16:52:19 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms
16:52:19 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/02/01-soap-jms-irc
16:52:21 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
16:52:21 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #soap-jms
16:52:23 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be SJMS
16:52:23 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
16:52:24 <trackbot> Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference
16:52:24 <trackbot> Date: 01 February 2011
16:56:45 <mphillip> mphillip has changed the topic to:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Jan/0018.html (mphillip)
16:59:11 <mphillip> Agenda:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2011Jan/0018.html
16:59:12 <Zakim> WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started
16:59:19 <Zakim> + +1.919.663.aaaa
16:59:20 <mphillip> Chair: Eric
17:00:30 <padams2> padams2 has joined #soap-jms
17:01:03 <Zakim> + +1.512.286.aabb
17:01:20 <alewis> alewis has joined #soap-jms
17:01:23 <padams> zakim, aabb is phil
17:01:23 <Zakim> +phil; got it
17:01:48 <Zakim> + +44.196.287.aacc
17:01:55 <padams> zakim, aabb is padams
17:01:58 <Zakim> sorry, padams, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb'
17:02:06 <mphillip> Zakim, aacc is Mark
17:02:06 <Zakim> +Mark; got it
17:02:39 <padams> anyone know how to give Zakim the *correct* name ?
17:03:10 <padams> zakim, phil is padams
17:03:10 <Zakim> +padams; got it
17:03:18 <padams> ha, good guess
17:03:21 <Zakim> + +1.209.474.aadd
17:04:07 <Zakim> + +1.708.246.aaee
17:04:08 <eric> eric has joined #soap-jms
17:04:15 <mphillip> Regrets: Matthew Golby-Kirk
17:04:45 <mphillip> Topic: Appointment of the scribe
17:04:49 <Derek> Derek has joined #SOAP-JMS
17:04:51 <mphillip> Scribe: Mark
17:05:00 <mphillip> Topic: Approval of prior meeting minutes
17:05:24 <mphillip> No objections to approving the minutes
17:05:34 <mphillip> Topic: Review the agenda
17:06:17 <mphillip> No modifications
17:06:26 <mphillip> Topic: Administrative items
17:06:41 <mphillip> Should we skip next week's call?
17:07:24 <mphillip> Matthew Golby-Kirk has joined the workgroup 
17:07:41 <mphillip> Topic: Review action items
17:08:28 <mphillip> Eric: Keeps following up 146, and moving to PR but no progress - 241 closed
17:08:34 <mphillip> close action-241
17:08:34 <trackbot> ACTION-241 Rewrite sentence in URI scheme abstract that the commenter pointed out. closed
17:08:50 <mphillip> Derek: No progress on 222
17:08:58 <mphillip> Phil: No progress on 223
17:09:44 <mphillip> Topic: Moving to PR (via CR? & LC)
17:11:27 <mphillip> No progress on testing 
17:11:36 <mphillip> Hopeful that we will be able to get some resource to start testing WebSphere Message Broker's SOAP/JMS for interoperabily against CXF 
17:12:31 <mphillip> Demonstrating interoperability should be sufficient to move the spec. to PR
17:13:52 <mphillip> Phil: Believes WebSphere App. Server is compliant with the spec. with the exception of the latest change to contentEncoding
17:15:55 <mphillip> Eric: The compliance testing should be against the last working draft, so could exclude the very latest change
17:17:03 <mphillip> Derek: Believe implementation is one failure away from compliance on the last working draft, but it is difficult to get the QA organisation to retest for interops against a different implementation
17:17:42 <mphillip> Eric: Will check with Yves what is required.  One criteria is vendors asserting compliance, but another criteria is interops testing
17:19:21 <mphillip> Phil: WebSphere Beta 3 should be publicly available and contain the latest SOAP/JMS
17:20:03 <mphillip> Action Eric to clarify with Yves the criteria needed for PR vs. Rec
17:20:04 <trackbot> Created ACTION-242 - Clarify with Yves the criteria needed for PR vs. Rec [on Eric Johnson - due 2011-02-08].
17:20:48 <mphillip> Action eric tofind out what TIBCOare doing with Websphere (re: compatibility testing and latest versions) 
17:20:48 <trackbot> Created ACTION-243 - Tofind out what TIBCOare doing with Websphere (re: compatibility testing and latest versions)  [on Eric Johnson - due 2011-02-08].
17:22:22 <mphillip> Note from Yves describes next steps
17:22:37 <mphillip> Eric: We could transition to CR now - or skip to PR
17:24:45 <mphillip> Suggest we wait a few weeks for progress on tests, and decide if we want to do a CR if there's no progress
17:25:12 <mphillip> Eric: Tempted to keep our meeting for next week
17:25:18 <mphillip> Mark: +1
17:25:32 <mphillip> Eric: OK - let's have a meeting next week
17:25:48 <mphillip> Topic: Specification Issues
17:25:50 <mphillip> None
17:26:20 <mphillip> (Issue 27 is open related to updating link for URI scheme)
17:26:27 <mphillip> Topic: URI scheme
17:27:12 <mphillip> Eric: Lots of emails, but highlight is that we're in the RFC editors queue - being reviewed by IANA
17:29:49 <mphillip> Topic: AOB?
17:30:03 <mphillip> none... same time next week.
17:30:14 <Zakim> -padams
17:30:16 <Zakim> -alewis
17:30:16 <Zakim> -Mark
17:30:17 <Zakim> - +1.209.474.aadd
17:30:17 <Zakim> - +1.708.246.aaee
17:30:19 <Zakim> WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended
17:30:21 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.919.663.aaaa, +1.512.286.aabb, +44.196.287.aacc, alewis, Mark, padams, +1.209.474.aadd, +1.708.246.aaee
17:30:27 <mphillip> rrsagent, make minutes
17:30:28 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/02/01-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip
17:30:35 <mphillip> rrsagent, make log public
17:31:00 <eric> eric has left #soap-jms
17:32:39 <padams> padams has left #soap-jms
17:34:06 <mphillip> mphillip has left #soap-jms
19:57:13 <Zakim> Zakim has left #soap-jms