16:58:38 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #soap-jms
16:58:38 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/12/07-soap-jms-irc
16:58:40 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
16:58:40 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #soap-jms
16:58:42 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be SJMS
16:58:42 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start in 2 minutes
16:58:43 <trackbot> Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference
16:58:43 <trackbot> Date: 07 December 2010
16:59:09 <Zakim> WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has now started
16:59:16 <Zakim> +alewis
16:59:50 <mphillip> mphillip has joined #soap-jms
17:00:15 <mphillip> trackbot, start telcon
17:00:17 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
17:00:19 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be SJMS
17:00:20 <trackbot> Meeting: SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group Teleconference
17:00:20 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM scheduled to start now
17:00:20 <trackbot> Date: 07 December 2010
17:00:26 <alewis> err.
17:00:32 <alewis> we'd already started.
17:00:48 <mphillip> oops sorry
17:00:52 <alewis> :-)
17:01:02 <alewis> doesn't seem to have caused problems, though.
17:01:25 <mphillip> no, phew, good old trackbot
17:02:29 <peaston> peaston has joined #soap-jms
17:02:49 <Zakim> +Mark
17:03:00 <Zakim> +eric
17:03:17 <eric> eric has joined #soap-jms
17:03:24 <Zakim> + +1.781.280.aaaa
17:03:31 <eric> Zakim, who is here?
17:03:32 <Zakim> On the phone I see alewis, Mark, eric, +1.781.280.aaaa
17:03:33 <Zakim> On IRC I see eric, peaston, mphillip, Zakim, RRSAgent, alewis, trackbot, Yves
17:04:51 <padams2> padams2 has joined #soap-jms
17:05:03 <Zakim> +padams
17:06:34 <mphillip> TOPIC: Appointment of the scribe
17:06:44 <mphillip> Chair: Eric
17:06:49 <mphillip> Scribe: Mark
17:07:01 <mphillip> TOPIC: Approval of prior meeting minutes
17:07:11 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-soap-jms-minutes.html
17:07:24 <mphillip> Minutes approved 
17:07:33 <mphillip> TOPIC: Review the agenda
17:08:01 <mphillip> No modifications to agenda 
17:08:15 <mphillip> TOPIC: Administrative items
17:08:32 <mphillip> Eric: Propose we skip meeting of 28th 
17:09:14 <mphillip> No objections
17:09:22 <mphillip> RESOLUTION: No meeting on 28th Dec.
17:09:39 <mphillip> TOPIC: Review action items
17:09:49 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/222 - Derek - no status 
17:09:59 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/223 - Phil - no progress
17:10:19 <mphillip> Phil: Planning to work on this over Christmas period
17:10:39 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/230 - Mark - no progress
17:10:56 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/231 - Mark - complete
17:11:02 <mphillip> close action-230
17:11:02 <trackbot> ACTION-230 Apply the changes for ISSUE-67 closed
17:11:14 <mphillip> close action-231
17:11:14 <trackbot> ACTION-231 Come up with a concrete proposal to resolve issue 68 closed
17:12:04 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/232 - Eric - Complete
17:12:12 <mphillip> close action-232
17:12:12 <trackbot> ACTION-232 Revise the proposal with Amy's addition and the fault in the proposal closed
17:12:35 <mphillip> (see:    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Dec/0001.html )
17:12:54 <mphillip> TOPIC: Moving to PR (via CR? & LC)
17:13:43 <mphillip> Eric:Any issues, comments & concerns regarding producing a conforming implementation
17:14:24 <mphillip> TOPIC: Specification Issues
17:14:43 <mphillip> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/65
17:15:16 <mphillip> See Eric's email (link above WRT action 232)
17:15:54 <mphillip> Eric: made modifications to proposal noted in previous meeting 
17:17:17 <mphillip> Peter: Contacted CXF who want this feature, so this is a welcome & timely addition
17:17:55 <mphillip> Eric: Should we wait for CXF to review this proposal before changing the spec.
17:18:45 <mphillip> Sounds like a good idea if we think there are people who will review the proposal
17:19:50 <mphillip> All: No objection to waiting a week for comments from CXF
17:20:19 <mphillip> action: Peter to forward proposal for ISSUE-65 to CXF folk for their approval
17:20:19 <trackbot> Created ACTION-233 - Forward proposal for ISSUE-65 to CXF folk for their approval [on Peter Easton - due 2010-12-14].
17:20:43 <mphillip> Next issue : http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/66
17:21:16 <mphillip> Peter: These changes have been applied
17:22:25 <mphillip> Peter: http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html
17:23:02 <mphillip> Peter: Have added Test0020 to cover Protocol-2070
17:23:08 <mphillip> http://dev.w3.org/2008/ws/soapjms/testcases/testcases/testcases.html#test0020
17:24:23 <mphillip> Peter: This is an optional test for the queue variant (topicReplyToName)
17:27:08 <mphillip> Eric: Would it  be worth mentioning in the text for the test that this would involve vendor-specific use of the API to specify the destination name (passed to the Session.createQueue ) 
17:27:37 <mphillip> (and Session.createTopic)
17:28:46 <mphillip> Eric: Probably unnecessary to spell this out - the test will all require some tweaks / JNDI setup to get them running 
17:29:41 <mphillip> Peter: The other change is to add references to  WSDLUsage3003, WSDLUsage3004 in WSDL tests test0006 test0007 test0009 test0010 test0013 test0014  test0015 test0016 
17:30:15 <mphillip> RESOLUTION: The applied resolution is accepted - ISSUE-66 is closed
17:30:27 <mphillip> Mark: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/68
17:30:44 <eric> Mark's latest email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Dec/0004.html
17:33:09 <mphillip> Mark: Proposal to set heaer properties on the producer instead of the message
17:34:16 <mphillip> RESOLUTION: The new proposal is accepted as-is 
17:34:35 <mphillip> action Mark: to apply the resolution for ISSUE-68
17:34:35 <trackbot> Created ACTION-234 - Apply the resolution for ISSUE-68 [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-14].
17:35:16 <mphillip>  http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/issues/67 - pending application of resolution per ACTION-230
17:35:23 <mphillip> TOPIC: URI scheme
17:36:12 <mphillip> Eric: Posted new draft with language to register IANA JMS URI scheme variants
17:36:21 <mphillip> Eric: Review came back with 3 comments
17:38:11 <mphillip> Eric: One on the formatting - caused by conversion to text , one because the URI examples were not indented - so Eric has indented the samples
17:38:35 <mphillip> Eric: We should now be ready to submit for final review 
17:39:25 <mphillip> Eric: Contacted various open-source implementations of JMS to bring the JMS URI to their attention (ActiveMQ, QPID), plus Oracle 
17:39:33 <mphillip> Eric: No feedback to date
17:41:41 <mphillip> Eric: Draft 10 is the latest draft - will chase up IETF later today
17:43:04 <mphillip> TOPIC: AOB?
17:46:48 <mphillip> Mark: Potential issue with BytesMessage being written and read in different ways (e.g. writeBytes, and readUTF)
17:47:41 <mphillip> Mark: Will send details to the list 
17:49:18 <mphillip> Eric: Yes, we nned to understand the scope of the possible change to the spec. e.g. normative, non-normative, FAQ etc.
17:49:34 <mphillip> action mark to get details of potential BytesMessageproblem
17:49:34 <trackbot> Created ACTION-235 - Get details of potential BytesMessageproblem [on Mark Phillips - due 2010-12-14].
17:50:29 <Zakim> - +1.781.280.aaaa
17:50:30 <Zakim> -padams
17:50:30 <Zakim> -Mark
17:50:31 <Zakim> -eric
17:50:33 <padams> padams has left #soap-jms
17:50:34 <Zakim> -alewis
17:50:35 <Zakim> WS_SOAP-JM()12:00PM has ended
17:50:36 <Zakim> Attendees were alewis, Mark, eric, +1.781.280.aaaa, padams
17:51:20 <mphillip> rrsagent, make minutes
17:51:20 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/12/07-soap-jms-minutes.html mphillip
17:52:11 <eric> rrsagent, make logs public
17:52:16 <mphillip> mphillip has left #soap-jms
17:52:34 <eric> eric has left #soap-jms
19:18:44 <Zakim> Zakim has left #soap-jms
19:24:28 <eric_> eric_ has joined #soap-jms
19:27:11 <eric> eric has joined #soap-jms