IRC log of ws-ra on 2011-01-04

Timestamps are in UTC.

20:24:22 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #ws-ra
20:24:22 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/01/04-ws-ra-irc
20:24:24 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs public
20:24:24 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #ws-ra
20:24:26 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be WSRA
20:24:26 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see WS_WSRA()3:30PM scheduled to start in 6 minutes
20:24:27 [trackbot]
Meeting: Web Services Resource Access Working Group Teleconference
20:24:27 [trackbot]
Date: 04 January 2011
20:27:37 [Ashok]
Ashok has joined #ws-ra
20:29:46 [Zakim]
WS_WSRA()3:30PM has now started
20:29:50 [Zakim]
+Doug_Davis
20:29:52 [Zakim]
+[Microsoft]
20:29:58 [Ram]
Ram has joined #ws-ra
20:30:00 [dug]
dug has joined #ws-ra
20:30:33 [Client]
Client has joined #ws-ra
20:30:34 [Zakim]
+Ashok_Malhotra
20:30:35 [Zakim]
+Wu_Chou
20:30:54 [Zakim]
+ +39.331.574.aaaa
20:31:03 [Zakim]
+Bob_Freund
20:31:04 [asoldano]
asoldano has joined #ws-ra
20:31:13 [Wu]
Wu has joined #ws-ra
20:31:16 [Zakim]
+ +44.196.281.aabb
20:31:22 [Zakim]
+ +1.831.713.aacc
20:32:23 [Katy]
Katy has joined #ws-ra
20:32:55 [Zakim]
+Yves
20:33:39 [Client]
chair: Bob Freund
20:33:46 [Client]
zakim, pick a victim
20:33:46 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose +44.196.281.aabb
20:34:30 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
20:36:42 [Client]
scribenick: li
20:36:44 [dug]
agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0002.html
20:37:04 [li]
TOPIC: agenda
20:37:48 [li]
bob: agenda approved
20:38:01 [li]
bob: minutes approved
20:38:07 [dug]
Gil - the f2f is at redwood shores, right?
20:38:36 [li]
TOPIC: next f2f meeting
20:40:12 [li]
bob: microsoft is ram + 1,2
20:40:27 [Ram]
Ram has joined #ws-ra
20:40:42 [li]
bob: no pre registration needed to attend f2f
20:40:50 [Zakim]
+Tom_Rutt
20:41:09 [Ram]
q+
20:41:15 [Ram]
q-
20:41:46 [dug]
no strategery discussions ;-)
20:42:01 [Zakim]
-Tom_Rutt
20:42:35 [gpilz]
q+
20:42:45 [gpilz]
q-
20:43:07 [Client]
New issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11667
20:43:28 [li]
TOPIC: 11667
20:43:42 [li]
bob: the above issue is opened
20:45:03 [dug]
options: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Dec/att-0028/00-part
20:45:15 [li]
gil: discuss approaches to 11667
20:45:40 [li]
gil: incline to support both
20:45:49 [li]
wu: fine with that
20:46:52 [li]
gil: i can come up needed text in ws-e 2.3
20:48:59 [li]
TOPIC: test Scenarios
20:50:40 [gpilz]
Add the following sentence to the end of the 2nd paragraph of Section 2.3: Conformant Event Source implementations MUST support both wrapped and unwrapped notifications.
20:51:15 [li]
dug: how about in 3.4?
20:51:35 [dug]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/wsmex.html#Compliance
20:53:01 [li]
bob: resolution to 11667 per gil's sentence in ws-e 2.3
20:53:37 [li]
bob: 11667 resolved w/o objection
20:54:12 [li]
TOPIC: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11551
20:54:22 [Zakim]
+Tom_Rutt
20:54:49 [Client]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2011Jan/0003.html
20:55:08 [Tom_Rutt]
Tom_Rutt has joined #ws-ra
20:55:11 [dug]
+q
20:55:23 [li]
bob: there is a mime type proposal for the issue in the link
20:55:26 [Tom_Rutt]
i am now present on the call
20:56:24 [li]
gil: describe his proposal per wsdl 2.0 approach
20:57:37 [dug]
queue
20:57:56 [Client]
ack dug
20:59:00 [Yves]
actually, you should look at 3023bis, even if 3023 is the current "stable"
20:59:26 [Client]
ack yv
21:00:10 [dug]
+q
21:00:19 [Client]
ack dug
21:00:48 [li]
discuss problem with mime type and URI fragment
21:02:14 [li]
dug: rename name to id to avoid conflict
21:03:01 [li]
yves and gil: sounds fine
21:04:00 [li]
tom: id is ncname
21:05:07 [Ashok]
From XML Schema: The ·value space· of ID is the set of all strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML].
21:05:51 [li]
bob: issue 11551 resolved w/o objection (replace name attribute with id in evd)
21:06:27 [li]
dug: can do these changes tonight
21:06:59 [dug]
ah, now I see "jessica"
21:08:10 [li]
gil: will not implement xpath in ws-e
21:08:55 [li]
dug: intend to do as many as possible
21:09:44 [li]
bob: mark optional feataures w/o implementation as "at risk"
21:10:06 [li]
... and they will disappear
21:12:20 [li]
...propose to mark all features "at risk" going into CR
21:12:42 [li]
s/all feateures/all optional features/
21:13:30 [li]
TOPIC: CR schedule
21:13:47 [Zakim]
-Tom_Rutt
21:14:31 [li]
... unless there are two implementations
21:16:16 [Zakim]
+Tom_Rutt
21:16:37 [li]
dug: what qualifies as implementation, e.g ws-policy?
21:17:34 [li]
bob: implementation exhibits required behaviors
21:19:08 [li]
dug: what does an implementation need to do keep ws-policy?
21:19:08 [Tom_Rutt]
q+
21:19:24 [Katy]
q+
21:19:30 [Client]
ack tom
21:19:36 [li]
bob: wsdl is sufficient
21:20:18 [Client]
ack katy
21:21:00 [Tom_Rutt]
q+
21:21:04 [li]
katy: we can test server behavior associated with policy
21:21:16 [Client]
ack tom
21:22:05 [Katy]
We can test that service errors indicating non-support should not contradict advertised policies
21:24:12 [li]
ashok: two wsdl with different policy should have different behaviors
21:24:23 [Tom_Rutt]
q+
21:24:36 [Client]
ack tom
21:24:44 [li]
dug: expose policy in wsdl is enought?
21:24:53 [li]
s/enought/enough/
21:26:03 [Katy]
q+
21:26:04 [Tom_Rutt]
q+
21:26:22 [li]
gil: policy associated behaviors can be hard-coded or tool derived, therefore it is hard to decide which was done
21:26:31 [Client]
ack katy
21:27:18 [Client]
ack tom
21:27:30 [li]
katy: behaviors exposed by policy should not be contradicted by protocol messages
21:28:51 [li]
bob: we do need to test policy are well-formed
21:29:23 [li]
tom: there is no need for test cases for policy
21:30:08 [dug]
+q
21:30:33 [dug]
-q
21:30:40 [Client]
ack dug
21:30:49 [li]
bob: mark all options at risk or everyone marks those to implement in week?
21:32:02 [li]
bob: to point feature list locations and AI to mark them up
21:33:34 [li]
bob: need to resolve issues in remind status
21:34:25 [Client]
test scenarios http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/scenario.html
21:35:20 [li]
TOPIC: test scenarios
21:36:22 [li]
ram: is there a separate doc for ws-enu?
21:39:59 [li]
bob: folks need to mark feature list as implemented, not implemented, or dont know
21:40:15 [dug]
ram: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/edcopies/scenario.xml and there are some templates in the enum section that nathan can follow
21:40:50 [Zakim]
- +1.831.713.aacc
21:40:54 [li]
bob: defer primers to after test cases
21:41:12 [asoldano]
bye
21:41:13 [Zakim]
-Wu_Chou
21:41:14 [Zakim]
-[IPcaller]
21:41:15 [Zakim]
-Tom_Rutt
21:41:16 [Zakim]
-Bob_Freund
21:41:17 [Zakim]
-Doug_Davis
21:41:17 [Zakim]
-Yves
21:41:20 [Zakim]
- +39.331.574.aaaa
21:41:21 [Zakim]
-Ashok_Malhotra
21:41:21 [Zakim]
- +44.196.281.aabb
21:41:30 [Client]
rrsagent, generate minutes
21:41:30 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/01/04-ws-ra-minutes.html Client
21:48:51 [Zakim]
-[Microsoft]
21:48:53 [Zakim]
WS_WSRA()3:30PM has ended
21:48:54 [Zakim]
Attendees were Doug_Davis, [Microsoft], Ashok_Malhotra, Wu_Chou, +39.331.574.aaaa, Bob_Freund, +44.196.281.aabb, +1.831.713.aacc, Yves, [IPcaller], Tom_Rutt