linecap' property is set to
20:40:44 <ChrisL>         'square' or 'round', but not if it is set to 'butt'.
20:41:09 <heycam> CM: jwatt has a patch for this, but it hasn't been approved to be landed yet
20:43:11 <ChrisL> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObjectApproved/
20:45:45 <heycam> ED: we have a bunch of bugs on zero length paths, and i don't think any of those are close to being fixed
20:45:54 <heycam> CM: it's probably not simple in batik, or in webkit
20:46:26 <heycam> ACTION: Cameron to see how easy painting-stroke-10-t is to fix in Batik
20:46:26 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2950 - See how easy painting-stroke-10-t is to fix in Batik [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:46:56 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/struct-dom-15-f.svg
20:47:25 <heycam> CM: seems to be doing the use element correctly with event dispatch
20:47:36 <shepazu> ISSUE: for SVG2 / SVG Fonts, describe rational for @lang on <glyph>, e.g. because of CJK unification, to select between different versions of character for chinese and japanese etc.
20:47:36 <trackbot> Created ISSUE-2399 - For SVG2 / SVG Fonts, describe rational for @lang on <glyph>, e.g. because of CJK unification, to select between different versions of character for chinese and japanese etc. ; please complete additional details at http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2399/edit .
20:50:20 <heycam> ACTION: Cameron to review struct-dom-15
20:50:20 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2951 - Review struct-dom-15 [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:50:42 <Zakim> -tbah
20:50:52 <heycam> ED: we can split it up
20:51:15 <Zakim> +tbah
20:51:27 <heycam> ACTION: Patrick to review struct-dom-15
20:51:28 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2952 - Review struct-dom-15 [on Patrick Dengler - due 2011-02-09].
20:53:35 <heycam> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObjectApproved/struct-dom-15-f.html
20:55:20 <heycam> ACTION: Cameron to look into off-colors in reference images on mac
20:55:20 <trackbot> Created ACTION-2953 - Look into off-colors in reference images on mac [on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-09].
20:55:34 <ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/text-align-07-t.svg
20:56:16 <heycam> CL: abbra passes -08 but not -07
20:56:29 <heycam> ... in unicode there are tables to determine which glyphs go from which baselines
20:56:38 <heycam> PD: we only have two fonts that support ideographic baseline
20:56:44 <Zakim> -ChrisL
20:57:34 <ChrisL> the problem is that for OT/TT fonts, there can be no baseline info at all so what should it align to?
20:57:57 <ChrisL> the svg version of the test has explicit baseline infor for all four lines
20:58:11 <ChrisL> so is the test correct, i am saying
20:59:27 <heycam> CM: (summarises some fx tf discussions)
20:59:34 <heycam> ... if we will unapprove one we should unapprove both
21:00:05 <ChrisL> don't follow; one has explicit info and the other has implicit or missing info
21:00:27 <heycam> ChrisL, ah you dropped off
21:00:38 <pdengler> pdengler has joined #svg
21:00:44 <heycam> ChrisL, I'll mail you a summary of what we discussed, since we're out of time now anyway
21:01:01 <ChrisL> yes I get dropped after 40 minutes
21:01:05 <ChrisL> ok
21:01:49 <ed> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMar/0100.html
21:05:00 <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
21:05:02 <Zakim> -adrianba
21:05:02 <Zakim> -Shepazu
21:05:04 <Zakim> -ed
21:05:04 <Zakim> -heycam
21:05:05 <Zakim> -anthony_work
21:05:09 <Zakim> -tbah
21:05:10 <Zakim> GA_SVGWG(SVG1)2:30PM has ended
21:05:12 <Zakim> Attendees were tbah, [IPcaller], ed, Shepazu, heycam, +39.524.9.aaaa, ChrisL, anthony_work, [Microsoft], adrianba
21:09:02 <heycam> ed, ah right yes i will :)
21:09:10 <heycam> RRSAgent, make minutes
21:09:10 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-minutes.html heycam
21:09:18 <heycam> trackbot, end telcon
21:09:18 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
21:09:18 <Zakim> sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
21:09:19 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
21:09:19 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-minutes.html trackbot
21:09:20 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> I see 18 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-actions.rdf :
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Chris to read css3 fonts and ask jdaggett about interpolating font-weight animations [1]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T19-46-33
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cameron to test batik/firefox/webkit with the last subtest removed (animate-elem-46-t) [2]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T19-46-50
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cameron to look at batik for filters-light-03 [3]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T19-56-44
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cameron to look into batik failing filters-overview-01 [4]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-01-22
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: erik to look at opera failing fonts-desc-04 [5]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-04-53
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cameron to look into batik failing fonts-desc-04 [6]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-06-05
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cameron to check batik for fonts-desc-05 [7]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-08-20
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Erik to check opera for fonts-desc-05, but no promises! [8]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-09-23
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: erik to regenerate reference image for fonts-glyph-02 [9]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-15-46
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: cameron to look into fonts-glyph-03 with no guarantees [10]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-21-48
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Erik to change the font in fonts-glyph-03 to make the space glyphs be blank [11]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-26-15
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Chris to propose wording for highlighting and :target [12]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-36-08
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Chris to change linking-uri-01 and linking-uri-02 to remove the requirement to highlight [13]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-37-36
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Cameron to unapprove painting-render-02-b [14]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-40-10
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Cameron to see how easy painting-stroke-10-t is to fix in Batik [15]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-46-26
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Cameron to review struct-dom-15 [16]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-50-20
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Patrick to review struct-dom-15 [17]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-51-27
21:09:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Cameron to look into off-colors in reference images on mac [18]
21:09:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/02-svg-irc#T20-55-20