W3C

- DRAFT -

WAI AU

10 Jan 2011

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Chair
Jutta Treviranus
Scribe
Alastair

Contents


<scribe> Chair: Jan Richards

<scribe> Scribe: Alastair

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0009.html

survey http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110103/results

zakim ht is really Andrew

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110103/results#xq2

break-up A.2.1.1 Alternative Content

<alastairc> "pre-existing" not needed in this case, as per Jutta's comment.

(b) user agent option: the author has the option to have the content being edited *previewed* in a *user agent* that is able to render the alternatives for the time-based content.

A.2.1.1 Text Alternatives for Rendered Non-Text Content: If an *editing-view* *renders* *non-text content* with *programmatically associated* *text alternatives*, then the text alternatives can be *programmatically determined*. (Level A)

A.2.1.X Alternatives for Rendered Time-Based Media: If an *editing-view* *renders* time-based media, then at least one of the following is true: (Level A)

(a) alternatives rendered: alternatives for the time-based content are also rendered; or

(b) user agent option: the author has the option to have the content being edited *previewed* in a *user agent* that is able to render the alternatives for the time-based content.

(b) the author has the option to *preview* the time-based content in a *user agent* that is able to render the alternatives.

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110103/results#xq2

Resolution: All accept the new wording of A2.1.1 and A.2.1.X here.

B.1.1.2 (NEW) Content Auto-Generation During Authoring Sessions (WCAG)

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110103/results#xq3

<alastairc> Discussion on whether options A to D need to be at different levels (A/AA/AAA)

<alastairc> Discussion on how far ATAG would affect a supply chain.

A.2.2.2 Access to Text Presentation (Minimum)

http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35520/20110103/results#xq4

<alastairc> Jan and Alex will discuss definition of authoring tool outside of the call.

<scribe> ACTION: JR to create nerw proposal from A222 A223 and sueanns' comment " that can be communicated by the supported platform accessibility service(s)", [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/01/10-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-317 - Create nerw proposal from A222 A223 and sueanns' comment " that can be communicated by the supported platform accessibility service(s)", [on Jan Richards - due 2011-01-17].

A.3.5.1 Text Search

A.3.5.1 Text Search

Resolution: All accept Proposed A.3.5.1 Text Search

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0009.html

Expanding ATAG2 table of contents to the Guideline Level

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2011/ED-ATAG20-20110105/

UAAG 2.0 is doing it

Resolution: All agree to Expanding ATAG2 table of contents to the Guideline Level

Removing "@@Note: As per Success Criterion A.3.6.1, authors' display settings must still be independent of the web content being edited."

Resoltion: Remove "@@Note: As per Success Criterion A.3.6.1, authors' display settings must still be independent of the web content being edited."

Reworded handle: A.3.6.5 @@Assistance with Preferences:

Resolution: All accept @@Assistance with Preferences

Rewording in B.2.3.2 Conditions on Automated Suggestions: During the authoring session, the authoring tool @@may only automatically suggest programmatically associated text alternatives for non-text content under the following conditions: (Level A)

Resolution: All accept new wording B.2.3.2 Conditions on Automated Suggestions: During the authoring session, the authoring tool @@may only automatically suggest programmatically associated text alternatives for non-text content under the following conditions:

Rewording in B.2.3.3 Let User Agents Repair: @@The authoring tool avoids repairing programmatically associated text alternatives for non-text content using any text value that would also be available to user agents

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: JR to create nerw proposal from A222 A223 and sueanns' comment " that can be communicated by the supported platform accessibility service(s)", [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/01/10-au-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/01/10 21:58:52 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Jan
Found Scribe: Alastair

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: ARonksley Alex Andrew Cherie Greg IPcaller Jan Jeanne Jutta Microsoft P11 P17 P25 Resoltion Sueann Tim_Boland aaaa alastairc ht trackbot
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2011JanMar/0009.html
Got date from IRC log name: 10 Jan 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/01/10-au-minutes.html
People with action items: jr

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]