16:56:16 RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms 16:56:16 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/12/21-soap-jms-irc 16:56:18 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:56:18 Zakim has joined #soap-jms 16:56:20 Zakim, this will be SJMS 16:56:20 ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 16:56:21 Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference 16:56:21 Date: 21 December 2010 16:58:34 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started 16:58:41 + +1.919.663.aaaa 17:00:55 mphillip has joined #soap-jms 17:01:48 + +1.650.846.aabb 17:02:39 + +44.196.287.aacc 17:02:52 eric has joined #soap-jms 17:02:59 zakim, aacc is mark 17:02:59 +mark; got it 17:03:12 Zakim, who is here? 17:03:12 On the phone I see alewis, eric, mark 17:03:13 On IRC I see eric, mphillip, Zakim, RRSAgent, trackbot, alewis, Yves 17:05:14 peaston has joined #soap-jms 17:06:51 Peter, are you going to make it on the phone? 17:08:01 + +1.617.519.aadd 17:08:07 TOPIC: Appointment of the scribe 17:08:14 Chair: Eric 17:08:17 Scribe: Mark 17:08:48 TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes 17:08:59 No objections to approving minutes 17:09:08 TOPIC: Review the agenda 17:09:38 We will skip the meeting on 28th Dec. 17:09:57 Assume meeting of 4th Jan will proceed 17:10:04 TOPIC: Review Action Items 17:10:31 Mark: Acions 230, 234, and 235 are done 17:10:40 close action-230 17:10:40 ACTION-230 Apply the changes for ISSUE-67 closed 17:10:43 close action-234 17:10:43 ACTION-234 Apply the resolution for ISSUE-68 closed 17:10:45 close action-235 17:10:45 ACTION-235 Get details of potential BytesMessageproblem closed 17:11:25 Peter: ACTION-233 is done - CXF have implemented the change 17:11:27 close action-233 17:11:27 ACTION-233 Forward proposal for ISSUE-65 to CXF folk for their approval closed 17:11:41 TOPIC: Moving to PR (via CR? & LC) 17:12:12 Waiting for second implementation 17:13:13 TOPIC: Specification Issues: 17:13:39 ISSUE-69 - BytesMessage Ambiguity 17:13:46 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/69 17:16:07 Amy: In favour of amendment 17:16:16 Peter: No objections 17:16:25 RESOLUTION: ISSUE-69 is open 17:19:11 Eric: Wonder if the two MUSTs can be merged into one. Is it testable. Does it warrant a new assertion? 17:22:49 Amy: Don't think it's testable - not based on a documented wire protocol - could be phrased as a warning because results will be unpredictable if writeBytes/readBytes not used 17:23:14 Alternate: If the message is formatted as a JMS BytesMessage, then the sender and and receiver MUST use the writeBytes() and readBytes() methods, respectively. 17:28:28 RESOLUTION: Eric's amended proposal (above) is accepted 17:29:00 action mark to apply the resolution as written in the chat 17:29:00 Created ACTION-236 - Apply the resolution as written in the chat [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-28]. 17:29:22 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/65 17:33:04 Deferred for a minute 17:33:06 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/67 17:33:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Dec/0011.html 17:35:17 http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html 17:35:56 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.xml.diff?r1=1.105&r2=1.106&f=h 17:36:41 Correct specification link and diff link above 17:37:45 RESOLUTION: Application of resolution for ISSUE-67 is accepted 17:38:16 Back to ISSUE-65: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/65 17:38:43 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Dec/0001.html 17:39:42 RESOLUTION: Proposal of resolution for ISSUE-65 is accepted 17:39:58 action: Mark to apply the resolution for ISSUE-65 17:39:58 Created ACTION-237 - Apply the resolution for ISSUE-65 [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-28]. 17:40:11 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/68 17:40:38 Is this the link: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.xml.diff?r1=1.106&r2=1.107&f=h 17:42:31 Some discussion on the mailing list on whether the example should use the 4 paramter send method instead of the producer 17:45:59 Amy: It is not incorrect - in some cases it makes sense to use the producer as long as within thread boundaries 17:46:29 Eric: For documentation purposes the more wordy methods in the sample make it clearer 17:46:53 RESOLUTION: Application of resolution for ISSUE-68 is accepted 17:47:59 action: mark to roll back incorrectly applied changes to CR 17:47:59 Created ACTION-238 - Roll back incorrectly applied changes to CR [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-28]. 17:48:12 TOPIC: URI scheme 17:48:24 Unaddressed feedback here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss/current/msg02090.html 17:48:48 Eric: Feedback from Tim Bray 17:49:32 Eric: Will respond in the new year once the public review period has closed 17:50:01 Eric: Awaiting feedback from Oracle after reminder 17:51:33 TOPIC: AOB? 17:51:50 None 17:52:13 -eric 17:52:14 -mark 17:52:14 -peaston 17:52:16 -alewis 17:52:17 WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended 17:52:19 Attendees were +1.919.663.aaaa, alewis, +1.650.846.aabb, eric, +44.196.287.aacc, mark, +1.617.519.aadd, peaston 17:53:38 rrsagent, please generate logs 17:53:38 I'm logging. I don't understand 'please generate logs', eric. Try /msg RRSAgent help 17:54:03 rrsagent, make minutes 17:54:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/12/21-soap-jms-minutes.html eric 17:54:19 rrsagent, make logs public 17:54:28 eric has left #soap-jms 19:12:50 mphillip has left #soap-jms 19:59:51 Zakim has left #soap-jms